請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69301完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 胡星陽 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yen-Fang Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳彥芳 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T03:12:26Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2020-08-23 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2018-08-23 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2018-07-15 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
中文部分 池祥萱、繆文娟與莊瀅臻 (2014),「企業社會責任對於公司財務績效之影響是雙面刃嗎?來自全球500大公司的證據」,管理學報,第31卷第1期,頁1-19。 沈中華與張元 (2008),「企業社會責任行為可以改善財務績效嗎?-以英國 FTSE 社會責任指數為例」,經濟論文,36(3):339-385。 李秀英、劉俊儒、楊筱翎 (2011),「企業社會責任與公司績效之關聯性」,東海管理評論,第13卷,第一期,頁77-112。 林文玲與傅鍾仁 (2011),「企業社會責任之揭露對會計資訊價值攸關性-以台灣資訊電子業上市公司為例」,商管科技季刊,12卷2期,頁209-229。 林嬋娟與張哲嘉 (2009),「董監事異常變動、家族企業與企業舞弊之關聯性」,會計評論,48:1-33。 洪雪卿、陳薇如、傅雁鈴 (2013),「影響企業社會責任績效之重要因素為何?」,商管科技季刊,第14卷,第4期,頁405-441。 徐怡與邱世熒 (2010),「資本支出、企業規模與研發投資對企業績效之影響」Journal of Data Analysis,5卷3期,頁1-21。 翁望回、黃俊英、劉水深 (1988),「企業正當性之實證研究―社會責任的觀點」,管理評論,7: 153-171。 葉旻其 (2009)「公司治理機制對企業績效與董監薪酬之影響」,政治大學會計學系碩士論文。 魏文欽與莊怡萱 (2009),「企業社會責任、企業形象、消費者態度與行爲意向關係之實證研究」,International Journal of Lisrel, 2卷2期,頁1-21。 英文部分 Arrow, K. J. 1973, “Social Responsibility and Economic Efficiency,” Public Policy, 21, 303– 317. Bennett, J., and Sias, R. 2008. Portfolio diversification. Working paper. Bowen, H. R. 1953, Social Responsibilities of the Businessman, New York: Harper and Brothers. Bowman, E. H., and Haire M. 1975, “A Strategic Posture toward Corporate Social Responsibility,” California Management Review, 18, 49–58. Cai, Y., Jo, H., and Pan, C. 2012. Doing well while doing bad? CSR in controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(4), 467–480. Carroll, A. B. 1999. Corporate social responsibility: evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society 38(3):268-269. Chava. S. 2010. Socially responsible investing and expected stock returns. Working paper. Georgia Institute of Technology. Choi, D.Y., and Gray E. R. 2008. Socially responsible entrepreneurs: what do they do to create and build their companies? Business Horizons 51(4):341-352. Christmann, P., and Taylor G. 2006. Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: Determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation. Journal of International Business Studies 37(6):863-878. Dhaliwal, D., Li, O., Zhang, A., and Yang, Y. 2011. Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiations of corporate social responsibility reporting. Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100. El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C.C.Y., and Mishra, D.R., 2011. Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking and Finance, 35 (9): 2388-2406. Ferrell, A., Liang, H., and Renneboog, L. 2016.Socially responsible firms. Journal of Financial Economics. 122, (3), 585-606. Galaskiewicz, J. 1985. Professional networks and the institutionalization of a single mind Set. American Sociological Review. 25(2):639-658. Mandelker, G., and Rhee, S., 1984. The Impact of the Degrees of Operating and Financial Leverage on Systematic Risk of Common Stock. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 19, No. 1, 45-57. Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30, 777–798. Hansen, U., Bode, M., and Moosmayer, D. 2004. Stakeholder theory between general and contextual approaches-A german view. Zeitschrift Für Wirtschafts-Und Unternehmensethik, 5(3), 242-254. Hoi, C. K. and Wu, Q. and Hao, Z. 2013 Is Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Associated with Tax Avoidance? Evidence from Irresponsible CSR Activities. The Accounting Review, Vol. 88, No. 6, 2025-2059. Jo, H., and Harjoto, M. 2011. Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 351–383. Jo, H., and Na, H. 2012a. Does CSR reduce firm risk? Evidence from controversial industry sectors. Journal of business ethics, 110(4), 441-456. Jo, H., and Harjoto, M. 2012b. The causal effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 53–72. Katamba, D., Kazooba,C. T., Mpisi, S.B., Nkiko, C.M., Nabatanzi‐Muyimba, Annet. K., Kekaramu, J. H. 2012. Corporate social responsibility management in Uganda: Lessons, challenges, and policy implications, International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 39 Issue: 6, 375-390. Kim, Y. T., Park, M. S. and Benson Wier, 2012. Is Earnings Quality Associated with Corporate Social Responsibility? The Accounting Review: Vol. 87, No. 3, 761-796. Malkiel, B. G. and Xu, Y. 1997. Risk and return revisited, Journal of Portfolio Management, Spring, 9-14. McWilliams, A., and Siegel, D. 2001. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28, 117–127. Porter, M. E., and Kramer M. R. 2006. Strategy and Society. Harvard Business Review 84(12):78-92. Schaltegger, S., and Burritt R. 2005. In the international yearbook of environmental and resource economics 2005/2006: A survey of current issues. Corporate sustainability 15(5):185-222. Sharfman, M. P., Fernando, C. S. 2008. Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 569-592. Sias, Richard W., 1996. Volatility and the institutional investor, Financial Analysts Journal, 13–20. Soloman, R. and Hansen K. 1985. Investors, corporate social performance and information disclosure: an empirical study. Accounting Review 53(1):94-111. Vuolteenaho, Tuomo, 2002. What drives firm-level stock returns, Journal of Finance, 57, 233– 264. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69301 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 隨著企業社會責任(CSR)之議題逐漸受到政府及社會大眾之關注,不論在學術界或實務界皆對其愈加重視,使企業社會責任成為各方利害關係人評估企業潛在風險及獲利能力的重要管道之一。本研究以 2007 年至 2017 年獲得天下雜誌《企業公民獎》之得獎企業,以及相對應之非得獎企業作為研究對象,探討企業社會責任與企業風險間之關聯性,驗證企業執行社會責任是否將降低企業風險。傳統上,企業經理人在進行投資決策時,皆以極大化股東利益作為主要考量,而從過去相關之研究文獻中發現,股東具有風險偏愛之傾向,但從事企業社會責任之企業經理人,在人格特質上,通常具備較高的道德水準,其在進行投資決策時,除了以極大化股東利益作為目標外,同時亦考慮包括如:債權人、員工等利害關係人之利益,及企業活動可能對環境所造成之影響,進而選擇較為穩健之經營模式,加上執行企業社會責任所帶來之正面效益,降低公司之企業風險。本研究實證結果發現,企業社會責任與企業風險間確實具有顯著的負向關係,並顯示兩者間之交互因果關係為企業社會責任之投入將能產生降低企業風險之效益,另外加以進行穩健性測試之結果亦大致相符。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Governments and the public recently show more interest in corporate social responsibility (CSR), so do the academics and the practice community. The increasing popularity of corporate social responsibility during the past few years has made it a conduit for stakeholders to measure the potential firm risk and profitability. The sample consists of winners of the Corporate Citizenship Award conferred by Common Wealth Magazine and their correspondence during 2007 to 2017 investigating the relationship between corporate social responsibility and firm risk. Implementation of corporate social responsibility will reduce firm risk. Traditionally, corporate managers took maximizing the interest of shareholders as the main consideration, who are risk preferred. However, the managers of corporate social responsibility firms often possess higher morality standards, make them are more concern about stakeholders, such as debtors, employees etc. and the environments rather than only considering shareholders and operate with conservatism; in addition, implementing corporate social responsibility will produce some benefits which further reduce firm risk. The research results showed that corporate social responsibility and firm risk are negatively correlated and that the implementation of corporate social responsibility will reduce firm risk. And the result of robust test showed consistence. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T03:12:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R05723023-1.pdf: 1179288 bytes, checksum: a1e2066a800a19f59c35965a62b90bb6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
摘 要 i Abstract ii 表目錄 iv 第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景及動機 1 第二節 研究目的與貢獻 4 第貳章 文獻探討 6 第一節 執行企業社會責任之動機 6 第二節 企業社會責任與企業風險相關性 8 第三節 研究假說發展 9 第參章 研究設計 11 第一節 研究方法 11 第二節 變數衡量 14 第三節 樣本選取與資料來源 19 第肆章 實證結果與分析 22 第一節 樣本敘述性統計量 22 第二節 Spearman 相關係數診斷 24 第三節 迴歸實證結果及分析 26 第四節 穩健性測試 29 第伍章 結論與建議 33 第一節 研究結論 33 第二節 研究建議 34 參考文獻 35 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 風險降低理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 企業風險 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 內生性問題 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 利害關係人 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 企業社會責任 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | risk-reduction hypothesis | en |
| dc.subject | endogenity problem | en |
| dc.subject | stakeholders | en |
| dc.subject | firm risk | en |
| dc.subject | corporate social responsibility | en |
| dc.title | 企業社會責任與公司風險之關聯性 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Corporate Social Responsibilities and Firm Risk | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 何耕宇,林岳祥 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 企業社會責任,企業風險,利害關係人,內生性問題,風險降低理論, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | corporate social responsibility,firm risk,stakeholders,endogenity problem,risk-reduction hypothesis, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 38 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201801466 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2018-07-16 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 財務金融學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 財務金融學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-107-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.15 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
