請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/67796
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 康仕仲(Shih-Chung Kang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Wei-Che Hsu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 徐偉哲 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T01:50:24Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-07-27 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2017-07-27 | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-07-24 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Ahn, S. J. G. (2011). Embodied Experiences in Immersive Virtual Environments: Effects on Pro-Environmental Attitude and Behavior. Dissertation:Stanford University(May), 1–156.
Ahn, S. J. G., Bailenson, J. N., & Park, D. (2014). Short-and long-term effects of embodied experiences in immersive virtual environments on environmental locus of control and behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 235–245. Ahn, S. J. G., Bostick, J., Ogle, E., Nowak, K. L., McGillicuddy, K. T., & Bailenson, J. N. (2016). Experiencing nature: Embodying animals in immersive virtual environments increases inclusion of nature in self and involvement with nature. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, 21(6), 399–419. Ahn, S. J. G., Fox, J., Dale, K. R., & Avant, J. A. (2015). Framing Virtual Experiences. Communication Research, 42(6), 839–863. Ahn, S. J. G., Le, A. M. T., & Bailenson, J. (2013). The effect of embodied experiences on self-other merging, attitude, and helping behavior. Media Psychology, 16(1), 7–38. Akerlof, K., Maibach, E. W., Fitzgerald, D., Cedeno, A. Y., & Neuman, A. (2013). Do people “personally experience”global warming, and if so how, and does it matter? Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 81–91. Anderson, A. (2012). Climate Change Education for Mitigation and Adaptation. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 62(6), 191–206. Attari, S. Z., DeKay, M. L., Davidson, C. I., & De Bruin, W. B. (2010). Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings. Proceedings of the National Academy of sciences, 107(37), 16054–16059. Bailenson, J. N., Swinth, K., Hoyt, C., Persky, S., Dimov, A., & Blascovich, J. (2005). The independent and interactive effects of embodied-agent appearance and behavior on self-report, cognitive, and behavioral markers of copresence in immersive virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 14(4), 379–393. Bailey, J. O., Bailenson, J. N., & Casasanto, D. (2016). When does virtual embodiment change our minds? PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 25(3), 222– 233. Bailey, J. O., Bailenson, J. N., Flora, J., Armel, K. C., Voelker, D., & Reeves, B. (2015). The impact of vivid messages on reducing energy consumption related to hot water use. Environment and Behavior, 47(5), 570–592. Bamberg, S., & Moser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14–25. Barnes, M. D., & Chen, Y.-J. (2014). A preliminary assessment of the national environmental education act in the united states: Background, issues, and implications for taiwan. 華 學 (34), 51–72. Bator, R., & Cialdini, R. (2000). The application of persuasion theory to the development of effective proenvironmental public service announcements. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 527–542. Blühdorn, I. (2011). The politics of unsustainability: Cop15, post-ecologism, and the ecological paradox. Organization & Environment, 24(1), 34–53. Bostrom, A. (2003). Future risk communication. Futures, 35(6), 553–573. Bowles, S. (2008). Policies designed for self-interested citizens may undermine “the moral sentiments”: Evidence from economic experiments. science, 320(5883), 1605– 1609. Bray, D., & Shackley, S. (2004). The social simulation of the public perception of weather events and their effect upon the development of belief in anthropogenic climate change. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research: Working Paper, 58. Breunig, M., Murtell, J., Russell, C., & Howard, R. (2014). The impact of integrated environmental studies programs: are students motivated to act pro-environmentally? Environmental Education Research, 20(3), 372–386. Carlson, A. (2001). Aesthetic preferences for sustainable landscapes: seeing and knowing. Forests and Landscapes. New York: CABI Publishing, 31–42. Cheng, T.