Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 資訊管理學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69241
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor翁崇雄(Chorng-Shyong Ong)
dc.contributor.authorYu-Ta Laien
dc.contributor.author賴郁達zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-17T03:11:12Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-19
dc.date.copyright2018-07-19
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.submitted2018-07-18
dc.identifier.citation[1] Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: recent developments and future research. Journal of management, 37(4), 1019-1042.
[2] Agrawal, A., Catalini, C., & Goldfarb, A. (2014). Some simple economics of crowdfunding. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 14(1), 63-97.
[3] Kuppuswamy, V., & Bayus, B. L. (2015). Crowdfunding creative ideas: The dynamics of project backers in Kickstarter.
[4] Colombo, M. G., Franzoni, C., & Rossi‐Lamastra, C. (2015). Internal social capital and the attraction of early contributions in crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 75-100.
[5] Cai-Cing Chen (2017). The Influence of Consumption Value on Intention to Invest in Crowdfunding Projects
[6] Crowdfunding Annual Report by Backer-Founder (2015), Retrieved from: https://annual-report.crowdwatch.tw/2015
[7] Wymenga, P., Spanikova, V., Barker, A., Konings, J., & Canton, E. (2012). EU SMEs in 2012: At the crossroads. Annual report on small and medium-sized enterprises in the EU, 2011/12. Retrieved from SME Performance Review: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme/facts-figures-analysis/performance-review/files/supporting-documents/2012/annual-report_en.pdf.
[8] Kane, T. J. (2010). The importance of startups in job creation and job destruction.
[9] Beck, T., & Demirguc-Kunt, A. (2006). Small and medium-size enterprises: Access to finance as a growth constraint. Journal of Banking & finance, 30(11), 2931-2943.
[10] De Buysere, K., Gajda, O., Kleverlaan, R., Marom, D., & Klaes, M. (2012). A framework for European crowdfunding. European Crowdfunding Network.
[11] Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2010, June). Crowdfunding: An industrial organization perspective. In Prepared for the workshop Digital Business Models: Understanding Strategies’, held in Paris on June (pp. 25-26).
[12] Schwienbacher, A., & Larralde, B. (2010). Crowdfunding of small entrepreneurial ventures.
[13] Kirby, E., & Worner, S. (2014). Crowd-funding: An infant industry growing fast. IOSCO Research Department.
[14] Cumming, D., Leboeuf, G., & Schwienbacher, A. (2015). Crowdfunding models: Keep-it-all vs. all-or-nothing.
[15] Ordanini, A., Miceli, L., Pizzetti, M., & Parasuraman, A. (2011). Crowd-funding: transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms. Journal of service management, 22(4), 443-470.
[16] Harrison, T., Waite, K., & Hunter, G. L. (2006). The internet, information and empowerment. European Journal of Marketing, 40(9/10), 972-993.
[17] Constantinides, E., & Fountain, S. J. (2008). Web 2.0: Conceptual foundations and marketing issues. Journal of direct, data and digital marketing practice, 9(3), 231-244.
[18] Andersen, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0?: ideas, technologies and implications for education (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1-64). Bristol: JISC.
[19] Labrecque, L. I., vor dem Esche, J., Mathwick, C., Novak, T. P., & Hofacker, C. F. (2013). Consumer power: Evolution in the digital age. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27(4), 257-269.
[20] Veuger, J. W. (2015). Crowdfunding: the role of platforms in project success (Bachelor's thesis, University of Twente).
[21] Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of business venturing, 29(1), 1-16.
[22] Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2014). Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Journal of business venturing, 29(5), 585-609.
[23] Tomczak, A., & Brem, A. (2013). A conceptualized investment model of crowdfunding. Venture Capital, 15(4), 335-359.
[24] Zvilichovsky, D., Inbar, Y., & Barzilay, O. (2015). Playing both sides of the market: Success and reciprocity on crowdfunding platforms.
[25] Gerber, E. M., & Hui, J. (2013). Crowdfunding: Motivations and deterrents for participation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 20(6), 34.
[26] Gerber, E. M., Hui, J. S., & Kuo, P. Y. (2012, February). Crowdfunding: Why people are motivated to post and fund projects on crowdfunding platforms. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Design, Influence, and Social Technologies: Techniques, Impacts and Ethics (Vol. 2, No. 11)
[27] Zheng, H., Li, D., Wu, J., & Xu, Y. (2014). The role of multidimensional social capital in crowdfunding: A comparative study in China and US. Information & Management, 51(4), 488-496..
[28] Liu, J., Yang, L., Wang, Z., & Hahn, J. (2015). Winner Takes All? The “Blockbuster Effect” in Crowdfunding Platforms.
[29] Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of business venturing, 29(1), 1-16.
[30] Lu, C. T., Xie, S., Kong, X., & Yu, P. S. (2014, February). Inferring the impacts of social media on crowdfunding. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining (pp. 573-582). ACM.
[31] Bretschneider, U., Knaub, K., & Wieck, E. (2014). Motivations for crowdfunding: What drives the crowd to invest in start-ups?.
[32] Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
[33] Casamatta, C., & Haritchabalet, C. (2013). Dealing with venture capitalists: shopping around or exclusive negotiation. Review of Finance, 18(5), 1743-1773.
[34] Cumming, D. J., and S. A. Johan. 2009. Venture Capital and Private Equity Contracting: An International Perspective. Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
[35] Pope, N. D. 2011. “Crowdfunding Microstartups: It’s Time for the Securities and Exchange Commission to Approve Small Offering.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law 13 (4): 101–129.
[36] Pope, N. D. (2010). Crowdfunding microstartups: It's time for the securities and exchange commission to approve a small offering exemption. U. Pa. J. Bus. L., 13, 973.
[37] Hemer, J. (2011). A snapshot on crowdfunding (No. R2/2011). Working papers firms and region.
[38] Bruton, G., Khavul, S., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2015). New financial alternatives in seeding entrepreneurship: Microfinance, crowdfunding, and peer‐to‐peer innovations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 9-26.
[39] Lewin, K. (1943). Forces behind food habits and methods of change. Bulletin of the national Research Council, 108(1043), 35-65.
[40] Bilkey, W. J. (1953). A psychological approach to consumer behavior analysis. Journal of Marketing, 18(1), 18-25.
[41] Wilkie, L. (1994). Consumer Behavior, 4th.
[42] Modeling and some findings. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 357– 373.
[43] Peter, J. P., & Tarpey Sr, L. X. (1975). A comparative analysis of three consumer decision strategies. Journal of consumer research, 2(1), 29-37.
[44] Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., & Rao, H. R. (2008). A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decision support systems, 44(2), 544-564.
[45] Chen, Z., & Dubinsky, A. J. (2003). A conceptual model of perceived customer value in e‐commerce: A preliminary investigation. Psychology & Marketing, 20(4), 323-347.
[46] Ghosh, A., & McLafferty, S. L. (1987). Location strategies for retail and service firms. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
[47] Buyukkurt, B. K. (1986). Integration of serially sampled price information:
[48] Zhang, H., Lu, Y., Shi, X., Tang, Z., & Zhao, Z. (2012). Mood and social presence on consumer purchase behaviour in C2C E-commerce in Chinese culture. Electronic Markets, 22(3), 143-154.
[49] Park, J., Lennon, S. J., & Stoel, L. (2005). On‐line product presentation: Effects on mood, perceived risk, and purchase intention. Psychology & Marketing, 22(9), 695-719.
[50] Miranda, S. M., & Saunders, C. S. (2003). The social construction of meaning: An alternative perspective on information sharing. Information systems research, 14(1), 87-106.
[51] Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications.
[52] Steinfield, C. W. (1986). Computer-mediated communication in an organizational setting: Explaining task-related and socioemotional uses. Annals of the International Communication Association, 9(1), 777-804.
[53] Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. The Journal of marketing, 2-22.
[54] Rao, A. R., & Monroe, K. B. (1989). The effect of price, brand name, and store name on buyers' perceptions of product quality: An integrative review. Journal of marketing Research, 351-357.
[55] Bloch, P. H., & Richins, M. L. (1983). A theoretical model for the study of product importance perceptions. The Journal of Marketing, 69-81.
[56] Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2000). Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of marketing research, 37(1), 60-71.
[57] Childers, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2001). Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. Journal of retailing, 77(4), 511-535.
[58] Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer behavior as risk taking. In Proceedings of the 43rd National Conference of the American Marketing Assocation, June 15, 16, 17, Chicago, Illinois, 1960. American Marketing Association.
[59] Kogan, N. and Wallach, M.A. (1964), Risk-taking: A Study in Cognition and Personality, Holt, Rhinehart & Winston, New York, NY.
[60] Cox, D. F. Risk handling in consumer behavior -- an intensive study of two cases. In D. F. Cox (Ed.), Risk-taking and information-handling in consumer behavior. Boston: Harvard University Press, 1967. PP. 34-81.
[61] Peter, J.P. and Ryan, M.J. (1976), “An investigation of perceived risk at the brand level”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 13, pp. 184-8.
[62] Roselius, T. (1971). Consumer rankings of risk reduction methods. The journal of marketing, 56-61.
[63] Jacoby, J., & Kaplan, L. B. (1972). The components of perceived risk. ACR Special Volumes.
[64] Cunningham, S. M. (1967). Perceived risk as a factor in informal consumer communications. Risk taking and information handling in consumer behavior, 265-288.
[65] Arndt, J. Profiling consumer innovators. In J. Arndt (Ed.), Insights into consumer behavior. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1968. Pp. 71-83.
[66] Perry, M. and Hamm, B. C. Canonical analysis of relations between socioeconomic risk and personal influence in purchase decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 1969, 6, 351-354.
[67] Lutz, R. J. and Reilly, P. J. An exploration of the effects of perceived social and performance risk on consumer information acquisition. In S. Ward and P. Wright (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research. Volume 1. Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Convention of the Association for Consumer Research . 1973 393-405.
[68] David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. The American economic review, 75(2), 332-337.
[69] Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster.
[70] Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
[71] Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information systems research, 2(3), 192-222.
[72] Ostlund, L. E. (1969). Product perceptions and predispositional factors as determinants of innovative behavior (Doctoral dissertation, Graduate School of Business Administration, George F. Baker Foundation, Harvard University).
[73] BOLTON, W. (1982). The perception and potential adoption of Channel 2000: implications for diffusion theory and videotex technology.
[74] Holloway, R. E. (1979). PERCEPTIONS OF AN INNOVATION: SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY PROJECT ADVANCE.
[75] Hurt, H. T., & Hibbard, R. (1989). The systematic measurement of the perceived characteristics of information technologies I: Microcomputers as innovations. Communication Quarterly, 37(3), 214-222.
[76] Tornatzky, L. G., & Klein, K. J. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on engineering management, (1), 28-45.
[77] Kleijnen, M., De Ruyter, K., & Wetzels, M. (2004). Consumer adoption of wireless services: discovering the rules, while playing the game. Journal of interactive marketing, 18(2), 51-61.
[78] Labay, D. G., & Kinnear, T. C. (1981). Exploring the consumer decision process in the adoption of solar energy systems. Journal of consumer research, 8(3), 271-278.
[79] Premkumar, G., Ramamurthy, K., & Nilakanta, S. (1994). Implementation of electronic data interchange: an innovation diffusion perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(2), 157-186.
[80] Zajonc, R. B., & Markus, H. (1982). Affective and cognitive factors in preferences. Journal of consumer research, 9(2), 123-131.
[81] Bearden, W. O., Netemeyer, R. G., & Teel, J. E. (1989). Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence. Journal of consumer research, 15(4), 473-481.
[82] Childers, T. L., & Rao, A. R. (1992). The influence of familial and peer-based reference groups on consumer decisions. Journal of consumer research, 19(2), 198-211.
[83] Smith, D., Menon, S., & Sivakumar, K. (2005). Online peer and editorial recommendations, trust, and choice in virtual markets. Journal of interactive marketing, 19(3), 15-37.
[84] Fisher, R. J., & Price, L. L. (1992). An investigation into the social context of early adoption behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 477-486.
[85] Berkman, L. F., & Syme, S. L. (1979). Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: a nine-year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. American journal of Epidemiology, 109(2), 186-204.
[86] Aneshensel, C. S., & Frerichs, R. R. (1982). Stress, support, and depression: A longitudinal causal model. Journal of Community Psychology, 10(4), 363-376.
[87] Turner, R. J. (1983). Direct, indirect, and moderating effects of social support on psychological distress and associated conditions. In Psychosocial stress (pp. 105-155).
[88] Liang, T. P., Ho, Y. T., Li, Y. W., & Turban, E. (2011). What drives social commerce: The role of social support and relationship quality. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16(2), 69-90.
[89] Shin, D. H. (2013). User experience in social commerce: in friends we trust. Behaviour & information technology, 32(1), 52-67.
[90] Hajli, M. N. (2014). The role of social support on relationship quality and social commerce. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 87, 17-27.
[91] Zhang, H., Lu, Y., Gupta, S., & Zhao, L. (2014). What motivates customers to participate in social commerce? The impact of technological environments and virtual customer experiences. Information & Management, 51(8), 1017-1030.
[92] Hajli, N., & Sims, J. (2015). Social commerce: The transfer of power from sellers to buyers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 94, 350-358.
[93] Cohen, S., Gottlieb, B. H., & Underwood, L. G. (2001). Social relationships and health: challenges for measurement and intervention. Advances in Mind-Body Medicine.
[94] Cobb, S. (1976). Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosomatic medicine, 38(5), 300-314.
[95] Langford, C. P. H., Bowsher, J., Maloney, J. P., & Lillis, P. P. (1997). Social support: a conceptual analysis. Journal of advanced nursing, 25(1), 95-100.
[96] Kahn, R. L., & Antonucci, T. C. (1980). Convoys over the life course: Attachment, roles, and social support. Life-span development and behavior.
[97] House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support.
[98] Wilcox, B. L., & Vernberg, E. M. (1985). Conceptual and theoretical dilemmas facing social support research. In Social support: Theory, research and applications (pp. 3-20). Springer Netherlands.
[99] Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological bulletin, 98(2), 310.
[100] Barrera, M. (1986). Distinctions between social support concepts, measures, and models. American journal of community psychology, 14(4), 413-445.
[101] Krause, N. (1986). Social support, stress, and well-being among older adults. Journal of gerontology, 41(4), 512-519.
[102] Gottlieb, B. H., & Bergen, A. E. (2010). Social support concepts and measures. Journal of psychosomatic research, 69(5), 511-520.
[103] Gardner, B. B., & Levy, S. J. (1963). The product and the brand. RD Irwin.
[104] Levy, S. J. (1959). Symbols for sale. Harvard business review, 37(4), 117-124.
[105] Duesenberry, J. S. (1949). Income, saving, and the theory of consumer behavior.
[106] Grubb, E. L., & Grathwohl, H. L. (1967). Consumer self-concept, symbolism and market behavior: A theoretical approach. The Journal of Marketing, 22-27.
[107] Tucker, W. T. (1967). Foundations for a theory of consumer behavior. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
[108] Holman, R. H. (1981). Product as communication: A fresh appraisal of a venerable to topic. Review of marketing, 106-119.
[109] David Krech, Richard S. Crutch field, and Egerton L. Ballachey, Individual in Society (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1962), 495-496.
[110] Rosenberg, Morris (1979), Conceiving the Self, New York: Basic Books.
[111] Theodore M. Newcomb, Social Psychology (New York: The Dryden Press, 1956), p. 319
[112] Sirgy, M. J., Johar, J. S., Samli, A. C., & Claiborne, C. B. (1991). Self-congruity versus functional congruity: Predictors of consumer behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19(4), 363-375.
[113] Carl R. Rogers, Client-Centered Therapy (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1965), p.501
[114] Schenk, C. T., & Holman, R. H. (1980). A sociological approach to brand choice: the concept of situational self image. ACR North American Advances.
[115] Sanchez, H. T., O'Brien, T. V., & Summers, G. W. (1975). Self-Concept and Consumer Motivation. In Proceedings of the American Marketing Association Educator's Conference (Vol. 8, pp. 225-227).
[116] Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect. Psychological review, 94(3), 319.
[117] Mann, M. M., Hosman, C. M., Schaalma, H. P., & De Vries, N. K. (2004). Self-esteem in a broad-spectrum approach for mental health promotion. Health education research, 19(4), 357-372.
[118] Sommers, M. S. (1964). Product symbolism and the perception of social strata. In Proceedings of the American Marketing Association (Vol. 22, pp. 200-216).
[119] Dolich, I. J. (1969). Congruence relationships between self images and product brands. Journal of Marketing Research, 80-84.
[120] Onkvisit, S., & Shaw, J. (1987). Self-concept and image congruence: Some research and managerial implications. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 4(1), 13-23.
[121] Birdwell, A. E. (1968). A study of the influence of image congruence on consumer choice. The Journal of Business, 41(1), 76-88.
[122] Grubb, E. L., & Stern, B. L. (1971). Self-concept and significant others. Journal of Marketing Research, 8(3), 382-385.
[123] Bellenger, D. N., Steinberg, E., & Stanton, W. W. (1976). Congruence of store image and self image-as it relates to store loyalty. Journal of retailing, 52(1), 17-32.
[124] Delozier, W., & Tillman, R. (1972). Self-image concepts: Can they be used to design marketing programs. Southern Journal of Business, 7(1), 9-15.
[125] Belch, G. E., & Landon Jr, E. L. (1977). Discriminant validity of a product-anchored self-concept measure. Journal of Marketing Research, 252-256.
[126] Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of consumer research, 9(3), 287-300.
[127] Sirgy, M. J. (1985). Using self-congruity and ideal congruity to predict purchase motivation. Journal of business Research, 13(3), 195-206.
[128] Higgins, E. T. (1989). Self-discrepancy theory: What patterns of self-beliefs cause people to suffer?. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 22, pp. 93-136). Academic Press.
[129] Sirgy, M. J. (2015). The self-concept in relation to product preference and purchase intention. In Marketing Horizons: A 1980's Perspective (pp. 350-354). Springer, Cham.
[130] Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
[131] Harms, M. (2007). What drives motivation to participate financially in a crowdfunding community?.
[132] Ponte, E. B., Carvajal-Trujillo, E., & Escobar-Rodríguez, T. (2015). Influence of trust and perceived value on the intention to purchase travel online: Integrating the effects of assurance on trust antecedents. Tourism Management, 47, 286-302.
[133] Yang, S., Lu, Y., Gupta, S., Cao, Y., & Zhang, R. (2012). Mobile payment services adoption across time: An empirical study of the effects of behavioral beliefs, social influences, and personal traits. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 129-142.
[134] Al-Jabri, I., & Sohail, M. S. (2012). Mobile banking adoption: Application of diffusion of innovation theory.
[135] Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2), 186-204.
[136] Featherman, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective. International journal of human-computer studies, 59(4), 451-474.
[137] Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., & Rao, H. R. (2009). Trust and satisfaction, two stepping stones for successful e-commerce relationships: A longitudinal exploration. Information systems research, 20(2), 237-257.
[138] Ha, S., & Im, H. (2012). Identifying the role of self-congruence on shopping behavior in the context of US shopping malls. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 30(2), 87-101.
[139] Ahn, T., Ekinci, Y., & Li, G. (2013). Self-congruence, functional congruence, and destination choice. Journal of Business Research, 66(6), 719-723.
[140] Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2012). Using partial least squares path modeling in advertising research: basic concepts and recent issues. Handbook of research on international advertising, 252.
[141] Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods. McGraw-Hill.
[142] Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 39-50.
[143] Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of management, 12(4), 531-544.
[144] Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
[145] Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
[146] Hair, J. F., Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). Common beliefs and reality about partial least squares: Comments on Rönkkö and Evermann.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69241-
dc.description.abstract隨著網路科技的持續發展,匯集群眾的力量也變得更加容易,目前在國內外已有許多新創將群眾募資作為籌措資金的另一種管道,然而群眾募資作為新興產業議題,目前的學界對其理解依然相對有限,因此本研究旨在探討群眾募資環境中影響潛在贊助者之出資意圖的影響因子,透過融合創新擴散理論、效價理論、自我一致性與社會支持提出一個整合性的模型。
研究結果顯示相對利益、相容性與自我一致性對於潛在贊助者之出資意圖有正向影響;感知風險對於潛在贊助者之出資意圖有負向影響;自我一致性對於相容性有正向影響;社會支持對於感知風險有負向影響,本研究的結果驗證了模型的適合度,並且提供群眾募資產業如何吸引潛在贊助者的重點參考。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractWith rapid advancement of Internet Technology, applying the power of the crowd becomes much easier than before. Instead of targeting on a small group of professional investors, many startups take crowdfunding as a substitute financing source at home and abroad. As a fast-growing creative industry, however, the characteristics of crowdfunding have yet to be fully studied. In this research, a model based on concepts of valence theory, innovation theory, self-congruence and social support theory is created to examine the motivation of funders to support crowdfunding projects.
In the empirical experiment, 148 valid questionnaires were collected. With the examination of reliability and validity, we utilize PLS-SEM to validate the factors affecting funder’s intention to support crowdfunding projects. Findings from the research are listed as follows. (1) Relative advantage, compatibility and self-congruence have significant positive effects on funder’s funding intention (2) Perceived risk has significant negative effects on funder’s funding intention (3) Self-congruence has significant positive effects on compatibility (4) Social support has significant negative effects on perceived risk
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T03:11:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-107-R05725041-1.pdf: 1974126 bytes, checksum: 203603578aa8c64c5981a1f77cc3d156 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018
en
dc.description.tableofcontents誌謝 ii
論文摘要 iii
ABSTRACT iv
目錄 v
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 5
第二章 文獻探討 8
第一節 群眾募資 8
第二節 效價理論 14
第三節 損失與感知風險 16
第四節 創新擴散理論 18
2.4.1 社會系統 18
2.4.2 溝通管道 18
2.4.3 擴散時間 19
2.4.4 創新特質 19
2.4.4.1 相對利益 20
2.4.4.2 相容性 20
2.4.4.3 複雜性 21
第五節 自我一致性 23
第六節 社會支持 25
第三章 研究架構 28
第一節 研究模型與假設 28
第二節 變數定義與研究問項 32
第三節 研究設計 37
3.3.1 問卷設計 37
3.3.2 研究對象 37
第四節 資料分析方法 37
3.4.1 敘述性統計分析 38
3.4.2 信效度分析 38
3.4.2.1 信度分析 38
3.4.2.2 效度分析 38
3.4.3 共同方法變異分析 39
3.4.4 假說檢定 39
第四章 資料分析與討論 41
第一節 敘述性統計分析 41
第二節 信效度分析 43
4.2.1.1 信度分析 43
4.2.1.2 效度分析 43
第三節 共同方法變異檢定 51
第四節 研究模型假說檢定 51
第五節 結果分析與討論 54
第五章 結論與建議 56
第一節 研究結論 56
5.1.1 相對利益對於出資意圖之影響 56
5.1.2 相容性對於出資意圖之影響 56
5.1.3 自我一致性對於出資意圖之影響 57
5.1.4 感知風險對於出資意圖之影響 57
5.1.5 社會支持對於感知風險之影響 58
5.1.6 自我一致性對於相容性之影響 58
第二節 研究貢獻 58
5.2.1 學術貢獻 58
5.2.2 實務貢獻 59
第三節 研究限制與未來方向 59
參考文獻 61
附錄一 問卷內容 76
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject社會支持zh_TW
dc.subject群眾募資zh_TW
dc.subject創新擴散理論zh_TW
dc.subject效價理論zh_TW
dc.subject自我一致性zh_TW
dc.subjectself-congruenceen
dc.subjectsocial supporten
dc.subjectcrowdfundingen
dc.subjectinnovation diffusion theoryen
dc.subjectvalence theoryen
dc.title對群眾募資專案出資意圖影響因子之研究zh_TW
dc.titleA Study of Factors Affecting Funder’s Intention to Invest in Crowdfunding projectsen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear106-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee盧信銘(Hsin-Min Lu),林育慶(Yu-Ching Lin)
dc.subject.keyword群眾募資,創新擴散理論,效價理論,自我一致性,社會支持,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordcrowdfunding,innovation diffusion theory,valence theory,self-congruence,social support,en
dc.relation.page80
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201801041
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2018-07-18
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept資訊管理學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:資訊管理學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-107-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.93 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved