請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6896
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林珊如(Shan-Ju Lin CHANG) | |
dc.contributor.author | Shu-Ping Lee | en |
dc.contributor.author | 李書萍 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-17T09:20:36Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-14 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-17T09:20:36Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2012-05-14 | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2012-03-22 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Strauss, A., & Corbin, J.(1997)。質性研究概論(徐宗國譯)。臺北市:巨流。
丁耀民(2005)。人際關係網路對虛擬社群使用意願的影響。未出版之碩士論文,國立清華大學資訊系統與應用研究所,新竹市。 卜小蝶(2008)。圖書館網路資訊服務。上網日期:2011,April 5。檢自:http://www.ntl.gov.tw/Publish_List.asp?CatID=2425 戈立秀(2006)。部落客之資訊蒐集與分享行為之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立台灣大學圖書資訊學硏究所,臺北市。 王家茗(2001)。網路書寫動機與意義之探索─以「明日報個人新聞台」為例。未出版之碩士論文,世新大學傳播研究所,臺北市。 王盈文(2005)。大學圖書館應用社會性軟體之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立政治大學圖書資訊研究所,臺北市。 王薇棻(2009)。部落格網路書寫的自我療癒歷程敘說探究。未出版之碩士論文,國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系所,彰化市。 吳燕惠(2000)。網路讀者書評之研究。未出版之碩士論文,南華大學出版學研究所,嘉義縣。 吳燕惠(2001)。網路讀者書評對讀者角色的衝擊─以亞馬遜網站為例。資訊社會研究,1,85-120。 呂慧珍(2009)。針對喜好圖書閱讀族群探討部落格之介面設計。未出版之碩士論文,大同大學工業設計研究所,臺北市。 李琴(2008)。談網絡時代的書評導讀。網絡財富,11,188-189。 李銘薰、卜小蝶(2009)。電腦與數位3C專業虛擬社群知識分享之影響因素研究。教育資料與圖書館學,46(3),377-401。 杜毓真、柯皓仁(2006)。部落格在公共圖書館的應用初探。臺北市立圖書館館訊,23(3),35-54。 林佳靜(2005)。Weblog使用者個人因素與書寫動機、書寫行為關聯性研究。未出版之碩士論文,中國文化大學新聞研究所,臺北市。 林珊如(2004)。書評的現代風貌:網路線上書評及其相關議題。在王振鵠教授八秩榮慶籌備小組編著,王振鵠教授八秩榮慶論文集(頁299-303)。臺北市:台灣學生。 林家儀、邱銘心(2010)。網路讀者書評文類分析研究:以科學普及類書評為例。教育資料與圖書館學,48(2),269-298。 胡幼慧編著(1996)。質性研究:理論、方法與本土女性研究實例。臺北市:巨流。 胡敏怡(1998)。網際網路事業經營之成功因素研究─以網路書店為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立政治大學科技管理研究所,臺北市。 高敬文(1999)。質化研究方法論。臺北市:師大。 翁秀琪、施伯燁、孫式文、方念萱、李嘉維(2009)。從使用者出發的網路資源準社會互動研究:理論建構與使用者經驗研究。新聞學研究,101,1-44。 張澄清(2004)。網路社群參與書寫態度與行為意向之研究─以「野葡萄文學網」為例。未出版之碩士論文,南華大學出版事業管理研究所,嘉義縣。 陳向明(2007)。社會科學質的研究。臺北市:五南。 陳致中(2003)。網路文學創作者行為之初探研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立中山大學傳播管理研究所,高雄市。 陳盈蓁(2010)。大學圖書館部落格迴響之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立台灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。 創市際市場研究顧問(2009)。網路社群(部落格)小調查。上網日期:2011,June 24。檢自:www.insightxplorer.com 黃玫溱(2009)。公共圖書館網路閱讀社群經營探討。臺北市立圖書館館訊,27(2),21-31。 黃運圭(2005)。網路書評與購買意願的研究:台灣網路書店的實證調查。未出版之博士論文,國立台灣科技大學企業管理學系,臺北市。 葉軒萍(2007)。書寫網路書評動機與書寫行為之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立台灣科技大學企業管理學系,臺北市。 劉應琳(2001)。閱讀硏究 : 臺大BBS books版愛書人休閒閱讀之探討 。未出版之碩士論文,國立台灣大學圖書資訊學硏究所,臺北市。 潘莉娟(2006)。網路書評與購書意願之關聯性研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。 鄭國威(2005)。Blog, research, and beyond。網路社會學通訊期刊,45,15-16。 Adler, P. R., & Christopher, J. A. (1998). Internet community primer: Overview and business opportunities. Retrieved March 7, 2011, from http://www. digitalplaces.biz/pages/primer_00_toc.html Ahituv, N., & Neumann, S. (1982). Principles of information systems for management. Dubuque, IA.: Wm. C. Brown Publisher. Andrews, D. C. (2001). Considerations in the development of commercially based online communities. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Seventh Americas Conference on Information Systems, Boston, MA. Andrews, D. C. (2002). Audience-specific online community design. Communications of the ACM, 45(4), 64-68. Andrews, D. C., Preece, J., & Turoff, M. (2001). A conceptual framework for demographic groups resistant to online community interaction. Paper presented at the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Los Alamitos, CA. Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 64-77. Armstrong, A., & Hagel III, J. (1996). The real value of on-line communities. Harvard Business Review, May/June, 134-141. Arnold, Y., Leimeister, J. M., & Krcmar, H. (2003). CoPEP: A development process model for a community platform for cancer patients. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Eleventh European Conference on Information Systems, Naples, Italy. Bagozzi, R. P., & Dholakia, U. M. (2002). Intentional social action in virtual communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16(2), 2-21. Beenen, G., Ling, K., Wang, X., Chang, K., Frankowski, D., Resnick, P., et al. (2004). Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Group, Chicago, IL. Bhandar, M., Pan, S. L., & Tan, B. C. Y. (2007). Towards understanding the roles of social capital in knowledge integration: A case study of a collaborative information systems project. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(2), 263-274. Brazelton, J., & Gorry, G. A. (2003). Creating a knowledge-sharing community: If you build it, will they come? Communications of the Acm, 46(2), 23-25. Brown, T. J., Barry, T. E., Dacin, P. A., & Gunst, R. F. (2005). Spreading the word: Investigating antecedents of consumers's positive word-of-mouth intentions and behaviors in a retailing context. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 33(2), 123-138. Butler, B., Sproull, L., Kiesler, S., & Kraut, R. E. (2005). Community effort in online groups: Who does the work and why? In S. Weisband & L. Atwater (Eds.), Leadership at a Distance. Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Chad, K., & Miller, P. (2005). Do libraries matter?: The rise of library 2.0. Retrieved April 2, 2011, from http://www.talis.com/applications/downloads/white _papers/DoLibrariesMatter.pdf Chan, C. M. L. (2004). Recognition and participation in a virtual community. Paper presented at the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Los Alamitos, CA. Chaudhury, A., Mallick, D. N., & Rao, H. R. (2001). Web channels in e-commerce. Communications of the ACM, 44(1), 99-104. Chen, I. Y. L. (2007). The factors influencing members’ continuance intentions in professional virtual communities–a longitudinal study. Journal of Information Science, 33(4), 451-467. Cheung, C. M. K., & Lee, M. K. O. (2009). Understanding the sustainability of a virtual community: model development and empirical test. Journal of Information Science, 35(3), 279-298. Chiu, C.-M., Hsu, M.-H., & Wang, E. T. G. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42, 1872-1888. Colgate, M. R., & Danaher, P. J. (2000). Implementing a customer relationship strategy: The asymmetric impact of poor versus excellent execution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(3), 400-405. Constant, D., Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1994). What's mine is ours, or is it? A study of attitudes about information sharing. Information Science Research, 5(4), 400-421. Cothrel, J., & Williams, R. L. (1999). On-line communities: Helping them form and grow. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(1), 54-60. Dervin, B. (1992). From the mind's eye of the user: The sense-making qualitative-quantitative methodology. In J. D. Glazier & R. R. Powell (Eds.), Qualitative Research in Information Management (pp. 327-338). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited. Dholakia, U. M., & Bagozzia, R. P. (2001). Consumer behavior in digital environments. In J. Wind & V. Mahajan (Eds.), Digital Marketing: Global Strategies from the World's Leading Experts (pp. 163-200). New York: Wiley. Donath, J. (1999). Identity and deception in the virtual community. In M. Smith & P. Killock (Eds.), Communities in Cyberspace (pp. 29-58). London, U.K.: Rutledge. Farkas, M. G. (2007). Social software in libraries: Building collaboration, communication, and community online. Medford, New Jersey: Information Today, Inc. Forman, C., Ghose, A., & Wiesenfeld, B. (2008). Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Information Systems Research, 19(3), 291-313. Gillam, C., & Oppenheim, C. (2006). Review article: Reviewing the impact of virtual teams in the information age. Journal of Information Science, 32(2), 160-175. Ginsburg, M., & Weisband, S. (2004). A framework for virtual community business success: The case of the Internet Chess Club. Paper presented at the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Los Alamitos, CA. Hagel III, J., & Armstrong, A. G. (1997). Net gain: Expanding markets through virtual communities. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press. Hall, H., & Graham, D. (2004). Creation and recreation: Motivating collaboration to generate knowledge capital in online communities. International Journal of Information Management, 24(3), 235-246. Hars, A., & Ou, S. (2002). Working for free? Motivations of participating in open source projects. Int. J. Electron. Comm., 6(3), 25-39. Herr, P. M., Kardes, F. R., & Kim, J. (1991). Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. The Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), 454-462. Hummel, J., & Lechner, U. (2002). Social profiles of virtual communities. Paper presented at the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Iriberri, A. (2005). Building online community: An action research project. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Eleventh Americas Conference on Information Systems, Omaha, NE. Iriberri, A., & Leroy, G. (2009). A life-cycle perspective on online community success. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(2), article 11:29pgs. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Knoll, K. (1998). Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 29-65. Jin, X.-L., Lee, M. K. O., & Cheung, C. M. K. (2010). Predicting continuance in online communities: model development and empirical test. Behaviour & Information Technology, 29(4), 383-394. Jones, Q., & Rafaeli, S. (2000). Time to split, virtually: 'Discourse Architecture' and 'Community Building' as means to creating vibrant virtual metropolises. International Journal of Electronic Commerce & Business Media, 10(4). Kang, I., Lee, K.C., Lee, S., & Choi, J. (2007) Investigation of online community voluntary behavior using cognitive map. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 111-126. Kapoor, N., Konstan, J. A., & Terveen, L. G. (2005). How peer photos influence member participation in online communities. Paper presented at the CHI'05: Extended Abstracts on Human Factor in Computer Systems, Portland, OR. Kim, A. J. (2000). Community building on the Web. Berkeley, CA.: Peachpit Press. Kollock, P. (1996). Design principles for online communities. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Harvard Conference on the Internet and Society. Lazar, J., & Preece, J. (1998). Classification schema for online communities. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Fourth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Baltimore, MD. Lee, F. S. L., Vogel, D., & Limayem, M. (2003). Virtual community informatics: A review and research agenda. The Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 5(1), 47-61. Leimeister, J. M., Ebner, W., & Krcmar, H. (2005). Design, implementation, and evaluation of trustsupporting components in virtual communities for patients. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(4), 101-135. Leimeister, J. M., & Krcmar, H. (2003). Engineering virtual communities in heath care: The case of www.krebsgemeinschaft.de. Electronic Journal of Organizational Virtualness, 5(3). Leimeister, J. M., & Krcmar, H. (2004). Revisiting the virtual community business model. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, New York, NY. Leimeister, J. M., & Sidiras, P. (2004). Success factors of virtual communities from the perspective of members and operators: An empirical study. Paper presented at the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Los Alamitos, CA. Ludford, P. J., Cosley, D., Frankowsly, D., & Terveen, L. G. (2004). Think different: Increasing online community participation using uniqueness and group dissimilarities. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Humand Factors in computing Systems, Vienna, Austria. Maloney-Krichmar, D., & Preece, J. (2005). A multilevel analysis of sociability, usability, and community dynamics in an online health community. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interaction, 12(2), 201-232. Maness, J. M. (2006). Library 2.0 theory: Web 2.0 and its implications for libraries. Webology, 3(2). Millen, D. R., Fontaine, M. A., & Andmuller, M. J. (2002). Understanding the benefit and costs of communities of practice. Communications of the ACM, 45(4), 69-73. Muthitcharoen, A., Palvia, P. C., & Grover, V. (2011). Building a model of technology preference: The case of channel choices. Decision Sciences, 42(1), 205-237. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266. Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (2001). Why lurkers lurk. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Seventh Americas Conference on Information Systems, Boston, MA. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. London: Sage Publications. Pawar, P., Subercaze, J., Maret, P., Beijnum, B.-J., & Konstantas, D. (2008). Towards business model and technical platform for the service oriented context-aware mobile virtual communities. Paper presented at the IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications. Preece, J. (2000). Online communities: Designing usability, supporting sociability. New York: Wiley. Preece, J. (2001). Sociability and usability: Twenty years of chatting online. Behavior and Information Technology Journal, 20(5), 347-356. Raban, D. R. (2008). The incentive structure in an online information market. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(14), 284-295. Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Rothaermel, F. T., & Sugiyama, S. (2001). Virtual internet communities and commercial success: Individual and community-level theory grounded in the atypical case of TimeZone.com. Journal of Management, 27, 297-312. Sangwan. (2005). Virtual community success: A uses and gratifications perspective. Paper presented at the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Los Alamitos, CA. Senecal, S., & Nantel, J. (2004). The influence of online product recommendations on consumers’ online choices. Journal of Retailing, 80, 159-169. Shelfari. (2006). Shelfari launches world's first social media site for books. Retrieved April 15, 2011, from http://www.shelfari.com/Shelfari/Press/10-11-06.aspx Shen, K. N., Yu, A. Y., & Khalifa, M. (2010). Knowledge contribution in virtual communities: Accounting for multiple dimensions of social presence through social identity. Behaviour & Information Technology, 29(4), 337-348. Starr, J. (2007). Librarything.com: The holy grail of book recommendation engines. Searcher, 15(7), 25-32. Tedjamulia, S. J. J., Olsen, D. R., Dean, D. L., & Albrecht, C. C. (2005). Motivating content contributions to online communities: Towards a more comprehensive theory. Paper presented at the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Los Alamitos, CA. Vannoy, S. A., & Palvia, P. (2010). The social influence model of technology adoption. Communications of the ACM, 53(6), 149-153. Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57. Widen-Wulff, G., Ek, S., Ginman, M., Perttila, R., Sodergard, P., & Totterman, A. (2008). Information behavior meets social capital: A conceptual model. Journal of Information Science, 34(3), 346-355. Williams, R. L., & Cothrel, J. (2000). Four smart ways to run online communities. Sloan Manage. Rev., 41(4), 81-91. Zhang, Y., & Hiltz, S. R. (2003). Factors that influence online relationship development in a knowledge sharing community. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Ninth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Tampa, FL. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6896 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 網路社群成功發展的關鍵,除了該平台所提供的功能及服務須符合使用者需求外,尚須依賴使用者主動發表相關資訊或分享經驗,以充實網站上的內容。爰此,本研究從網路書評發表者的角度出發,探詢他們的書寫動機、平台選擇及使用經驗,以了解哪些因素可能影響他們的書寫行為與使用行為,以供圖書館及相關機構設計網路閱讀社群平台功能及活動。
本研究採半結構式訪談方法,從aNobii、iReading、無名小站、痞客邦及其他相關平台中尋找受訪者,共25位網路書評發表者進行訪談。研究結果依據研究問題分為以下四項陳述: 「網路書評書寫動機」─大多數受訪者為了個人閱讀記錄、抒發閱讀心得感想而進行網路書評的發表,而促使他們持續發表行為的原因,除了持續原有的閱讀記錄外,社群成員間的激勵與閱讀活動的誘發亦相當重要。 「平台選擇暨使用經驗」─因朋友間口耳相傳、互相介紹而開始接觸、進而使用社群平台者居多;但是在挑選平台時,該平台上所提供的系統功能是否符合使用者需求則是關鍵,特別是書籍管理、資料備份、版面設定等功能。而書籍記錄管理的完整性與容易度、以及社群成員熟悉與否,則可能會影響他們的平台忠誠度,即持續使用特定平台的意願。 「社群互動經驗」─網路書評發表者可以從社群互動中,獲得兩種類型的回饋,分別為系統即時統計數據,及參加活動所能獲得的實質獎勵;而社群成員間互動所帶來的影響,包括能夠擴展社交網絡、拓展閱讀視野、並激勵書評發表行為。 「圖書館平台建置想法」─多數受訪者對使用圖書館所建置的網路閱讀社群平台有所疑慮,歸納七點包括:『使用人數問題』、『書庫豐富度怕不足』、『真實身分洩漏的顧慮』、『身分使用限制』、『借閱記錄互通問題』、『內容管理問題』、『系統品質疑慮』。受訪者建議圖書館能『舉辦主題活動』、『跨越地域身分的限制』、『提供虛擬身分的設定』以及『提供整合性資源』。 根據研究結果,本研究對網路閱讀社群平台提出五項建議:第一,「書寫動機」─透過舉辦活動提高發表意願;第二,「平台選用」─提供資料備份功能以提升使用意願;第三,「持續使用」─提供個人化設定留住使用者;第四,「社群互動」─減少使用者同步發布的程序;第五,「平台建置」─提供資源整合後的主題內容。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of this study is to explore online book reviewers’ motives for writings, selection and use experience of websites. Based on these analyses, libraries and the organizations concerned could better develop system’s usability and activity for online reading community.
This study conducted semi-structured interview to collect data. A total of 25 online book-reviewers were collected by purposive sampling and snowball sampling techniques. Subjects of this study have been chosen from aNobii, iReading, Wretch, Pixnet and other online bookshelves or blogs for posting book reviews. The results of this research can be summarized as follows: “Motives for writing online book review”─ The initial motivation of writing online book review is to keep reading records. Besides, community members’ interactions and activities are two vital factors to continuous writing. “Selection and use experience of websites”─ Book reviewers start to participate in online reading community because of friends’ recommendations. Systems’ usability is the key point when selecting websites, system performance such as books management, data backup and interface design, etc. The integrity of reading records and social networks of community members will affect their website loyalty. “Experience of members’ interaction”─ Online book-reviewers can get two kinds of feedback from community members’ interactions. One is system’s up-to-date statistics, including numbers of visitors, and etc. Another is material incentives, which can get from participating in reading activities. Effects of members’ interaction are broadening book reveiewers’ reading tastes, strengthen their social networks, and stimulating their writing behaviors. “Suggestions for library website”─ Most interviewee lack the willingness to participate in a library online reading community. Some doubts have been mentioned as follows: lack of critical mass of users, not enough types of book in online bookshelf, lack of anonymity, questions about time and location flexibility due to different types of libraries, questions about system maintenance, and concerns about privacy and safety. This research proposes five suggestions to better develop online reading community. First, organize online or offline events to arouse members’ willingness to participate. Second, provide data backup function to enhance willingness to use. Third, provide personalization service to keep more users, since personalized interface will create a sense-of-place . Fourth, provide flexible gathering places to support sub groups interaction. Fifth, provide integrated subject information to gather users of different reading tastes. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-17T09:20:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-R98126006-1.pdf: 4638784 bytes, checksum: 65316806ed98ef60f5d6e9495850633e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 i
Abstract iii 目次 v 表次 vii 圖次 viii 第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 背景陳述 2 第二節 研究目的及問題 7 第三節 研究範圍與限制 8 第四節 名詞解釋 9 第貳章 文獻回顧 11 第一節 網路社群與圖書館服務 11 第二節 網路書評與書寫者動機 19 第三節 網路社群研究構面與結果 27 第四節 小結 40 第參章 研究設計與方法 41 第一節 研究方法 41 第二節 研究對象 42 第三節 資料蒐集與分析 46 第四節 研究實施 50 第肆章 研究結果 53 第一節 受訪對象描述 53 第二節 書評書寫動機 56 第三節 平台選擇原因 62 第四節 平台使用經驗 73 第五節 社群互動經驗 96 第六節 試讀活動經驗 106 第七節 圖書館建置想法 112 第伍章 綜合討論 117 第一節 網路書評書寫動機探析 117 第二節 平台選擇暨使用經驗探析 118 第三節 社群互動經驗探析 126 第四節 圖書館平台建置想法 130 第五節 網路閱讀社群之成功要素 131 第陸章 結論與建議 135 第一節 結論 135 第二節 建議 143 第三節 未來研究之建議 146 參考文獻 148 附錄一、網頁畫面擷取 155 附錄二、訪談邀約信示例 159 附錄三、訪談大綱 160 附錄四、Atlas.ti 使用畫面 161 附錄五、Atlas.ti 譯碼階層表 162 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 網路書評發表者之書寫動機、平台選擇與使用經驗探討 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Exploring Online Book-Reviewers’ Motives for Writings, Selection and Use Experience of Websites | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 100-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 唐牧群(Muh-Chyun Tang),林奇秀(Chi-Shiou Lin),邱銘心(Ming-Hsin Chiu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 網路閱讀社群,線上書評,書寫動機,平台選擇,忠誠度,使用者經驗, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Online Reading Community,Online Book Reviews,Motives of Writing,Platform Selection,Loyalty,User Experience, | en |
dc.relation.page | 162 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2012-03-23 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 圖書資訊學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 圖書資訊學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-101-1.pdf | 4.53 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。