-M., & Wu, H. C. (2015). How do environmental knowledge, environmental sensitivity, and place attachment affect environmentally responsible behavior? An integrated approach for sustainable island tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(4), 557–576. Cheng, Y.-M., Lou, S.-J., Kuo, S.-H., & Shih, R.-C. (2013). Investigating elementary school students’ technology acceptance by applying digital game-based learning to environmental education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1). Corral-Verdugo, V. (2002). A Structural Model of Proenvironmental Competency. Environment and Behavior, 34(4), 531–549. De Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2009). Morality and Prosocial Behavior: The Role of Awareness, Responsibility, and Norms in the Norm Activation Model. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149(4), 425–449. Delmas, M. A., Fischlein, M., & Asensio, O. I. (2013). Information strategies and energy conservation behavior: A meta-analysis of experimental studies from 1975 to 2012. Energy Policy, 61, 729–739. de Miranda Coelho, J. A. P., Gouveia, V. V., de Souza, G. H. S., Milfont, T. L., & Barros, B. N. R. (2016). Emotions toward water consumption: Conservation and wastage. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 48(2), 117–126. Dillard, A. J., & Main, J. L. (2013). Using a Health Message With a Testimonial to Motivate Colon Cancer Screening. Health Education & Behavior, 40(6), 673–682. Felnhofer, A., Kothgassner, O. D., Schmidt, M., Heinzle, A. K., Beutl, L., Hlavacs, H., & Kryspin-Exner, I. (2015). Is virtual reality emotionally arousing? Investigating five emotion inducing virtual park scenarios. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 82, 48–56. Fischer, C. (2008). Feedback on household electricity consumption: A tool for saving energy? Energy Efficiency, 1(1), 79–104. Grothmann, T., & Patt, A. (2005). Adaptive capacity and human cognition: The process of individual adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15(3), 199– 213. Hershfield, H. E. (2011). Future self-continuity: how conceptions of the future self transform intertemporal choice. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1235(1), 30–43. Heydarian, A., Carneiro, J. P., Gerber, D., Becerik-Gerber, B., Hayes, T., & Wood, W. (2015). Immersive virtual environments versus physical built environments: A benchmarking study for building design and user-built environment explorations. Automation in Construction, 54, 116–126. Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing Learner Behavior Through Environmental Education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8–21. Jain, R. K., Taylor, J. E., & Culligan, P. J. (2013). Investigating the impact eco-feedback information representation has on building occupant energy consumption behavior and savings. Energy and Buildings, 64, 408–414. Jamieson, D. (2006). An american paradox. Climatic Change, 77(1), 97–102. Jeong, S. H., Gulbinas, R., Jain, R. K., & Taylor, J. E. (2014). The impact of combined water and energy consumption eco-feedback on conservation. Energy and Buildings, 80, 114–119. Kagawa, F. (2007). Dissonance in students’ perceptions of sustainable development and sustainability: Implications for curriculum change. International journal of sustainability in higher education, 8(3), 317–338. Karlin, B., Zinger, J. F., & Ford, R. (2015). The effects of feedback on energy conservation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141(6), 1205–1227. Karthe, D., Reeh, T., Walther, M., Niemann, S., & Siegmund, A. (2016). School- based environmental education in the context of a research and development project on integrated water resources management: experiences from Mongolia. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(18), 1–18. Larson, K. L., & Redman, E. N. (2014). Water Education for Sustainability: Criteria and Recommendations. Society & Natural Resources, 27(11), 1213–1222. Lee, T. H., & Jan, F.-H. (2015). The influence of recreation experience and environmental attitude on the environmentally responsible behavior of community-based tourists in taiwan. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(7), 1063–1094. Linnenbrink, E. A. (2006). Emotion research in education: Theoretical and methodological perspectives on the integration of affect, motivation, and cognition. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 307–314. Liu, S.-Y., Yeh, S.-C., Liang, S.-W., Fang, W.-T., & Tsai, H.-M. (2015). A National investigation of teachers’environmental literacy as a reference for promoting environmental education in Taiwan. The Journal of Environmental Education, 46(2), 114–132. Lowe, T. (2006). Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 15(4), 435–457. Maibach, E. W., Nisbet, M., Baldwin, P., Akerlof, K., & Diao, G. (2010). Reframing climate change as a public health issue: an exploratory study of public reactions. BMC Public Health, 10(1), 299. Markowitz, E. M., & Shariff, A. F. (2012). Climate change and moral judgement. Nature Climate Change, 2(4), 243–247. Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers and Education, 70, 29–40. Mobley, C., Vagias, W. M., & DeWard, S. L. (2010). Exploring additional determinants of environmentally responsible behavior: The influence of environmental literature and environmental attitudes. Environment and Behavior, 42(4), 420–447. Moser, S. C. (2010). Communicating climate change: history, challenges, processes and future directions. WIREs Climate Change, 1(February), 31–53. Newton, P., & Meyer, D. (2013). Exploring the attitudes-action gap in household resource consumption: does ?environmental lifestyle? segmentation align with consumer behaviour? Sustainability, 5(3), 1211–1233. Novak, J., Melenhorst, M., Micheel, I., Pasini, C., Fraternali, P., & Rizzoli, A. E. (2016). Behaviour change and incentive modelling for water saving : first results from the SmartH2O project. International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software. Nussbaum, E. M., Owens, M. C., Sinatra, G. M., Rehmat, A. P., Cordova, J. R., Ahmad, S., ... Dascalu, S. M. (2015). Losing the lake: Simulations to promote gains in student knowledge and interest about climate change. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10(6), 789–811. Oh, S. Y., Bailenson, J., Weisz, E., & Zaki, J. (2016). Virtually old: Embodied perspective taking and the reduction of ageism under threat. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 398–410. Onwezen, M. C., Antonides, G., & Bartels, J. (2013). The Norm Activation Model: An exploration of the functions of anticipated pride and guilt in pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 39, 141–153. Pahl, S., Goodhew, J., Boomsma, C., & Sheppard, S. R. J. (2016). The Role of Energy Visualization in Addressing Energy Use: Insights from the eViz Project. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–4. Parker, J., & Sams, D. (2015). Eco-feedback technology’s influence on water conservation attitudes and intentions of university students in the usa: An experimental design. In Sustainable water use and management (pp. 169–184). Springer. Petkov, P., Köbler, F., Foth, M., & Krcmar, H. (2011). Motivating domestic energy conservation through comparative, community-based feedback in mobile and social media. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on communities and technologies (pp. 21–30). ACM. Pooley, J. A., & O’Connor, M. (2000). Environmental Education and Attitudes: Emotions and Beliefs are What is Needed. Environment and Behavior, 32(5), 711–723. Quay, R., Larson, K. L., & White, D. D. (2013). Enhancing water sustainability through university–policy collaborations: Experiences and lessons from researchers and decision-makers. Water Resources IMPACT, 15(2), 17–19. Redman, E. (2013). Advancing educational pedagogy for sustainability: Developing and implementing programs to transform behaviors. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 8(1), 1–34. Rees, J. H., Klug, S., & Bamberg, S. (2015). Guilty conscience: motivating pro- environmental behavior by inducing negative moral emotions. Climatic Change, 130(3), 439–452. Roczen, N., Kaiser, F. G., Bogner, F. X., & Wilson, M. (2014). A competence model for environmental education. Environment and Behavior, 46(8), 972–992. Rosenberg, R. S., Baughman, S. L., & Bailenson, J. N. (2013). Virtual superheroes: Using superpowers in virtual reality to encourage prosocial behavior. PloS one, 8(1), e55003. Rowe, Z. (2017). Influencing sustainable product choice through anticipated pride and guilt: the role of self-accountability and recalled emotions. Sandstrom, N. J., Kaufman, J., & Huettel, S. A. (1998). Males and females use different distal cues in a virtual environment navigation task. Cognitive Brain Research, 6(4), 351–360. Sarabia-Sánchez, F. J., Rodríguez-Sánchez, C., & Hyder, A. (2014). The role of personal involvement, credibility and efficacy of conduct in reported water conservation behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 206–216. Sheppard, S. R. (2005). Landscape visualisation and climate change: The potential for influencing perceptions and behaviour. Environmental Science and Policy, 8(6), 637– 654. Sheppard, S. R. (2012). Visualizing climate change: a guide to visual communication of climate change and developing local solutions. Routledge. Sheppard, S. R. (2015). Making climate change visible: A critical role for landscape professionals. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 95–105. Slater, M., Spanlang, B., Sanchez-Vives, M. V., & Blanke, O. (2010). First person experience of body transfer in virtual reality. PloS one, 5(5), e10564. Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309–317. Sundar, S. S. (2004). Theorizing interactivity’s effects. The information society, 20(5), 385–389. Swaim, J. A., Maloni, M. J., Napshin, S. A., & Henley, A. B. (2014). Influences on Student Intention and Behavior Toward Environmental Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(3), 465–484. Tsai, M. H., Wen, M. C., Chang, Y. L., & Kang, S. C. (2015). Game-based education for disaster prevention. AI and Society, 30(4), 463–475. Uzzell, D. L. (2000). The psycho-spatial dimension of global environmental problems. Journal of environmental psychology, 20(4), 307–318. Van Der Werff, E., & Steg, L. (2015). One model to predict them all: Predicting energy behaviours with the norm activation model. Energy Research and Social Science, 6, 8–14. Van Dam, S., Bakker, C., & Van Hal, J. (2010). Home energy monitors: impact over the medium-term. Building Research & Information, 38(5), 458–469. Weber, E. U. (2006). Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: Why global warming does not scare us (yet). Climatic change, 77(1), 103–120. Wiek, A., Withycombe, L., & Redman, C. L. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability science, 6(2), 203–218. Willis, R. M., Stewart, R. A., Panuwatwanich, K., Williams, P. R., & Hollingsworth, A. L. (2011). Quantifying the influence of environmental and water conservation attitudes on household end use water consumption. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(8), 1996–2009. Zaalberg, R., & Midden, C. (2010). Enhancing human responses to climate change risks through simulated flooding experiences. In International conference on persuasive technology (pp. 205–210). Berlin, Heidelberg. Zimbardo, P., & Boyd, J. (2008). The time paradox: The new psychology of time that will change your life. Simon and Schuster. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/67796 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 節水教育已推廣多年,然而成效上卻相當有限。水環境教育最大的挑戰,在於個人往往難以將自身行為與對應對環境造成的負面結果做連結,因為浪費水對環境的破壞通常要一段時間才會產生,一般人能難意識到節水的重要性。本研究目的在於利用「沈浸式虛擬體驗遊戲」,讓參與者接受到更具體、與自己相關、急切性等資訊,以激發個人的節水意向。此虛擬遊戲讓玩家將置身於一虛擬的浴室進行體驗,透過手上600毫升的寶特瓶於一分鐘內不斷運送水源至指定水箱,直到水量可以成功沖馬桶與完成一分鐘的淋浴。而在這消耗水資源的過程中,我們嘗試讓參與者接受誇張化的反饋 (Exaggerated feedback, EF),包含直接提升每次參與者裝水時的耗水量(Direct EF)或惡化虛擬體驗中的外部環境(Ambient EF)等方式以加強個人情意上對水資源消耗的反應。接著以個人在虛擬實境中是否會主動關水龍頭,以及延宕一個月後的問卷驗證虛擬實境節水體驗與誇張化反饋是否對參與者在節水認知、態度、行為意向上有正向的影響。研究共分四組,共計165位高中生參與一次性的虛擬遊戲體驗。結果發現,整體而言所有參賽者在體驗遊戲後,在用水量認知與節水行為意向上有顯著的進步,此外,體驗外部環境誇張化反饋的參與者(Ambient EF)相較於沒有體驗者,在用水態度與節水行為意向上有較為顯著的進步。依據驗證成果,此研究成功針對節水教育開發新的勸導媒介,同時發覺誇張化體驗型教育上的優勢,未來可應用於其他環境教育。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Water-saving is easy saying than doing. The primary challenge of water environmental education is the gap between individual’s actual behavior of water-consuming and the consequences of that action, e.g. possible and potential environmental damage a long period after. That leads to individual’s lack of awareness of the problem. We thus designed a virtual reality water conservation game based on the psychological consideration to fill the gap between the individual habitual behaviors and the effect of negative consequences of the environment. The purpose of the present study is to utilize an immersive virtual environment technology (IVET) to create virtual experiences and expose the individual to vivid information, personal relevance and immediacy with the goal to raise behavior intention to water conservation. We provided the mediated virtual experience in the form of experiential learning game in which participants were situated in a virtual bathroom and were asked to repeat delivering water of 600-milliliter bottle in one minute until filling the specific water tank to flush toilet and have one-minute showering. The virtual reality game was designed for two participants. One was the major player embodies in the virtual environment while another one as the assistant stayed in the physical environment. Two participants should cooperate with each other to complete the virtual reality game. During the process of consuming the water resource, participants received exaggerated feedbacks (EF) vary in intensifying negative consequence of water consumption (direct EF) and/or environmental damage (ambient EF) that emphasizes personal affective responses. The evaluation of the effect of virtual experiences and exaggerated feedback was conducted through investigating individual willingness to turn off virtual faucet as well as pre-test and post-test questionnaire focusing on personal change of cognition, attitude and behavior intention to water conservation. An overall of 165 players, separated into four groups according to ambient or/and direct EF condition, experienced the game activities. A series of ANOVA was used to examine the effect of the experimental intervention. The results show that the immersive virtual reality game in this study cause significantly change of cognition and behavior intention. Further, the salience of water environmental risks from ambient EF can stimulate individual stronger improvement of attitude and behavior intention. We contributed a novel persuasive technology that is particular to the water resource. Also, the advantage of ambient EF was explored that could be applied to numerous and environmental-related issues in society. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T01:50:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R04521604-1.pdf: 14156206 bytes, checksum: aa46cd2ce7bae2193e2faa7274098c42 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 1 Introduction ................................. 1
1.1 Background ................................. 1 1.2 Problem description ............................ 3 1.3 Thesis organization ............................. 4 2 Related Works ................................. 5 2.1 Key to raising awareness to environmental problem ............. 5 2.2 Experiential learning ............................ 7 2.3 Strengthof IVET .............................. 8 3 Game Design ................................. 12 3.1 Psychological consideration ........................ 12 3.2 Apparatus .................................. 17 4 Experiment Design .................................. 20 4.1 Participants ................................. 20 4.2 Procedure .................................. 20 4.3 Measures .................................. 23 5 Results .................................. 27 5.1 Effect of vivid and personal relevant experience in virtual environment ... 27 5.2 Effect of exaggerated feedback ....................... 28 5.3 Immediate recall of virtual experience ................... 29 6 Discussion................................. 31 6.1 Reason for positive effects of the virtual reality game ................... 31 6.2 Reason for positive effects of exaggerated feedback ................... 32 7 Conclusion and Future Work ................................. 34 7.1 Conclusion ................................. 34 7.2 Limitation and future work ......................... 35 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 利用誇張化反饋於虛擬實境環境中提升個人節水意向 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Using Exaggerated Feedback in a Virtual Reality Environment to Enhance Behavior Intention of Water-Conservation | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 曾敬梅(Ching-Mei Tseng) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 葉欣誠(Shin-Cheng Yeh),許素朱(Su-Chu Hsu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 水環境教育,節約用水,虛擬實境,體驗式學習,誇張化反饋,行為意向, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | water environmental education,water conservation,virtual reality,experiential learning,exaggerated feedback,behavior intention, | en |
dc.relation.page | 45 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201701901 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2017-07-25 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-106-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 13.82 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。