請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69515完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 王俊傑(Chun-Chieh Wang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wei-Keat See | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 施為傑 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T03:17:55Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-07-06 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2018-07-06 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2018-07-02 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [1] 上下游新聞市集（2011）。上下游新聞市集臉書粉絲專頁資訊。自臉書：https://bit.ly/2pEtFTf。
[2] 王峻翊、劉詩瑜、陳伯村與楊兆章（1998）。傳統書與電子書閱讀者之閱讀動機—閱讀行為及市場佔有率之研究。世新印刷學報，4，47-64。 [3] 中國時報（2012）。關懷農業的新動力— 獨立媒體，上下游新聞市集。搜索時間2017/11/25。http://bit.ly/2DaLfUh。 [4] 中華民國消費者文教基金會（2018）。2017 年十大消費新聞，食安問題占半數。自中華民國消費者文教基金會官網：https://bit.ly/2GJSDqG。 [5] 台灣人類學與民族學學會（2012）。「農業技術與社區」：知識，社群與技術網絡的回聲。2012 年會：區域研究，臺灣人類學。 [6] 台灣數位出版聯盟（2012）。2012 台灣數位閱讀行為調查研究問卷結果報告。文化部消費者對於數位出版閱讀行為研究。 [7] 尼爾森（2014）。2014 年尼爾森媒體使用行為研究報告。搜索時間2017/6/11。自http://bit.ly/2CzDBSt。 [8] 台灣衛生福利部（2016）。食品安全政策白皮書。搜索時間2017/6/14。自http://bit.ly/2hhsCEA。 [9] 社 企流（ 2015 ） 。社企案例： 農業經營。搜索時間2017/11/25 。自http://www.seinsights.asia/info/list/5。 [10] 林金玉（2010）。傳統新聞記者擁抱社群媒體的五種方式。公視新聞。 [11] 東森新聞（2015）。如何抵制黑心廠商？看看日本人怎麼讓「雪印」破產。自東森新聞雲官網：https://bit.ly/2Gbchvv。 [12] 佳佳玖（2016）。兼具線上閱讀及線下體驗的時代。自閱讀最前線官網：https://bit.ly/2unWisA。 [13] 洪美慧（2009）。《科學發展》月刊編輯內容之讀者偏好分析。臺灣師範大學美術學系在職進修碩士班學位論文，1-94。 [14] 食力（2015）。食力臉書粉絲專頁資訊。https://bit.ly/2uVbBt1。 [15] 陳明來（2001）。臺北市公立國中生課外閱讀行為之研究。國立政治大學圖書資訊研究所, 碩士論文。 [16] 翁聰慧（2005）。學童閱讀活動及其家庭兒童圖書消費之研究—以嘉義縣國小六年級學童為例。國立台南大學教師在職進修社會碩士學位班，學位論文。 [17] 陳玠廷（2015）。風險下的出路：臺灣食農教育發展初探。農業推廣文彙，61-67。 [18] 張麗雲、葉兆祺（2006）。縣立高中學生閱讀與圖書館利用情形之研究—以旭光高中為例。彰化師大教育學報，9，107-112。 [19] 黃彥棻（2014）。天下雜誌導入大資料自動推薦系統藉由讀者模型分析讀者行為偏好。自iThome 官網：https://bit.ly/2DT4PmA。 [20] 黃郁婷、徐顤倩（2016）。閱讀與數位科技的結合：淺談數位閱讀。臺灣教育評論月刊，5(5)，105-107。 [21] 資訊工業策進會資訊產業情報研究所（2014）。網路社群口碑需求調查。搜索時間2017/6/15。自http://bit.ly/2yR2muy。 [22] 農委會（2015）。氣候變遷下台灣溫帶果樹產業之危機與轉機：產業優勢及發展策略。搜索時間 2018/1/3。自http://bit.ly/2qwUYBP。. [23] 農委會（2015）。農產品網路上架，創造永不停頓的商機。搜索時間2018/1/1。自http://bit.ly/2Cz3otL。 [24] 農傳媒（2016）。農傳媒臉書粉絲專頁資訊。自臉書：https://bit.ly/2IC75BI。 [25] 鄭?益（2011）。網路新聞之社群經營研究—以Facebook 粉絲團為例。世新大學廣播電視電影學系(所) 碩士論文，1-152。 [26] 羅美玲（1998）。電子報讀者之動機分析。元智大學資訊研究所學位論文，1-150。 [27] Alhabash, S., McAlister, A. R., Hagerstrom, A., Quilliam, E. T., Rifon, N. J., &Richards, J. I. (2013). Between likes and shares: Effects of emotional appeal and virality on the persuasiveness of anticyberbullying messages on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(3), 175-182. [28] Arapakis, I., Lalmas, M., Cambazoglu, B. B., Marcos, M. C., & Jose, J. M. (2014). User engagement in online news: Under the scope of sentiment, interest, affect, and gaze. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(10), 1988-2005. [29] Bergstrom, A. (2008). The reluctant audience: Online participation in the Swedish journalistic context. Westminster Papers in Communication & Culture, 5(2). [30] Box, G. E. (1954). Some theorems on quadratic forms applied in the study of analysis of variance problems, I. Effect of inequality of variance in the one-way classification. The annals of mathematical statistics, 25(2), 290-302. [31] Brown, G. J. (2001). Beyond print: reading digitally. Library Hi Tech, 19(4), 390-399. [32] Chung, D. S. (2007). Profits and perils: Online news producers’ perceptions of interactivity and uses of interactive features. Convergence, 13(1), 43-61. [33] Chung, D. S., & Nah, S. (2009). The effects of interactive news presentation on perceived user satisfaction of online community newspapers. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 855-874. [34] Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (Eds.). (1999). Doing qualitative research. sage publications. [35] Cvijikj, I. P., & Michahelles, F. (2013). Online engagement factors on Facebook brand pages. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 3(4), 843-861. [36] DeVries, L., Gensler, S., & Leeflang, P. S. (2012). Popularity of brand posts on brand fan pages: An investigation of the effects of social media marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(2), 83-91. [37] Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer?Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. [38] Greenhow, C., & Reifman, J. (2009). Engaging youth in social media: Is Facebook the new media frontier?. Nieman Reports, 63(3), 53. [39] Hansen, J. P. (2014). Experiences with promoting uptake of social media amongst farmers and advisers. Conference of the Asian Federation for Information Technology in Agriculture, At Perth, Volume: 9th. [40] Hensel, K., & Deis, M. H. (2010). Using social media to increase advertising and improve marketing. The Entrepreneurial Executive, 15, 87. [41] Hermida, A., Fletcher, F., Korell, D., & Logan, D. (2012). Share, like, recommend: Decoding the social media news consumer. Journalism Studies, 13(5-6), 815-824. [42] Hoffman, D., & Novak, T. (1996). Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 50-68. [43] Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research, 15(9), 1277-1288. [44] Huertas, A., & Marine-Roig, E. (2015). Destination brand communication through the social media: What contents trigger most reactions of users?. In Information and communication technologies in tourism 2015 (pp. 295-308). Springer, Cham. [45] Hughes?Hassell, S., & Rodge, P. (2007). The leisure reading habits of urban adolescents. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(1), 22-33. [46] Hujanen, J., & Pietikainen, S. (2004). Interactive uses of journalism: crossing between technological potential and young people’s news-using practices. New Media & Society, 6(3), 383-401. [47] Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business horizons, 53(1), 59-68. [48] Keller, K. L. (2009). Building strong brands in a modern marketing communications environment. Journal of marketing communications, 15(2-3), 139-155. [49] Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage. [50] Ksiazek, T. B., Peer, L., & Lessard, K. (2016). User engagement with online news: Conceptualizing interactivity and exploring the relationship between online news videos and user comments. New Media & Society, 18(3), 502-520. [51] Kushin, M. J., & Yamamoto, M. (2010). Did social media really matter? College students' use of online media and political decision making in the 2008 election. Mass Communication and Society, 13(5), 608-630. [52] Kwok, L., & Yu, B. (2013). Spreading social media messages on facebook an analysis of restaurant business-to-consumer communications. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 54(1), 84-94. [53] Leroux, N., Wortman, M. S., & Mathias, E. D. (2001). Dominant factors impacting the development of business-to-business (B2B) e-commerce in agriculture. The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 4(2), 205-218. [54] Levine-Clark, M. (2006). Electronic book usage: A survey at the University of Denver. Libraries and the Academy, 6(3), 285-299. [55] Liu, Z. (2006). Print vs. electronic resources: A study of user perceptions, preferences, and use. Information Processing & Management, 42(2), 583-592. [56] Luarn, P., Lin, Y. F., & Chiu, Y. P. (2015). Influence of Facebook brand-page posts on online engagement. Online Information Review, 39(4), 505-519. [57] Maier, S. R. (2010). Newspapers offer more news than do major online sites. Newspaper Research Journal, 31(1), 6-19. [58] Malhotra, A., Malhotra, C. K., & See, A. (2013). How to create brand engagement on Facebook. MIT Sloan Management Review, 54(2), 18. [59] Mangold, W. G., & Faulds, D. J. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business horizons, 52(4), 357-365. [60] Mayfield, R. (2005). Social network dynamics and participatory politics. Extreme democracy, 116-132. [61] Miall, D. S. & Dobson, T. (2006). Reading hypertext and the experience of literature. Journal of digital information, 2(1). [62] Miller, W. L. & Crabtree, B. F. (1999). Doing qualitative research. (2nd ed.) London: Sage. [63] Mitchell, A., Kiley, J., Gottfried, J., & Guskin, E. (2013). The role of news on Facebook: Common yet incidental. Pew Journalism Project. [64] Mueller, J., & Kamerer, D. (1995). Reader preference for electronic newspapers. Newspaper Research Journal, 16(3), 2-13. [65] Netzley, S. B., & Banning, S. A. (2011). Tomorrow's Journalists: In-Groups, Out-Groups, and News Topic Preference. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 66(1), 39-53. [66] Neuman, L. W. (2014). Social research methods. Pearson Education Limited. [67] Nguyen, T. T., & Kravets, A. G. (2016). Analysis of the social network facebook comments. In Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA), 2016 7th International Conference on (pp. 1-5). IEEE. [68] Nov, O., Naaman, M., & Ye, C. (2010). Analysis of participation in an online photosharing community: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 61(3), 555-566. [69] O'Brien, H. L., & Toms, E. G. (2010). The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 50-69. [70] Oeldorf-Hirsch, A., & Sundar, S. S. (2015). Posting, commenting, and tagging Effects of sharing news stories on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 240-249. [71] Olmstead, K., Mitchell, A., & Rosenstiel, T. (2011). Navigating news online: Where people go, how they get there and what lures them away. Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism, 9. [72] Patel, N. (2014). 15 Types of Content That Will Drive You More Traffic. 2018/1/2. Retrieved from: http://bit.ly/1KYSbVQ. [73] Peeroo, S., Samy, M., & Jones, B. (2016, September). Generating Customer Engagement and Customer Enragement on Facebook Pages of Tesco and Walmart. In Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society (pp. 146-156). Springer, Cham. [74] Purcell, K., Rainie, L., Mitchell, A., Rosenstiel, T., & Olmstead, K. (2010). Understanding the participatory news consumer. Pew Internet and American Life Project, 1, 19-21. [75] Sabate, F., Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Canabate, A., & Lebherz, P. R. (2014). Factors influencing popularity of branded content in Facebook fan pages. European Management Journal, 32(6), 1001-1011. [76] Sandilands, T. (2016). Advantages and disadvantages of social media marketing. Chron. [77] Schultz, T. (1999). Interactive options in online journalism: A content analysis of 100 US newspapers. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5(1), JCMC513. [78] Seelig, M. I. (2008). An updated look at trends in content and web page design in news web sites. Electronic news, 2(2), 86-101. [79] Stanfield, K. (2014). Why should they comment? Understanding local television news viewers' motivation for commenting on stations' Facebook pages. University of Missouri-Columbia. [80] Stone, G. C., & Boudreau, T. (1995). 1985, 1994: Comparison of reader content preferences. Newspaper Research Journal, 16(4), 13-28. [81] Su, N., Reynolds, D., & Sun, B. (2015). How to make your Facebook posts attractive: A case study of a leading budget hotel brand fan page. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27(8), 1772-1790. [82] Sundar, S. S., & Nass, C. (2001). Conceptualizing sources in online news. Journal of Communication, 51(1), 52-72. [83] Tafesse, W. (2015). Content strategies and audience response on Facebook brand pages. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 33(6), 927-943. [84] Tewksbury, D., & Althaus, S. L. (2000). Differences in knowledge acquisition among readers of the paper and online versions of a national newspaper. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3), 457-479. [85] Tewksbury, D. (2005). The seeds of audience fragmentation: Specialization in the use of online news sites. Journal of broadcasting & electronic media, 49(3), 332-348. [86] Tsai, W. H. S. & Men, L. R. (2013). Motivations and antecedents of consumer engagement with brand pages on social networking sites. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 13(2), 76-87. [87] Weaver, D. H., & Willnat, L. (2016). Changes in US journalism: How do journalists think about social media?. Journalism Practice, 10(7), 844-855. [88] Weber, M. (2009). Marketing To The Social Web: How Digital Customer Communities Build Your Business, John Willey & Sons Inc. New Jersey. [89] Weinberg, B. D., & Pehlivan, E. (2011). Social spending: Managing the social media mix. Business Horizons, 54(3), 275-282. [90] Williams, A. E. (2012). Trust or bust?: Questioning the relationship between media trust and news attention. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(1), 116-131. [91] Willnat, L. & Weaver, D. H. (2014). American Journalist in the Digital Age: Key Findings. School of Journalism, Indiana University. [92] Willnat, L., & Weaver, D. H. (2014). The american journalist in the digital age. School of Journalism, Indiana University, Tech. Rep. [93] Woodrum, E. (1984). “Mainstreaming” content analysis in social science: Methodological advantages, obstacles, and solutions. Social Science Research, 13(1), 1-19. [94] Wu, H. D., & Bechtel, A. (2002). Web site use and news topic and type. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79(1), 73-86. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69515 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 食品安全的問題頻頻發生，許多食品企業皆被揭露出所生產之產品具有危險物質，使得農業議題受到社會大眾關注。為了讓農業新聞媒體更有效地制訂內容策略，本研究目的：（一）探討農業新聞媒體的臉書讀者偏好之農業新聞議題類型；（二）探討農業新聞媒體的臉書讀者所偏好的農業新聞內容之差異；（三）探討農業新聞之讀者人口特性。本研究運用Fanpage Karma 和Python Facebook SDK 獲取上下游新聞市集、農傳媒以及食力之數據資料，其中包括新聞文章連結、新聞內容，以及每篇新聞文章所擁有之讚數、留言數、分享數和粉絲成員之人口特性資料（性別、年齡等）。透過使用單因子變異數分析檢測讀者對新聞議題之偏好，以及運用質性內容分析法對受讀者偏好之新聞內容進行分析。研究結果發現，上下游新聞市集的人物與歷史及吃安心、農傳媒的新農鳴，以及食力的食加工最能獲得消費者認同，及進行留言或分享。上下游新聞市集「人物與歷史」議題之讀者偏好具有激勵性及溫馨故事之新聞內容；而「吃安心」議題之讀者偏好揭露黑心食品及廠商之新聞內容；農傳媒「新農鳴」議題之讀者偏好政策發佈與細節說明之新聞內容；而食力「食加工」議題之讀者偏好食品詳細製作流程及原料介紹之新聞內容。另外，農業新聞的男性讀者多於女性讀者，居住地為北部地區最大宗。本研究之研究結果可供農業新聞媒體進行農業相關議題報導時作為參考，以掌握讀者對議題與內容之偏好並有效地制訂內容策略，提升新聞文章之閱讀人數與流量。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Issues of food safety have occurred frequently. Several food companies exposed to the hazardous substances of their products and give rise to concern of public to the agricultural issues once again. However, the preference of reader to the agricultural news is still undiscovered. In order to find out the reader’s preference of agricultural news topic and content, this study employ “Fanpage Karma” and “Python Facebook SDK” to capture the data from the date of fan page established to December of 2017. The data include the news links, content, number of likes, comments and share, and background information of fans from Facebook fan page of “News&Market”, “Agrihavest” and “FoodNext”. ANOVA analysis and content analysis adopted to analyze the data. Results showed that “Character and History” and “Ease to Eat” in News&Market, “New Agricultural News” in Agrihavest and “Food Processing” in FoodNext are more attracted by reader of agricultural news. Readers who prefer to the news in “Character and History” are to be partial to content of incentive and comfort story. Besides, readers who prefer to the news in “Ease to Eat” are to be partial to content of expose the vicious company. In addition, readers who prefer to the news in “New Agricultural News” are to be partial to content of agricultural policy introduction. Moreover, readers who prefer to the news in “Food Processing” are to be partial to content of food production details. The ratio of male reader is greater than female. Majority of reader’s location is “Taipei City”. Results can be an indicator by agricultural news media to draw up a content strategy and increase the traffic of news. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T03:17:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R05630011-1.pdf: 3872742 bytes, checksum: 5cd1dd94dbf380804c6998b07354ce1a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 目錄 v 圖目錄 vii 表目錄 viii 第一章 緒論 1 第二章 文獻回顧 3 第一節、 新聞議題 3 一、 新聞議題的類型與讀者偏好 3 二、 農業新聞議題之高關注度 9 三、 農業新聞議題之類型 10 第二節、 社群媒體與新聞讀者 13 一、 社群媒體為新聞轉載之平台 13 二、 臉書讀者對新聞的閱讀動機 17 三、 臉書讀者對新聞的參與模式 18 四、 新聞議題讀者偏好的臉書成效衡量指標 19 第三章 研究方法 24 第一節、 研究流程 24 第二節、 農業新聞媒體 25 第三節、 資料蒐集與整理 30 第四節、 數據分析 35 第四章 研究結果 39 第一節、 農業新聞議題偏好 39 第二節、 農業新聞之讀者內容偏好 45 第三節、 讀者人口特性 57 第五章 結論與建議 64 第一節、 研究結果與討論 64 第二節、 研究限制 69 參考文獻 70 附錄 75 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 農業新聞議題與內容之臉書讀者偏好分析：以上下游新聞市集、農傳媒、食力為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Analysis of Agricultural News Topic and Content Preference of Facebook User: A Case Study of News&Market, Agriharvest, and FoodNext | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 薛招治(Chao-Chih Hsueh),楊東謀(Tung-Mou Yang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 新聞議題,讀者偏好,農業新聞媒體,臉書, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | News Topic,Reader preference,Agricultural news media,Facebook, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 96 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201801191 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2018-07-02 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物產業傳播暨發展學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 生物產業傳播暨發展學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-107-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.78 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。