Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 森林環境暨資源學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6958
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor丁宗蘇
dc.contributor.authorHsiu-Ming Changen
dc.contributor.author張修銘zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-17T09:22:18Z-
dc.date.available2013-02-16
dc.date.available2021-05-17T09:22:18Z-
dc.date.copyright2012-02-16
dc.date.issued2012
dc.date.submitted2012-02-01
dc.identifier.citation呂勝由,邱文良,2003。農委會林務局自然資源與生物資料庫。 http://ngis.zo.ntu.edu.tw/rareplant/list.asp。
沈葆聖,2005。SAS統計軟體與資料分析。台中,滄海書局。
Arruda, R., Carvolho, L. N., and Del-Claro, K. 2006. Host specificity of a Brazilian mistletoe, Struthanthus aff. polyanthus (Loranthaceae), in cerrado tropical savanna. Flora 201: 127-134.
Aukema, J. E. and Martinez del Rio, C. 2002a. Mistletoe as parasites and seed-dispersing birds as disease vectors: current understanding, challenges and opportunities. In: Levey, D. J., Silva, W. R., and Galetti, M., eds. Seed Dispersal and Frugivory: Ecology, Evolution and Conservation. Oxford, UK: CAB International, 99-108.
Aukema, J. E. and Martinez del Rio, C. 2002b. Where dose a fruit-eating bird deposit mistletoe seeds? Seed deposition patterns and an experiment. Ecology 83: 3489-3496.
Chiu, S.-T. 1996a. Notes on the genus Taxillus van Tieghem (Loranthaceae) in Taiwan. Taiwania 41: 154-167
Chiu, S.-T. 1996b. Loranthaceae. In: Huang, T., Boufford, C. F. Hsieh, C., Ohashi, H., and Yang, Y. (eds.). Flora of Taiwan Second Edition. 2: 269-285.
Chiu, S.-T. 2005. The hyperparasitism by Taxillus tsaii S. T. Chiu (Loranthaceae). Collection and Research (Taichung) 18: 51-63.Corlett, R. T. 1998. Frugivory and seed dispersal by vertebrates in the Oriental (Indomalayan) Region. Biological Reviews 73: 413-448.
de Buen, L. L. and Ornelas, J. F. 2002. Host compatibility of the cloud forest mistletoe Psittacanthus schiedeanus (Loranthaceae) in central Veracruz, Mexico. American Journal of Botany 89: 95-102.
Devkota, M. P. and Glatzel, G.. 2007. Comparative haustorium morphology and vegetative reproduction in the Old World genus Scurrula L. (Loranthaceae) from the Central Nepal Himalayas. Flora 202: 179-193.
Gill, R. M. A. and Beardall, V. 2001. The impact of deer on woodlands: the effects of browsing and seed dispersal on vegetation structure and composition. Forestry 74: 209-218.
Herrera, C. M. 1998. Long-term dynamics of Mediterranean frugivorous birds and fleshy fruits: a 12-year study. Ecological Monographs 68: 511-538.
Hoffmann, A. J., Fuentes, E. R., Cortes, I., Liberona, F., and Costa, V. 1986. Tristerix tetrandus (Loranthaceae) and its host plants in the Chilean matorral: patterns and mechanisms. Oecologia 69: 202-206.
Ladley, J. J. and Kelly, D. 1995. Explosive New Zealand mistletoe. Nature 378: 766-766.
Ladley, J. J. and Kelly, D. 1996. Dispersal, germination and survival of New Zealand mistletoes (Loranthaceae): Dependence on bird. 1996. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 20: 69-79.
Lamont, B. 1983. Mineral nutrition of mistletoes. In: Calder, M. and Bernhardt, P., eds. The Biology of Mistletoes. New York, USA: Academic Press, 185-¬¬204.
Larson, D. L. 1996. Seed dispersal by specialist versus generalist foragers: the plant's perspective. Oikos 76: 113-123.
Levin, S. A., Muller-Landau, H. C., Nathan, R., and Chave, J. 2003. The ecology and evolution of seed dispersal: a theoretical perspective. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 34: 575-604.
Lin, H.-Y., 1994. Seed dispersal of mistletoes by flowerpeckers at Lien-Hua-Chih County. Master thesis, Department of Biology, Tunghai University. Taichung, Taiwan.
Lichter, J. M. and Berry, A. M. 1991. Establishment of the mistletoe Phoradendron macrophyllum – phenology of early stages and host compatibility studies. Botanical Gazette 152: 468-475.
Lord, J. M., Markey A. M., and Marshall, J. 2002. Have frugivores influenced the evolution of fruit traits in New Zealand? In: Levey, D. J., Silva, W. R., and Galetti, M., eds. Seed Dispersal and Frugivory: Ecology, Evolution and Conservation. Oxford, UK: CAB International, 55-68.
Mathiasen, R., Nickrent, D., Shaw, D., and Watson, D. 2008. Mistletoe: pathology, systematics, ecology, and management. Plant Disease 92: 988-1006.
Medel, R., Vergara, E., Silva, A., and Kalin-Arroyo, M. 2004. Effects of vector behavior and host resistance on mistletoe aggregation. Ecology 85: 120-126.
Muller-Landau, H. C., Wright, S. J., Calderon, O., Hubbell, S. P., and Foster, R. B. 2002. Assessing recruitment limitation: concepts, methods and case-studies from a tropical forest. In: Levey, D. J., Silva, W. R., and Galetti, M., eds. Seed Dispersal and Frugivory: Ecology, Evolution and Conservation. Oxford, UK: CAB International, 35-53.
Murray, K. G., Russel, S., Picone, C. M., Winnett-murray, K., Sherwood, W., and Kuhlmann, M. L. 1994. Fruit laxatives and seed passage rate in frugivores: consequences for plant reproductive success. Ecology 75: 989-994.
Musselman, L. J. and Press, M. C. 1995. Introduction to parasitic plants. In: Press, M. C. and Graves, J. D., eds. Parasitic Plants. London, UK: Chapman and Hall, 1-13.yers
Myers, J. A., Vellend, M., Gardescu, S., and Marks, P. L. 2004. Seed dispersal by white-tailed deer: implications for long-distance dispersal, invasion, and migration of plants in eastern North America. Oecologia 139, 35-44.
Norton, D. A. and Reid, N. 1997. Lessons in ecosystem management from management of threatened and pest Loranthaceous mistletoe in New Zealand and Australia. Conservation Biology 11: 759-769.
Norton, D. A. and Carpenter, M. A. 1998. Mistletoes as parasites: host specificity and speciation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13: 101-105.
Norton, D. A. and Ladley, J. J. 1998. Establishment and early growth of Alepis flavida in relation to Nothofagus solandri branch size. New Zealand Journal of Botany 36: 213-217.
Norton, D. A., Ladley, J. J., and Sparrow, A. D. 2002. Host provenance effects on germination and establishment of two New Zealand mistletoe (Loranthaceae). Functional Ecology 16: 657-663.
Overton, J. M. 1994. Dispersal and infection in mistletoe metapopulations. Journal of Ecology 82: 711-723.
Overton, J. M. 1996. Spatial autocorrelation and dispersal in mistletoe: field and simulation results. Vegetatio 125: 83-98.
Press, M. C. and Phoenix, G. K. 2004. Impacts of parasitic of plants on natural communities. New Phytologist 166: 737-751.
Robertson, A. W., Kelly, D., Ladley, J. J., and Sparrow, A. D. 1999. Effects of pollinator loss on endemic New Zealand mistletoe (Loranthaceae). Conservation Biology 13: 499-508.
Reid, N. 1989. Dispersal of mistletoes by honeyeaters and flowerpeckers: components of seed dispersal quality. Ecology 70: 137-145.
Reid, N., Smith, N. M., and Yan, Z. 1995. Ecology and population biology of mistletoe. In: Lowman, M. D. and Nadkarni, N. M., eds. Forest Canopies. San Diego, USA: Academic Press, 285-310. (cited in Press and Phoenix, 2004)
Restrepo, C., Sargent, S., Levey, D. J., and Watson, D. M. 2002. The role of vertebrates in the diversification of New World mistletoe. In: Levey, D. J., Silva, W. R., and Galetti, M., eds. Seed Dispersal and Frugivory: Ecology, Evolution and Conservation. Oxford, UK: CAB International, 83-98.
Roxburgh, L. and Nicolson, S. W. 2005. Patterns of host use in two African mistletoe: the importance of mistletoe-host compatibility and avian disperser behaviour. Functional Ecology 19: 865-873.
Roxburgh, L. 2007. The effect of gut processing on the quality of mistletoe seed dispersal. Journal of Tropical Ecology 23: 377-380.
Roxburgh, L. and Nicolson, S. W. 2008. Differential dispersal and survival of an African mistletoe: does host size matter? Plant Ecology 195: 21-31.
Rodl, T. and Ward, D. 2002. Host recognition in a desert mistletoe: early stages of development are influenced by substrate and host origin. Functional Ecology 16: 128-134.
Sargent, S. 1995. Seed fate in a tropical mistletoe: the importance of host twig size. Functional Ecology 9: 197-204.
Shaw, D. C., Chen, J., Freeman, E. A., and Braun, D. M. 2005. Spatial and population characteristics of dwarf mistletoe infected trees in an old-growth Douglas-fir - western hemlock forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 35: 990-1001.
Traveset, A. and Verdu, M. 2002. A meta-analysis of effect of gut treatment on seed germination. In: Levey, D. J., Silva, W. R., and Galetti, M., eds. Seed Dispersal and Frugivory: Ecology, Evolution and Conservation. Oxford, UK: CAB International, 339-350.
Walsberg, G. E. 1977. Ecology and energetics of contrasting social systems in Phainopepla nitens (Aves: Ptilogonatidae). University of California Publish in Zoology 108: 1-63.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6958-
dc.description.abstract桑寄生(mistletoe)植物是近年來研究寄生植物演化非常重要的一類植物。其特徵為半寄生(hemiparasite),花粉及種子多半由鳥類散播,果實量多,分布於專一種或多種類的寄主植物,且常呈群集性分布。近年許多研究認為這些特徵和桑寄生、散播者、寄主植物三者之間長期的共同演化所造成。桑寄生的群集性分布主要受生長初期的二個階段所影響,即(1)鳥類消化種子後的散播分布,及(2)種子散播於不同寄主樹種不同部位的相容性差異。但目前這二個因素影響的程度或機制還未被徹底了解,而這個過程是否導因於長期的演化也仍處於理論階段,加上台灣的研究少有對桑寄生寄生機制的探討,故本研究著重於桑寄生初期生長的存活率變動,並探討其各生理階段存活率變動的主因為何。
研究物種為臺灣特有的蓮華池桑寄生(Taxillus tsaii),研究地點為南投縣魚池鄉的林業試驗所蓮華池研究中心,此地的蓮華池桑寄生呈現高密度且群集性的分布。研究方法是採用接種三種類型種子:(1)未去皮種子、(2)去皮種子、(3)鳥類排遺種子,於三種試驗寄主物種:(1)牛樟(Cinnamomum micranthum)、(2)土肉桂(Cinnamomum osmophloeum)、(3)油茶(Camellia oleifera),並將寄主枝條分成二種徑級:(1)5-23 mm、(2)26-50 mm。自2007年六月至2008年一月,記錄不同種子類型、寄主物種、枝條粗細對種子黏附率、發芽率、固著性、總有效率、及存活率的影響。
結果發現,黏附率顯著受到種子類型與寄主物種的影響,發芽率顯著受種子類型的影響(p<0.01),固著性、總有效率、及存活率顯著受種子類型與寄主物種的影響(p<0.01)。果皮若未去除,種子黏附率會下降,且若寄主物種樹皮光滑,種子黏附率也會下降。未去皮的種子無法發芽,鳥類消化種子的發芽率低於人工去皮種子。所有試驗種子的發芽率,受寄主樹種的影響不顯著。但寄主樹種對固著器建立率有關鍵性的影響,主因是桑寄生與不同種寄主相容性有所差異,不相容物種無法建立吸器。另外,鳥類的消化也會降低種子成功固著的機率。
因此蓮華池桑寄生的初期存活率確實主要由散播者和寄主物種所共同影響,但影響的機制並不相同。鳥類消化對桑寄生種子有生理上的傷害,但對種子發芽及散播還是必需的;散播者的微棲地選擇及寄主物種與桑寄生間的相容性差異,應是影響桑寄生分布的關鍵性因素。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractMistletoes have played an important role in studying the evolution of parasitical plants in recent years. Mistletoes are almost hemiparasite and parasitize in clusters on one or many species of hosts. Mistletoes produce abundant fruits and both of their pollination and seed dispersal are mostly relied on birds. Many recent studies suggest these traits of mistletoes are resulted from the long-term co-evolution among the mistletoe, dispersers, and hosts. The clumped distribution of mistletoes is affected by two phases during the early stage of life cycle. One phase is that the seeds are affected by birds’ digestion and spreading range. The other phase is that the seeds have different host compatibility with different species or branches of hosts where they are dispersed. The mechanisms of these two parasitic phases are under-studied and the parasitic mechanisms of the mistletoes of Taiwan have been rarely reported. As a result, this research focuses on the early survival rates of seeds of Taxillus tsaii, an endemic species of Taiwan, and the effects of seed dispersers, host trees, and branch diameter.
This study was conducted in the Lianhuachih Research Center of Taiwan Forestry Research Institute (Yuchih Township, Nantou County, Taiwan), where has high density of Taxillus tsaii. I inoculated three types of seeds (coated seeds, uncoated seeds, and defecated seeds) on two classes of branch size (5-23 mm and 26-50 mm in diameter) of three host species, including Cinnamomum micranthum, Cinnamomum osmophloeum, and Camellia oleifera. I monitored the effects of different types of seeds, host species, and branch size on seeds adhesion, seeds germination, holdfast establishment, total active seed ratio, and seed survival ratio from June, 2007 to January, 2008.
Results revealed that seed germination was significantly affected by seed types. In addition, seed adhesion, holdfast establishment, total active seed ratio, and survival ratio were significantly affected by both seed types and host species. The adhered ratio greatly decreased in the coated seeds and on the branches with smooth bark. Host species did not have significant influence on germinated ratio. Defecated seeds had significantly lower germinated ratio than uncoated seeds, while coated seeds could not germinate at all. Host species was critical for holdfast established ratio, as the compatibility of Taxillus tsaii seeds differed with tree species. Haustoria of mistletoe could not establish on antagonistic species. The holdfast established ratio of digested seeds was significantly lower than uncoated seeds.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-05-17T09:22:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-101-R95625035-1.pdf: 1678347 bytes, checksum: 258597ac3e569de21145108cda1ad5be (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2012
en
dc.description.tableofcontents目錄
前 言............................................. 1
方法............................................. 6
研究地點.......................................... 6
研究樹種選擇....................................... 6
寄主樹木的編號與選取................................. 7
種子收集.......................................... 7
接種試驗.......................................... 8
種子觀察.......................................... 9
分析方法.......................................... 10
研究結果.......................................... 13
種子存活率分析....................................... 13
接種種子黏附率分析.................................... 14
接種種子發芽率分析.................................... 15
接種種子固著性分析...................................... 16
接種種子總和有效率分析................................... 17
討論.................................................. 19
桑寄生初期存活率改變..................................... 19
鳥類散播對桑寄生種子的影響................................ 20
桑寄生種子與寄主的相容性.................................. 22
桑寄生與森林的經營管理.................................... 25
參考文獻................................................ 27
附錄................................................... 32
圖目錄
圖一、台灣林業試驗所蓮華池研究中心苗圃周圍地圖................. 32
圖二、種子接種配置簡圖..................................... 33
圖三、數據分析流程圖...................................... 34
圖四、發芽種子和未發芽種子其存活率與存活時間之曲線圖............ 35
圖五、建立固著與未建立固著的種子其存活率與存活時間之曲線圖....... 36
圖六、去皮種子和排遺種子其存活率與存活時間之曲線圖.............. 37
圖七、桑寄生種子接種於三種試驗寄主樹種其存活率與存活時間之曲線圖.. 38
圖八、桑寄生種子接種於粗細枝條其存活率與存活時間之曲線圖......... 39
圖九、比較種子於不同試驗寄主黏附率的差異...................... 40
圖十、比較種子於不同試驗寄主發芽率的差異...................... 41
圖十一、比較種子於不同試驗寄主固著性的差異.................... 42
圖十二、比較種子於不同試驗寄主總和有效率的差異................. 43
表目錄
表一、將種子原始記錄標準化................................. 44
表二、各項變數對應種子存活率的模式........................... 45
表三、黏附率模式的配適度檢定................................ 45
表四、黏附率模式,檢測三項變數及交感影響...................... 46
表五、黏附率模式,檢測四項變數及交感影響...................... 47
表六、三種種子類型接種於各類枝條其黏附率比較................... 48
表七、粗細枝條對桑寄生各生長階段之影響........................ 48
表八、發芽率模式的配適度檢定................................ 49
表九、發芽率模式,檢測三項變數及交感影響...................... 49
表十、發芽率模式,檢測四項變數及交感影響...................... 50
表十一、三種種子類型接種於各類枝條其發芽率比較................. 51
表十二、固著性模式的配適度檢定.............................. 51
表十三、固著性模式,檢測三項變數及交感影響.................... 52
表十四、固著性模式,檢測四項變數及交感影響.................... 53
表十五、二種種子類型接種於各類枝條其固著性比較................. 54
表十六、總和有效率模式的配適度檢定........................... 54
表十七、總和有效率模式,檢測三項變數及交感影響................. 55
表十八、總和有效率模式,檢測四項變數及交感影響................. 56
表十九、三種種子類型接種於各類枝條其總和有效率比較............... 57
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title蓮華池桑寄生種子之初期存活率:
傳播媒介、寄主樹種、與寄生枝條之影響
zh_TW
dc.titleEarly Survival Ratio of Mistletoe Seeds (Taxillus tsaii): Effects of Seed Disperser, Host Trees, and Branch Sizeen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear100-1
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee謝寶森,許富雄,邱少婷,袁孝維
dc.subject.keyword桑寄生,種子散播,動物體內散播,散播者,寄主相容性,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordmistletoe,seed dispersal,endozoochory,disperser,host compatibility,en
dc.relation.page57
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)
dc.date.accepted2012-02-02
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept森林環境暨資源學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:森林環境暨資源學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-101-1.pdf1.64 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved