Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 資訊管理學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/68520
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor魏志平(Chih-Ping Wei)
dc.contributor.authorWen-Ling Chuen
dc.contributor.author朱雯伶zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-17T02:23:51Z-
dc.date.available2027-07-17
dc.date.copyright2017-08-24
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.submitted2017-08-19
dc.identifier.citationAaker, D. (1991). Managing Brand Equity. The Free Press. New York, NY.
Aaker, D. (1992). The Value of Brand Equity. Journal of Business Strategy, 13(4), 27-32.
Aaker, D. A., & Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 27-41.
Ahuvia, A. C. (2005). Beyond the extended self: Loved objects and consumers' identity narratives. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 171-184.
Belk, R.W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139-168.
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3-5.
Camiciottoli, B.C., Guercini, S., & Ranfagni, S. (2012). The integration of netnography and text mining for the representation of brand image in fashion blogs. Proceedings of Eleventh International Marketing Trends. Congress, Venice, Italy.
Camiciottoli, B.C., Ranfagni, S., & Guercini, S. (2014). Exploring brand associations: an innovative methodological approach. European Journal of Marketing, 48(5/6), 1092-1112.
Chang, H. (2016). Capturing Brand Associations from Online Product Reviews: Method Development and Evaluation. Unpublished master’s thesis. National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Christodoulides G., de Chernatony, L. (2010). Consumer based brand equity conceptualization and measurement: A literature review. International Journal of Market Research, 52(1), 43-66.
Dellarocas, C., Zhang, X. M., & Awad, N. F. (2007). Exploring the value of online product reviews in forecasting sales: The case of motion pictures. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(4), 23-45.
Elliott, R. (1994). Exploring the symbolic meaning of brands. British Journal of Management, 5(June), 13-19.
Farrelly, M. C., Davis, K. C., Haviland, M. L., Messeri, P., & Healton, C. G. (2005). Evidence of a dose-response relationship between 'truth' antismoking ads and youth smoking prevalence. American Journal of Public Health,, 95(3), 425-431.
Fetscherin, M., & Usunier, J.C. (2012). Corporate branding: an interdisciplinary literature review. European Journal of Marketing, 46(5), 733-753.
Floyd, K., Freling, R., Alhoqail, S., Cho, H. Y., & Freling, T. (2014). How online product reviews affect retail sales: A meta-analysis. Journal of Retailing, 90, 217-232.
French, A., & Smith, G. (2013). Measuring brand association strength: a consumer based brand equity approach. European Journal of Marketing, 47(8), 1356-1367.
Gensler, S., Völckner, F., Egger, M., Fischbach, K., & Schoder, D. (2015). Listen to your customers: Insights into brand image using online consumer-generated product reviews. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 20(1), 112-141.
Geylani, T., Inman, J. J., & Hofstede, F. T. (2008). Image reinforcement or impairment: The effects of co-branding on attribute uncertainty. Marketing Science, 27(4), 730-744.
Grossman, R. P., & Till, B. D. (1998). The persistence of classically conditioned brand attitudes. Journal of Advertising, 27(1), 23-31.
Grossman, R.P. (1997). Co-branding in advertising: developing effective associations. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 6(3), 191-201.
Gruen, T. W., Osmonbekov, T., & Czaplewski, A. J. (2006). eWOM: The impact of customer-to-customer online know-how exchange on customer value and loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 59(4), 449-456.
Helmig, B., Huber, J. A., & Leeflang, P. S. H. (2008). Co-branding: The state of the art. Schmalenbach Business Review, 60, 359-377.
Henderson, G.R., Iacobucci, D., & Calder, B.J. (1998). Brand diagnostics: Mapping branding effects using consumer associative networks. European Journal of Operational Research, 111(2), 306-327.
How, B. C., & Narayanan, K. (2004). An empirical study of feature selection for text categorization based on term weightage. IEEE/WIC/ACA International Conference on Web Intelligence (pp. 599-602). IEEE Computer Society.
John, D.R., Loken, B., Kim, K., & Monga, A.B. (2006). Brand concept maps: A methodology for identifying brand association networks. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(4), 549-563.
Keller, K.L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-22.
Lanseng, E. J., & Olsen, L. E. (2012). Brand alliances: the role of brand concept consistency. European Journal of Marketing, 46, 1108-1126.
Lassar, W., Mittal, B., & Sharma, A. (1995). Measuring customer-based brand equity. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 12(4), 11-19.
