Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 資訊管理學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69266
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor吳玲玲(Ling-Ling Wu)
dc.contributor.authorKuan-Ling Liuen
dc.contributor.author劉冠伶zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-17T03:11:43Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-26
dc.date.copyright2018-07-26
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.submitted2018-07-16
dc.identifier.citationREFERENCE
[1] Ahluwalia, R., & Shiv, B. (1997). The Effects of Negative Information in the Political and Marketing Arenas: Exceptions to the Negativity Effect. Advances in Consumer Research, 24, 222.
[2] Bornemann, T., & Homburg, C. (2011). Psychological distance and the dual role of price. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(3), 490-504
[3] Boor, M. (1990). Reliability of ratings of movies by professional movie critics. Psychological Reports, 67(1), 243-257.
[4] Carmines, E. Z. (1979). Reliability and Validity Assessment. Sage Publications.
[5] Chen, Z., & Lurie, N. H. (2013). Temporal contiguity and negativity bias in the impact of online word of mouth. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(4), 463-476.
[6] Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006, August). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 345–354.
[7] Clement, M., Proppe, D., & Rott, A. (2007). Do critics make bestsellers? Opinion leaders and the success of books. Journal of Media Economics, 20(2), 77-105.
[8] Clemons, E. K., Gao, G. G., & Hitt, L. M. (2006). When online reviews meet hyperdifferentiation: A study of the craft beer industry. Journal of management information systems, 23(2), 149-171.
[9] Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers' product evaluations. Journal of marketing research, 307-319.
[10] Folkes, V. S. (1984). Consumer reactions to product failure: An attributional approach. Journal of consumer research, 10(4), 398-409.
[11] Folkes, V. S. (1988). Recent attribution research in consumer behavior: A review and new directions. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(4), 548-565.
[12] Frank, M. G., & Gilovich, T. (1989). Effect of memory perspective on retrospective causal attributions. Journal of personality and social psychology, 57(3), 399.
[13] Garvin, David A. (1984), “What Does Product Quality Really Mean,” Sloan Management Review, 26 (1), 25-43.
[14] Goel, S., Mason, W., & Watts, D. J. (2010). Real and perceived attitude agreement in social networks. Journal of personality and social psychology, 99(4), 611.
[15] He, S. X., & Bond, S. D. (2015). Why is the crowd divided? Attribution for dispersion in online word of mouth. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(6), 1509-1527.
[16] Heider, Fritz (1958), The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations, New York: Wiley.
[17] Hellier, P. K., Geursen, G. M., Carr, R. A., & Rickard, J. A. (2003). Customer repurchase intention: A general structural equation model. European journal of marketing, 37(11/12), 1762-1800.
[18] Herr, Paul M., Frank R. Kardes, and John Kim (1991), “Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product- Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (4), 454-62.
[19] Hinton, P. R., McMurray, I., & Brownlow, C. (2004). SPSS explained. Routledge.
[20] Huang, J. H., & Chen, Y. F. (2006). Herding in online product choice. Psychology & Marketing, 23(5), 413-428.
[21] Jaccard, J., & Wood, G. (1988). The effects of incomplete information on the formation of attitudes toward behavioral alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 580.
[22] Jones, Edward E., and Keith E. Davis (1965), “From Acts to Dispositions the Attribution Process in Person Perception,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2, ed. Berkowitz Leonard, New York: Academic Press, 219–66.
[23] Karniouchina, E. V. (2011). Impact of star and movie buzz on motion picture distribution and box office revenue. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28(1), 62-74.
[24] Kelley, Harold H. (1967), 'Attribution Theory in Social Psychology,' in Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, D. Levine, ed., Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.
[25] Laczniak, R. N., DeCarlo, T. E., & Ramaswami, S. N. (2001). Consumers’ responses to negative word-of-mouth communication: An attribution theory perspective. Journal of consumer Psychology, 11(1), 57-73.
[26] De Langhe, B., Fernbach, P. M., & Lichtenstein, D. R. (2015). Navigating by the stars: investigating the actual and perceived validity of online user ratings. Journal of Consumer Research, ucv047.
[27] Mandel, N. (2003). Shifting selves and decision making: The effects of self-construal priming on consumer risk-taking. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(1), 30-40.
[28] Markus, Hazel R. and Shinobu Kitayama (1991), “Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation,” Psychological Review, 98 (April), 224–53.
[29] Meyer, R. J. (1981). A model of multiattribute judgments under attribute uncertainty and informational constraint. Journal of Marketing Research, 428-441.
[30] Moe, W. W., & Trusov, M. (2011). The value of social dynamics in online product ratings forums. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 444-456.
[31] Moon, S., Bergey, P. K., & Iacobucci, D. (2010). Dynamic effects among movie ratings, movie revenues, and viewer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing, 74(1), 108-121.
[32] Muchnik, L., Aral, S., & Taylor, S. J. (2013). Social influence bias: A randomized experiment. Science, 341(6146), 647-651.
[33] Ng, S., & Houston, M. J. (2006). Exemplars or beliefs? The impact of self-view on the nature and relative influence of brand associations. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(4), 519-529.
[34] Orvis, Bruce R., John D. Cunningham, and Harold H. Kelley (1975), “A Closer Examination of Causal Inference: The Roles of Consensus, Distinctiveness, and Consistency Information,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32 (4), 605–16.
[35] Park, D. H., & Han, I. (2008, January). Integrating conflicting reviews: Attributional hypotheses of consumer response to information uncertainty depending on prior brand attitude. In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Proceedings of the 41st Annual (pp. 287-287). IEEE.
[36] Resnick, P., & Zeckhauser, R. (2002). Trust among strangers in Internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay's reputation system. In The Economics of the Internet and E-commerce (pp. 127-157). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
[37] Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological monographs: General and applied, 80(1), 1.
[38] Rosenbaum, R. M. (1973). A dimensional analysis of the perceived causes of success and failure (Doctoral dissertation, ProQuest Information & Learning).
[39] Russell, D. (1982). The Causal Dimension Scale: A measure of how individuals perceive causes. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 42(6), 1137.
[40] Schwartz, S. H. (1990). Individualism–collectivism: Critique and proposed refinements. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 139–157.
[41] Singelis, T. M., & Brown,W. J. (1995). Culture, self, and collectivist communication: Linking culture to individual behavior. Human Communication Research, 21, 354-389.
[42] Singelis, T. M., Bond, M. H., Sharkey, W. F., & Lai, C. S. Y. (1999). Unpackaging culture’s influence on self-esteem and embarrassability: The role of self-construals. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30(3), 315-341.
[43] Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1987). Social Judgment and Social Memory: The Role of Cue Diagnosticity in Negativity, Positivity, and Extremity Biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 689.
[44] Sun, Monic (2012), “How Does the Variance of Product Ratings Matter?” Management Science, 58 (4), 696–707.
[45] Sundar, S.S. and Kim, J. (2005). Interactivity and persuasion: Influencing attitudes with information and involvement. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 5(2), 5-18.
[46] Swaminathan, V., Page, K. L., & Gürhan-Canli, Z. (2007). “My” brand or “our” brand: The effects of brand relationship dimensions and self-construal on brand evaluations. Journal of consumer research, 34(2), 248-259.
[47] Trafimow, D., Triandis, H. C., & Goto, S. G. (1991). Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. Journal of personality and social psychology, 60(5), 649.
[48] Weber, E. U., & Hsee, C. (1998). Cross-cultural differences in risk perception, but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes towards perceived risk. Management science, 44(9), 1205-1217.
[49] Weber, E. U., & Hsee, C. K. (1999). Models and mosaics: Investigating cross-cultural differences in risk perception and risk preference. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6(4), 611-617.
[50] Weiner, Bernard (1971), Perceiving the Causes of Success and Failure, Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
[51] Weiner, B. (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of educational psychology, 71(1), 3.
[52] Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological review, 92(4), 548.
[53] West, Patricia M., and Susan M. Broniarczyk (1998), “Integrating Multiple Opinions: The Role of Aspiration Level on Consumer Response to Critic Consensus,” Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (1), 38–51.
[54] Wirtz, J., & Mattila, A. S. (2004). Consumer responses to compensation, speed of recovery and apology after a service failure. International Journal of service industry management, 15(2), 150-166.
[55] Yates, J. F., & Zukowski, L. G. (1976). Characterization of ambiguity in decision making. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 21(1), 19-25.
[56] Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. The Journal of marketing, 2-22.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69266-
dc.description.abstract本研究考察了自我構念以及評分正負性的作用以解釋感知網路口碑分布對消費者歸因、產品感知品質和購買意向的影響。隨著資訊科技日新月益的進步,他人意見和網路口碑分布越來越容易被消費者取得。本研究目的主要探討感知網絡口碑分布對網路消費者的產品歸因之影響。在研究中我們假設認知自我構念和評分正負性在評分分布對產品歸因的效果上有著調節作用。實驗結果高度支持假設,並顯示感知評分分布與產品歸因、穩定性歸因、控制性歸因呈負相關。換句話說,評分越分散(即意見多樣化程度越高),消費者認為評分分布反映賣家產品質量、產品質量的穩定性(可預測性)和產品質量的可控制性越低,我們稱此為評分分布效應(rating dispersion effect)。歸因也進一步影響感知品質和購買意願。最有趣的是,我們的結果還顯示感知評分分布、自我構念和評分正負性之間的三方相互作用效應:在正面評分的情況下,互依我(重視社會關係)的網路消費者的感知評分分布效應比獨立我(強調個體獨特性)的網路消費者效果來得更強; 相反的,在負面評分的情況下,獨立我的評分分布效應比互依我的人更強。本研究對於網路口碑對網路消費者的影響提出了新的看法,在學術理論上有著相當大的貢獻。實務方面,對網路平台上之店家與銷售者也有很大貢獻。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe advancement of information technologies allows consumers to reach opinions of others and also the distribution of possibly diverse opinions. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of perceived eWOM dispersion on online consumers’ attributions of product quality. It is hypothesized in this study that perceived self-construal and review rating valence play the role of moderators for the dispersion effects on product attributions. The results highly support the hypotheses and show that perceived dispersion is negatively related to product-related, stability, and controllability attributions. That is, the more disperse of review ratings (i.e. a higher degree of diversity in opinions), the less likely the online consumers think that the review ratings reflect the product quality, the stability (predictability) of product quality and the manageability of product quality by the seller. The attributions further affect perceived quality and purchase intention. Most interestingly, the results also show a three-way interaction effect among perceived rating dispersion, perceived self-construal, and rating valence: in the case of positive ratings, the dispersion effect is stronger for interdependent people (who define themselves in terms of their social identity) than for independent people (who defines themselves in terms of their own uniqueness), whereas, in the case of negative review ratings, the dispersion effect is stronger for independent people than for interdependent people. This research investigates the roles of review rating valence as well as self-construal types of online consumers to explain the effects of perceived eWOM dispersion on customers' attributions, perceived quality, and purchase intention.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T03:11:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-107-R04725013-1.pdf: 1692945 bytes, checksum: 0cb55b4c6b47cbe0566db6460b77fc9f (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書 #
誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii
ABSTRACT iii
CONTENTS iv
LIST OF FIGURES vi
LIST OF TABLES vii
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
Chapter 2 Literature Review 4
2.1 Dispersion of Review Rating 4
2.2 Attribution Theory 5
2.2.1 Locus 6
2.2.2 Stability 7
2.2.3 Controllability 8
2.3 Moderating Role of Self-Construal 9
2.4 Product Evaluation 15
2.4.1 Perceived Quality 15
2.4.2 Purchase Intention 15
Chapter 3 Methodology 19
3.1 Research Design 19
3.2 Participants 19
3.3 Procedure 21
3.4 Materials 22
3.5 Measurements of Dependent Variables 23
Chapter 4 Empirical Results 25
4.1 Reliability of Measurement 25
4.2 Test of Hypotheses 25
Chapter 5 Conclusion 34
5.1 Conclusion and Implications 34
5.2 Limitations and Future Work 35
REFERENCE 37
Appendix A 43
Appendix B 44
Appendix C 46
Appendix D 49
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject網路口碑zh_TW
dc.subject評分正負性zh_TW
dc.subject自我構念zh_TW
dc.subject歸因理論zh_TW
dc.subject評分分布zh_TW
dc.subject電子商務zh_TW
dc.subjectattributionen
dc.subjecte-commerceen
dc.subjectself-construalen
dc.subjecteWOMen
dc.subjectrating valenceen
dc.subjectrating dispersionen
dc.title自我構念與評分正負性對網路口碑分布效應之影響zh_TW
dc.titleWalking My Way? The Role of Self-Construal and Rating Valence in the Effects of Rating Dispersion on EWOMen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear106-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee翁崇雄(Chorng-Shyong Ong),盧希鵬(Hsi-Peng Lu)
dc.subject.keyword電子商務,網路口碑,評分分布,歸因理論,自我構念,評分正負性,zh_TW
dc.subject.keyworde-commerce,eWOM,rating dispersion,attribution,self-construal,rating valence,en
dc.relation.page55
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201801595
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2018-07-17
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept資訊管理學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:資訊管理學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-107-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.65 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved