請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/68672
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 蘇國賢(Kuo-Hsien Su) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Cheng Chang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 張育誠 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T02:29:59Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-01 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2020-09-23 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-08-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 江彥生、陳昇瑋,2016,〈簡介「計算社會學」: 一個結合電腦與數位科技的新興社會學研究〉。《台灣社會學》。32:171-201。 張明宜、吳齊殷,2013,〈友誼網絡中誰的獲益更多:青少年友誼網絡與學業成就的動態分析〉。《台灣社會學》26: 97-146。 葉高華,2017,《2017中山大學基本調查》。中山大學社會學系。 趙鼎新,2007,《國家、社會關係與八九北京學運》。Chinese University Press。 陳婉琪、張恒豪、黃樹仁,2016,〈網絡社會運動時代的來臨?太陽花運動參與者的人際連帶與社群媒體因素初探〉。《人文及社會科學集刊》,28(4):467-501。 陳婉琪、黃樹仁,2015,〈立法院外的春吶:太陽花運動靜坐者之人口及參與圖象〉。《臺灣社會學刊》,30:141-79。 謝雨生、吳齊殷、李文傑,2006,〈青少年網絡特性、互動結構和友誼動態〉。《台灣社會學》,11: 175-234。 傅仰止,2016,《2016大學應屆畢業生網絡調查》。中央研究院社會學研究所。 Alstott, Jeff, Stuart Madnick, and Chander Velu. 2014. “Homophily and the Speed of Social Mobilization: The Effect of Acquired and Ascribed Traits.” PLOS ONE 9(4):e95140. Aral, Sinan, and Christos Nicolaides. 2017. “Exercise Contagion in a Global Social Network.” Nature Communications 8(1):14753. Aral, Sinan, and Dylan Walker. 2014. “Tie Strength, Embeddedness, and Social Influence: A Large-Scale Networked Experiment.” Management Science 60(6):1352–70. Brady, Henry E., Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Sidney Verba. 1999. “Prospecting for Participants: Rational Expectations and the Recruitment of Political Activists.” The American Political Science Review 93(1):153–68. Burt, Ronald S. 1987. “Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence.” American Journal of Sociology 92(6):1287–1335. Burt, Ronald S. 2009. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press. Castells, Manuel. 2012. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge, UK ; Malden, MA. Centola, Damon. 2010. “The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment.” Science 329(5996):1194–97. Centola, Damon. 2011. “An Experimental Study of Homophily in the Adoption of Health Behavior.” Science 334(6060):1269–72. Centola, Damon. 2018. How Behavior Spreads: The Science of Complex Contagions. Princeton; Oxford. Centola, Damon, and Michael Macy. 2007. “Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 113(3):702–34. Centola, Damon, Robb Willer, and Michael Macy. 2005. “The Emperor’s Dilemma: A Computational Model of Self‐Enforcing Norms.” American Journal of Sociology 110(4):1009–40. Coleman, James S. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology 94:S95–120. Duff, Robert W., and William T. Liu. 1975. “The Significance of Heterophilous Structure in Communication Flows.” Philippine Quarterly of Culture and Society 3(2/3):159–75. Easley, David, and Jon Kleinberg. 2010. Networks, Crowds, and Markets. Vol. 8. Cambridge university press Cambridge. Gould, Roger V. 1991. “Multiple Networks and Mobilization in the Paris Commune, 1871.” American Sociological Review 56(6):716–29. Granovetter, Mark. 1978. “Threshold Models of Collective Behavior.” American Journal of Sociology 83(6):1420–43. Granovetter, Mark S. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78(6):1360–80. Guilbeault, Douglas, Joshua Becker, and Damon Centola. 2018. “Complex Contagions: A Decade in Review.” Pp. 3–25 in Complex Spreading Phenomena in Social Systems. Springe. Harrigan, Nicholas, Palakorn Achananuparp, and Ee-Peng Lim. 2012. “Influentials, Novelty, and Social Contagion: The Viral Power of Average Friends, Close Communities, and Old News.” Social Networks 34(4):470–80. Hedström, Peter. 1994. “Contagious Collectivities: On the Spatial Diffusion of Swedish Trade Unions, 1890-1940.” American Journal of Sociology 99(5):1157–79. Hedström, Peter, Rickard Sandell, and Charlotta Stern. 2000. “Mesolevel Networks and the Diffusion of Social Movements: The Case of the Swedish Social Democratic Party.” American Journal of Sociology 106(1):145–72. Heider, Fritz. 1958. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley Sons Inc. Karsai, Márton, Gerardo Iñiguez, Kimmo Kaski, and János Kertész. 2014. “Complex Contagion Process in Spreading of Online Innovation.” Journal of The Royal Society Interface 11(101):20140694. Kearns, Michael, Stephen Judd, Jinsong Tan, and Jennifer Wortman. 2009. “Behavioral Experiments on Biased Voting in Networks.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(5):1347–52. McAdam, Doug. 1986. “Recruitment to High-Risk Activism: The Case of Freedom Summer.” American Journal of Sociology 92(1):64–90. McAdam, Doug, and Ronnelle Paulsen. 1993. “Specifying the Relationship Between Social Ties and Activism.” American Journal of Sociology 99(3):640–67. McAdam, Doug, and Dieter Rucht. 2016. “The Cross-National Diffusion of Movement Ideas:” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. McPherson, Miller, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and James M. Cook. 2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology 27(1):415–44. Mønsted, Bjarke, Piotr Sapieżyński, Emilio Ferrara, and Sune Lehmann. 2017. “Evidence of Complex Contagion of Information in Social Media: An Experiment Using Twitter Bots.” PLoS ONE 12(9). Morgan, Stephen L., and Christopher Winship. 2015. Counterfactuals and Causal Inference. Cambridge University Press. Myers, Daniel J. 1997. “Racial Rioting in the 1960S: An Event History Analysis of Local Conditions.” American Sociological Review 62(1):94–112. Rogers, Everett M., and D. Lawrence Kincaid. 1981. Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research. New York : London. Romero, Daniel M., Brendan Meeder, and Jon Kleinberg. 2011. “Differences in the Mechanics of Information Diffusion Across Topics: Idioms, Political Hashtags, and Complex Contagion on Twitter.” Pp. 695–704 in Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW ’11. New York, NY, USA: ACM. Sharma, Sanjay. 2013. “Black Twitter? Racial Hashtags, Networks and Contagion.” Simmons, Beth A., and Zachary Elkins. 2004. “The Globalization of Liberalization: Policy Diffusion in the International Political Economy.” American Political Science Review 98(1):171–89. Snow, David A., and Robert D. Benford. 1999. “Alternative Types of Cross-National Diffusion in the Social Movement Arena.” Pp. 23–39 in Social Movements in a Globalizing World, edited by D. della Porta, H. Kriesi, and D. Rucht. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. Soule, Sarah A. 1997. “The Student Divestment Movement in the United States and Tactical Diffusion: The Shantytown Protest.” Social Forces 75(3):855–82. State, Bogdan, and Lada Adamic. 2015. “The Diffusion of Support in an Online Social Movement: Evidence from the Adoption of Equal-Sign Profile Pictures.” Pp. 1741–1750 in Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Social Computing, CSCW ’15. New York, NY, USA: ACM. Steinert-Threlkeld, Zachary C. 2017. “Spontaneous Collective Action: Peripheral Mobilization During the Arab Spring.” American Political Science Review 111(2):379–403. Strang, David. 1991. “Adding Social Structure to Diffusion Models: An Event History Framework.” Sociological Methods Research 19(3):324–53. Strang, David, and John W. Meyer. 1993. “Institutional Conditions for Diffusion.” Theory and Society 22(4):487–511. Travers, Jeffrey, and Stanley Milgram. 1969. “An Experimental Study of the Small World Problem.” Sociometry 32(4):425–443. Ugander, Johan, Lars Backstrom, Cameron Marlow, and Jon Kleinberg. 2012. “Structural Diversity in Social Contagion.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(16):5962–66. Uzzi, Brian. 1996. “The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect.” American Sociological Review 61(4):674–98. Watts, Duncan J., and Steven H. Strogatz. 1998. “Collective Dynamics of ‘Small-World’ Networks.” Nature 393(6684):440–42. Watts, Duncan J. 1999. “Networks, Dynamics, and the Small‐World Phenomenon.” American Journal of Sociology 105(2):493–527. Watts, Duncan J. 2004. Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age. W. W. Norton Company. VanderWeele, Tyler. 2015. Explanation in Causal Inference: Methods for Mediation and Interaction. New York. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/68672 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 社會行為在何種網絡結構中,能夠有效迅速的傳播?過去傳播研究的結果,大致上可分為「弱連帶/小世界傳播理論」與「複雜傳播理論」的這兩個理論典範,由於這兩個理論對於傳播門檻有不同的假設,因此關於網絡結構對傳播的影響,兩者持有不同的觀點。前者認為弱連帶的橋接特性,可以連結到更遠的社會距離,並形成小世界現象而有利傳播。後者認為社會行為存在傳播的門檻,這會導致橋接連帶的傳播功能失效,反而在冗餘的網絡結構中,容易重複地刺激行動者,達到傳播門檻閾值,而有利於傳播。再來,雖然複雜傳播理論認為傳播存在門檻,但不同人的傳播門檻可能有所不同。因此本研究更進一步分析,何種脈絡會造成傳播門檻的差異。 研究使用中研院社會所「2016大學應屆畢業生網絡調查」蒐集的Facebook資料,檢驗上述兩種理論,何者較能有效解釋太陽花運動的傳播。最後研究發現,太陽花運動的傳播模式,較符合「複雜傳播理論」的預測,除了存在明顯的傳播門檻外,在冗餘連結的網絡結構中,傳播的效率也較高。此外,研究發現「身分同質性」與「結構冗餘」能夠提高傳播的機率,扮演調節傳播門檻高低的重要角色。這解釋了傳播門檻在不同人身上具有差異的可能原因。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | What kind of network structures spreads social behaviors more quickly and more effectively? Past studies of diffusion generally fall into two theoretical paradigms: “Weak Tie/Small World Diffusion Theory” and “Complex Contagion Theory”. Due to differing assumptions regarding the threshold of diffusion, these two theories have opposite points of view on the effect of network structure on the spread of social behaviors. Weak Tie/Small World Diffusion Theory argues that weak ties can connect individuals across longer social distances due to the bridging effect of networks, which can produce a small world phenomenon that is favorable to diffusion. Complex Contagion Theory maintains that the bridging ties tend to fail to spread social behaviors due to a threshold on diffusion effects, because there is a threshold that exists on such networks. Rather, it is argued, behaviors are most effectively diffused through redundant networks, as these are more likely to achieve the threshold necessary to activate actors. Actors with different characteristics may have different thresholds of diffusions, so this study also explores the cause of the difference in the threshold. This paper uses Facebook data in the “2016 College Graduated Students’ Network Survey” to examine which of the previously mentioned theories can best explain the spread of the Sunflower Movement. The result shows that the diffusion pattern of the Sunflower Movement is more consistent with Complex Contagion Theory. That is, as well as there being a notable threshold that shapes the networks, it is redundant networks that are most effective in spreading social behaviors.In addition, this thesis also finds that “identity homophily” and “structure redundancy” significantly increase the likelihood of diffusion, playing an important role in moderating the diffusion threshold. This finding explains the heterogeneity in the diffusion threshold. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T02:29:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1708202010542000.pdf: 2838572 bytes, checksum: ab355b131ba07b8b73220e292061fb88 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 一、 社會行為如何傳播? 1 二、 傳播理論回顧 3 1. 弱連帶與小世界傳播理論 3 2. 複雜傳播理論 6 3. 社會運動與太陽花的複雜傳播 10 4. 複雜傳播的門檻調節機制 12 5. 理論命題與假說提出 15 三、 研究方法 18 1. 資料說明 18 2. 從FB建立網絡 19 3. 資料結構 21 4. 分析模型 23 5. 變數定義 24 四、 分析:弱連帶/小世界傳播還是複雜傳播 30 五、 分析:傳播門檻差異的脈絡 34 六、 討論與總結 41 七、 附件 46 1. 7-degree網絡定義的模型結果 46 2. 敏感性分析 48 八、 參考文獻 50 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 集體行動中的複雜傳播:大學生網絡結構對太陽花運動傳播的影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Complex Contagion in Collective Action: The Influence of College Students’ Networks on the Spread of the Sunflower Movement | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 李宣緯(Hsuan-Wei Lee) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 謝雨生(Yeu-Sheng Hsieh),江彥生(Yen-sheng Chiang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 複雜傳播,弱連帶,小世界,太陽花運動,社會網絡,Facebook,大數據, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Complex Contagion,Weak Tie,Small World,Sunflower Movement,Social Network,Facebook,Big Data, | en |
dc.relation.page | 55 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202003693 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-08-18 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 社會學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 社會學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-1708202010542000.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.77 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。