請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69606
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 闕蓓德 | |
dc.contributor.author | Zhong-Jie Zheng | en |
dc.contributor.author | 鄭仲傑 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T03:20:51Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-06 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-07-06 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2018-06-23 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Apitz, S.E., Fitzpatrick, A.G., McNally, A., Harrison, D., Coughlin, C. and Edwards, D.A. (2018) Stakeholder value-linked sustainability assessment: Evaluating remedial alternatives for the Portland Harbor Superfund Site, Portland, Oregon, USA. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 14(1), 43-62.
ATSDR (2004, September) Division of Toxicology ToxFAQs™ for Copper. Available: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/tfacts132.pdf. ATSDR (2005a, August) Division of Toxicology ToxFAQs™ for Zinc. Available: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/tfacts60.pdf. ATSDR (2005b, August) Division of Toxicology ToxFAQs™ for Nickel. Available: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/tfacts15.pdf. Beames, A., Broekx, S., Heijungs, R., Lookman, R., Boonen, K., Van Geert, Y., Dendoncker, K. and Seuntjens, P. (2015) Accounting for land-use efficiency and temporal variations between brownfield remediation alternatives in life-cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production 101, 109-117. Bates, M.E., Fox-Lent, C., Seymour, L., Wender, B.A. and Linkov, I. (2015) Life cycle assessment for dredged sediment placement strategies. Science of the Total Environment 511, 309-318. Braden, J.B., Taylor, L.O., Won, D., Mays, N., Cangelosi, A., Patunru, A.A. (2008a) Economic benefits of remediating the Buffalo River, New York area of concern. Journal of Great Lakes Research 34, 631-648. Braden, J.B., Won, D., Taylor, L.O., Mays, N., Cangelosi, A., Patunru, A.A. (2008b) Economic benefits of remediating the Sheboygan River, Wisconsin area of concern. Journal of Great Lakes Research 34, 649-660. Chen, S.S., Taylor, J.S., Baek, K., Khan, E., Tsang, D.C.W. and Ok, Y.S. (2017) Sustainability likelihood of remediation options for metal contaminated soil/sediment. Chemosphere 174, 421-427. Choi, Y., Thompson, J.M., Lin, D.N., Cho, Y.M., Ismail, N.S., Hsieh, C.H. and Luthy, R.G. (2016) Secondary environmental impacts of remedial alternatives for sediment contaminated with hydrophobic organic contaminants. Journal of Hazardous Materials 304, 352-359. European Commission (2015) Guide to cost-benefit analysis of investment projects. Belgium: Office of the European Union. Giri, S. and Singh, A.K. (2014) Risk assessment, statistical source identification and seasonal fluctuation of dissolved metals in the Subarnarekha River, India. Journal of Hazardous Materials 265, 305-314. Goldblum, D.K., Rak, A., Ponnapalli, M.D. and Clayton, C.J. (2006) The Fort Totten mercury pollution risk assessment: A case history. Journal of Hazardous Materials 136(3), 406-417. Hischier, R., Weidema, B., Althaus, H. J., Bauer, C., Doka, G., Dones, R., Frischknecht, R., Hellweg, S., Humbert, S., Jungbluth, N., Köllner, T., Margni, M., Nemecek, T. (2010) Implementation of life cycle impact assessment methods. Holm, G., Lundberg, K., and Svedberg, B. (2013) Sustainable management of contaminated sediments. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. Hou, D.Y. and Al-Tabbaa, A. (2014) Sustainability: A new imperative in contaminated land remediation. Environmental Science & Policy 39, 25-34. Hou, D.Y., Al-Tabbaa, A., Guthrie, P., Hellings, J. and Gu, Q.B. (2014a) Using a hybrid LCA method to evaluate the sustainability of sediment remediation at the London Olympic Park. Journal of Cleaner Production 83, 87-95. Hou, D.Y., Al-Tabbaa, A. and Guthrie, P. (2014b) The adoption of sustainable remediation behaviour in the US and UK: A cross country comparison and determinant analysis. Science of the Total Environment 490, 905-913. Huang, W.Y., Hung, W.T., Vu, C.T., Chen, W.T., Lai, J.W. and Lin, C.T. (2016) Green and sustainable remediation (GSR) evaluation: framework, standards, and tool. A case study in Taiwan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 23(21), 21712-21725. Huijbregts, M.A.J., Steinmann, Z.J.N., Elshout, P.M.F., Stam, G., Verones, F., Vieira, M., Zijp, M., Hollander, A. and van Zelm, R. (2017) ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 22(2), 138-147. Iqbal, J., Tirmizi, S.A. and Shah, M.H. (2013) Statistical apportionment and risk assessment of selected metals in sediments from Rawal Lake (Pakistan). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 185(1), 729-743. ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework. ISO 14044 (2006) Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Requirements and guidelines. ITRC (2014) Contaminated sediments remediation. Washington, DC: Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council. James D. and Gillespie R. (2002) Guideline for economic effects and evaluation in EIA. Australia: PlanningNSW. Jersak, J., Göransson, G., Ohlsson, Y. (2016) In-situ capping of contaminated sediments - Sediment remediation technologies: A general overview. Available: http://www.swedgeo.se/globalassets/publikationer/sgi-publikation/sgi-p30-3e.pdf. Lee, A.S., Lu, W.L., Huang, J.J., Chang, Q., Wei, K.Y., Lin, C.J. and Liou, S.Y.H. (2016) Multivariate analysis of heavy metal contamination using river sediment cores of Nankan River, northern Taiwan. European Geosciences Union General Assembly Conference (Vol. 18), Vienna, Austria. Linkov, I., Satterstrom, F.K., Kiker, G., Batchelor, C., Bridges, T. and Ferguson, E. (2006) From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: Recent developments and applications. Environment International 32(8), 1072-1093. Linkov, I. and Seager, T.P. (2011) Coupling multi-criteria decision analysis, life-cycle assessment, and risk assessment for emerging threats. Environmental Science & Technology 45(12), 5068-5074. Manap, N. and Voulvoulis, N. (2014) Risk-based decision-making framework for the selection of sediment dredging option. Science of the Total Environment 496, 607-623. Manap, N. and Voulvoulis, N. (2015) Environmental management for dredging sediments - The requirement of developing nations. Journal of Environmental Management 147, 338-348. McGartland, A., Revesz, R., Axelrad, D.A., Dockins, C., Sutton, P. and Woodruff, T.J. (2017) Estimating the health benefits of environmental regulations. Science 357(6350), 457-458. Mulligan, C. N., Fukue, M., and Sato, Y. (2009) Sediments contamination and sustainable remediation. CRC Press. New South Wales Treasury (2017) Guide to cost-benefit analysis. Australia: NSW Government. OEHHA (2009) Air toxics hot spots program technical support document for cancer potencies. Appendix B: Chemical-specific summaries of the information used to derive unit risk and cancer potency values. California: CalEPA. Available: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/appendixb.pdf. Patmont, C.R., Ghosh, U., LaRosa, P., Menzie, C.A., Luthy, R.G., Greenberg, M.S., Cornelissen, G., Eek, E., Collins, J., Hull, J., Hjartland, T., Glaza, E., Bleiler, J. and Quadrini, J. (2015) In situ sediment treatment using activated carbon: A demonstrated sediment cleanup technology. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 11(2), 195-207. Pejman, A., Bidhendi, G.N., Ardestani, M., Saeedi, M. and Baghvand, A. (2015) A new index for assessing heavy metals contamination in sediments: A case study. Ecological Indicators 58, 365-373. Perelo, L.W. (2010) Review: In situ and bioremediation of organic pollutants in aquatic sediments. Journal of Hazardous Materials 177(1-3), 81-89. Pourabadehei, M. and Mulligan, C.N. (2016) Selection of an appropriate management strategy for contaminated sediment: A case study at a shallow contaminated harbour in Quebec, Canada. Environmental Pollution 219, 846-857. PRé. (2016) SimaPro database manual methods library. Puccini, M., Seggiani, M., Vitolo, S. and Iannelli, R. (2013) Life cycle assessment of remediation alternatives for dredged sediments. Chemical Engineering 35, 781-786. Rosen, L., Back, P.E., Soderqvist, T., Norrman, J., Brinkhoff, P., Norberg, T., Volchko, Y., Norin, M., Bergknut, M. and Doberl, G. (2015) SCORE: A novel multi-criteria decision analysis approach to assessing the sustainability of contaminated land remediation. Science of the Total Environment 511, 621-638. Rovira, J., Mari, M., Schuhmacher, M., Nadal, M. and Domingo, J.L. (2011) Monitoring environmental pollutants in the vicinity of a cement plant: A temporal study. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 60(2), 372-384. Sander, H.A., Haight, R.G. (2012) Estimating the economic value of cultural ecosystem services in an urbanizing area using hedonic pricing. Journal of Environmental Management 113, 194-205. Soderqvist, T., Brinkhoff, P., Norberg, T., Rosen, L., Back, P.E. and Norrman, J. (2015) Cost-benefit analysis as a part of sustainability assessment of remediation alternatives for contaminated land. Journal of Environmental Management 157, 267-278. Soltani, A., Dyck, R., Hossaini, N., Mohapatra, A., Hewage, K. and Sadiq, R. (2016) Human health assessment for remediation technologies (HEART): a multi-criteria decision analysis tool. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management 7(2), 183-200. Song, Y.N., Hou, D.Y., Zhang, J.L., O'Connor, D., Li, G.H., Cu, Q.B., Li, S.P. and Liu, P. (2018) Environmental and socio-economic sustainability appraisal of contaminated land remediation strategies: A case study at a mega-site in China. Science of the Total Environment 610, 391-401. Sparrevik, M., Saloranta, T., Cornelissen, G., Eek, E., Fet, A.M., Breedveld, G.D. and Linkov, I. (2011) Use of life cycle assessments to evaluate the environmental footprint of contaminated sediment remediation. Environmental Science & Technology 45(10), 4235-4241. Sparrevik, M., Barton, D.N., Bates, M.E. and Linkov, I. (2012) Use of stochastic multi-criteria decision analysis to support sustainable management of contaminated sediments. Environmental Science & Technology 46(3), 1326-1334. Ting, Y., Chen, C., Ch’ng, B. L., Wang, Y. L. and Hsi, H. C. (2018). Using raw and sulfur-impregnated activated carbon as active cap for leaching inhibition of mercury and methylmercury from contaminated sediment. Journal of Hazardous Materials 354, 116-124. Urban, J.D., Tachovsky, J.A., Haws, L.C., Staskal, D.W. and Harris, M.A. (2009) Assessment of human health risks posed by consumption of fish from the Lower Passaic River, New Jersey. Science of the Total Environment 408(2), 209-224. USEPA (1999) Introduction to contaminated sediments. EPA-823-F-99-006, Office of Science and Technology 24, 1-18. USEPA (2000, July) A guide to developing and documenting cost estimates during the feasibility study. EPA-540-R-00-002. Available: http://www.epa.gov/superfund/. USEPA (2004a) Presenter's manual for: remediation of contaminated sediments. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response 58, 12-33. USEPA (2004b) Risk assessment guidance for superfund. Volume I: Human health evaluation manual (Part E, Supplemental guidance for dermal risk assessment). EPA-540-R-99-005. Available: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/part_e_final_revision_10-03-07.pdf. USEPA (2005) Contaminated sediment remediation guidance for hazardous waste sites. EPA-540-R-05-012, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation 236, 7-235. USEPA (2006, December) Economic benefits of sediment remediation. EPA GL-96553601. USEPA (2010) Guidelines for preparing economics analysis. Washington, DC: USEPA. USEPA (2014, December) A profile in using green remediation strategies. Available: http://clu-in.org/greenremediation/profiles/elizabethmine. USEPA (2015a, August) A profile in using green remediation strategies. Available: http://clu-in.org/greenremediation/profiles/pharmaciaupjohn. USEPA (2015b, October) A profile in using green remediation strategies. Available: http://clu-in.org/greenremediation/profiles/whitneyyoung. Wan, L., Xu, L. and Fu, Y.S. (2016) Contamination and risk assessment of heavy metals in lake bed sediment of a large lake scenic area in china. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 13(7), 12. Wang, Y.B., Liu, C.W., Kao, Y.H. and Jang, C.S. (2015a) Characterization and risk assessment of PAH-contaminated river sediment by using advanced multivariate methods. Science of the Total Environment 524, 63-73. Wang, Y.B., Liu, C.W. and Wang, S.W. (2015b) Characterization of heavy-metal-contaminated sediment by using unsupervised multivariate techniques and health risk assessment. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 113, 469-476. Yang, C.P., Chiang, P.C., Chang, E.E., Lin, T.F. and Kao, C.M. (2013) Using a systematic approach to develop water quality management strategies in the Nankan River, Taiwan. Desalination and Water Treatment 51(34-36), 6808-6823. 丁昱、席行正 (2017),「應用活性覆蓋法針對污染底泥中有害物質溶出抑制介紹」,土木水利,第44卷,第6期,36-42。 中國石油化學工業開發股份有限公司 (2015),「臺南市中國石油化學工業開發股份有限公司安順廠及二等九號道路東側草叢區土壤污染整治場址污染整治第二次變更計畫」。 王嶽斌 (2015),「整合多變量方法評估水體及底泥品質時空特性之研究」,博士論文,國立臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學研究所。 行政院主計總處 (2016),「105年薪資與生產力統計年報」。 行政院經濟建設委員會 (1998),「公共建設工程經費估算編列手冊」。臺北:行政院經濟建設委員會。 行政院經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所 (2013),「水資源規劃經濟效益分析與評估」。臺北:國立臺灣大學。 行政院經濟部 (2017),「前瞻基礎建設計畫—水環境建設全國水環境改善計畫」。 行政院衛生福利部國民健康署 (2008),「臺灣一般民眾暴露參數彙編」,DOH96-HP-1801。臺北:國立臺灣大學公共衛生學院健康風險及政策評估中心。 行政院衛生福利部統計處 (2016),「105年度全民健康保險醫療統計年報」。 行政院衛生福利部中央健康保險署 (2018),「健保業務概況月報」。 行政院環境保護署 (2006),「土壤及地下水污染場址健康風險評估評析方法及撰寫指引」。 行政院環境保護署 (2010a),「土壤及地下水污染整治法」。總統華總一義字第09900024211號令修正,公布全文共五十七條,中華民國99年2月3日公布。 行政院環境保護署 (2010b),「綠色整治決策支援系統之建立」,EPA-99-GA103-03-A236-4。臺北:永灃環境管理顧問股份有限公司。 行政院環境保護署 (2011a),「底泥污染來源及傳輸模式調查計畫—以重點河川為例」,EPA-100-GA102-02-A232。臺北:美商傑明工程顧問股份有限公司臺灣分公司。 行政院環境保護署 (2011b),「健康風險評估技術規範」。綜字第1000060206號令修正,發布全文共十二點,中華民國101年7月20日公布。 行政院環境保護署 (2011c),「營運中含鉛製程事業之土壤污染潛勢調查計畫—土壤及地下水重金屬與無機陰離子污染物污染場址之整治技術選取、系統設計要點與操作維護注意事項參考手冊」,EPA-98-GA102-03-A069。臺北:美商傑明工程顧問股份有限公司臺灣分公司。 行政院環境保護署 (2012a),「底泥品質指標之分類管理及用途限制辦法」。土字第1000116349號令訂定,發布全文共七條,中華民國101年1月4日公布。 行政院環境保護署綜合計畫處 (2012b),「環境政策與開發計畫成本效益分析作業參考手冊」。臺北:財團法人中華經濟研究院。 行政院環境保護署 (2012c),「污染場址綠色及永續整治策略研擬計畫」,EPA-101-GA103-02-A163。臺北:業興環境科技股份有限公司。 行政院環境保護署 (2013a),「土壤及地下水污染場址初步評估暨處理等級評定辦法」。土字第1020031936號令訂定,發布全文共十條,中華民國102年4月24日公布。 行政院環境保護署 (2013b),「底泥整治評估技術與對策支援專案計畫」,EPA-102-GA11-03-A297。臺北:國立臺灣大學。 行政院環境保護署 (2013c),「污染場址綠色及永續導向型整治之評估 (評價) 作業示範及措施規劃 (改進) 輔導計畫」,EPA-102-GA13-03-A130。臺北:業興環境科技股份有限公司。 行政院環境保護署 (2014a),「污染場址綠色及永續導向型整治試辦及推廣計畫」,EPA-103-GA13-03-A327。臺北:業興環境科技股份有限公司。 行政院環境保護署 (2014b),「底泥污染風險評估平台建置計畫」,EPA-103-GA13-03-A319。臺北:國立臺灣大學。 行政院環境保護署 (2016a),「2016年河川水質歷史資料」。 行政院環境保護署 (2016b),「底泥採樣方法」。檢字第1040109644號公告訂定,中華民國106年1月4日公布。 行政院環境保護署 (2017),「底泥污染風險評估平台建置計畫 (第二期)」,EPA-106-GA13-03-A088。臺北:國立臺灣大學。 李汶洙 (2010),「生命價值與年齡關係之實證分析—以台灣為例」,碩士論文,國立中央大學產業經濟研究所。 林舜隆、邱漢瑜、黃德坤、高志明、梁閎森、陳大麟、郭政隆 (2012),「土壤及地下水永續性綠色整治評估工具簡介」,工業污染防治,第31卷,第124期,103-131。 林幸萱 (2013),「工業區有害空氣污染物之排放與健康風險成本效益評估—以新北市為例」,碩士論文,國立臺灣大學環境工程學研究所。 馬鴻文、吳先琪 (2016),「土壤地下水污染場址的風險評估與管理:挑戰與機會」。臺北:五南圖書出版有限公司。 桃園市政府環境保護局 (2015),「桃園市重點河川重金屬總量管制實施評估與管理先期計畫」。臺北:美商傑明工程顧問 (股) 臺灣分公司。 桃園市政府環境保護局 (2016),「桃園市重點河川污染總量管制實施管理計畫」。臺北:美商傑明工程顧問 (股) 臺灣分公司。 倪婕舲 (2017),「南崁溪水質與底泥品質之主成分分析」,碩士論文,國立臺灣大學環境工程學研究所。 陳建銘 (2010),「重金屬銅鉻鎳在土壤中之型態分佈及淋洗去除效率」,碩士論文,朝陽科技大學環境工程與管理系。 陳勝一 (2014),「厭氧生物溶出技術應用於重金屬污染底泥整治之探討」,土壤及地下水污染整治,第1卷,第2期,127-139。 張書奇、余光昌、蔡利局、陳姿文、江蓬鈺 (2012),「河川底泥污染整治技術研究—以二仁溪為例」,工業污染防治,第121期,146-152。 黃仁杰 (2009),「臺灣癌症病患於死亡前一年健保醫療費用支出之相關因素分析」,碩士論文,中國醫藥大學醫務管理學系。 黃智、吳勇興、林淑滿、鍾裕仁 (2011a),「土壤清洗技術於土壤污染整治應用」,中興工程,第110期,53-61。 黃智、吳勇興、林淑滿 (2011b),「土壤清洗可行性評估程序之開發」,中興工程,第111期,107-111。 楊博傑 (2013),「永續整治的決策支援系統之建構」,碩士論文,國立臺灣大學環境工程學研究所。 溫麗琪、劉哲良、楊筠、林俊旭 (2015),「台灣農地土壤污染整治之成本效益分析」,農業經濟叢刊,第21卷,第1-2期,221-255。 葉琮裕 (2011),「以植生復育法處理重金屬污染底泥之探討」,臺灣鑛業,第63卷,第4期,28-43。 臺北翡翠水庫管理局 (2002),「翡翠水庫底泥性質及對水質影響潛勢研究」。臺北:國立臺灣大學環境工程學研究所。 臺灣港務股份有限公司 (2014),臺灣國際商港未來發展及建設計畫 (101~105年)修正計畫。 劉錦龍 (2011),「愈老愈不值錢? 年齡結構與生命價值之研究」,行政院國家科學委員會補助專題計畫。桃園:國立中央大學產業經濟研究所。 蔣在文、陳以新、吳雅婷、游秀萱 (2016),「污染場址綠色及永續導向型整治評估架構與方法於含氯地下水污染場址之應用」,土壤及地下水污染整治,第3卷,第2期,151-162。 賴秋文 (2013),「基隆市旭川河復原對地價影響之研究」,碩士論文,中國文化大學建築及都市計劃研究所。 蕭代基、蔡麗雪、錢玉蘭 (1998),「淡水河水質與景觀改善效益之評估」,經濟研究,第35卷,第1期,25-59。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69606 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 隨著工業化快速發展等人為活動因素,含重金屬、有機污染物的工業廢水進入自然水體,使得河川底泥遭受污染,並構成水生生物及人體健康之威脅。對於底泥污染管理方法,國內目前管理機制尚未健全,而國外過去多以人類與生態風險評估的單一方法來選擇管理方案,但其僅處理特定化學物質或壓力源相關的風險,較不具全面性,因此本研究建立一套考量綠色及永續導向型整治的底泥污染管理架構,藉由兼顧環境、社會及經濟之評估面向,以供決策者全面性與整合性的管理策略。
此架構以人體健康風險評估為基礎,結合多準則決策分析、生命週期評估與經濟效益評估之分析方法,並將其應用於南崁溪底泥污染場址,協助評比合適的底泥污染管理方案,亦作為未來相關污染場址評估之參考。案例分析的結果顯示,南崁溪主流河段的污染底泥對當地孩童族群有不可接受之致癌風險,並以龜山橋之採樣點位最為顯著;進入經濟效益評估流程,整體底泥污染場址進行整治之淨現值在保守估計下大於零,代表具有整治可行性。本研究依據污染場址之人體健康風險評估結果,將龜山橋至舊路大橋之河段列為優先整治區域,並以多準則決策分析比較疏浚結合土壤清洗處理及現地覆蓋無煙煤活性碳兩個整治方案之整體優先順序。 環境層面之生命週期評估結果顯示,現地覆蓋無煙煤活性碳方案的總環境衝擊為38.48 kPt,明顯大於疏浚結合土壤清洗處理方案 (21.40 kPt);經濟層面之成本效益分析結果則顯示,疏浚結合土壤清洗處理方案的成本為135佰萬元,大於現地覆蓋無煙煤活性碳方案 (33.5佰萬元);而社會層面之人體健康風險評估結果顯示採用現地覆蓋無煙煤活性碳方案於整治後的致癌風險較小,且有相對較高的民眾接受度。綜合上述各項準則的評估,經層級分析法結果顯示現地覆蓋無煙煤活性碳方案較為合適。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Contaminated sediment may pose threats to ecosystems and human health. However, sediment remediation almost requires high cost and time-consuming process. The decision-making process of contaminated sediment remediation has been concerned. Single assessment for sediment remediation might be insufficient. Therefore, combining different analytical approaches was highly recommended. The objective of this study is to develop a comprehensive assessment framework with the concept of green and sustainable remediation which involves environmental, economic, and social aspects for the management of contaminated sediment. This study proposed the framework that comprised a three-stage analysis, beginning with human health risk assessment (HHRA) of the contaminated site, preliminary cost-benefit analysis (CBA), and ended with multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). MCDA was combined with life cycle assessment (LCA) for environmental aspect, CBA for economic aspect, then HHRA and public acceptance for social aspect to implement integrated and sustainable strategies for sediment management. The framework was applied to select the best sediment management alternative for the heavy metals contaminated sediment in Nankan River. The results of HHRA before remediation indicated an unacceptable cancer risk to the children, whose mean cancer risk in all the sampling sites was 1.29E-06 through pathways of ingestion and dermal contact. The results of preliminary-CBA showed that the net present value of remediation project was 1.59 billion TWD, which indicated the economic feasibility. For the sustainability assessment of sediment remediation, the results of MCDA revealed that in situ capping anthracite activated carbon (AC) strategy had relatively low cost and human health risk after remediation, and high environmental impact and public acceptance when compared to the method of dredging and soil washing. In this case study, in situ capping anthracite AC was identified as the preferable remediation alternative with comprehensive aspects. The proposed framework enables decision makers to choose the integrated management for sediment-contaminated site. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T03:20:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R05541209-1.pdf: 8742179 bytes, checksum: cc42922d35584a44e80080ee27828a26 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii 目錄 iv 圖目錄 vi 表目錄 viii 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究緣起 1 1.2 研究目的 4 1.3 研究內容與架構 4 第二章 文獻回顧 5 2.1 底泥污染物種類及其傳輸特性 5 2.1.1 底泥污染物種類 5 2.1.2 底泥污染物傳輸特性 7 2.2 底泥污染處理技術 8 2.2.1 監測式自然衰減法 8 2.2.2 現地覆蓋處理 8 2.2.3 挖泥疏浚處理 9 2.3 底泥污染永續性評估方法 12 2.3.1 人類與生態風險評估 12 2.3.2 多準則決策分析 13 2.3.3 生命週期評估 13 2.3.4 經濟效益評估 14 2.4 底泥污染整治場址之生命週期評估與綠色整治資訊 16 2.4.1 底泥污染整治場址之生命週期評估 16 2.4.2 底泥污染整治場址之綠色整治 26 第三章 研究方法 30 3.1 研究流程 30 3.2 研究案例 34 3.3 底泥污染場址之人體健康風險評估 37 3.4 底泥污染場址之分階段經濟效益評估 40 3.4.1 底泥污染整治作業架構 40 3.4.2 經濟效益評估流程 41 3.5 底泥污染整治方案之評估 54 3.5.1 底泥污染整治可能方案提出 54 3.5.2 環境面-底泥污染整治方案之生命週期評估流程 54 3.5.3 經濟面-底泥污染整治方案之經濟效益評估流程 59 3.5.4 社會面-底泥污染整治方案之人體健康風險評估流程 59 3.5.5 社會面-底泥污染整治方案之民眾接受度調查流程 59 3.6 底泥污染整治永續管理綜合分析 60 3.6.1 底泥污染整治方案優選 60 3.6.2 結果闡釋 64 第四章 結果與討論 65 4.1 底泥污染場址之評估結果 65 4.1.1 人體健康風險評估結果 65 4.1.2 經濟效益評估結果 78 4.2 底泥污染整治方案之評估結果 102 4.2.1 環境面-底泥污染整治方案之生命週期評估結果 103 4.2.2 經濟面-底泥污染整治方案之經濟效益評估結果 119 4.2.3 社會面-底泥污染整治方案之人體健康風險評估結果 122 4.2.4 社會面-底泥污染整治方案之民眾接受度調查結果 123 4.3 底泥污染整治永續管理之評估結果 123 第五章 結論與建議 128 5.1 結論 128 5.2 建議 129 參考文獻 132 附錄一、ReCiPe之生命週期衝擊評估方法 142 附錄二、底泥污染綠色及永續導向型整治調查問卷 145 附錄三、分年工程經費表 154 附錄四、整治方案之盤查清單 160 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 底泥污染整治之永續管理決策分析—以南崁溪為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Sustainable Decision Analysis of Contaminated Sediment Remediation: A Case Study in Nankan River, Northern Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 駱尚廉,馬鴻文,林逸彬 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 底泥,人體健康風險評估,多準則決策分析,生命週期評估,成本效益分析,綠色及永續導向型整治, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Sediment,Human health risk assessment,Multi-criteria decision analysis,Life cycle assessment,Cost-benefit analysis,Green and sustainable remediation, | en |
dc.relation.page | 161 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201800939 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-06-25 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 環境工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 環境工程學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 8.54 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。