Mühlbacher, H., Raies, K., Grohs, R., & Koll, O. (2015). Drivers of brand strength: Configural paths to strong cognitive brand equity. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2774-2780.
Nam, H., & Kannan, P. K. (2014, July). The informational value of social tagging networks. Journal of Marketing, 78(4), 21-40.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
Putzke, J., Fischbach, K., & Schoder, D. (2013). An exploratory study on the appropriateness of latent dirichlet allocation for automatic discovery of product associations from user-generated content. Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL).
Rao, A.R., Qu, L., & Ruekert, R.W. (1999). Signaling unobservable product quality through a brand ally. Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (2), 258-268.
Riley, D., Charlton, N., & Wason, H. (2015). The impact of brand image fit on attitude towards a brand alliance. Management & Marketing, 10(4), 270-283.
Samu, S., Krishnan, S., & Smith, R. E. (1999). Using advertising alliances for new product introduction: Interactions between product complementary and promotional strategies. Journal of Marketing, 63(1), 57-74.
Schnittka, O., Sattler, H., & Zenker, S. (2012). Advanced brand concept maps: A new approach for evaluating the favorability of brand association networks. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(3), 265-274.
Simonin, B.L., & Ruth, J.A. (1998). Is a company known by the company it keeps? Assessing the spillover effects of brand alliances on consumer brand attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(1), 30-42.
Smith, A. N., Fischer, E., & Yongjian, C. (2012). How does brand-related user-generated content differ across YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26, 102-113.
van der Lans, R., van den Bergh, B., & Dieleman, E. (2014). Partner selection in brand alliances: An empirical investigation of the drivers of brand fit. Marketing Science, 33(4), 551-566.
Voss, K. E., & Tansuhaj, P. (1999). A consumer perspective on foreign market entry: building brands through brand alliances. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 11(2), 39-58.
Washburn, J.H., Till, B.D., & Priluck, R. (2000). Co-branding: brand equity and trial effects. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17(7), 591-604.
Wood, L. (2000). Brands and brand equity: definition and management. Management Decision, 38(9), 662-669.
Xu, K., Liao, S. S., Li, J., & Song, Y. (2011). Mining comparative opinions from customer reviews for Competitive Intelligence. Decision Support Systems, 50(4), 743-754.
Yoo, B., & Donthu, N. (1997). Developing and validating a consumer-based overall brand equity scale for Americans and Koreans: an extension of Aaker’s and Keller’s conceptualizations. paper presented at American Marketing Association’s Summer Educators’ Conference. Chicago, IL.
Yoo, B., Donthu, N., & Lee, S. (2000). An examination of selected marketing mix elements and brand equity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 195–211.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/68520-
dc.description.abstract聯合品牌是促進品牌形象或品牌知名度的一個很重要的品牌策略。聯合品牌泛指兩個品牌一起進行營銷活動的一種形式,包含廣告、行銷或產品等,一個好的聯合品牌不僅可以為兩個品牌帶來知名度、創造營收,也可以藉由彼此的合作創造更大的價值。在進行聯合品牌評估的時候,品牌聯想是其中很重要的一個面向,品牌聯想泛指消費者的記憶中對於品牌的認知與偏好,尤其是進行消費選擇時所產生的任何關聯,而認清品牌聯對於企業以及消費者雙方都有極大的好處。過去品牌聯想的相關研究,主要都是透過問卷的方式去萃取各品牌的品牌聯想,這種方法不僅費時,亦無法了解現實中眾多實際品牌的情況,但隨著網路的世代來臨,許多網站成了消費者提供意見的平台,這些累積的使用者生成內容,逐漸成為取得品牌聯想的資料來源。而過去聯合品牌的相關研究也多是以問卷方式為主,這種方法費時之外,可以取得現實中聯合品牌成效的資料也都較少。
本研究將建構一個系統化的方法來進行聯合品牌的評估,透過文字探勘的方法和使用者生成內容,將之應用在品牌聯想的萃取,並將萃取的結果應用於聯合品牌的評估方法中,以建立一個聯合品牌的預測模型。而在我們的實驗結果中也證實利用品牌聯想所產生的變數是可以有效地評估聯合品牌的成效。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractCo-branding is an important branding strategy that can bolster brand image and brand awareness. It is defined as “two brands are deliberately paired with one another in a marketing context such as in advertisements, products, product placements, and distribution outlets.” When making a co-branding decision (selecting the right partner for a co-branding), the brand associations of two brands represent an important source of information to examine. Brand associations are customers’ perceptions, preferences, and choices in memory linked to a brand.
