請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/68183
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 余化龍(Hwa-Lung Yu) | |
dc.contributor.author | Hua-Ting Tseng | en |
dc.contributor.author | 曾華廷 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T02:14:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-31 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2020-08-21 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-08-18 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Berger, A. L., Pietra, V. J. D., Pietra, S. A. D. (1996). A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing. Computational linguistics, 22(1), 39-71. Bogaert, P. (2002). Spatial prediction of categorical variables: the Bayesian maximum entropy approach. Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment, 16(6), 425-448. Bogaert, P., D'Or, D. (2002). Estimating soil properties from thematic soil maps. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66(5), 1492-1500. Boughton, W. (1989). A review of the USDA SCS curve number method. Soil Research, 27(3), 511-523. Chen, S. X. (2000). Probability density function estimation using gamma kernels. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 52(3), 471-480. Christakos, G. (1990). A Bayesian/maximum-entropy view to the spatial estimation problem. Mathematical Geology, 22(7), 763-777. Christakos, G. (1991). Some applications of the Bayesian, maximum-entropy concept in geostatistics. In Maximum entropy and Bayesian methods (pp. 215-229): Springer. Christakos, G. (2000). Modern spatiotemporal geostatistics (Vol. 6): Oxford University Press. Christakos, G., Li, X. (1998). Bayesian maximum entropy analysis and mapping: a farewell to kriging estimators? Mathematical Geology, 30(4), 435-462. Christakos, G., Olea, R. A. (2005). New space-time perspectives on the propagation characteristics of the Black Death epidemic and its relation to bubonic plague. Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment, 19(5), 307-314. Christakos, G., Serre, M. L. (2000). BME analysis of spatiotemporal particulate matter distributions in North Carolina. Atmospheric Environment, 34(20), 3393-3406. Cleveland, R. B., Cleveland, W. S., McRae, J. E., Terpenning, I. (1990). STL: a seasonal-trend decomposition. Journal of official statistics, 6(1), 3-73. D'Or, D., Bogaert, P., Christakos, G. (2001). Application of the BME approach to soil texture mapping. Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment, 15(1), 87-100. D’Or, D., Bogaert, P. (2004). Combining categorical information with the Bayesian Maximum Entropy approach. In geoENV IV—Geostatistics for Environmental Applications (pp. 295-306): Springer. Eggleston, J., Rojstaczer, S., Peirce, J. (1996). Identification of hydraulic conductivity structure in sand and gravel aquifers: Cape Cod data set. Water Resources Research, 32(5), 1209-1222. Goovaerts, P. (1997). Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation: Oxford University Press on Demand. Haitjema, H. M., Feinstein, D. T., Hunt, R. J., Gusyev, M. (2010). A hybrid finite‐difference and analytic element groundwater model. Groundwater, 48(4), 538-548. Hannachi, A., Jolliffe, I., Stephenson, D. (2007). Empirical orthogonal functions and related techniques in atmospheric science: A review. International Journal of Climatology: A Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 27(9), 1119-1152. Hotelling, H. (1933). Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of educational psychology, 24(6), 417. Houska, T., Kraft, P., Chamorro-Chavez, A., Breuer, L. (2018). SPOTPY: A python tool for sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of environmental models. Paper presented at the EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. Pearson, K. (1901). Principal components analysis. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 6(2), 559. Ramsay, J. O. (1991). Kernel smoothing approaches to nonparametric item characteristic curve estimation. Psychometrika, 56(4), 611-630. Reeves, H. W., Zellner, M. L. (2010). Linking MODFLOW with an agent‐based land‐use model to support decision making. Groundwater, 48(5), 649-660. Sheather, S. J. (2004). Density estimation. Statistical science, 588-597. Terrell, G. R., Scott, D. W. (1992). Variable kernel density estimation. The Annals of Statistics, 20(3), 1236-1265. Troisi, S., Fallico, C., Straface, S., Migliari, E. (2000). Application of kriging with external drift to estimate hydraulic conductivity from electrical-resistivity data in unconsolidated deposits near Montalto Uffugo, Italy. Hydrogeology Journal, 8(4), 356-367. Tsai, J.-P., Chang, L.-C., Chang, P.-Y., Lin, Y.-C., Chen, Y.-C., Wu, M.-T., Yu, H.-L. (2017). Spatial-temporal pattern recognition of groundwater head variations for recharge zone identification. Journal of hydrology, 549, 351-362. USGS. (2019). MODFLOW-2005: USGS Three-Dimensional Finite-Difference Ground-Water Model. Venables, W., Ripley, B. (1994). Tree-Based Methods. Modern Applied Statistics with S-Plus. In: Springer Verlag, New York. Wackernagel, H. (2013). Multivariate geostatistics: an introduction with applications: Springer Science Business Media. Wand, M. P., Jones, M. C. (1994). Kernel smoothing: Chapman and Hall/CRC. Yu, H.-L., Chu, H.-J. (2010). Understanding space–time patterns of groundwater system by empirical orthogonal functions: a case study in the Choshui River alluvial fan, Taiwan. Journal of hydrology, 381(3-4), 239-247. Yu, H.-L., Chu, H.-J. (2012). Recharge signal identification based on groundwater level observations. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 184(10), 5971-5982. Yu, H.-L., Ku, S.-C., Kolovos, A. (2016). A GIS tool for spatiotemporal modeling under a knowledge synthesis framework. Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment, 30(2), 665-679. Yu, H.-L., Ku, S.-J., Kolovos, A. (2012). Advanced space-time predictive analysis with STAR-BME. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 20th international conference on advances in geographic information systems. Yu, H.-L., Lin, Y.-C. (2015). Analysis of space–time non-stationary patterns of rainfall–groundwater interactions by integrating empirical orthogonal function and cross wavelet transform methods. Journal of hydrology, 525, 585-597. 中央地質調查所. (2015). 地下水補注地質敏感區劃定計畫書(G00004)臺北盆地. 吳偉特. (1979). 台北盆地土壤之工程特性. 中國土木水利工程學會, 土木水利, 5(4), 53-59. 吳孟庭. (2015). 應用貝氏最大熵法於臺北盆地水文地質推估. 臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學研究所學位論文, 1-79. 周彥呂. (2008). 臺北盆地地下水利用可行性之分析評估及管理. 臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學研究所學位論文, 1-149. 張良正. (1995). 區域性地下水觀測站網檢討 (I). 曹以松, 許榮庭. (1985). 地下水抽水量反向推求模式之研究與應用. 中國農業工程學報, 31. 李振誥. (2003). 台北盆地地下水管制區檢討及土液化評估(2/2). 經濟部水利署專題研究計畫. 李振誥. (2004). 淡水河流域水資源乾旱預警機制與風險管理策略之建立-子計畫: 淡水河流域地下水源補助供水系統之研究 (1/3). 李振誥. (2005). 子計畫: 淡水河流域地下水源補助供水系統之研究 (Ⅱ). 李振誥, 陳尉平, 李如晃. (2002). 應用基流資料估計法推估台灣地下水補注量. 台灣水利, 第 50 卷(第 1 期), 第 69-80 頁. 李振誥, 陳景文. (2002). 台北盆地地下水管制區檢討及土壤液化評估 (1/2). 林海倫, 張良正. (2012). 應用一維地電阻於水力傳導係數推估-以濁水溪沖積扇為例. 楊萬全. (1972). 台北盆地地下水蘊藏量與超抽情況的研究. 台銀季刊, 第 22 卷(第 4 期), 235-253 頁. 歐晉德, 李延恭, 鄭在仁. (1983). 台北盆地松山層地下水位及水壓分佈對基礎工程影響. 中國土木水利工程學會, 土木水利, 10(3). 經濟部中央地質調查所. (2014). 地下水水文地質與補注模式研究-補注區劃設與資源量評估(2/4). 能邦科技顧問公司. (2000). 台灣地區地下水補注量估算. (經濟部水資源局). 蔡秉宏. (2009). 台北地區地下水資源評估與利用之研究. 譚仲哲, 童慶斌. (2008). 氣候變遷對台北地下水補注之衝擊. 農業工程學報, 54(1), 1-15. 譚志豪, 冀樹勇, 顧承宇, 林坤霖. (2006). 台北盆地區域性三維地下水流動數值模擬. 中興工程(93), 1-9. 賈儀平, 張閩翔, 劉文煜, 賴典章. (1999). 淡水河流域之水文地質研究. 水河流域地下地質與工程環境專刊, 393-406. 邵明忱, 黃立煌, 馮堯松, 劉格非. (1995). 礫石層水理參數探討. 國際卵礫石層地下工程研討會, 第 4-29~24-38 頁. 鄧屬予. (2006). 台北盆地之地質研究. WESTERN PACIFIC EARTH SCIENCES, 6, 1-28. 陳忠偉, 謝壎煌, 李振誥. (2008). 台北盆地下水可再利用量評估. 農業工程學報, 54(1), 70-84. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/68183 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 欲更了解地下水的流動方式,地下水模型的建置一直都是常用的方式,然而過往許多研究在模型的輸入方面,諸如地下水分層的層數,含水層阻水層邊界的位置,水文地質的參數與邊界條件等,都是採取較為主觀的方法,如此導致在同一個研究區,每個研究者設計出來的模式都不盡相同,模擬之結果也都不一樣,甚至有極大的差異。故本研究嘗試以資料的觀點,以相較客觀的方式決定模式的架構與輸入,建立地下水模型,以臺北盆地為研究區。 本研究以數種資料分析的方法建立MODFLOW模式,應用的面向分別為模式架構建立、水利傳導係數推估以及補注區判釋。模式架構方面以類別型貝式最大熵法推估岩性資料至模式各網格,並以kernel density estimation決定阻水層與含水層之分界,結果將台北盆地分為五層,由上至下分別為含水層、阻水層、含水層、阻水層、含水層;水利傳導係數推估方面應用抽水試驗水利傳導係數資料做為確定性資料並考量上述所推估之岩性資料作為不確性資料以連續型貝式最大熵法推估MODFLOW各層各網格之水平與垂直水利傳導係數。補注區則利用經驗證交函數分析地下水位資料與降雨資料,配合表層岩性進行判釋,結果顯示台北盆地補注區位在大漢溪與新店溪上游接近盆地邊緣的扇頂區,分別是柑園、省民一帶與清溪、新店區一帶。 模式率定以Python裡Soptpy函式庫進行,分穩態率定與暫態率定,RMSE分別為0.44與0.97,皆位於一般可接受標準1之內。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | To understand groundwater system further, groundwater modelling have always been a common way. However, in the past, many studies have used subjective method to decide model input such as the number of groundwater layers, the boundary of aquifer and aquitard, the hydrogeological parameters and the boundary conditions. As a result, the models designed by each researcher are different in the same research area, so the results of the simulation are different as well. Therefore, this research attempts to determine the structure and input of the model in a relatively objective way from data perspective, and build a groundwater model. Taking the Taipei Basin as the study area. In this study, several data analysis methods are used to support MODFLOW modelling. These methods are used to decide model structure, interpolate hydraulic conductivity in each MODFLOW grid and identify the recharge area. In terms of model structure, the lithology data is estimated by the categorical Bayesian maximum entropy method into each MODFLOW grid, then determined the boundary of the aquifer and aquitard by the kernel density estimation. As a result, the Taipei Basin is divided into five layers, from top to bottom is aquifer, aquitard, aquifer, aquitard, aquifer; In hydraulic conductivity estimation part, use pumping test hydraulic conductivity data as hard data and consider the above estimated lithology data as soft data. Using continuous Bayesian maximum entropy method estimates the horizontal and vertical hydraulic conductivity into each grid in each layer of MODFLOW. As for the identification of recharge area, the Empirical orthogonal function was used to analyze groundwater level data and rainfall data, and the surface lithology was took into consideration as well. The results showed that the recharge area of the Taipei Basin was located in the alluvial fan-top area near the edge of the basin at the upstream of Dahan River and Xindian River where is around GanYuan, XingMin and QingXi, XinDian respectively. The mode calibration is carried out by the Soptpy package in Python. It is divided into steady-state calibration and transient calibration. The RMSE is 0.44 and 0.97 respectively, which are within the general acceptable standard 1. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T02:14:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1708202015482800.pdf: 7624744 bytes, checksum: 3d9f6d634ca6d1f42191eada07c5025b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 I 摘要 II ABSTRACT III 目錄 V 圖目錄 VII 表目錄 X CHAPTER1. 緒論 1 1.1 研究緣起與目的 1 1.2 論文架構 2 1.3 研究架構 3 CHAPTER2. 文獻回顧 5 2.1 貝式最大熵法的應用 5 2.2 臺北盆地地下水數值建模 6 CHAPTER3. 理論概述 10 3.1 類別型隨機場 10 3.2 貝氏最大熵法 12 3.3 經驗正交函數EOF 14 3.4 KERNEL DENSITY ESTIMATION 16 3.5 MODFLOW模式 17 3.6 SPOTPY 22 3.7 模式評估指標 23 CHAPTER4. 研究區域之資料蒐集與概況分析 26 4.1 研究區域介紹 26 4.2 資料收集與前處理 27 CHAPTER5. 地下水模型建置 40 5.1 水文地質架構的建置 40 5.2 水力傳導係數推估模式建置 47 5.3 降雨補注區判識 57 5.4 MODFLOW模型設置與模擬 68 CHAPTER6. 結果與討論 73 6.1 含水層與阻水層分層 73 6.2 水力傳導係數推估 75 6.3 MODFLOW模擬 77 CHAPTER7. 研究總結與建議 79 CHAPTER8. 參考文獻 81 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 結合資料科學輔助地下水模式建置-以臺北盆地為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Application of Data Science to Support Groundwater Modeling – A Case Study in Taipei Basin | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 羅偉誠(Wei-Cheng Lo),江崇榮(Chung-Jung Chiang),許少瑜(Shao-Yiu Hsu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | MODFLOW,貝式最大熵法,經驗正交函數,地下水模式分層,補注區判釋,水文地質參數推估, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | MODFLOW,Bayesian maximum entropy,Empirical orthogonal function,Groundwater model stratification,Recharge area identification,Hydrogeological parameter estimation, | en |
dc.relation.page | 85 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202003781 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-08-19 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物環境系統工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 生物環境系統工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-1708202015482800.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 7.45 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。