請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/67468完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 蔡明哲(Ming-Jer Tsai) | |
| dc.contributor.author | King-Fai Wong | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 黃勁暉 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T01:33:32Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2020-08-04 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2017-08-04 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2017-08-02 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. 山中勝次、難波謙二、中西純一(2000)中国雲南省產黒トリュフの形態的特 徴。日本菌学会会報,41(2): 79–84。
2. 弓明欽、陳應龍、仲崇祿(1997)菌根研究及應用。中國林業出版社。北京。223 頁。 3. 弓明欽、陳羽、王鳳珍(2003)黑孢塊菌的苗木菌根化合成效果研究。林業科 學研究,16(1): 52-57。 4. 弓明欽(2009)塊菌首次在國內栽培成功。中國食用菌,28(3): 15。 印度塊菌菌根合成及其對苗木促生防病效果試驗。貴州林業科技,32(2): 19–24。 5. 吳文希(2012)有機農業。胡蜀琪出版,藝軒圖書文具有限公司經銷。臺北。131 頁。 6. 呂勝由、楊智凱、吳維修、謝卉婷(2012)台灣橡實森林博覽會。行政院農業 委員會林業試驗所。臺北。105 頁。 7. 李沛軒、林謙佑、邱文良、黃曜謀、林則桐(2013)福山植物園蕨類物候。林 業研究專訊,20: 45-48。 8. 李金梅、餘欣怡、王瀛生(2014)臺灣常見殼斗科木材圖鑑。行政院農業委員 會林業試驗所。臺北。144 頁。 9. 李叡明(1991)花卉土壤與肥料。淑馨出版社。台北。81 頁。 10. 周文能、張東柱(2005)野菇圖鑑。遠流出版事業有限公司。臺北。439 頁。 11. 林健銘(2005)青剛櫟接種塊菌對其生長之影響及龜紋硬皮馬勃對塊菌菌根之 競爭力。臺灣大學森林學研究所學位論文。64 頁。 12. 邵廣昭(2009)台灣物種名錄 網路電子版。中央研究院生物多樣性研究中心, 取自 http://taibnet.sinica.edu.tw。 13. 胡弘道(1987)塊菇與林木共生關係之研究(I)菌根合成試驗。國立臺灣大學農學院實驗林研究報告,1(1): 1-6。 14. 胡弘道(1990)林木菌根。千華出版有限公司。臺北。666 頁。 15. 胡弘道 (1996)青剛櫟與美味牛肝菌之菌根純合成及共生後對苗木生長之影響。 國立台灣大學農學院研究報告,36(4): 1-13。 16. 胡弘道、黃鏡諺 (2004) 印度塊菌及台灣塊菌與青剛櫟形成菌根形態之比較。 中華林學季,37(3): 259-267 17. 胡弘道(2010)塊菌(松露)培育與食譜。國立編譯館。臺北。104 頁。 18. 胡炳福、朱忠榮、遠香美、尹向陽、張小敏、王亮、方珊、楊松、廖萬兵 (2004) 印度塊菌菌根合成及其對苗木促生防病效果試驗。貴州林業科技。32(2):19-24 19. 胡炳福、尹曉陽、朱忠榮、遠香美、楊安敏、金天喜、胡剛、廖萬兵、楊萍(2006) 印度塊菌苗木菌根化接種技術研究。貴州林業科技,34(2): 15–18,26。 20. 胡炳福、遠香美、余金、吳躍開(2010)印度塊菌栽培在貴州首獲成功。中國 林副特產,2:F0003 版。 21. 張東柱(2000)福山大型真菌。行政院農業委員會。臺北。195 頁。 22. 曹雲(2014 年 11 月 4 日)一個亟待開發的林下超級種植專案──訪中國科學院 昆明植物研究所教授劉培貴。中國綠色時報,綜合新聞 A02。 23. 陳怡君(2004)義大利白塊菇之半無菌菌根合成與不同 pH 值介質對其菌根形 成與青剛櫟葉部大量養分元素之效應。國立台灣大學森林研究所碩士論文。台 北。71 頁。 24. 陳波濤(2003)塊菌的感染接種與塊菌林營建技術初報。貴州林業科技,31(1):10–14。 25. 陳家全、李家維、楊瑞森(1991)生物電子顯微鏡學。行政院國家科學委員會 精密儀器發展中心。新竹。266 頁。 26. 黃增泉主編(1996)《臺灣植物誌》第二版。行政院國家科學委員會。722 頁。 27. 臧穆、蒲春翔、鄔建明、陳啟芳、劉蓓(1992)印度塊菌在我國分布的確認。 中國食用菌,11(3): 19–39。 28. 應紹舜(1996)臺灣高等植物彩色圖誌第三卷(增訂一版)。應紹舜。670 頁。 29. Agerer, R. (1986) Studies on ectomycorrhizae. II: Introducing remarks on characterization and identification. Mycotaxon, 26: 473-492. 30. Agerer, R. (1988) Colour Atlas of Ectomycorrhizae. Einhorn-Verlag Efuard Dientenberger. 145p. 31. Agerer, R. and M. Weiss (1989) Studies on ectomycorrhizae. XX. Mycorrhizae formed by Thelephora terrestris on Norway spruce. Mycologia, 81(3): 444-453. 32. Agerer, R. (1991) Characterization of Ectomycorrhiza. Methods in microbiology, 23: 25-73. 33. Agerer, R. (1995) Anatomical characteristics of identified ectomycorrhizas: an attempt towards a natural classification. In Mycorrhiza, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, p685-734. 34. Agerer, R. (2001) Exploration types of ectomycorrhizae. Mycorrhiza, 11(2): 107-114. 35. Agerer, R. (2006) Fungal relationships and structural identity of their ectomycorrhizae. Mycol Progress 5: 67–107 36. Bonito G., J. Trappe, S. Donovan and R. Vilgalys (2011) The Asian black truffle Tuber indicum can form ectomycorrhizas with North American host plants and complete its life cycle in non-native soils. Fungal Ecology, 4: 83-93. 