Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 管理學院企業管理專班(Global MBA)
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69191
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor謝冠雄(Edward Hsieh)
dc.contributor.authorPei-Wen Tsaien
dc.contributor.author蔡佩汶zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-17T03:10:21Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-06
dc.date.copyright2018-08-06
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.submitted2018-07-18
dc.identifier.citationA. Martin, J., & M. Eisenhardt, K. (2001). EXPLORING CROSS-BUSINESS SYNERGIES (Vol. 2001).
Acemoglu, D., Griffith, R., Aghion, P., & Zilibotti, F. (2010). Vertical integration and technology: theory and evidence. Journal of the european economic Association, 8(5), 989-1033.
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Mitton, T. (2009). Determinants of vertical integration: financial development and contracting costs. The Journal of Finance, 64(3), 1251-1290.
Angwin, D., McGee, J., & Sammut‐Bonnici, T. (2015). Turnaround Strategy. In C. L. Cooper, J. McGee, & T. Sammut‐Bonnici (Eds.), Wiley Encyclopedia of Management.
Benur, A. M., & Bramwell, B. (2015). Tourism product development and product diversification in destinations. Tourism Management, 50, 213-224. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.02.005
Chao, R.-F., & Kuo, T. (2013). The Influence of Experience Marketing and Brand Image on Consumers’’ Revisit Intention: A Case Study of E-DA THEME PARK. Journal of Tourism and Leisure Management, 1(1), 33-55.
Chon, B. S., Choi, J. H., Barnett, G. A., Danowski, J. A., & Joo, S.-H. (2003). A structural analysis of media convergence: Cross-industry mergers and acquisitions in the information industries. The Journal of Media Economics, 16(3), 141-157.
Chou, H.-J., & Wu, M.-Y. (2007). The Effect of Theme Park’s Play Attraction and Recreation Experience on Customer Satisfaction and Return Visiting: A Case Study of Yamay Resort. Journal of commercial Modernization, 4(2), 155-168.
Department of Budget Accounting and Statistics, K. C. G. (2018). Statistical Information Network of Kaohsiung City. Retrieved April, 28, 2018 http://kcgdg.kcg.gov.tw/pxweb2007p/dialog/treelist/folder.htm
Disney: magic restored. (2008). The Economist. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/node/11058438
Ensign, P. C. (1998). Interrelationships and horizontal strategy to achieve synergy and competitive advantage in the diversified firm. Management Decision, 36(10), 657-668. doi:doi:10.1108/00251749810245318
Forest L. Reinhardt, Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Hanson, D. J. (2002). BP and the Consolidation of the Oil Industry, 1998-2002. Retrieved from
Fu, W. W. (2009). Screen survival of movies at competitive theaters: Vertical and horizontal integration in a spatially differentiated market. Journal of Media Economics, 22(2), 59-80.
Gomes, J., & Livdan, D. (2004). Optimal Diversification: Reconciling Theory and Evidence. The Journal of Finance, 59(2), 507-535. doi:doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00641.x
Goold, M., & Luchs, K. S. (1996). Managing the multibusiness company: strategic issues for diversified groups: Cengage Learning EMEA.
Grossman, G. M., Helpman, E., & Szeidl, A. (2006). Optimal integration strategies for the multinational firm. Journal of International Economics, 70(1), 216-238.
Hanson, G. H., Mataloni Jr, R. J., & Slaughter, M. J. (2005). Vertical production networks in multinational firms. Review of Economics and statistics, 87(4), 664-678.
Harrigan, K. R. (1986). Matching vertical integration strategies to competitive conditions. Strategic Management Journal, 7(6), 535-555.
Hoberg, G., & Phillips, G. (2010). Product Market Synergies and Competition in Mergers and Acquisitions: A Text-Based Analysis. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(10), 3773-3811.
Hsieh, C.-C., & Chang, Y.-L. (2014). Market Positioning for the Theme Parks in Taiwan. Journal of Physcial Eucation and Leisule, Ling Tung University(12), 39-59.
Janvier-James, A. M. (2011). A New Introduction to Supply Chains and Supply Chain Management: Definitions and Theories Perspective. International Business Research, 5(1). doi:10.5539/ibr.v5n1p194
Kao, R.-H., & Chen, C.-Y. (2014). A Study on the Relationships between Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Image and Organization Identification in Theme Park Industry – A Case of E Theme Park. International Journal of Commerce and Strategy, 6(4), 281-300.