Traditionally, the process of eliciting brand associations relies on the use of the survey-based approach, which often time consuming and labor intensive. Similarly, co-branding assessment typically is conducted via the survey-based approach; thus, it incurs the same limitations as brand association elicitation.
As the Internet embeds in people’s lives, consumers start to share everything online. Such user-generated data (UGC) becomes an alternative data source for extracting brand associations and helping assess the effectiveness of co-branding decisions. In this research, we propose four methods to extract brand associations from UGC (specifically, from online product reviews). Moreover, we develop and construct a predictive model to assess the effectiveness of a co-branding, using the variables derived from the brand associations of the two brands involved in the focal co-branding. Our empirical evaluations suggest the utility and satisfactory effectiveness attained by our proposed brand association extraction methods and the co-branding assessment technique.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T02:23:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-106-R04725030-1.pdf: 1887268 bytes, checksum: 244f1a80668f75d86d9b0bb30a228be7 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017
en
dc.description.tableofcontents致謝 .................................................................................................................................. ii
中文摘要 ......................................................................................................................... iii
Abstract .......................................................................................................................... iv
Table of Contents ........................................................................................................... vi
List of Tables ................................................................................................................... x
List of Figures ............................................................................................................... xii
Chapter 1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 1
1.1 Background ................................................................................................................ 1
1.2 Research Motivation and Objectives ....................................................................... 3
Chapter 2 Literature Review ................................................................................... 5
2.1 Overview of Brand Association ................................................................................ 5
2.2 Brand Association Network – Survey-based Approach ......................................... 7
2.3 Brand Association Network – UGC-based Approach ............................................ 7
2.4 Overview of Co-branding ........................................................................................ 10
Chapter 3 Brand Association Extraction Method ............................................... 12
3.1 Association Extraction ............................................................................................. 12
3.1.1 Text Processing ......................................................................................................... 12
3.1.2 Definitions of Extraction Methods ............................................................................ 13
3.2 Association Grouping and Favorability Identification ......................................... 14
3.3 Association Selection ................................................................................................ 15
3.3.1 Consensus Check ....................................................................................................... 16
3.3.2 Threshold Setting ....................................................................................................... 16
3.4 Link Weighting ........................................................................................................ 17
3.5 Brand Association Network Visualization ............................................................. 17
Chapter 4 Evaluation of Our Brand Association Extraction Method ............... 19
4.1 Evaluation Context .................................................................................................. 19
4.1.1 Social Media Collection ............................................................................................ 19
4.1.2 Ground Truth Collection ........................................................................................... 21
4.2 Results ....................................................................................................................... 23
Chapter 5 Brand-association-based Co-Branding Prediction Method .............. 26
5.1 Association Extraction ............................................................................................. 26
5.2 Variables ................................................................................................................... 26
5.3 Classifier ................................................................................................................... 29
Chapter 6 Brand-association-based Co-Branding Decision Method Evaluation 30
6.1 Evaluation Context .................................................................................................. 30
6.1.1 Social Media Collection ............................................................................................ 30
6.1.2 Ground Truth Collection ........................................................................................... 31
6.2 Results .............................................................................................................................. 35
Chapter 7 Conclusion ............................................................................................. 37
7.1 Summary .................................................................................................................. 37
7.2 Future Work ............................................................................................................. 38
References...................................................................................................................... 39
Appendix A: Brand List of BrandZTW Database ....................................................... 44
Appendix B: Results for Brand-association-based Co-Branding Decision Evaluation with All Combinations .............................................................................. 45
Appendix C: Questionnaire for Brand Association Extraction Study .................... 46
Appendix D: Questionnaire for Brand-association-based Co-Branding Decision Study .............................................................................................................................. 48
dc.language.isoen
dc.title使用用戶生成內容進行品牌聯想萃取及聯合品牌評估zh_TW
dc.titleUsing User-Generated Content for Brand Association Extraction and Co-Branding Assessmenten
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear105-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee盧信銘(Hsin-Min Lu),吳基逞(Chi-Cheng Wu)
dc.subject.keyword使用者生成內容,文字探勘,產品評論,品牌聯想,聯合品牌,zh_TW
dc.subject.keyworduser generated content,text mining,product reviews,brand association,co-branding,en
dc.relation.page52
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201703524
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2017-08-20
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept資訊管理學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:資訊管理學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-106-1.pdf
  目前未授權公開取用
1.84 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved