請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6967
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 岳修平(Hsiu-Ping Yueh) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Lin Liu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 劉伊霖 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-17T09:22:33Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-02-16 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-17T09:22:33Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2012-02-16 | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2012-01-30 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Allen, B. S., Hoffman, R. P., Kompella, J., & Sticht, T. G. (1993). Computer-based mapping for curriculum development. In Proceedings of Selected Research and Development (pp. 3-25). New Orleans, Louisiana.
Angelopulo, G. (2009). Q methodology and the measurement of subjectivity in corporate brand perception. South African Journal of Business Management, 40(3), 21-33. Bai, C. (2001). Progress of nanoscience and nanotechnology in China. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 3(4), 251-256. Bainbridge, W. S. (2002). Public attitudes toward nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 4(6), 561-570. Baker, R., Thompson, C., & Mannion, R. (2006). Q methodology in health economics. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 11(1), 38-45. Barry, J. & Proops, J. (1999). Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology. Ecological Economics, 28, 337-345. Berelson, B. (1952). Content Analysis in Communication Research. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. Braach-Maksvytis, V. (2002). Nanotechnology in Australia – towards a national initiative. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 4(1/2), 1-7. Britton, A., Letassy, N., Medina, M. S., & Er, N. (2008). A curriculum review and mapping process supported by an electronic database system. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72(5), 1-6. Brouwer, M. (1999). Q is accounting for tastes. Journal of Advertising Research, 39(2), 35-39. Brown, S. R. (n. d.). The history and principles of Q methodology in psychology and the social science. Retrieved July 12, 2010, from http://facstaff.uww.edu/cottlec/QArchive/Bps.htm Brown, S. R. (1971). The forced-free distinction in Q technique. Journal of Educational Measurement, 8 (4), 283-287. Brown, S. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Brown, S. R. (1991). A Q methodological tutorial. Retrieved July 13, 2010, from http://facstaff.uww.edu/cottlec/QArchive/Primer1.html Brown, S.R. (1994-1995). Q methodology as the foundation for a science of subjectivity. Operant Subjectivity, 18, 1-16. Brown, S. R. (1996). Q methodology and qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 6(4), 561-567. Brown, S. R., & Mathieson, M. (1990). The operantcy of practical criticism. The Electronic Journal of Communication, 1(1). Retrieved July 19, 2010, from http://www.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/001/1/00115.html Brown, R. D., & Pirtle, T. (2008). Beliefs of professional and family caregivers about the sexuality of individuals with intellectual disabilities: Examining beliefs using a Q-methodology approach. Sex Education, 8(1), 59-75. Cavanagh, S. (1997). Content analysis: concepts, method and applications. Nurse Researcher, 4(3), 5-16. Cobb, M. D., & Macoubrie, J. (2004). Public perception about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trust. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 6(4), 395-405. Cools, M., Moons, E., Janssens, B., & Wets, G. (2009). Shifting towards environment-friendly modes: Profiling travelers using Q-methodology. Transportation, 36(4), 437-453. Cottrell, S., Linger, B., & Shumway, J. (2004). Using information contained in the curriculum management tool (CurrMIT) to capture opportunities for student learning and development. Medical Teacher, 26(5), 423-427. Council of Labor Affairs Executive Yuan (2011). Classification employment search system. Retrieved April 1, 2011, from http://www3.evta.gov.tw/odict/srch.htm Cowan, K., & Gogotsi, Y. (2004). The Drexel/UPenn IGERT: Creating a new model for graduate education in nanotechnology. Journal of Materials Education, 26(2), 147-152. Crouch, R. D. (2006). A course in nanotechnology for nonscience majors. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(1), 40-44. Downe-Wamboldt, B. (1992). Content analysis: Method, application, and issues. Health Care for Women International, 13, 313-321. Downe-Wamboldt, B. L., & Ellerton, M. L. (1986). A study of the role of hospice volunteers. Hospice Journal, 1, 17-31. Dyehouse, M. A., Diefes-Dux, H. A., Bennett, D. E., & Imbrie, P. K. (2008). Development of an instrument to measure undergraduates’ nanotechnology awareness, exposure, motivation, and knowledge. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 500-510. Eisenberg, M. (1984). Microcomputer-based curriculum mapping: A data management approach. Paper Presented at the Mid-Year Meeting of the American Society for Information Science. Bloomington, IN. Ellis, G., Barry, J., & Robinson, C. (2007). Many ways to say “no”, different ways to say “yes”: Applying Q-methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50(4), 517-551. English, F. W. (1978). Quality control in curriculum development. Arlington, VA: American Association of Social Administrators. Exel, J. V., & Graaf, G. D. (2005). Q methodology: A sneak preview. Retrieved July 13, 2010, from http://www.jobvanexel.nl Flinders University (2010). Bachelor of science in nanotechnology. Retrieved January 18, 2010, from http://www.flinders.edu.au/courses/undergrad/bscnt/bscnt_home.cfm Fonash, S. J. (2001). Education and training of the nanotechnology workforce. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 3(1), 79-82. Fujita, Y. (2006). Perception of nanotechnology among general public in Japan. Asia Pacific Nanotech Weekly, 4, article#6. Gaskell, G., Allum, N., Stares, S., et al. (2003). Europeans and biotechnology in 2002. Retrieved October 09, 2011, from http://www.keine-gentechnik.de/bibliothek/basis/studien/eurobaromenter_europeans_biotechnology_010303.pdf Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Towards a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255-274. Goldman, I. (1990). Abductory inference, communication theory and subjective science. The Electronic Journal of Communication, 1 (1). Retrieved July 19, 2010, from http://www.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/001/1/00112.html Goto, K., Tiffany, J., Pelto, G., & Pelletier, D. (2008). Use of a Q methodology to analyze divergent perspectives on participatory action research as a strategy for HIV/AIDS prevention among Caribbean youth. AIDS Education and Prevention, 20(4), 301-311. Hallacher, P. M., Fenwick, D. E., & Fonash, S. J. (2002). The Pennsylvania nanofabrication manufacturing technology partnership: Resource sharing for nanotechnology workforce development. International Journal of Engineering Education, 18(5), 526-531. Harden, R. M. (2001). AMEE guide no.21: Curriculum mapping: A tool for transparent and authentic teaching and learning. Medical Teacher, 23(2), 123-137. Harden. R. M., Crosby, J. R., & Davis, M. H. (1999). AMEE guide no.14: Outcome-based education: Part 1 – An introduction to outcome-based education. Medical Teacher, 21(1), 7-14. Harrison, R., & Mitchell, L. (2006). Using outcomes-based methodology for the education, training and assessment of competence of healthcare professionals. Medical Teacher, 28(2), 165-170. Hausman, J. J. (1974). Mapping as an approach to curriculum planning. Curriculum Theory Network, 4(2/3), 192-198. Hege, I., Siebeck, M., & Fischer, M. R. (2007). An online learning objectives database to map a curriculum. Medical Education, 41(11), 1095-1096. Hill, T. & Lewicki, P. (2006). STATISTICS Methods and Applications. StatSoft, Tulsa. Hsu, C. H. (2009). Reflection on the quantitative curriculum research methodology. Journal of Education National Changhua University of Education, 15, 23-40. Hwang, J. J. (2000). The Development and Perspective of Technology Education. Taipei: Shtabook. Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship (IGERT) (1999). An IGERT fellowship program in manufacturing logistics. Retrieved December 16, 2011, from http://www.igert.org/projects/185 Jacobs, H. H. (1997). Mapping the big picture: Integrating curriculum and assessment K-12. VA: Alexandria. Johnson, R. B. & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26. Kahan, D. M., Slovic, P., Braman, D, Gastil, J., & Cohen, G. L. (2007). Affect, values, and nanotechnology risk perceptions: An experimental investigation. Retrieved October 09, 2011, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=968652 Kallay. E. (2007). Q methodology – The investigation of meaning systems in different life-conditions through proverbs. Cognition, Brain, Behavior, 6(2), 353-369. Kitzinger, C. & Rogers, R. S. (1985). A Q-methodological study of lesbian identities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15(2), 167-187. Kolb, D. F., & Shepherd, D. M. (1997). Concept mapping organizational cultures. Journal of Management Inquiry, 6(4), 282-295. Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content Analysis: An Introduction To Its Methodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Kullman, J. (2011). NSF-funded research fellowship program to focus on producing experts to aid people with disabilities. Retrieved December 16, 2011, from http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2011-11/asu-nrf110111.php Lee, J. W. (2002). Overview of nanotechnology in Korea – 10 years blueprint. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 4(6), 473-476. Lee, K. C. (2009). Outcome-based curriculum development model. Journal of Educational Research, 186, 39-58. Lee. C. K., Wu, M. K., & Yang, J. C. (2002). A catalyst to change everything: MEMS/NEMS – a paradigm of Taiwan’s nanotechnology program. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 4(5), 377-386. Lin, H. M. (2011). The future development trend of nanomaterials. Retrieved October 04, 2011, from http://nano.mse.ttu.edu.tw/html/doc/data/data02.pdf Lo, H. E. (2008). The evaluation report of engineering education executed by Center for Educational Research and Evaluation suggests to strength practical abilities. Retrieved January 25, 2012, from http://140.122.66.60/news/index.php?mode=data&id=1910 Luckenbill, L., Hintze, K., Ramakrishna, B. L., & Pizziconi, V. (1999). Interactive nano-visualization in science and engineering education: Conforming technology to transform education. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning, 1(2). Retrieved April 13, 2010, from http://imej.wfu.edu/articles/1999/2/09/index.asp Macoubrie, J. (2005). Informed public perceptions of nanotechnology and trust in government. Retrieved January 18, 2010, from http://www.pewtrusts.org/uploadedFiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/Reports/Nanotechnologies/Nanotech_0905.pdf McKenney, S., Nieveen, N., & van den Akker, J. (2002). Computer support for curriculum developers: CASCADE. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 50 (4), 25-35. McKeown, B. (1990). Q methodology, communication, and the behavioral text. The Electronic Journal of Communication, 1(1). Retrieved July 19, 2010, from http://www.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/001/1/00111.html McKeown, B., & Thomas, D. (1988). Q methodology. Sage, Newbury Park. Mehta, M. D. (2008). Nanotechnology and the developing world: Lab-on-chip technology for health and environment applications. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 28(5), 400-407. Ministry of Economic Affairs (2010). Competence descriptions. Retrieved November 18, 2010, from http://proj.moeaidb.gov.tw/training/Competency/index_form.asp?id=Aa0 Ministry of Education (2007). General Education Pioneering Project. Retrieved January 18, 2012, from http://www3.nccu.edu.tw/~cyberlin/4.htm Morgan, D. L. (1993). Qualitative content analysis: A guide to paths not taken. Qualitative Health Research, 3, 112-121. Mosyagina, N. I., Kashin, A. B., & Peck, R. L. (1997). Emerging russian consumerism: A Q methodological study of consumer attitudes after perestroika. Retrieved July 12, 2010, from http://facstaff.uww.edu/cottlec/QArchive/peck.htm Mulcahy, D. (2000). Turning the contradictions of competence: Competence-based training and beyond. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 52(2), 259-280. National Center for Learning and Teaching in Nanoscale Science and Engineering (NCLT) (2009). Retrieved January 18, 2010, from http://www.nclt.us/ National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) (2011). The national nanotechnology initiative. Retrieved June 27, 2011, from http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf&AD=ADA540822 Nanotechnology Human Resource Development (NHRD) Program (2010). Retrieved December 20, 2010, from http://nano-1.colife.org.tw/ Ockwell, D. G. (2008). “Opening up” policy to reflexive appraisal: A role for Q methodology? A case study of fire management in Cape York, Australia. Policy Sciences, 41(4), 263-292. Plaza, C. M., Draugalis, J. R., Slack, M. K., Skrepnek, G. H., & Sauer, K. A. (2007). Curriculum mapping in program assessment and evaluation. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 71(2), 1-8. Polit, D., & Hungler, B. (1991). Nursing Research: Principles and Methods. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott. Porter, L. A. (2007). Chemical nanotechnology: A liberal arts approach to a basic course in emerging interdisciplinary science and technology. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(2), 259-264. Prateepko, T., & Chongsuvivatwong, V. (2009). Patterns of perception toward influenza pandemic among the front-line responsible health personnel in southern Thailand: A Q methodology approach. BMC Public Health, 9. Retrieved July 19, 2010, from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/9/161 Previte, J., Pini, B., & Haslam-McKenzie, F. (2007). Q methodology and rural research. Sociologia Ruralis, 47(2), 135-147. Ramlo, S. E. (2008). Determining the various perspectives and consensus within a classroom using Q methodlogy. In C. Henderson, M. Sabella, & L. Hsu (Eds), Proceedings of Physics Education Research Conference, 179-182. Robinson, T., Popovich, M., Gustafson, R., & Fraser, C. (2003). Older adults’ perceptions of offensive senior stereotypes in magazine advertisements: Results of a Q method analysis. Educational Gerontology, 29(6), 503-519. Roco, M. C. (2002a). Nanotechnology – a frontier for engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 18(5), 1-15. Roco, M. C. (2002b). Nanoscale science and engineering education activities in the United States (2001-2002). Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 4(3), 271-274. Roco, M. C. (2003a). Converging science and technology at the nanoscale: Opportunities for education and training. Nature Biotechnology, 21(10), 1247-1249. Roco, M. C. (2003b). Broader societal issues of nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 5(3/4), 1818-189. Roco, M. C., & Bainbridge, W. S. (Eds.). (2001). Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology. Virginia: National Science Foundation. Rogers, R. S., & Rogers, W. S. (1990). What the brits got out of the Q: And why their work may not line up with the American way of getting into it! The Electronic Journal of Communication, 1(1). Retrieved July 19, 2010, from http://www.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/001/1/00113.html Rosengren, K. E. (1981). Advances in Scandinavia content analysis: An introduction. In K. E. Rosengren (Ed.), Advances in content analysis (pp.9-19). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering (2004). Nanotechnology: Views of the General Public. Retrieved January 18, 2010, from http://www.nanotec.org.uk/Market%20Research.pdf Rutgers University (2010). Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship (IGERT). Retrieved December 16, 2011, from http://mse.rutgers.edu/integrative_graduate_education_and_research_traineeship_igert Sanders, K. P., & Morris, D. N. (1990). Combining research approaches: The Anvil writers revisited. The Electronic Journal of Communication, 1(1). Retrieved July 19, 2010, from http://www.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/001/1/00114.html Scheufele, D. A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2005). The public and nanotechnology: How citizens make sense of emerging technologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 7(6), 659-667. Schlinger, M. J. (1969). Cues on Q-technique. Journal of Advertising Research, 9(3), 53-60. Shee, D. Y. (2006). An analytic framework for competence set expansion: Lessons learned from an SME. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 17(8), 981-997. Shih, Y. W., Wu, Y. L., Wang, Y. S., & Wang, Y. M. (2009). Competence maps for the information service industry. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(7), 1618-1633. Shinebourne, P. (2009). Using Q method in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 93-97. Shinebourne, P., & Adams, M. (2007). Therapists’ understandings and experiences of working with clients with problems of addiction: A pilot study using Q methodology. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 7(4), 211-219. Stainton Rogers, R. (1995). Q methodology. In Smith, J. A., Harre, R. & Van Longenhove, I. (Eds.). Rethinking methods in psychology. London: Sage. Stenner, P. H. D., Dancey, C. P., & Watts, S. (2000). The understanding of their illness amongst people with irritable bowel syndrome: A Q methodological study. Social Science & Medicine, 51(3), 439-452. Stenner, P., & Marshall, H. (1995). A Q methodological study of rebelliousness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(6), 621-636. Stenner, P., & Rogers, R. S. (1998). Jealousy as a manifold of divergent understandings: A Q methodological investigation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(1), 71-94. Stephenson, W. (1935). Technique of factor analysis. Nature, 136, 297 Stephenson, W. (1936). The foundations of psychometry: Four factor systems. Psychometrika, 1, 195-209. Stephenson, W. (1977). Factors as operant subjectivity. Operant Subjectivity, 1, 3-16. Stoof, A., Martens, R. L., Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Bastiaens, T. J. (2002). The boundary approach of competence: A constructivist aid for understanding and using the concept of competence. Human Resource Development Review, 1(3), 345-365. Stoof, A., Martens, R. L., & Merrienboer, J. J. G. (2006). Effects of web-based support for the construction of competence maps. Instructional Science, 34(3), 189-211. Stoof, A., Martens, R. L., & Merrienboer, J. J. G. (2007). Web-based support for constructing competence maps: Design and formative evaluation. Education Technology Research & Development, 55(4), 347-368. Sullivan, C. J., & Maxfield, M. G. (2003). Examining paradigmatic development in criminology and criminal justice: A content analysis of research methods syllabi in doctoral programs. Journal of criminal Justice Education, 14(2), 269-285. Sumsion, J., & Goodfellow, J. (2004). Identifying generic skills through curriculum mapping: A critical evaluation. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(3), 329-346. Toral, S. L., Martinez-Torres, M. R., Barrero, F., Gallardo, S., & Ayala, E. V. (2006). Planning a master’s level curriculum according to career space recommendations using concept mapping techniques. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16(3), 237-252. Toral, S. L., Martinez-Torres, M. R., Barrero, F., Gallardo, S., & Duran, M. J. (2007). An electronic engineering curriculum design based on concept-mapping techniques. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 17(3), 341-356. Uchiyama, K. P., & Radin, J. L. (2009). Curriculum mapping in higher education: A vehicle for collaboration. Innovative Higher Education, 33(4), 271-280. University of Washington (2010). Education. Retrieved January 18, 2010, from http://www.nano.washington.edu/education/index.html Wang, M. J., Liu, Z. Z., Ye, Y. Z., Li, W. W., & Huang, Y. Z. (2008). The Outlook of Nanotechnology Application on New Materials. Hsinchu, Taiwan: Industrial Economics & Knowledge Center. Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2005a). The subjective experience of partnership love: A Q methodological study. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44(1), 85-107. Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2005b). Doing Q methodology: Theory, method and interpretation. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2(1), 67-91. Webler, T., Danielson, S., & Tuler, S. (2009). Using Q method to reveal social perspectives in environmental research. Retrieved July 13, 2010, from http://www.seri-us.org/pubs/Qprimer.pdf Weber, R. P. (1985). Basic Content Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. Willett, T. G. (2008). Current status of curriculum mapping in Canada and the UK. Medical Education, 42(8), 786-793. Willett, T. G., Marshall, K. C., Broudo, M., & Clarke, M. (2007). TIME as a generic index for outcome-based medical education. Medical teacher, 29(7), 655-659. Wright, D. W., Simmons, L. A., & Campbell, K. (2007). Does a marriage ideal exist? Using Q-sort methodology to compare young adults’ and professional educators’ views on healthy marriages. Contemporary Family Therapy, 29(4), 223-236. Yamaguchi, Y, & Komiyama, H. (2001). Structuring knowledge project in nanotechnology materials program launched in Japan. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 3(2/3), 105-110. Zaharim, A., Omar, M.Z., Basri, H., Muhamad, N., ISA, F. L. M. (2009a). A gap study between employers’ perception and expectation of engineering graduates in Malaysia. WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education, 11(6), 409-419. Zaharim, A., Yusoff, Y. N., Omar, M.Z., Mohamed, A., Muhamad, N., Mustapha, R. (2009b). Employers perception towards engineering employability skills in Asia. WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education, 9(6), 306-315. Zheng, Z. R. (2010). The risk perceptions and policy researches of nanotechnology. Taipei: Environmental Protection Administration, Executive Yuan (Report No. EPA-99-U1U1-02-101). | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6967 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 近期許多研究活動與奈米科學相關之趨勢,促使奈米科技人力培養及發展成為新興科技進展之重要挑戰,其中,又以各階層之人力資源訓練及發展為影響奈米科技成功與否之關鍵因素。為有效發揮奈米科技潛力以增進社會福祉,必須具備充足人力以從事研究、發展及製造工作,因應此需求,自2000年起,全球大專院校開始投入於開設奈米科技相關之大學及研究所層級之學程。然而,綜觀目前大專院校之奈米科技相關教育研究,發現其缺乏奈米科技學程之完整分析,以及利害關係人期望之核心奈米職能為何之深入探究。因此,本研究意圖根據成果導向教育(outcome-based education)及職能觀點(competence-based perspectives),採用課程地圖及Q方法探索臺灣高等教育之奈米科技學程,以進行學程規劃及職能定義,並突顯利害關係人對奈米科技職能之獨特觀點及共通模式。本研究針對臺灣9所大學、共計13個奈米科技相關之大學及研究所學程所開設的600門課程進行深入分析,建構出四個奈米科技課程地圖,並將由課程地圖所萃取之47個重要職能進一步運用於Q方法中。
本研究招募33位Q受試者針對47個Q描述進行排序,並於排序後進行訪談。根據Q排序及論述分析結果,可將受試者期望大學畢業生應具備之奈米科技職能的主觀意見區分為四類,包含奈米特定技能及個人特質導向、基礎知識及個人特質導向、奈米核心及特定知識導向、以及奈米核心知識導向。雖然各類型所強調之重要職能有所不同,但奈米材料、獨立思考能力、解決問題能力、以及創新為共通之奈米核心職能。本研究結果將提供奈米科技教育之教學設計及課程地圖運用建議。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The preparation and development of nanotechnology workforce represent a major challenge for the new technology progress in coming decades since most recent research activities of all varieties are directed towards nanoscience. One of the key factors determining nanotechnology success lies in training and development of human resources at all levels. A sufficient workforce for research, development and manufacturing is required for nanotechnology to reach its full potential to contribute to our society. As a result of this trend, many universities around the world have been devoted to the establishment of undergraduate and graduate nanotechnology programs since 2000. However, what seems lack of current nanotechnology university education studies is a thorough analysis of nanotechnology curriculum, and investigation of what the expected nanotechnology core competences really are of related stakeholders.
Research on university nanotechnology curriculum of the present study aims to introduce a new approach to curriculum planning and competence identification based primarily on outcome-based education and competence-based perspectives, as well as to highlight the unique viewpoints and patterns toward nanotechnology competences expressed by stakeholders. To achieve this study purpose, curriculum mapping and Q methodology are employed as a tool to explore nanotechnology curricula in higher education in Taiwan. The 600 course syllabi collected from thirteen nanotechnology-related undergraduate and graduate programs in nine leading universities in Taiwan are analyzed. Four curriculum maps of nanotechnology of the university level are constructed and verified. Besides, the extracted competences from curriculum mapping are further employed by Q methodology. Thirty-three Q participants are recruited to sort the 47 Q statements and conduct the postsorting interviews. Based on the results of Q sorting and discourse analysis, four factors of subjective viewpoint toward expected general nanotechnology competences of university graduates are presented, including nano-sepcific skill and personal attributes oriented viewpoint, basic knowledge and personal attributes oriented viewpoint, nano core and specific knowledge oriented viewpoint, and nano core knowledge oriented viewpoint. Although the emphases are put to dissimilar statements by different factors, nanomaterials, independent thinking ability, solve problem ability, and innovation, together construct the core nanotechnology competences. In conclusion, implications of instructional design features as well as important applications of the developed curriculum maps for the preparation of nanotechnology education are discussed. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-17T09:22:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-D95630001-1.pdf: 1460024 bytes, checksum: 098b4a36850c53f2bfa783a97bd545b5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Chapter One Introduction……………………………………...1
1.1 Research Background………………………………………………..1 1.2 Research Purpose…………………………………………………….3 1.3 Research Significance………………………………………………..4 1.4 List of Definition……………………………………………………..6 Chapter Two Literature Review……………………………….7 2.1 Nanotechnology Development………………………………………7 2.1.1 Nanotechnology perception………………….………………………….7 2.1.2 Investment in developing nanotechnology……………………………...9 2.1.3 Nanotechnology education……………………………………………..15 2.2 Competence-Based Workforce Development……………………….23 2.2.1 Definition of competence………………………………………………23 2.2.2 Competence-based education and training……………………………..28 2.3 Curriculum Maps……………………………………………...…….33 2.3.1 Definition of curriculum maps………………………………………….33 2.3.2 Definition and process of curriculum mapping………………………...34 2.3.3 Curriculum mapping in higher education………………………………42 Chapter Three Research Methodology………………………46 3.1 Research Design…………………………………………………….49 3.1.1 Content analysis for curriculum mapping………………………………49 3.1.2 Q methodology for identifying nanotechnology competences…………51 3.2 Research Procedure…………………………………………………68 3.2.1 Study 1 - Curriculum mapping…………………………………………68 3.2.2 Study 2 – Q methodology………………………………………………71 Chapter Four Curriculum Maps Analysis and Discussion….77 4.1 Curriculum Maps Analysis………………………………………….77 4.2 Curriculum Maps Interpretation…………………………………….87 Chapter Five Q Analysis and Interpretation………………...91 5.1 Demographics of Q Participants…………………………………….91 5.2 Factors Extraction…………………………………………………...93 5.3 Factors Analysis and Interpretation…………………………………95 5.3.1 Factor Ⅰ: Nano-specific skill and personal attributes oriented………..99 5.3.2 Factor Ⅱ: Basic knowledge and personal attributes oriented………...107 5.3.3 Factor Ⅲ: Nano core and specific knowledge oriented………………118 5.3.4 Factor Ⅳ: Nano core knowledge oriented……………………………125 5.3.5 Comparison among Q participants……………………………………136 Chapter Six Conclusion and Suggestion…………………....140 6.1 Conclusion……………………………………................................140 6.2 Suggestion……………………………………................................143 6.2.1 Future research……………………………………………………….143 6.2.2 Practical application………………………………………………….144 6.3 Research Limitation…………………………………….................148 Reference ……………………………………………………149 Appendix 1: Summary of courses by level………………...163 Appendix 2: Competences utilized in this study…………..181 Appendix 3: Summary of statements by competences……187 Appendix 4: Questions for postsorting interviews………...194 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 奈米科技領域從業人員之專業職能研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Study of the Professional Competences of Employees in Nanotechnology Domain | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 100-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蕭崑杉,沈弘俊,張基成,陳姿伶 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 奈米教育,職能發展,課程地圖,Q方法, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Nanotechnology education,Competence development,Curriculum mapping,Q methodology, | en |
dc.relation.page | 194 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2012-01-31 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物產業傳播暨發展學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 生物產業傳播暨發展學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-101-1.pdf | 1.43 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。