37. Bonito, G. M. and M. E. Smith (2016) General Systematic Position of the Truffles: Evolutionary Theories, in True Truffle (Tuber spp.) in the World, Zambonelli A, Iotti M and Murat C, eds, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland. 436p. 38. Castresana J. (2000) Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution 71: 540-552. 39. Chen J., S.X. Guo and P.G. Liu (2011) Species recognition and cryptic species in the Tuber indicum complex. PLoS One 6(1):e14625. 40. Comandini O. and G. Pacioni (1997) Mycorrhizae of Asian black truffles, Tuber himalayense and T. indicum. Mycotaxon 63: 77-86 41. Cooke M.C. and G. Massee (1892) Himalayan truffles. Grevillea 20: 67. 42. Deng X.J., F.Q. Yu and P.Q. Liu (2014) Contribution to confirmed & synthesized on mycorrhizae of Tuber indicum with two dominated & subalpine broadleaf trees in southwestern China. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 5: 3269-3279. 43. Dominik, T. (1969) Key to ectotrophic mycorrhizae. Folia For. Pol. Ser. A. Lesn. 15: 309-328. 44. Garcia-Montero L.G., G. Di Massimo, J.L. Manjon and A. Garcia-Abril (2008) New data on ectomycorrhizae and soils of the Chinese truffles Tuber pseudoexcavatum and Tuber indicum, and their impact on truffle cultivation. Mycorrhiza, 19: 7-14. 45. Garcia-Montero L.G., P. Dı´az, G. Di Massimo and A. Garcia-Abril (2010) A review of research on Chinese Tuber species. Mycological Progress, 9: 315-335. 46. Geng L.Y., X.H. Wang, F.Q. Yu, X.J. Deng, X.F. Tian, X.F. Shi, X.D. Xie, P.G. Liu and Y.Y. Shen (2009) Mycorrhizal synthesis of Tuber indicum with two indigenous hosts, Castanea mollissima and Pinus armandii. Mycorrhiza, 19: 461-467. 47. Giovannetti A. and G. Fontana (1982) Mycorrhizal synthesis between Cistaceae and Tuberaceae. New Phytol., 92: 533-537 48. Giovanni P.(1991)Effects of Tuber Metabolites on the rhizospheric environment. Mycol.Res., 95(12): 1355-1358. 49. Hall I.R., G.T. Brown and A. Zambonelli (2007) Taming the Truffle: The History, Lore, and Science of the Ultimate Mushroom. Timber Press. London. 304p. 50. Harley, J.L. and S.E. smith (1983) Mycorrhizal sumbiosis. Academic Press Inc. UK. 483p. 51. Hu, H. T. (1992) Tuber formosanum sp. nov. and its mycorrhizal associations. Journal of the Experimental Forest of National Taiwan University, 6: 79-86. 52. Hu H.T., Y. Wang and B. Y. Hu (2005) Cultivation of Tuber formosanum on limed soil in Taiwan. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 33: 363-366. 53. Huang J.Y., H.T. Hu and W. C. Shen (2009) Phylogenetic study of two truffles, T. formosanum and Tuber furfuraceum, identified from Taiwan. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 294(2): 157–171. 54. Hung, T. H., M. L. Wu and H. J. Su (1999) Development of a rapid method for the diagnosis of Citrus Greening Disease using the polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Phytopathology 147: 599-607. 55. Jeandroz S., C. Murat, Y.J. Wang, P. Bonfante, F. Le Tacon (2008) Molecular phylogeny and historical biogeography of the genus Tuber, the ‘true truffles’. J Biogeogr 35(5):815–829. 