請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69323完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 雷庚玲(Keng-Ling Lay) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cheng-Yu Hsu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 須正宇 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T03:12:55Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2018-07-19 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2018-07-19 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2018-07-13 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 王郁琮（2011）:〈階層線性模式路徑圖與策略化模型建構機制〉。《教育研究與發展期刊》，7（2），25-55。
陳清梅（2013）:〈別讓「學習」從十二年國教中「逃走」〉。 《臺灣教育評論月刊》，2（5），37-41。 Ainsworth, M. (1979). Infant-mother attachment. The American Psychologist, 34, 932-937. Anderman, L., & Anderman, E. (1999). Social predictors of changes in students' achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(1), 21-37. Anderson, J. (1983), The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Battistich, V., Solomon, D., Kim, D., Watson, M., & Schaps, E. (1995). Schools as communities, poverty levels of student populations, and students’ attitudes, motives, and performance: A multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 627-658. Bao, X. H., & Lam, S. F. (2008). Who makes the choice? Rethinking the role of autonomy and relatedness in Chinese children’s motivation. Child Development, 79, 269-283. Belmont, M., Skinner, E., Wellborn, J., & Connell, J. (1988). Teacher as social context: A measure of student perceptions of teacher provision of involvement, structure, and autonomy support. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Attachment (vol. 1). London, UK: Hogarth. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Separation (vol. 2). London, UK: Hogarth. Bretherton, I. (1985). Attachment theory: Retrospect and prospect. Monographs of The Society for Research in Child Development, 50(1&2), 3-35. Brophy, J. (1986). Teacher influences on student achievement. The American Psychologist, 41, 1069-1077. Chapman, M., Skinner, E., & Baltes, P. (1990). Interpreting correlations between children's perceived control and cognitive performance: Control, agency, or means-ends beliefs? Developmental Psychology, 26, 246-253. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Connell, J. P. (1990). Context, self, and action: A motivational analysis of self-system processes across the life span. The Self in Transition: Infancy to Childhood, 8, 61-97. Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1990). Competence, autonomy and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), The Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology (pp. 43–77). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Corno, L., & Rohrkemper, M. (1985). The intrinsic motivation to learn in classrooms. Research on Motivation in Education, 2, 53-90. Crittenden, P. M. (1990). Internal representational models of attachment relationships. Infant Mental Health Journal, 11, 259-277. Culver, J. (2015). Relationship quality and student engagement. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).Wayne State University, Michigan, MI. Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16. deCharms, R. (1976). Enhancing motivation: Change in the classroom. NewYork, NY: Irvington. Dao, T. K., Kerbs, J. J., Rollin, S. A., Potts, I., Gutierrez, R., Choi, K., ... & Prevatt, F. (2006). The association between bullying dynamics and psychological distress. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39, 277-282. Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109-134. Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26, 325-346. Eccles, J. S. (2004). Schools, academic motivation, and stage-environment fit. Handbook of Adolescent Psychology, 2, 125-153. Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121. Engels, M. C., Colpin, H., Van Leeuwen, K., Bijttebier, P., Van Den Noortgate, W., Claes, S.,...Verschueren, K. (2016). Behavioral engagement, peer Status, and teacher–student relationships in adolescence: A longitudinal study on reciprocal influences. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 1192-1207. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. Frodi, A., Bridges, L., & Grolnick, W. (1985). Correlates of mastery-related behavior: A short-term longitudinal study of infants in their second year. Child Development, 56, 1291-1298. Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148. Furrer, C., Skinner, E., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2006). Engagement vs. disaffection as central constructs in the dynamics of motivational development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, San Francisco, CA. Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 13(1), 21-43. Hamre, B., & Pianta, R. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children's school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72, 625-638. Harter, S. (1981). A new self-report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom: Motivational and informational components. Developmental Psychology, 17, 300-312. Hofer, M., & Peetsma, T. (2005). Societal values and school motivation. Students’ goals in different life domains. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20, 203. Hofmann, D. A., & Gavin, M. B. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24, 623-641. Hughes, J. N., & Chen, Q. (2011). Reciprocal effects of student–teacher and student–peer relatedness: Effects on academic self efficacy. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 278-287. Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 383-434). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Lamb, S., Markussen, E., Teese, R., Sandberg, N., & Polesel, J. (2011). School dropout and completion: International comparative studies in theory and policy. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. Langbein, J. H. (1994). The historical origins of the privilege against self-incrimination at common law. Michigan Law Review, 92, 1047-1085. Lynch, M., & Cicchetti, D. (1992). Maltreated children's reports of relatedness to their teachers. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1992, 81-107. Mathieu, J. E., & Taylor, S. R. (2007). A framework for testing meso‐mediational relationships in Organizational Behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 141-172. Midgley, C., Feldlaufer, H., & Eccles, J. (1989). Change in teacher efficacy and student self- and task-related beliefs in mathematics during the transition to junior high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 247-258. Newmann, F. (1991). Student engagement in academic work: Expanding the perspective on secondary school effectiveness. In J. R. Bliss & W. A. Firestone (Eds.), Rethinking effective schools: Research and practice (pp. 58–76). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. OECD. (2012). Education at a glance 2012: OECD Indicators (p. 567). Paris: Author. Park, S., Holloway, S. D., Arendtsz, A., Bempechat, J., & Li, J. (2012). What makes students engaged in learning? A time-use study of within-and between-individual predictors of emotional engagement in low-performing high schools. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 390-401. Pederson, D. R., Gleason, K. E., Moran, G., & Bento, S. (1998). Maternal attachment representations, maternal sensitivity, and the infant–mother attachment relationship. Developmental Psychology, 34, 925. Pianta, R. C., & Steinberg, M. (1992). Teacher‐child relationships and the process of adjusting to school. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1992(57), 61-80. Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44, 159-175. Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). New York, NY: Springer. Reis, H. T., Sheldon, K. M., Gable, S. L., Roscoe, J., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 419-435. Roeser, R. W., Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. C. (1996). Perceptions of the school psychological environment and early adolescents' psychological and behavioral functioning in school: The mediating role of goals and belonging. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 408. Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on students' school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81, 493. Ryan, R., Connell, J., & Grolnick, W. (1992). When achievement is not intrinsically motivated: A theory of internalization and self-regulation in school. Achievement and Motivation: A Social-Developmental Perspective, 167, 167-188. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68. Ryan, R. M., Stiller, J. D., & Lynch, J. H. (1994). Representations of relationships to teachers, parents, and friends as predictors of academic motivation and self-esteem. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, 226-249. Sandler, I. N., Miller, P., Short, J., & Wolchik, S. A. (1989). Social support as a protective factor for children in stress. In D. Belle (Ed.), Children’s social networks and social supports (pp. 277–307). New York, NY: Wiley. Schunk, D. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207-231. Seppälä, T., Lipponen, J., Pirttila-Backman, A.-M., & Lipsanen, J. (2011). Reciprocity of trust in the supervisor–subordinate relationship: The mediating role of autonomy and the sense of power. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20, 755-778. Shernoff, E. S., Kratochwill, T. R., & Stoiber, K. C. (2003). Training in evidence-based interventions (EBIs): What are school psychology programs teaching? Journal of School Psychology, 41, 467-483. Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 765. Skinner, E. A. (1995). Perceived control, motivation, and coping. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571. Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (2009). Engagement and disaffection as organizational constructs in the dynamics of motivational development. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 223–245). New York: Routledge. Skinner, E., Zimmer-Gembeck, M., & Connell, J. (1998). Individual differences and the development of perceived control. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63, 2–3. Smit, K., de Brabander, C. J., Boekaerts, M., & Martens, R. L. (2017). The self-regulation of motivation: Motivational strategies as mediator between motivational beliefs and engagement for learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 82, 124-134. Sweden, S. (2008). Official statistics of Sweden. Education and Research. Population. Sweden: Statistics Sweden Waters, E., & Deane, K. (1985). Defining and assessing individual differences in attachment relationships: Q-methodology and the organization of behavior in infancy and early childhood. In I. Bretherton & E. Waters (Eds.), Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50, 41–65. Weisz, J. R., & Cameron, A. M. (1985). Individual differences in the student's sense of control. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on Motivation in Education: Vol. 2. The Classroom Milieu. Orlando, FL: Academic Press. Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Engaged and disaffected action: The conceptualization and measurement of motivation in the academic domain. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester, New York, NY. Wentzel, K. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 202-209. Wentzel, K. (1999). Social-motivational processes and interpersonal relationships: Implications for understanding motivation at school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 76-97. Wentzel, K. R. (2009). Peers and academic functioning at school. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Social, emotional, and personality development in context. Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 531-547). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press. Wigfield, A., Byrnes, J. P., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Development during early and middle adolescence. Handbook of Educational Psychology, 2, 87-113. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69323 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 兒童期到青少年期學習動機不斷下降甚至排斥學習已幾乎是全球趨勢。本研究以自我決定理論中的「關聯感」向度為理論基礎，釐清關聯感的操作型定義，再以關聯感的不同測量方式，探討師生關係對青少年學習動機的解釋力。亦即除探討學生針對特定教師所知覺之關聯感及該教師知覺學生對其的關聯感對於學生在該教師課堂中「參與及承諾」和「無感及不滿」的行為與情緒之預測程度；同時測量教師的教學信念與行為共七個向度（鼓勵獨立、過度保護、對學生社會適應的洞察、對師生關係的重視、對自身權威的重視、回應性與可得性以及對學生的情感連結），釐清何者為能夠預測知覺關聯感的因子。研究一邀請61位在職教師填寫本研究所發展之「關聯感」及「教師之教學行為與信念」兩個測量工具並進行心理計量分析。研究二則邀請八所高中共55位高一班級之主科教師或導師填寫教師行為與信念及關聯感問卷，並邀請這些教師班上共1970位同學填寫關聯感問卷及課堂投入問卷。透過師生對偶樣本的多層次線性模式分析結果發現，即便考量了師生熟稔度及學生對特定教師所授科目的擅長程度，學生所知覺之師生關聯感依然能夠正向預測其在該教師的課堂中的參與及承諾之行為（β = .60, p < .001）和情緒（β = .64, p < .001）；並負向預測無感及不滿之行為（β = -.26, p < .05）和情緒（β = -.54, p < .05）。而教師知覺學生對其之關聯感則對學生課堂參與或無感等四個指標皆無顯著預測力。另一方面，透過班級層次的相關分析得知，本研究中僅有對師生關係的重視（β = .31, p < .05）、回應性與可得性（β = .29, p < .05）及與學生的情感連結（β = .31, p < .05）等三個教師因子能夠預測學生知覺之師生關聯感。本研究不但區分出不同關聯感報告者對學生課堂投入之預測力的差異，也顯示教師行為與信念對不同報告者所知覺關聯感的預測力不同，因此具體建議往後測量對教師之關聯感時不但應區分報告者，亦須區分測量內容是「關聯感本身」或「提昇關聯感之教師支持系統」。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Learning motivation continues to drop from childhood to adolescence is now almost a worldwide trend. To understand how high-school teachers can promote students’ motivation in learning, the current research adopted the concept of “relatedness,” one of the key human needs postulated by Deci and Ryan’s (1985) Self-Determination Theory. Specifically, the current research aimed to clarify the operational definition of relatedness and apply different measurements of relatedness to find out whether teacher-student relatedness perceived by students and students’ relatedness perceived by teachers could predict students’ engagement and disaffection in learning. We also investigated which of the seven dimensions of teachers’ behaviors or beliefs, including autonomy support, over-protection, caring for students’ social adjustment, concern about teacher-student relationship, emphasis on teacher’s authority, responsiveness and availability, and affective connection with students, would help build relatedness. 61 high-school teachers participated in Study 1. They filled out online questionnaires investigating “relatedness” and “teachers’ behaviors and beliefs.” Some items and one subscale was deleted from the questionnaires according to results of item analyses. Another 55 teachers from eight high schools and 1970 tenth-grade students from those teachers’ classes were recruited in Study 2. The teachers filled out questionnaires of “teachers’ behaviors and beliefs” and “teacher’s perception of student’s relatedness.” The students filled out questionnaires of “self-perception of relatedness” and “classroom engagement and disaffection.” MLM (multilevel modeling) analyses on the teacher-student dyadic sample indicated that, after the time each teacher spent with the class per week and students’ self-rated ranking of class performance had been taken into account, relatedness perceived by students but not students’ relatedness perceived by teachers could significantly and positively predict students’ behavioral (β = .60, p < .001) and emotional (β = .64, p < .001) engagement, while negatively predict students’ behavioral (β = -.26, p < .05) and emotional (β = -.54, p < .05) disaffection. The correlation analyses between “relatedness” and “teacher’s behaviors and beliefs” pointed out that only “concern about teacher-student relationship” (β = .31, p < .05), “responsiveness and availability” (β = .29, p < .05), and “affective connection with students” (β = .31, p < .05), could predict relatedness perceived by students. This study revealed the differential predictability of relatedness reported by different informants toward student in-class engagement. The results also indicated relatedness perceived by students and teachers are correlated with different aspects of teachers’ behaviors and beliefs. We specifically suggest that relatedness reported by different informants should be treated with caution and should be conceptualized separately in terms of the perception of relatedness per se as opposed to the supporting system provided by teachers in promoting relatedness. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T03:12:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R03623008-1.pdf: 1690745 bytes, checksum: cae1297f5616c3dcd34a47bba11d5d17 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝..........................................................................................................................i
摘要.........................................................................................................................iii Abstract...................................................................................................................v 第一章 緒論...........................................................................................................1 第一節 研究動機....................................................................................................1 第二節 文獻探討....................................................................................................4 第三節 研究問題與假設........................................................................................10 第二章 研究方法..................................................................................................14 第一節 研究參與者...............................................................................................14 第二節 施測步驟..................................................................................................15 第三節 測量工具..................................................................................................16 第四節 分析方法..................................................................................................19 第三章 研究結果..................................................................................................21 第一節 高中教學現場的師生關聯感（問卷之心理計量分析）..................................21 第二節 可能促進師生關聯感的教師因素（問卷之心理計量分析）...........................22 第三節 與「學生知覺師生關聯感」或「教師知覺學生關聯感」相關的教師因子.......25 第四節 學生課堂投入量表的心理計量分析............................................................26 第五節 關聯感與學生課堂投入.............................................................................26 第四章 討論........................................................................................................42 第一節 師生關聯感的構念測量.............................................................................42 第二節 與師生關聯感相關的教師因素...................................................................43 第三節 關聯感與學生課堂投入.............................................................................45 第四節 研究限制與未來展望................................................................................49 參考文獻.................................................................................................................51 附錄........................................................................................................................58 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 學習動機 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 師生關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 班級經營 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 關聯感 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自我決定理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | relatedness | en |
| dc.subject | Self-Determination Theory | en |
| dc.subject | learning motivation | en |
| dc.subject | teacher-student relationship | en |
| dc.subject | class management | en |
| dc.title | 高中師生各自知覺的關聯感對學生課堂投入的預測力 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Predictability of Relatedness Perceived by High School Students and Teachers toward Student Engagement | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 游琇婷(Hsiu-Ting Yu),林烘煜(Hung-Yu Lin) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 自我決定理論,關聯感,學習動機,師生關係,班級經營, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Self-Determination Theory,relatedness,learning motivation,teacher-student relationship,class management, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 74 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201801338 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2018-07-13 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-107-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.65 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。