Lin, S.-H., Huang, W.-L., & Cho, T.-Y. (2011). Impact of Diversification on Firm Risk and Value - Comparing Family and Non-family firms. International Journal of Commerce and Strategy, 3(4), 233-249.
Milman, A. (2010). The global theme park industry. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 2(3), 220-237. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17554211011052177
Murayama, M., & Osada, H. (2008). An Analysis of Business System in Developing Business - An Empirical Study on New Business Development through Diversification in Japan. Paper presented at the 2008 International Symposium of Quality Management, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Okumus, F., Altinay, L., & Prakash, K. C. (2010). Strategic Management for Hospitality and Tourism, 2010: Butterworth-Elsevier.
Pan, W.-H., & Chen, Y.-L. (2014). A CASE STUDY OF THE CORPORATE TURNAROUND STRATEGIES. International Journal of Organizational Innovation (Online), 7(2), 63-78.
Pikkemaat, B., & Schuckert, M. (2007). Success factors of theme parks–An exploration study. Turizam: međunarodni znanstveno-stručni časopis, 55(2), 197-208.
Raluca, D. C., & Gina, S. (2008). Theme park-the main concept of tourism industry development. Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Science Series, 17(2), 635-640.
Rukstad, M. G., Collis, D. J., & Levine, T. (2001). The Walt Disney Company: The Entertainment King: Harvard Business School.
Taneja, S., Srivastava, R., & Ravichandran, N. (2014). ‘Diversification: Performance turnaround’ (A case of Sarvodaya Hospitals). International Journal of Healthcare Management, 7(3), 206-213. doi:10.1179/2047971914Y.0000000080
Tourism Bureau, M. (2018a). 2017 Visitors to Principal Tourist Spots in Taiwan Retrieved April, 23, 2018 http://admin.taiwan.net.tw/statistics/month_en.aspx?no=14
Tourism Bureau, M. (2018b). Tourism Statistics Database. Retrieved April, 19, 2018 http://stat.taiwan.net.tw/system/index.html
Varadarajan, P. R., & Ramanujam, V. (1987). Diversification and Performance: A Reexamination Using a New Two-Dimensional Conceptualization of Diversity in Firms. The Academy of Management Journal, 30(2), 380-393. doi:10.2307/256281
Warf, B. (2007). Oligopolization of global media and telecommunications and its implications for democracy. Ethics Place and Environment, 10(1), 89-105.
Yang, W.-G., Ho, P.-T., & Lee, S.-S. (2008). The Analysis of Taiwan Theme Park Development. The Journal of Chaoyan University of Technology(13), 247-269.
Yeh, T. M., & Tsai, P. L. (2014). Combining Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS for the Evaluation of the Service
Quality of Theme Amusement Park. Leisure Industry Research, 12(3), 1-21.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69191-
dc.description.abstract麗寶樂園度假區於2017年底跨年晚會創造了10萬人次的入園人潮,成為台灣最受歡迎、最知名的遊樂區,然自1996年政府規劃該園區成為全臺最大之度假娛樂園區以來,麗寶樂園歷經破產、重整、易主、多角化經營等階段,前後經歷將近20年,終於在麗寶集團接手努力下,達成了政府當初規劃的目標-成為全臺最大且具世界水平的綜合娛樂園區。
麗寶樂園的前身(月眉育樂世界),由台中規模最大的公司長億集團於1996年參與BOT投標並取得經營權, 然而,因為長億集團腐敗的公司文化、上下對立的領導模式,以及投機高槓桿的財務操作,使得其在開始營運五年內,即因積欠銀行團超過新台幣一百三十億,宣布破產。
麗寶集團於2006年接手麗寶樂園之後,逐步展開其多樣化經營發展計畫,從興建五星級福容飯店、增加密室脫逃遊樂設施,至2017年新增麗寶Outlet Mall,天空之城摩天輪及麗寶賽車場等園區項目,不僅為麗寶樂園度假區帶來大量觀光、商務人潮,同時也大大提升了度假區的年營收。由於麗寶建設集團成功的周轉策略,麗寶度假樂園目前已變身為台灣最成功的休閒度假綜合區,正如當初政府擘劃的BOT藍圖一般。
藉由文獻分析、問卷調查及深度訪談,發現,麗寶集團在接手此度假區之後所採取的周轉策略、利用集團中相關事業體的技術知識,加上極具向心力的集團文化與由下而上的領導方針,成功地將麗寶樂園轉型成為台灣遊樂產業的龍頭。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractLihPao Resort started with a vision that the government planned to build up a large amusement complex to compete with the world and to encourage the tourism and service industries in Taiwan, went terribly bankruptcy for corrupted management. Within less than twenty years, LihPao Resort has turned out to be the biggest and national-known resort, with two theme parks, one five-star hotel, an outlet mall, the biggest Ferris wheel in Taiwan, and a racing park with world-graded racing tracks. What has LihPao done to bring the dead back to life? What are the challenges and strategies it faced and applied to the case?