56. Katoh, K. and D.M. Standley (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 30: 772-780. 57. Kinoshita A., H. Sasaki and K. Nara (2011) Phylogeny and diversity of Japanese truffles (Tuber spp.) inferred from sequences of four nuclear loci. Mycologia, 103(4): 779-794. 58. LÆSSØE T. and K. Hansen (2007) Truffle trouble: what happens to the Tuberales. Mycol Res, 111: 1075-1099. 59. Lakhanpal, T. N. (2000) Ectomycorrhiza—An overview. In Mycorrhizal biology, Springer US, p101-118. 60. Montero L.G., G. D. Massimo, J.L. Manjón and A. Abril (2008) New data on ectomycorrhizae and soils of the Chinese truffles Tuber pseudoexcavatum and Tuber indicum, and their impact on truffle cultivation. Mycorrhiza 19:7–14 61. Murat C., E. Zampieri, A. Vizzini and P. Bonfante (2008) Is the Perigord black truffle threatened by an invasive species? We dreaded it and it has happened!. New Phytologist, 178: 699-702. 62. Paolocci F., A. Rubini, C. Riccioni, A. Granetti and S. Arcioni (2000) Cloning and characterization of two repeated sequences in the symbiotic fungus Tuber melanosporum Vitt. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 34: 139–146. 63. Pegler D.N., B.M. Spooner and T.W.K. Young (1993) British Truffles: A revision of British hypogeous fungi. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. UK. 216p. 64. Peng Q., P.G. Liu, H.T. Hu and Y. Wang (2013) Typification of Tuber formosanum(Tuberaceae, Pezizales, Ascomycota) from Taiwan, China. Mycotaxon, 123: 293-299 65. Rambaut, A. (2014) FigTree v1.4. Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh. 66. Ronquist, F., M. Teslenko, P. Van Der Mark, D. L. Ayres, A. Darling, S. Höhna, B. Larget, L. Liu, M. A. Suchard and J. P. Huelsenbeck (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic biology, 61(3), 539-542. 67. Smith S.E. and D.J. Read(2008)Mycorrhizal symbiosis. 3rd edition. Academic Press Ltd.. UK. 787p. 68. Suwannarach N., J. Kumla. and S. Lumyong (2015) A new whitish truffle, Tuber thailandicum from northern Thailand and its ectomycorrhizal association. Mycol Progress, 14: 83-95. 69. Suwannarach N., J. Kumla, S. Vadthanarat, O. Raspé and S. Lumyong (2016) Morphological and molecular evidence support a new truffle, Tuber lannaense, from Thailand. Mycol Progress (2016) 15:827–834 70. Tamura, K., G. Stecher, D. Peterson, A. Filipski and S. Kumar (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 2725-2729. 71. Tateno Y, Imanishi T, Miyazaki S, Fukami-Kobayashi K, Saitou N, Sugawara H, & Gojobori T. (2002) DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ) for genome scale research in life science. Nucleic acids research, 30(1):27-30. 72. Trappe J. M. (1962) Fungus associates of ectotrophic mycorrhizae. The Bot. Rev., 28: 538-606. 73. Trappe, J. M. (1967) Pure culture synthesis of Douglas-fir mycorrhizae with species of Hebeloma, Suillus, Rhizopogon, and Astraeus. Forest Science, 13(2): 121-130. 74. Trappe M., F. Evans and J. M. Trappe (2007) Field guide to North American truffles. Ten Speed, Berkeley, CA. 136p. 75. Wang Y.J., Z.M. Tan, D.C. Zhang, C. Murat, S. Jeandroz and F. LeTacon(2006)Phylogenetic and populational study of the Tuber indicum complex. Mycological Research 110: 1034-1045. 76. Wang Y. and P.G. Liu (2009) Achievements and challenges of research on truffles in China. Acta Botanica Yunnanica, Suppl. XVI: 1-9. 77. Wang, X. (2012) Truffle cultivation in China. In Edible Ectomycorrhizal Mushrooms. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. p227-240 78. White T.J., T. Bruns, S. Lee and J. W. Taylor (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics, PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, Academic Press, Inc., New York. p315-322 79. Zak, B. (1971) Characterization and classification of Douglas fir mycorrhizae, in: Mycorrhiae: Proc. I. Nacom, E. Hacskaylo, ed., USDA For. Ser. Misc. Pub, 1189, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. 3853p. 80. Zak, B. (1973) Classification of Ectomycorrhizae, in Ectomycorrhizae: Their Ecology and Physiology, Marks GC and Kozlowski TT, eds., Academic press. UK. p43-78. 81. Zhang L.F., Z.L. Yang and D.S. Song (2005) A phylogenetic study of commercial Chinese truffles and their allies: taxonomic implications. FEMS Microbiology Letters 245: 85-92. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/67468 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究以子囊菌塊菌屬(Tuber)之印度塊菌(Tuber indicum)製成 20 ml 孢子濃度為 5×10^3個/ml之孢子懸浮液,接種至福山植物園41種殼斗科樹木,以探討不同殼斗科樹種與印度塊菌共生的可能性,期望以高寄主親和性的印度塊菌接種 於推薦樹種青剛櫟等殼斗科樹木之根系,得出印度塊菌在不同季節、樹種、培養介質及接種方法下形成菌根共生關係的最佳條件。實驗分為兩次地下根部接種及地上部樹冠接種,菌根收集後將以形態學觀察及記錄其合成情形、表面構造、排列、 菌氈、菌絲及剛毛等顯微形態特徵;另外亦輔以分子生物鑑定比對基因資料庫及製 作基因親緣樹以分析菌根菌的種類及親緣關係。
地下部根系接種的發根率佔總接種包數70-85%之間,菌根率在55-63%之間,其中第二次接種的菌根共生情況比第一次的效果較好,而菌根測序率約 43-47%; 而枝條高壓接種的發根率及菌根率比根系接種低,分別為 45 及 33 %,菌根測序率 約 1.5 %。第一次地下部根系接種中擔子菌佔 85 %之絕大多數,以硬皮馬勃科、牛 肝菌科及革菌科之菌根菌為主,其中擔子菌的 Tomentella 屬、Russula recondite Melera & Ostellari.,以及子囊菌 Lauriomyces bellulus Crous & M.J. Wingf 為台灣新 記錄種,惟未有發現塊菌科菌根菌;第二次地下部根系接種仍以擔子菌佔 76 %大多數,以革菌科、紅菇科及硬皮馬勃科之菌根菌為主,並有 6 個菌根樣本共 3 屬 5 種的殼斗科樹木顯示出與塊菌共生的可能,惟非本次實驗接種之印度塊菌,其中擔子菌的 Tomentella sublilacina (Ellis & Holw.) Wakef、Russula recondita Melera & Ostellari.、Russula heterophylla (Fr.) Fri.、Lactarius kesiyae Verbeken & K.D. Hyde、 Laccaria fulvogrisea Popa, K.H. Rexer & G. Kost、Entoloma inusitatum Noordel.、Sebacina flagelliformis Oberw.,以及子囊菌的 Neonectria 屬為台灣新記種;而與塊菌屬 Tuber thailandicum N. Suwannarach, J. Kumla & S. Lumyong 及 Tuber sp.11 相似之菌根菌則可能為世界新種,惟仍需待子囊果之發現以完成完整的形態學鑑定。地 上部枝條高壓接種的在發根率、菌根率及測序率均較地下部根系接種低,但卻可以 讓塊菌得到接近無雜菌且菌類多樣性較低的生長環境,避免與其他於土壤中擁有 高空氣傳播能力和菌絲快速生長的菌根菌競爭。 地下部根系接種之 6 個塊菌菌根樣本若單以形態學作鑑定符合前人於印度塊菌的菌根形態之描述。研究結果顯示形態學可以輔助區分菌根菌之有無及排除部分非塊菌屬之菌根菌,但如果要用作鑑別塊菌屬之菌根,需要另外再輔以分子生物 鑑定,才能得到較準確之鑑定。然而,分子生物技術於塊菌菌根的鑑定上亦有許多 的難題需要克服,如菌根菌測序率普遍偏低,亦無法以基因鑑定技術測出印度塊菌 之結果等;而另外進行之其他印度塊菌接種實驗亦得到與福山印度塊菌接種實驗 相似之結果,排除了個別偶然事件的可能性。因此,印度塊菌與寄主如青剛櫟是否 真的如前人研究般具有廣泛寄主而且具高親和性,仍然是值得全盤再深究、實驗、 證明與探討。最後,在實驗過程中以分子鑑定的方法能於未發現子實體的情況下, 得知臺灣可能存在有不少新記錄之真菌,包括類似於日本及泰國發現的一些白塊菌,若環境適合出菇,再輔以一些保護設置,應有不低機會可找到相關之子實體, 以完成完整的形態學鑑定。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The objective of this study is to analysis the symbiotic relationship of Tuber with Fagaceae tree species under different environmental condition, inoculation method and growing medium, as the basic information for further research on the cultivation of truffles. Based on researches by predecessors, Tuber indicum, with wide host range and affinity, were inoculated to 41 species of Fagaceae trees, reported as common host of truffles and with high affinity with Tuber species, in Fushan Botanical Garden of Taiwan. Experiments were carried out in two ways: (1) twice root inoculation and (2) once branch air-layering inoculation in one-year period. Mycorrhizae were then sampled for detailed morphological analysis and molecular identification, and some for further phylogenetic analysis.
Root inoculations experiments resulted in 70-85 % root induction rate, with mycorrihzae formation rate for 55-63 %. The second root inoculation experiment, in winter season, resulted in more mycorrhizae formations. Branch air-layering inoculation experiment obtained lower root induction rate and mycorrihzae formation rate than root inoculation, of 45 % and 33 % respectively. In the first root inoculation experiment, most of the mycorrhizae (85 %) were found to be associated with mycorrhizal fungi of Sclerodermataceae, Boletaceae and Thelephoraceae of basidiomycota, with Tomentella sp., Russula recondite Melera & Ostellari. and Lauriomyces bellulus Crous & M.J. Wingf as the new discovery species of Taiwan. In the second root inoculation experiment, most of the mycorrhizae (76 %) were found to be associated with mycorrhizal fungi of Sclerodermataceae, Russulaceae and Thelephoraceae of basidiomycota, with Tomentella sublilacina (Ellis & Holw.) Wakef, Russula recondita Melera & Ostellari., Russula heterophylla (Fr.) Fri., Lactarius kesiyae Verbeken & K.D. Hyde, Laccaria fulvogrisea Popa, K.H. Rexer & G. Kost, Entoloma inusitatum Noordel., Sebacina flagelliformis Oberw., Neonectria sp. as the new discovery species of Taiwan; Species similar to Tuber thailandicum N. Suwannarach, J. Kumla & S. Lumyong and Tuber sp.11 may be the new species of world. 6 mycorrhizae samples from 5 different Fagaceae tree species, were found to be associated with Tuber, but should with white truffles found in Japan and Thailand, not with the inoculated black truffle Tuber indicum. Branch air-layering inoculation experiment results in much lower root induction and mycorrhizae formation rate, but reviews much less contamination by other undesired mycorrhizal fungi. The 6 Tuber mycorrhizae samples from 5 different Fagaceae tree species were morphologically identical to mycorrhizae associated with Tuber indicum as sited in references. It reviews the difficulty and unreliability of identification of mycorrhizal fungi solely by mycorrhizae morphology, the assist of molecular analysis is necessary. However,there are still many unsolved problems in the detection and identification of Tuber species in mycorrhizae. Tuber indicum were detected neither from the experiment in Fushan Botanical Garden nor from the other experiment we have conducted in nurseries. The wide host range and affinity of Tuber indicum and Fagaceae host reported in previous research is doubted based on the result in this study. The possibility of truffles cultivation needs further experiments and discussion. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T01:33:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R03625054-1.pdf: 5834053 bytes, checksum: 65ce3817ad69612fd0466a7ba1f3b89d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝誌 I
摘要 II Summary IV 圖目錄 IX 表目錄 XII 第一章、引言 1 第二章、文獻回顧 4 2.1 印度塊菌 4 2.1.1 簡介 4 2.1.2 經濟及生態價值 5 2.1.3 分布及生育地物候 7 2.1.4 塊菌之採集 9 2.2 外生菌根菌 12 2.2.1 簡介 12 2.2.2 菌根鑑定 14 2.2.2.1 形態鑑定 14 2.2.2.2 印度塊菌菌根形態 18 2.2.2.3 分子生物技術鑑定 21 2.3 塊菌人工栽培 22 2.3.1 栽培方法 22 2.3.2 寄主樹木 24 2.3.3 塊菌接種源 27 2.3.3.1 污染與檢定 27 2.3.3.2 接種孢子數量 29 2.3.4 栽培介質 30 第三章、材料與方法 31 3.1 材料 31 3.1.1 塊菌接種源 31 3.1.2 寄主樹木 31 3.1.3 栽培介質 32 3.2 方法 32 3.2.1 接種時間 32 3.2.2 接種方法 34 3.2.2.1 地下部根部接種 34 3.2.2.2 地上部樹冠枝條接種 34 3.2.3 菌根形態鑑定 37 3.2.3.1 目視觀察 37 3.2.3.2 解剖及光學顯微鏡之觀察 37 3.2.3.3 掃描式電子顯微鏡之觀察 37 3.2.4 菌根分子鑑定 38 3.2.4.1 核酸萃取 38 3.2.4.2 聚合酶鏈鎖反應 39 3.2.4.3 電泳分析 40 3.2.5 基因資料庫之比對佐證 40 3.2.6 基因親緣樹分析 40 第四章、結果 42 4.1 接種包收集情況 42 4.2 分子生物鑑定佐證 44 4.2.1 兩次根部接種之結果 44 4.2.2 兩次根部接種之結果比較 48 4.2.3 樹冠部枝條高壓接種結果 51 4.3 基因親緣樹分析 52 4.4 形態鑑定結果 54 4.4.1 大葉石櫟 55 4.4.2 鋸葉長尾栲 57 4.4.3 毛刺栲 59 4.4.4 後大埔石櫟 61 4.4.5 栓皮櫟(編號 41.10-04) 63 4.4.6 塊菌菌根形態之比較 65 4.4.7 其他菌根菌之菌根形態 66 4.5 菌根菌之多樣性 71 4.6 塊菌屬菌根之品種 74 4.6.1 日本白松露 Tuber sp.11 74 4.6.2 泰國白松露 Tuber thailandicum 75 4.7 台灣新記錄種 76 4.8 以序列長度區分菌種 78 第五章、討論 80 5.1 接種包根系之情況 81 5.2 菌根形態特徵 83 5.3 分子生物鑑定佐證 84 5.4 臺灣可能存在之東南亞及東北亞新種塊菌 86 第六章、結論 87 參考文獻 89 附件 97 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 分子生物學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 形態學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 人工接種 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 殼斗科 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 福山植物園 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 印度塊菌 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 塊菌屬 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 松露 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | morphological identification | en |
| dc.subject | Tuber | en |
| dc.subject | Tuber indicum | en |
| dc.subject | Fushan Botanical Garden | en |
| dc.subject | Fagaceae | en |
| dc.subject | artificial inoculation | en |
| dc.subject | Truffles | en |
| dc.subject | molecular identification | en |
| dc.title | 印度塊菌與福山植物園41種殼斗科樹木之共生關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Symbiosis relationship of Tuber indicum and 41 species of Fagaceae in Fu-shan Botanical Garden | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 傅春旭(Chuen-Hsu Fu),王松永(Song-Yung Wang),林蘭東(Lang-Dong Lin) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 松露,塊菌屬,印度塊菌,福山植物園,殼斗科,人工接種,形態學,分子生物學, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Truffles,Tuber,Tuber indicum,Fushan Botanical Garden,Fagaceae,artificial inoculation,morphological identification,molecular identification, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 102 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201702451 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2017-08-02 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 森林環境暨資源學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 森林環境暨資源學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-106-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 5.7 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
