請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69499完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 簡怡雯 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Chuan Liu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 劉又銓 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T03:17:26Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2018-07-06 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2018-07-06 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2018-07-03 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Bargh, John A. (1990), “Auto-Motives: Preconscious Determinants of Social Interaction,” Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior, Vol. 2, ed. E. Tory Higgins and Richard M. Sorrentino, New York: Guilford, 93–130.
Baron, Reuben M. and David A. Kenny (1986), “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychology Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-82. Basil, Michael D. (1996), “Identification as A Mediator of Celebrity Effects,” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40(4), 478-95. Boerman, Sophie C., Eva A. van Reijmersdal, and Peter C. Neijens (2014), “Effects of Sponsorship Disclosure Timing on the Processing of Sponsored Content: A Study on the Effectiveness of European Disclosure Regulations,” Psychology and Marketing, 31(3), 214–24. Campbell, Margaret C., Gina S. Mohr, and Peeter W.J. Verlegh (2013), “Can Disclosures Lead Consumers to Resist Covert Persuasion? The Important Roles of Disclosure Timing and Type of Response,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(4), 483–95. Chapple, Callum and Fiona Cownie (2017), “An Investigation into Viewers’ Trust in and Response Towards Disclosed Paid-for-Endorsements by YouTube Lifestyle Vloggers,” Journal of Promotional Communications, 5(2), 110-36. Chartrand, Tanya L., Amy N. Dalton, and Clara M. Cheng (2008), “Consequences of Nonconscious Goal Activation,” Handbook of Motivation Science, ed. James Y. Shah and Wendi L. Gardner, New York: Guilford, 342–55. Dawes, John (2008), “Do Data Characteristics Change According to the Number of Scale Points Used,” International journal of market research, 50(1), 61-77. Darke, Peter R. and Robin J. B. Ritchie (2007), “The Defensive Consumer: Advertising Deception, Defensive Processing, and Distrust,” Journal of Marketing Research, 44(1), 114–27. Forehand, Mark R. and Sonya Grier (2003), “When Is Honesty the Best Policy? The Effect of Stated Company Intent on Consumer Skepticism,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 349–56. Friestad, Marian and Esther Thorson (1993), “Remembering Ads: The Effects of Encoding Strategies, Retrieval Cues and Emotional Response,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2(1), 1-24. — and Peter Wright (1994), “The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts,” Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1–31. Gakhal, Baldeesh and Carl Senio (2008), “Examining The Influence of Fame in The Presence Of Beauty: An Electrodermal ‘Neuromarketing’ Study,” Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 7(4-5), 331-41. Glaser, Jack and Mahzarin R. Banaji (1999), “When Fair Is Foul and Foul Is Fair: Reverse Priming in Automatic Evaluation,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(4), 669–87. Goldsmith, Ronald E., Barbara A. Lafferty, and Stephen J. Newell (2013), “The Impact of Corporate Credibility and Celebrity Credibility on Consumer Reaction to Advertisements and Brands,” Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 43-54. Goodstein, Ronald C. (1993), “Category-Based Applications and Extensions in Advertising: Motivating More Extensive Ad Processing,” Journal of Consumer Research, 20(1), 87-99. Hardesty, David M., Jay P. Carlson, and William Bearden (2002), “Brand Familiarity and Invoice Price Effects on Consumer Evaluations: The Moderating Role of Skepticism toward Advertising,” Journal of Advertising, 31(2), 1-15. Harkins, Stephen G. and Richard E. Petty (1981), “The Multiple Source Effect in Persuasion: The Effects of Distraction”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7(4), 627-35. Hsieh, Jung-Kuei, Yi-Ching Hsieh, and Yu-Chien Tang (2012), “Exploring The Disseminating Behaviors of Ewom Marketing: Persuasion in Online Video,” Electronic Commerce Research,” 12(2), 201-24. Isaac, Mathew S. and Kent Grayson (2017), “Beyond Skepticism: Can Accessing Persuasion Knowledge Bolster Credibility?” Journal of Consumer Research, 43(6), 895–912. Jin, Seung-A Annie and Joe Phua (2014), “Following Celebrities’ Tweets About Brands: The Impact of Twitter-Based Electronic Word-of-Mouth on Consumers’ Source Credibility Perception, Buying Intention, and Social Identification With Celebrities,” Journal of Advertising, 43(2), 181-95. Kahle, Lynn R. and Pamela M. Homer (1985), “Physical Attractiveness of the Celebrity Endorser: A Social Adaptation Perspective,” Journal of Consumer Research, 11(4), 954-61. Laran, Juliano, Amy N. Dalton, and Eduardo B. Andrade (2010), “The Curious Case of Behavioral Backlash: Why Brands Produce Priming Effects and Slogans Produce Reverse Priming Effects,” Journal of Consumer Research, 37(6), 999–1014. Liljander, Veronica Johanna Gummerus, and Magnus Söderlund (2015), “Young Consumers’ Responses to Suspected Covert and Overt Blog Marketing,” Internet Research, 25(4), 610-32. Liu, Matthew Tingchi, Yu-Ying Huang, and Jiang Minghua (2007), 'Relations among Attractiveness of Endorsers, Match-Up, and Purchase Intention in Sport Marketing in China,' Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24(6), 358-65. Martin, Leonard L. (1986), “Set/Reset: Use and Disuse of Concepts in Impression Formation,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(3), 493-504. Mathur, Lynette K., Ike Mathur, and Nanda Rangan (1997), “The Wealth Effects Associated With a Celebrity Endorser: The Michael Jordan Phenomenon,” Journal of Advertising Research, 37(3), 67-73. Mugge, Ruth and Jan P. L. Schoormans (2012), “Newer Is Better! The Influence of a Novel Appearance on the Perceived Performance Quality of Products,” Journal of Engineering Design, 23(6), 469–84 Obermiller, Carl and Eric R. Spangenberg (2000), “On the Origin and Distinctness of Skepticism toward Advertising,” Marketing Letters, 11(4), 311–22. Petty, Richard E., John T. Cacioppo, and David Schumann (1983), “Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement,” Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (September), 135-46. — and John T. Cacioppo (1984), “Source Factors and the Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion,” Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 668-72. — and John T. Cacioppo (1986), “The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Leonard Berkowitz, ed. New York: Academic Press, 123-205. — and Duane T. Wegener (1993), “Flexible Correction Processes in Social Judgment: Correcting for Context-Induced Contrast,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29(2), 137-65 — and Duane T. Wegener (1999),“The Elaboration Likelihood Model: Current Status and Controversies,” in Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology, Shelley Chaiken and Yaacov Trope, eds. New York: Guilford, 41-72. Reijmersdal, Eva A. van, Marieke L.Fransen, Guda van Noort, Suzanna J.Opree, Lisa Vandeberg, Sanne Reusch, Floor van Lieshout, “Sophie C. Boerman (2016), “Effects of Disclosing Sponsored Content in Blogs: How the Use of Resistance Strategies Mediates Effects on Persuasion,” American Behavioral Scientist, 60(12), 1458–74. Rule,Brendan G., Gay L. Bisanz, and Melinda Kohn (1985), “Anatomy of a Persuasion Schema: Targets, Goals and Strategies,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(5), 1127–40. Schindler, Robert M., Maureen Morrin, and Nada Nasr Bechwati (2005), “Shipping Charges and Shipping-Charge Skepticism: Implications for Direct Marketers’ Pricing Formats,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19(1), 41–52. Schmidt, Daniel F. and Richard C. Sherman (1984), “Memory for Persuasive Messages: A Test of a Schema-Copy-Plus-Tag Model,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(1), 17-25. Schwarz, Norbert and Herbert Bless (1992), “Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Attitude Measurement: an Inclusion/Exclusion Model,” Advances in Consumer Research, 19, 72-77. Shavitt, Sharon, Suzanne Swan, Tina M. Lowrey, and Michaela Wänke (1994), “The Interaction of Endorser Attractiveness and Involvement in Persuasion Depends on The Goal That Guides Message Processing,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 3(2), 137-62. Si, Steven X. and John B. Cullen (1998), “Response Categories and Potential Cultural Bias: Effects of an Explicit Middle Point in Cross‐Cultural Surveys,' The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 6(3), 218-30. Till, Brian D. and Michael Busler (1998), 'Matching Products with Endorsers: Attractiveness versus Expertise,' Journal of Consumer Marketing, 15(6), 576-86. — and Michael Busler (2000), “The Match-Up Hypothesis: Physical Attractiveness, Expertise, and the Role of Fit on Brand Attitude, Purchase Intent and Brand Beliefs,” Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 1-13. — and Terence A. Shimp (1998), “Endorsers in Advertising: The Case of Negative Celebrity Information,” Journal of Advertising, 27(1), 67-82 Tutaj, Karolina and Eva A. van Reijmersdal (2012), “Effects of Online Advertising Format and Persuasion Knowledge on Audience Reactions,” Journal of Marketing Communications, 18, (1), 5-18. Wegener, Daniel T. and Richard E. Petty (1995), “Flexible Correction Processes in Social Judgment: The Role of Naive Theories in Corrections for Perceived Bias,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(1), 36-51. — and Richard E. Petty (1997), “The Flexible Correction Model: The Role of Naive Theories of Bias in Bias Correction,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 141-208. Verhellen, Yann, Nathalie Dens, and Patrick De Pelsmacker (2013), “Consumer Responses to Brands Placed in Youtube Movies: The Effect of Prominence and Endorser Expertise,” Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 14(4), 287-303. Wu, Mu, Yan Huang, Ruobing Li, Denise Sevick Bortree, Fan Yang, Anli Xiao, and Ruoxu Wang (2016), “A Tale of Two Sources in Native Advertising: Examining the Effects of Source Credibility and Priming on Content, Organizations, and Media Evaluations,” American Behavioral Scientist, 60(12), 1492–1509. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69499 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 即便我們身處在網際網路2.0的快速成長的時代，現今仍少有學術研究專注在探究部落格業配文(即業務配合文章)廣告效果的有效性，遑論探討業配文作者選擇對於消費者產品態度的影響。本研究目標便是探究當業配本質已然揭露於文章開頭時，業配文作者吸引力及其與目標產品之關聯度如何影響消費者對產品的判斷。研究結果指出以下三點：(1)當作者與目標產品低度相關時，作者吸引力愈高，消費者對於產品的態度愈差。(2)當作者為具有高吸引力的名人時，作者與目標產品關聯度愈高，消費者對於產品的態度愈佳。(3)文章可信度在作者產品關聯度對消費者產品態度的效果中，扮演中介變數的角色。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In spite of the vast growth of web 2.0., there has been few academic research examining the effectiveness of advertising techniques for user-generated content on blog, not to mention the endorser effect behind the technique. The current research is aimed to investigating the effect of endorser attractiveness and endorser-product relevance on product judgments in the context of user-generated content on blog when there is an explicit disclosure of sponsorship. Our findings show that: (1) when the endorser was product-irrelevant, the more attractive the endorser was, the lower product attitude people would have; (2) when the endorser was a highly attractive celebrity, the more the endorser was related to target product, the higher product attitude people would have; (3) article credibility acted as mediator in the effect of endorser-product relevance on product judgment. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T03:17:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R05741042-1.pdf: 1252240 bytes, checksum: ffb02294d704691bc210c27d7950ed8d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 論文口試委員審定書……………………………………………....…….01
誌謝……………………………………………………………………….02 摘要………………………………………………………………….........03 ABSTRACT…………………………….………………………………...04 CONTENT…………………………..……………………………………05 LIST OF FIGURES………..…………………………..…………….........08 LIST OF TABLES………..…………………………….....……………....09 CH1. INTRODUCTION………………..…..…………………………….11 CH2. LITERATURE REVIEW…..……………...………………………..13 Flexible Correction Model…………………………………………………………..13 Persuasion Knowledge Model……………………………………………………….15 Automatic Correction………………………………………………………………..17 Endorser Effect and Elaboration Likelihood Model……………………………..…..18 Sponsorship Disclosure……………………………………………………………...20 Previous Researches Related to Sponsored User-Generated Content……………….22 CH3. HYPOTHESES AND FRAMEWORK………………..…………...25 CH4. METHOD…………………………………..………………………29 Participants and Design……………………………………………………………...29 Procedure…………………………………………………………………………….29 Independent Variables………………………………………………………………..31 Endorser-Product Relevance……………………………………………………...31 Endorser Attractiveness………………………………………………………...…31 Disclosure…………………………………………………………………………32 Dependent Variables…………………………………………………………………32 Target Measures…………………………………………………………………...32 Manipulation Check………………………………………………………………32 CH5. RESULTS……………………..……………………………………34 Reliability Test………………………………………………………………………34 Manipulation Check…………………………………………………………………36 Endorser-Product Relevance…………………………………………………...…36 Endorser Attractiveness…………………………………………………………...38 Sponsored User-Generated Content Recognition…………………………………40 Possession of Persuasion Knowledge…………………………………………......41 Involvement……………………………………………………………………….43 Hypotheses Testing…………………………………………………………………..46 Target Evaluation………………………………………………………………….46 Mediation Analysis………………………………………………………………..52 CH6. DISCUSSION…...….………………………………………………57 Experiment Result Discussion………………………………………………………57 Hypotheses Verification…………………………………………………………...57 Mediation Effect………………………………………………………………..…61 Managerial Implication……………………………………………………………....64 Research Limitation and Future Work……………………………………………….65 Sample Size……………………………………………………………………….65 Participants………………………………………………………………………..65 Fictitious/Real Endorser…………………………………………………………..66 Endorser Attractiveness Manipulation…………………………………………….66 REFERENCES……………………………………………………………68 APPENDIX: QUESTIONNAIRE………………………………………...77 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 業配文 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 偏誤修正 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 說服知識 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 產品判斷 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 代言人效應 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Product Judgment | en |
| dc.subject | Bias Correction | en |
| dc.subject | Sponsored Content | en |
| dc.subject | Persuasion Knowledge | en |
| dc.subject | Endorser Effect | en |
| dc.title | 業配文作者吸引力與產品關聯性對於產品判斷之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Effect of Endorser Attractiveness and Product-Endorser Relevance on Product Judgment of Sponsored User-Generated Content | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蕭中強,練乃華,陳建維 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 產品判斷,偏誤修正,業配文,說服知識,代言人效應, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Product Judgment,Bias Correction,Sponsored Content,Persuasion Knowledge,Endorser Effect, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 87 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201801164 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2018-07-03 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 商學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-107-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.22 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。