In this study, the author uses both quantitative survey and qualitative, in-depth interview, to collect data and further investigate how LihPao Group is able to reinvigorate the livelihood of the Resort. By looking at the turnaround strategies, the synergies generated from the horizontal and vertical integration among the entities within the LihPao Group, along with the leadership and cooperative culture that is deeply rooted in this Resort, this case study aims to provides insights as to the managerial strategies in the hospitality and tourism industry.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T03:10:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-107-R05749006-1.pdf: 3315836 bytes, checksum: 681da15cb0817e9269cc3773085dcb31 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018
en
dc.description.tableofcontentsTable of Contents
摘要 II
ABSTRACT III
1 INTRODUCTION 1
2 METHODOLOGY 2
2.1 QUANTITATIVE METHODOLOGY - SURVEY 2
2.2 QUALITATIVE METHODOLOGY – INTERVIEW 2
3 LITERATURE REVIEW 4
3.1 STUDIES ON TURNAROUND STRATEGIES 4
3.2 STUDIES ON AMUSEMENT PARK MANAGEMENT 7
4 BEFORE THE TAKEOVER – PROBLEMS 11
4.1 THE PAST – YAMAY RESORT (1996-2005) 11
4.1.1 The first Large Amusement Resort Plan in Taiwan (1996) 11
4.1.2 The First Phase of the Resort (1996-2005) 15
4.1.3 An Ugly Bankruptcy (2005) 17
4.1.4 LihPao’s Motivations and Challenges of the Acquisition (2005) 18
4.1.5 Corporate Restructure (2005-2006) 22
4.2 THE TAKING-OVER – LIHPAO RESORT (2006) 23
4.3 CURRENT DEVELOPMENT OF LIHPAO RESORT (AFTER 2006) 26
5 TURNAROUND STRATEGIES OF LIHPAO RESORT 29
5.1 DIVERSIFICATION AND SYNERGY 29
5.2 BOTTOM-UP LEADERSHIP 38
5.3 SUSTAINABLE CORPORATE CULTURE 40
5.4 EMPLOYEES’ PERCEPTION 43
6 PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS AND FUTURE GOALS 48
6.1 PERFORMANCE COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS 48
6.2 FUTURE GOALS 52
7 CONCLUSION 56
REFERENCES 61
APPENDIX A. LIHPAO EMPLOYEE SURVEY AND RESULTS 63
APPENDIX B. MAJOR THEME PARKS IN TAIWAN – CHINESE-ENGLISH TRANSLATION COMPARISON 66
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject協力zh_TW
dc.subject多樣化經營zh_TW
dc.subject管理策略zh_TW
dc.subject度假區經營zh_TW
dc.subject休閒娛樂產業zh_TW
dc.subjectHospitality and Tourism Industryen
dc.subjectManagerial Strategyen
dc.subjectDiversificationen
dc.subjectSynergyen
dc.subjectResort Managementen
dc.title麗寶樂園發展之案例研究zh_TW
dc.titleFrom Nothing to Something Big: A Case Study for Business Development of LihPao Resorten
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear106-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.coadvisor曹承礎(Shen-Cho Chou)
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee陳建錦
dc.subject.keyword休閒娛樂產業,管理策略,多樣化經營,協力,度假區經營,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordHospitality and Tourism Industry,Managerial Strategy,Diversification,Synergy,Resort Management,en
dc.relation.page66
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201801519
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2018-07-19
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept企業管理碩士專班zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:管理學院企業管理專班(Global MBA)

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-107-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
3.24 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved