請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69242完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林新智(Hsin-Chih Lin) | |
| dc.contributor.author | He-Ying Jiang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 江和穎 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T03:11:13Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2018-07-23 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2018-07-23 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2018-07-17 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. B.A. Szost, R.H. Vegter, And Pedro E.J. Rivera-Di´Az-Del-Castillo, “Hydrogen-Trapping Mechanisms In Nanostructured Steels”, Metallurgical And Materials Transactions A, Volume 44A, October 2013, pp. 4542 - 4550
2. S. Keeler, M Kimchi, “Advanced High Strength Steels Application Guide Line Version 5.0”, World Auto Steel, 2014 3. C.M. Tamarellei, “AHSS 101:The Evolving Use of Advanced High-Strength Steels for Automotive Applications”, Steel Market Development Institute, 2011. 4. M. S. Rashid, ”DUAL PHASE STEELS”, Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci. 1981. 11:245-66 5. C.C. Tasan, M. Diehl, D. Yan, M. Bechtold, F. Roters, L. Schemmann, C. Zheng, N. Peranio, D. Ponge, M. Koyama, K. Tsuzaki, and D. Raabe, “An Overview of Dual-Phase Steels: Advances in Microstructure-Oriented Processing and Micromechanically Guided Design”, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2015. 45:391–431 6. D. J. Schaeffler, “Introduction To Advanced High Strength Steel”, Stamping Journal, 2004 7. G. B. Olson, M. Cohen, “Kinetics of Nucleation Strain-Induced Martensitic”, METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS A VOLUME 6A, APRIL 1975 8. B. C. De Cooman, O. Kwon, K. G. Chin, ”State-of-the-knowledge on TWIP steel”, Materials Science and Technology 2012 VOL 28 NO 5 9. American Welding Society, “Effect of Chemical Elements in Steel” 10. Global Metals, “Effects of Alloying Elements” 11. M. Maalekian, “The Effects of Alloying Elements on Steels (I)”, October 2007 12. Reed-Hill and R. E, “Physical Metallurgy Principles 3rd edition”, 1994. 13. J. Haglund, G. Grimvall, T. Jarlborg, “Electronic structure, x-ray photoemission spectra, and transport properties of Fe3C (cementite)”, PHYSICAL REVIEW B VOLUME 44, NUMBER 7 15 AUGUST 199 14. G. Krauss, “Martensite in steel: strength and structure, Materials Science and Engineering A”, 1999, pp. 40 - 57 15. R. A. Grange, C. R. Hribal, L. F. Porter, “Hardness of Tempered Martensite in Carbon and Low-Alloy Steels”, Metallurgical Transactions A, Volume 8A, November 1977, pp. 1775 - 1786 16. G. R. Speich, W. C. Leslie, “Tempering of Steel”, Metallurgical Transactions, Volume 3, May 1972, pp. 1043 - 1054 17. George Krauss, “Tempering of Lath Martensite in Low and Medium Carbon Steels: Assessment and Challenges”, steel research int. 88 (2017) No. 10 18. L. Morsdorf, O. Jeannin, D. Barbier, M. Mitsuhara, D. Raabe, C.C. Tasan, “Multiple mechanisms of lath martensite plasticity”, Acta Materialia 121 (2016) 202e214 19. C. Capdevila, F. G. Caballero, C. García De Andrés, “Determination of Ms Temperature in Steels: A Bayesian Neural Network Model”, ISIJ International, Volume 42, No. 8, 2002, pp. 894 - 902 20. N. Kobasko, M. Aronov, J. Powell, J.Vanas, “Intensive Quenching Of Steel Parts: Equipment And Method”, Proceedings of the 7th IASME / WSEAS International Conference on Heat Transfer, Thermal Engineering And Environment ,August 2009 21. G. Thomas, “Retained Austenite and Tempered Martensite Embrittlement”, Metallurgical Transactions A, Volume 9A, March 1978, pp. 439 - 451 22. B. V. Narasimha Rao, “On the Orientation Relationships Between Retained Austenite and 'Lath' Martensite”, METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS A VOLUME 10A, MAY 1979 23. K.A. Taylor, G.B. Olson, M. Cohen, J.B. Vander Sande, “Carbide Precipitation during Stage I Tempering of Fe-Ni-C Martensites”, Metallurgical Transactions A, Volume 20A, December 1989, pp. 2749 - 2766 24. S. Murphy, J. A. Whitman, “The Precipitation of Epsilon-Carbide in Twinned Martensite”, METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS VOLUME 1, APRIL 1970 25. R. C. Thomson, M. K. Miller, “Carbide Precipitation In Martensite During The Early Stages Of Tempering Cr- And Mo-Containing Low Alloy Steels”, Acta mater. Volume 46, No. 6, 1998, pp. 2203 - 2213 26. T. Ohmura,T. Hara, K. Tsuzaki, “Relationship Between Nanohardness And Microstructures In High-Purity Fe-C As-Quenched And Quench-Tempered Martensite”, J Mater. Res., Volume 18, No. 6, June 2003, pp. 1465 – 1471 27. B. D. Craig, G. Krauss, “The Structure of Tempered Martensite and Its Susceptibility to Hydrogen Stress Cracking”, Metallurgical Transactions A, Volume 11A, November 1980, pp. 1799 - 1809 28. G. Thomas, “Retained Austenite and Tempered Martensite Embrittlement”, METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS A VOLUME 9A, MARCH 1978 29. A. Burnoush, “Hydrogen Embrittlement”, December 2011 30. S. Lynch, “Hydrogen embrittlement phenomena and mechanisms”, Corros Rev, Volume 30, 2012, pp. 105 - 123 31. M.R Louthan, “Hydrogen Embrittlement of Metals: A Primer for the Failure Analyst”, Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, Volume 8, 2008, pp. 289 - 307. 32. J.O.M Bockris, “Comprehensive treatise of electrochemistry”, Springer, 1981 33. H. Wroblowa, B.J. Piersma, J.O.M. Bockris, “Studies of the mechanism of the anodic oxidation of ethylene in acid and alkaline media”, Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, Volume6, 1959, pp. 401 - 416. 34. J.PP. Hirth, “Effects of hydrogen on the properties of iron and steel”, Metallurgical Transactions A, 1980. Volume 11, pp. 861 - 890. 35. J. Völkl, G. Alefeld, “Diffusion in solids”, Academic Press, 1975, pp. 231 - 302 36. H.J. Christ, M. Decker, and S. Zeitler, “Hydrogen Diffusion Coefficients In The Titanium Alloys”, Metall. and Mater. Trans. A, Volume 31A, 2000, pp. 1507 – 1517 37. S. Taketomi, R. Matsumoto, N. Miyazaki, “Atomistic study of the competitive relationship between edge dislocation motion and hydrogen diffusion in alpha iron”, J. Mater. Res., Vol. 26, No. 10, May 28, 2011 38. Y. Momotani, A. Shibata, D. Terada, N. Tsuji, “Effect of strain rate on hydrogen embrittlement in low-carbon martensitic steel”, international journal of hydrogen energy 42 (2017) 3371-3379 39. Y. Murakami, S. Matsuoka, “Effect of hydrogen on fatigue crack growth of metals”, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 77 (2010) 1926–1940 40. P. J. Ferreira, I. M. Robertson, H. K. Birnbaum, “HYDROGEN EFFECTS ON THE INTERACTION BETWEEN DISLOCATIONS”, Acta mater. Vol. 46, No. 5, pp. 1749-1757, 1998 41. A. Pundt, R. Kirchheim, “Hydrogen in metals: microstructural aspects”, Annual Rev. Mater. Res., Volume 36, 2006, pp. 555 - 608 42. S. M. Myers, M. I. Baskes, H. K. Birnbaum, etal, “Hydrogen interactions with defects in crystalline solids”, Reviews of Modern Physics, Volume 64, No. 2, April 1992, pp. 559 - 618 43. Y.H. Fan, B. Zhang, H.L. Yi, G.S. Hao, Y.Y. Sun, J.Q. Wang, E.-H. Han, W. Ke, “The role of reversed austenite in hydrogen embrittlement fracture of S41500 martensitic stainless steel”, Acta Materialia 139 (2017) 188-195 44. K. G. Solheim, J. K. Solberg, J. Walmsley, F. Rosenqvist, T. H. Bjørnå, “The role of retained austenite in hydrogen embrittlement of supermartensitic stainless steel”, Engineering Failure Analysis 34 (2013) 140–149 45. D.G. Westlake, “A generalized model for hydrogen embrittlement”, Trans ASM, Volume 62, 1969, pp. 1000 - 1006 46. H.K. Birnbaum, “Mechanisms of hydrogen related fracture of metals”, TMS, 1990, pp. 639 - 658 47. H.K. Birnbaum, I.M. Robertson, P. Sofronis, and D. Teter, “Mechanisms of hydrogen related fracture - a review”, Corrosion-deformation interactions, 1997, pp. 172 - 195 48. E.J. Song, “Hydrogen Desorption in Steels”, Pohang University of Science and Technology, 2015 49. S. Gahr, M. Grossbeck, H. Birnbaum, “Hydrogen Embrittlement of Nb -Macroscopic Behavior At Low Temperatures”, Acta Metallurgica, Volume 25, 1997, pp. 125 - 134. 50. C. Zapffe, C. Sims, “Hydrogen Embrittlement, Internal Stress and Defects In Steel”, Trans. AIME, Volume 145, 1941, pp. 225 - 271. 51. P. Escobar, “Internal and Surface Damage of Multiphase Steels and Pure Iron after Electrochemical Hydrogen Charging”, Corrosion Science, Volume 53, 2011, pp. 3166 - 3176. 52. H. Rogers, “Hydrogen Embrittlement of Metals Atomic Hydrogen From A Variety of Sources Reduces The Ductility of Many Metals”, Science, Volume 159, 1968, pp. 1057 - 1064. 53. L.B. Pfeil, “The Effect of Occluded Hydrogen on The Tensile Strength of Iron”, Proc. Roy. Soc., A112, 1926, pp. 128 - 195, 54. A.R. Troiano, “The Role of Hydrogen And Other Interstitials in The Mechanical Behavior of Metals”, Trans. ASM, Volume 52, 1960, pp. 54 - 80. 55. H. Vehoff, W. Rothe, “Gaseous Hydrogen Embrittlement In Fesi-And Ni-Single Crystals”, Acta Metallurgica, Vol. 31, 1983, pp. 1781 - 1793. 56. R.A Oriani, “Hydrogen-The versatile embrittler”, Corrosion, Volume 43, 1987, pp. 390 - 397 57. X. Chen and W.W. Gerberich, “The kinetics and micromechanics of hydrogen-assisted cracking in Fe-3 Pct Si single crystals, Metall”, Trans. A, Volume 22A, 1991, pp. 59 - 70. 58. C.D. Beachem, “A new model for hydrogen assisted cracking (Hydrogen embrittlement)”, Metall. Trans., Volume 3, 1972, pp. 437 - 451 59. H.K. Birnbaum, P. Sofronis, “Hydrogen-Enhanced Localized Plasticity - A Mechanism For Hydrogen-Related Fracture”, Mater.Sci. Eng., Volume A176, 1994, pp. 191 - 202 60. H.K. Birnbaum, I.M. Robertson, P. Sofronis, “Hydrogen effects on plasticity”, Kluwer Academic Publ, 2000, pp. 367 - 381 61. G. Lu, Q. Zhang, N. Kioussis, E. Kaxiras, “Hydrogen enhanced local plasticity in aluminum: an ab-initio study”, Phys. Rev., 2001. 62. I.M. Robertson, “The effect of hydrogen on dislocation dynamics”, Eng. Fract. Mech., Volume 68, 2001, pp. 671 - 692 63. H. Asahi, D. Hirakami, S. Yamasaki, “Hydrogen trapping behavior in vanadium-added steel. ISIJ International”, Volume 43, 2003, pp 527-533. 64. H. Bhadeshia, “Prevention of hydrogen embrittlement in steels. ISIJ International”, Volume 56, 2016, pp 24-36. 65. F.G. Wei, T. Hara, T. Tsuchida, K. Tsuzaki, “Hydrogen trapping in quenched and tempered 0.42c-0.30ti steel containing bimodally dispersed tic particles”, ISIJ International, Volume 43, 2003, pp 539-547. 66. H. Hagi, “Effect of substitutional alloying elements (al, si, v, cr, mn, co, ni, mo) on diffusion coefficient of hydrogen in alpha-iron”, Materials Transactions, JIM, Volume 33, 1992, pp 472-479. 67. J. Pietikainen, “Considerations about tempered martensite embrittlement”, Materials Science and Engineering A, Volume 273, 1999, pp 466-470 68. S. Lee, D.Y. Lee, R.J. Asaro, “Correlation of Microstructure and Tempered Martensite Embrittlement in Two 4340 Steels”, Metallurgical Transactions A, Volume 20A, June 1989, pp 1089-1104 69. B.C. Kim, S. Lee, D.Y. Lee, N.J. Kim, “In Situ Fracture Observations on Tempered Martensite Embrittlement in an AISI 4340 Steel”, Metallurgical Transactions A, Volume 22A, August 1991, pp 1889-1893 70. J. A. Peters, J. V. Bee, B. Kolk, G. G. Garrett, “On The Mechanisms Of Tempered Martensite Embrittlement”, Acta metal, Volume 37, No. 2, 1989, pp. 675-686 71. R. M. Horn, R. O. Ritchie, “Mechanisms of Tempered Martensite Embrittlement in Low Alloy Steels”, Metallurgical Transactions A, Volume 9a, August 1978, pp 1039-1054 72. F. Zia-Ebrahimp, G. Krauss, “Mechanisms Of Tempered Martensite Embrittlement In Medium-Carbon Steels”, Acta metal, Volume 32, No. 10, 1984, pp. 1767-1777 73. K. Yoshino, C. J. McMahon, JR, “The Cooperative Relation between Temper Embrittlement and Hydrogen Embrittlement in a High Strength Steel”, METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS VOLUME 5~FEBRUARY 1974 74. A.F. Liu, “Mechanics and Mechanisms of Fracture: An Introduction”, ASM International, 2005, pp 62-80 75. A. Nagao, C. D. Smith, M. Dadfarnia, P. Sofronis, I. M. Robertson, “The role of hydrogen in hydrogen embrittlement fracture of lath martensitic steel”, Acta Materialia 60 (2012) 5182–5189 76. A. Shibata, T. Matsuoka, A. Ueno, N. Tsuji, “Fracture surface topography analysis of the hydrogen-related fracture propagation process in martensitic steel”, Int J Fract (2017) 205:73–82 77. H.E. Kissinger, “Reaction Kinetics in Differential Thermal Analysis”, ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY VOL. 29, NO. U, NOVEMBER 1957 78. W.Y. Choo, J.Y. Lee, “Thermal Analysis of Trapped Hydrogen in Pure Iron”, METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS A VOLUME 13A, JANUARY 1982 79. D. Pérez Escobar, K. Verbekena, L. Duprezc, M. Verhaegea, “Evaluation of hydrogen trapping in high strength steels by thermal desorption spectroscopy”, Materials Science and Engineering A 551 (2012) 50–58 80. J. R. Yang, H. K. D. H. Bhadeshia, “The Dislocation Density of Acicular Ferrite in Steel Welds”, WELDING RESEARCH SUPPLEMENT AUGUST 1990 81. X. Zhu, W. Li, T.Y. Hsu, S. Zhou, L. Wang, X. Jin, “Improved resistance to hydrogen embrittlement in a high-strength steel by quenching–partitioning–tempering treatment”, Scripta Materialia 97 (2015) 21–24 82. H. K. D. H. Bhadeshia, “Prevention of Hydrogen Embrittlement in Steels”, ISIJ International, Vol. 56 (2016), No. 1, pp. 24–3 83. D. H. Shim, T. Lee, J. Lee, H. J. Lee, J. Y. Yoo, C. S. Lee, “Increased resistance to hydrogen embrittlement in high-strength steels composed of granular bainite”, Materials Science & Engineering A 700 (2017) 473–480 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69242 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 8625M為鎳鉻鉬系高強度低合金鋼(HSLA steel),於淬火態強度可達1600 MPa,在常溫下的衝擊值亦可達45 J,且為麻田散鐵鋼,可透過回火處理作機械性質上之調整。然而,高強度鋼種易受到氫脆影響,尤其又以麻田散鐵鋼最為嚴重,故本研究以陰極電化學法對8625M鋼材進行充氫,評估其在不同回火條件下充氫前後機械性質之變化,並透過SEM、TEM、TDS等等分析,釐清在不同回火條件下8625M鋼材之顯微組織、氫捕集位置與其氫脆現象之關聯性。
由實驗結果可知,在任何回火條件下,8625M鋼材最主要之氫捕集位置為差排,氫捕集活化能約為20 kJ/mol,屬於可擴散氫。在水淬態時,材料擁有最高密度之差排,其充氫後之吸氫量亦最多,大量可擴散氫造成水淬態之氫脆現象最為嚴重。200°C回火後則差排密度降低,吸氫量亦跟著降低,較少的吸氫量使得其有著本研究中次低的UTS loss以及最高的充氫後UTS。300°C以及400°C時,氫脆現象又開始變得嚴重,此時殘留沃斯田鐵分解為板片之間細長且硬脆的雪明碳鐵,其形貌容易使得應力集中並造成板片間強度下降,並在氫的作用下於更低的抗拉強度變造成氫致破壞。500°C回火後,這些細長硬脆的雪明碳鐵有明顯的球化,其形貌較不會造成其板片強度下降,且有著更低的差排密度與吸氫量,使得其有著本研究中最低的UTS loss以及最高的充氫後破斷應變。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | 8625M steel is a Ni-Cr-Mo high strength low alloy steel (HSLA steel). In quenching state, the ultimate tensile strength can reach 1600 MPa, and the impact energy at room temperature can reach 45J. Moreover, as a martensitic steel, the mechanical property of 8625M can be adjusted by tempering. However, high strength steel is prone to hydrogen embrittlement, especially the martensitic steel. In this study, we use the electrochemical method to charge hydrogen into the 8625M steel, and measure the ultimate tensile strength by the tensile test in order to evaluate the hydrogen embrittlement effect on the mechanical properties of 8625M steels. Meanwhile, the microstructure observation by SEM and TEM and the hydrogen trapping energy measurement by TDS are also conducted to clarify the relationship between the tempering temperature, microstructure, trapping site and the hydrogen embrittlement effect on mechanical property.
Experimental results show that the dominant hydrogen trapping site of the 8625M steel at any tempering temperature is dislocation, of which trapping energy is about 20 kJ/mol, indicating that the hydrogen trapped in the dislocation is diffusible. In quenching state, 8625M has the highest dislocation density and the highest hydrogen content after hydrogen charged. The most diffusible hydrogen cause 8625M to exhibit severe hydrogen embrittlement in the quenching state. After 200°C tempering, the dislocation density drops, as well as the hydrogen content after hydrogen charged, and this make 8625M has lower UTS loss after 200°C tempering. After 300°C and 400°C tempering, the hydrogen embrittlement phenomenon becomes serious again. In these states, the retained austenite decomposes into sharp, needle-like inter-lath cementite, which may cause stress concentration and weak the strength of the lath, and make 8625M fracture at lower stress after hydrogen charged. After 500°C tempering, the 8625M has the lowest dislocation density, and the inter-lath cementite become spheroidized, making 8625M in 500°C tempering state has the lowest UTS loss and the highest elongation after hydrogen charged in this study. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T03:11:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R05527004-1.pdf: 7886965 bytes, checksum: 327e44ce4310705217c567499b929e29 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 II
摘要 III Abstract IV 目錄 VI 圖目錄 IX 表目錄 XI 第一章 前言 1 第二章 文獻回顧 2 2.1 先進高強度鋼(AHSS)介紹 2 2.1.1 雙相鋼 3 2.1.2 多相鋼 3 2.1.3 麻田散鐵鋼 4 2.1.4 變態誘發塑性鋼 (TRIP Steel) 4 2.1.5 雙晶誘發塑性鋼 (TWIP Steel) 5 2.2 YOKE 8625M介紹 5 2.3 合金添加 6 2.3.1 碳 6 2.3.2 矽 6 2.3.3 錳 6 2.3.4 鎳 6 2.3.5 鉻 7 2.3.6 鉬 7 2.3.7 鋁 7 2.3.8 磷 7 2.3.9 硫 7 2.4 鋼鐵組織介紹 8 2.4.1 麻田散鐵 8 2.4.2 自回火麻田散鐵 (auto-tempered martensite) 11 2.4.3 殘留沃斯田鐵 11 2.4.4 麻田散鐵的回火處理 13 2.5 氫脆現象 16 2.6 氫進入材料內部 18 2.6.1 氫氣分子 18 2.6.2 氫離子H+ 19 2.6.3 幫助氫進入材料的物質 19 2.7 氫在材料內的擴散 19 2.8 氫捕集位置 21 2.8.1 殘留沃斯田鐵 22 2.9 氫脆理論 23 2.9.1 氫化物形成理論(Hydride Formation) 23 2.9.2 內壓理論(Internal Pressure) 24 2.9.3 氫致鍵結弱化理論(Hydrogen Enhanced Decohesion, HEDE) 25 2.9.4 氫致局部塑性變形理論(Hydrogen Enhanced Local Plasticity, HELP) 26 2.9.5 混合理論 28 2.10 元素添加對氫脆的影響 29 2.11 回火脆性 30 2.12 材料的破斷面分析 31 2.12.1 渦穴破斷(Dimple) 31 2.12.2 劈裂破斷(Cleavage) 32 2.12.3 半劈裂破斷(Quasi-Cleavage) 32 2.12.4 沿晶破斷(Intergranular Fracture) 34 2.12.5 混合型破斷 34 2.13 熱脫氫(thermal desorption spectroscopy, TDS) 38 第三章 實驗方法 41 3.1 實驗流程設計與目的 41 3.2 8625M合金設計與成分分析 41 3.3 熱膨脹儀實驗(dilatometer test) 42 3.4 鋼材熱處理 42 3.5 拉伸試片加工 43 3.6 金相觀察實驗 43 3.7 TEM觀察實驗 44 3.8 電化學充氫 44 3.9 硬度試驗 45 3.10 一般拉伸與充氫拉伸 46 3.11 熱脫氫分析 46 第四章 結果與討論 47 4.1 成分分析 47 4.2熱膨脹儀實驗(dilatometer test) 47 4.3麻田散鐵與回火麻田散鐵金相觀察 48 4.4 各回火階段TEM影像觀察 50 4.4.1 自回火麻田散鐵板片 50 4.4.2殘留沃斯田鐵觀察 51 4.4.3碳化物析出觀察 52 4.4.4差排觀察與差排密度量測 56 4.5熱脫氫試驗 58 4.5.1氫含量分析 58 4.5.2氫捕集位置之活化能計算 59 4.6硬度試驗 66 4.7拉伸試驗 67 4.8充氫拉伸試驗 69 4.9一般拉伸破斷面觀察 73 4.10充氫拉伸破斷面觀察 76 第五章 結論 80 參考文獻 82 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 麻田散鐵鋼 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 8625M鋼材 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 回火處理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 氫脆 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 氫捕集位置 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 熱脫氫 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | TDS | en |
| dc.subject | 8625M steel | en |
| dc.subject | martensitic steel | en |
| dc.subject | tempering | en |
| dc.subject | hydrogen embrittlement | en |
| dc.subject | hydrogen trapping site | en |
| dc.title | 回火熱處理對SAE 8625M高強度低合金鋼氫脆性質影響之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Influence of tempering treatment on the hydrogen embrittlement of SAE 8625M HSLA steel | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 顏鴻威,薛人愷,林昆明,蔡履文 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 8625M鋼材,麻田散鐵鋼,回火處理,氫脆,氫捕集位置,熱脫氫, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | 8625M steel,martensitic steel,tempering,hydrogen embrittlement,hydrogen trapping site,TDS, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 87 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201801618 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2018-07-17 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 材料科學與工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 材料科學與工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-107-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 7.7 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
