請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/67394
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 袁孝維(Hsiao-Wei Yuan) | |
dc.contributor.author | Han-Po Chang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 張瀚柏 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T01:30:28Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-20 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2020-08-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-08-16 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 丁宗蘇,2015。栗喉蜂虎棄蛋孵育計畫(一)。臺北市立動物園動物認養保育計畫。 王力平,2003。金門島栗喉蜂虎營巢地選擇與繁殖生物學研究。碩士論文。國立台灣大學森林學研究所。 王怡平,2005。 金門島栗喉蜂虎營巢棲地復育效應與棲地選擇模式。碩士論文。國立台灣大學森林暨資源學系研究所。 王元均,2006。金門島栗喉蜂虎單獨與集體營巢之生殖策略分析。碩士論文。國立台灣大學森林暨資源學系研究所。 施怡伸,2018。灰頭織巢鳥群內繁殖衝突之研究。臺灣大學生態學與演化生物學研究所學位論文。 袁孝維,2002。栗喉蜂虎營巢地環境因子研究報告。內政部營建署金門國家公園委託研究案。 袁孝維,2003。栗喉蜂虎營巢地維護與評估(二)。內政部營建署金門國家公園委託研究案。 袁孝維,2004。金門栗喉蜂虎營巢地復育及生殖生態學研究。內政部營建署金門國家公園委託研究案。 袁孝維,2009。栗喉蜂虎生態棲地維護與保育。內政部營建署金門國家公園委託研究案。 袁孝維,2010。金門栗喉蜂虎生殖族群與棲地經營管理。內政部營建署金門國家公園委託研究案。 袁孝維,2015。金門栗喉蜂虎遷徙生態調查(1/2)。內政部營建署金門國家公園委託研究案。 袁孝維,2016。金門栗喉蜂虎遷徙生態調查(2/2)。內政部營建署金門國家公園委託研究案。 陳映嵐,2010。舊巢洞使用與否對栗喉蜂虎繁殖成功的影響。碩士論文。國立台灣大學森林暨資源學系研究所。 陳鋒蔚,2010。栗喉蜂虎幫手在親鳥餵食幼鳥時期之影響。碩士論文。國立台灣大學森林暨資源學系研究所。 劉奇璋,2016。栗喉蜂虎棄蛋孵育計畫(二)。臺北市立動物園動物認養保育計畫。 劉奇璋,2018。透過公民參與提升民眾的保育意識與行動-目標物種栗喉蜂虎、黑冠麻鷺。臺北市立動物園動物認養保育計畫。 劉奇璋,2019。栗喉蜂虎托卵寄生行為之親緣關係研究。臺北市立動物園動物認養保育計畫。 蔡佩妤,2007。金門島栗喉蜂虎生殖經驗對於繁殖棲地忠實性之影響。碩士論文。國立台灣大學森林暨資源學系研究所。 Abolins-Abols, M. Hauber, M. (2019). Proximate Predictors of Variation in Egg Rejection Behavior by Hosts of Avian Brood Parasites. bioRxiv, 788505. Andersson, M. Åhlund, M. (2012). Don’t put all your eggs in one nest: spread them and cut time at risk. The American Naturalist, 180(3), 354-363. Andersson, M. Waldeck, P. (2007). Host-parasite kinship in a female-philopatric bird population: evidence from relatedness trend analysis, Mol Ecol, vol. 16, 2797-2806. Arnold, K. E. Owens, I. P. (2002). Extra-pair paternity and egg dumping in birds: life history, parental care and the risk of retaliation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 269(1497), 1263-1269. Avilés, J. M. (2018). Can hosts tolerate avian brood parasites? An appraisal of mechanisms. Behavioral ecology, 29(3), 509-519. Baker, J. N. (1975). Egg-carrying by a common flicker. The Auk, 92(3), 614-615. Berger, I., Dvir, Y., Leshem, Y., Yom-Tov, Y. Markman, S. (2013). Extra-pair copulations, intra-specific brood parasitism, and quasi-parasitism in birds: a theoretical approach. Acta Ethol 17:131–140. Blomme, C. (1983). Egg-carrying behaviour observed in Northern Flicker. Ontario Field Biologist 37: 34-35. Brown, C. R. Brown, M. B. (1988). A new form of reproductive parasitism in cliff swallows. Nature 331:66–68Clutton Brock T. H. 1991. The Evolution of Parental Care. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. 352 pp. Brown, C. R., Brown, M. B. (1989). Behavioural dynamics of intraspecific brood parasitism in colonial cliff swallows. Animal Behaviour, 37, 777-796. Brown, C. R., Brown, M. B. (1999). Fitness components associated with clutch size in cliff swallows. The Auk, 116(2), 467-486. Burt, D. B. (2002). Social and breeding biology of bee-eater in Thailand. Wilson Bulletin 114: 275-279. Bryant, D. M. Tatner, P. (1990). Hatching asynchrony, sibling competition and siblicide in nestling birds: studies of swiftlets and bee-eaters. Animal Behaviour, 39(4), 657-671. Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1991). The evolution of parental care (Vol. 64). Princeton University Press. Davies, N. B. (2000). Cheating on your own kind. In: Davies NB, editor. Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. Bath (UK): The Bath Press. p. 211–240. Emlen, S. T Wrege, P. H. (1986). Forced copulations and intraspecific parasitism: two costs of social living in the white-fronted bee-eater. Ethology 71:2–29. Etterson, M. A., Ellis-Felege, S. N., Evers, D., Gauthier, G., Grzybowski, J. A., Mattsson, B. J., Laura, N. R., Olsen, B. J., Pease, C. M., Post van der Burg, M. Potvien, A. (2011). Modeling fecundity in birds: conceptual overview, current models, and considerations for future developments. Ecological Modelling, 222(14), 2178-2190. Fry, C. H. (2001). Meropidae(bee-eaters). p:286-325. in J. D. Hoyo, A. Elliot J. Sargatal., editors. Handbook of the birds of the world, Vol.6. Lynx Edicions, Bacelona. Geffen, E., Yom-Tov, Y. (2001). Factors affecting the rates of intraspecific nest parasitism among Anseriformes and Galliformes. Animal Behaviour, 62:1027–38 Goymann, W., Safari, I., Muck, C. Schwabl, I. (2016). Sex roles, parental care and offspring growth in two contrasting coucal species. Royal Society open science, 3(10), 160463. Grønstøl, G., Blomqvist, D. Wagner, R. H. (2006). The importance of genetic evidence for identifying intra‐specific brood parasitism. Journal of Avian Biology, 37(2), 197-199. Griffith, S. C., Lyon, B. E. Montgomerie, R. (2004). Quasi-parasitism in birds. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 56:191–200. Guigueno, M. F. Sealy, S. G. (2012). Nest sanitation in passerine birds: implications for egg rejection in hosts of brood parasites. Journal of Ornithology, 153:35–52. Jamieson, I. G., McRae, S.B., Simmons, R. E. Trewby, M. (2000). High rates of conspecific brood parasitism and egg rejection in coots and moorhens in ephemeral wetlands in Namibia. The Auk, 117:250–55. Kalinowski, S. T., Taper, M. L. Marshall, T. C. (2007). Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Molecular Ecology 16: 1099-1106. Krüger, O. (2008). Alternative reproductive tactics in birds. In R. F. Oliveira, M. Taborsky, J. Brockmann (Eds.), Alternative reproductive tactics: an integrative approach (pp. 343-355). Cambridge University Press. Lahti, D. C., Lahti, A. R. (2002). How precise is egg discrimination in weaverbirds? Animal Behaviour, 63(6), 1135-1142. Lai, J., Khor, M., Loei J. Amar-Singh, H.S.S. (2017). Blue-throated Bee-eater flying with an egg to a potential nesting site. Bird Ecology Study Group. Retrieved from https://besgroup.org/2017/06/23/blue-throated-bee-eater-flying-with-an-egg-to-a-potential-nesting-site/. Lill, A. Fell, P. J. (2007). Microclimate of nesting burrows of the Rainbow Bee-eater. Emu-Austral Ornithology, 107(2), 108-114. Lombardo, M. P., Power, H. W., Stouffer, P. C., Romagnano, L.C. Hoffenberg, A. S. (1989). Egg removal and intraspecific brood parasitism in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 24:217–23. Lyon, B. E., Hochachka, W. M Eadie, J. M. (2002). Paternity-parasitism trade-offs: a model and test of hostparasite cooperation in an avian conspecific brood parasite. Evolution, 56(6), 1253–1266. Lyon, B. E. Eadie, J. M. (2008). Conspecific brood parasitism in birds: a life-history perspective. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 39, 343–363. Lyon, B. E., Eadie, J. M. Shizuka, D. (2018). Conspecific brood parasites can also help us understand the evolution of tolerance: a comment on Avilés. Behavioral Ecology, 29(3), 522-523. Møller, A. P. (1987). Intraspecific nest parasitism and anti-parasite behaviour in swallows Hirundo rustica. Animal Behaviour, 35(1), 247-254. Mumme, R. L., Koenig, W. D. Pitelka, F. A. (1983). Reproductive competition in the communal acorn woodpecker: sisters destroy each other's eggs. Nature, 306(5943), 583-584. Osorio‐Beristain, M., Pèrez‐Staples, D., Drummond, H. (2006). Does Booby Egg Dumping Amount to Quasi‐Parasitism?. Ethology, 112(7), 625-630. Pinxten, R., Eens, M., Verheyen, R. F. (1991). Conspecific nest parasitism in the European starling. Ardea, 79(1), 15-30. Poláček, M., Griggio, M., Bartíková, M., Hoi, H. (2013). Nest sanitation as the evolutionary background for egg ejection behaviour and the role of motivation for object removal. PLoS One, 8(11), e78771. Power, H. W., Kennedy, E. D., Romagnano, L. C., Lombardo, M. P., Hoffenberg, A. S., Stouffer, P. C., McGuire, T. R. (1989). The parasitism insurance hypothesis: why starlings leave space for parasitic eggs. The Condor, 91(4), 753-765. Pöysä, H. (2003). Low host recognition tendency revealed by experimentally induced parasitic egg laying in the common goldeneye (Bucephala clangula). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 81(9), 1561-1565. Reichart, L. M., Anderholm, S., Muñoz‐Fuentes, V. Webster, M. S. (2010). Molecular identification of brood‐parasitic females reveals an opportunistic reproductive tactic in ruddy ducks. Molecular Ecology, 19(2), 401-413. Roldán, M., Soler, M. (2011). Parental-care parasitism: how do unrelated offspring attain acceptance by foster parents?. Behavioral Ecology, 22(4), 679-691. Royle, N. J., Smiseth, P. T., Kölliker, M. (Eds.). (2012). The evolution of parental care. Oxford University Press. Ruxton, G. D., Broom, M. (2002). Intraspecific brood parasitism can increase the number of eggs that an individual lays in its own nest. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 269(1504), 1989-1992. Sánchez-Tójar, A., Parejo, D., Martínez, J. G., Rodríguezruiz, J., Avilés, J. M. (2015). Parentage analyses reveal hidden breeding strategies of European Rollers Coracias garrulus. Acta Ornithologica, 50(2), 252-258. Siefferman, L., Wang, Y. J., Wang, Y. P., Yuan, H. W. (2007). Sexual dichromatism, imorphism, and condition-dependent coloration in blue-tailed bee-eaters. The Condor, 109(3), 577-584. Soler, M., Ruiz-Castellano, C., del Carmen Fernández-Pinos, M., Rösler, A., Ontanilla, J., Pérez-Contreras, T. (2011). House sparrows selectively eject parasitic conspecific eggs and incur very low rejection costs. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65(10), 1997. Sorenson, M. D. (1991). The functional significance of parasitic egg laying and typical nesting in redhead ducks: an analysis of individual behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 42(5), 771-796. Stader, L. D. (1994). Breeding behaviour of a tropical bird: a study of the blue-throated Bee-eater (Merops viridis) using relational database and DNA fingerprinting. Oliveira, R. F., Taborsky, M., Brockmann, H. J. (Eds.). (2008). Alternative reproductive tactics: an integrative approach. Cambridge University Press. Tiedemann, R., Paulus, K. B., Havenstein, K., Thorstensen, S., Petersen, A., Lyngs, P., Milinkovitch, M. C. (2011). Alien eggs in duck nests: brood parasitism or a help from Grandma?. Molecular Ecology, 20(15), 3237-3250. Truslow, F. K. (1967). Egg-carrying by the Pileated Woodpecker. Living Bird, 6, 227-236. Wang, L. P. (2003). Breeding habitat selection and breeding biology of blue-tailed bee-eaters (Merops philippinus) on Kinmen Island. MS thesis. National Taiwan University. Weaver, H. B., Brown, C. R. (2004). Brood parasitism and egg transfer in cave swallows (Petrochelidon fulva) and cliff swallows (P. pyrrhonota) in South Texas. The Auk, 121(4), 1122-1129. Yamaguchi, Y. (1997). Intraspecific nest parasitism and anti-parasite behavior in the grey starling, Sturnus cineraceus. Journal of Ethology, 15(2), 61-68. Yom-Tov, Y. (2001). An updated list and some comments on the occurrence of intraspecific nest parasitism in birds. Ibis, 143(1), 133-143. Yuan, H. W., Wang, M. K., Chang, W. L., Wang, L. P., Chen, Y. M., Chiou, C. R. (2006). Soil composition affects the nesting behavior of blue-tailed bee-eaters (Merops philippinus) on Kinmen Island. Ecological Research, 21(4), 510-512. Zink, A. G., Lyon, B. E. (2016). Evolution of conspecific brood parasitism versus cooperative breeding as alternative reproductive tactics. The American Naturalist, 187(1), 35-47. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/67394 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 寄生者(parasite)透過種內托卵寄生(intraspecific brood parasitism)在其他個體巢中下蛋減少親代照顧(parental care),提升親代投資效益。有些鳥類中的宿主(host)可以透過棄蛋行為(egg-rejection)抵抗種內托卵寄生,減少種內托卵寄生對親代投資的影響。每年繁殖季可以在金門栗喉蜂虎(Merops philippinus)巢洞外發現30-90顆蛋殼完整的棄蛋(abandoned egg),人工孵育結果顯示超過1/2的棄蛋已授精且具有孵化能力。行為觀察也指出栗喉蜂虎有種內托卵寄生行為。為了釐清栗喉蜂虎宿主的棄蛋行為如何影響種內托卵寄生,本研究分成兩個部分,第一部分於2019年在金門地區選取5個樣區進行人為托卵寄生試驗,分別在宿主下蛋前後放入人工假蛋,透過繁殖監測記錄假蛋狀態。第二部分針對棄蛋、巢內蛋及離巢前幼鳥,分析不同繁殖階段子代與親鳥的親緣關係。第一部分結果顯示,遭移除的假蛋皆在宿主下蛋前(n=31),下蛋後的假蛋都被宿主接受並持續孵育(n=50),然而部分在下蛋前3日內試驗的假蛋被接受(n=3)。第二部分親緣分析指出,大部分棄蛋與親鳥無親緣關係(n=7),應是宿主的棄蛋行為所致。少數具有親緣關係的案例(n=1)可能是移蛋行為(egg trasfer)的結果。3巢巢內蛋的結果顯示,在有棄蛋出現的情況下,巢內仍有多達1/3非親生蛋;高於平均窩卵數的宿主也持續孵育巢內蛋。離巢前幼鳥中,巢中親生幼鳥最多5隻,非親生幼鳥最多3隻;此外,也有1巢2隻幼鳥全為非親生的案例。綜合上述,宿主的棄蛋行為能有效移除下蛋前的寄生蛋;下蛋後,宿主會接受寄生子代,栗喉蜂虎採取種內托卵寄生繁殖策略可以產生子代。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Bird parasites of intraspecific brood parasitism (IBP) reduced parental care by laying eggs in others nest. By contrast, Some avian host took actions against IBP through egg-rejection. Abandoned eggs was common phenomenon in Blue-tailed Bee-eaters(Merops philippinus) breeding in Kinmen. Around 30-90 abandoned eggs could be found in breeding colonies each year, and over one half of abandoned eggs were fertilized and able to hatch. Evidences of IBP in blue-tailed bee-eaters were confirmed through behavioral observation. To examine how egg-rejection by host affected the behavior of IBP parasites, this study was divided into 2 sections. First section, I conducted artificial egg experiment in 5 sampling colonies in 2019. Artificial eggs were added into cavities both before and after host laying, and the status of eggs were monitored. Second section, we analyzed kinship of abandoned eggs, eggs in nest, and fledgling, respectively, with their putative parents. In first section, Artificial eggs were rejected only before hosts lay the first egg (n=31). While after hosts laid their first egg, they tolerated parasitic eggs remain in the nest and hatched as true eggs (n=50). However, some eggs entered cavities within 3 days would also keep and incubate by hosts (n=3). Results of second section showed that most abandoned eggs were non-related to parents (n=7), which may come from hosts’ egg-rejection against intraspecific brood parasitism. We found egg transfer IBP might contribute to the presence of abandon eggs related to parents (n=1). Kinship of eggs in nest from 3 nests revealed that hosts still accepted eggs in clutch while there were abandoned eggs and 1/3 of offspring were non-related. Besides, nests with exceeded clutch size were also incubated. Among kinship of fledglings, up to 3 non-related fledglings in one nest.on the other hands, 5 related fledgling remained. In conclusion, host can only reject parasitic eggs before laying. Since parasitic eggs accepted, IBP is successful strategies able to produce offsprings in Blue-tailed Bee-eater. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T01:30:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1608202000141500.pdf: 1998973 bytes, checksum: efa3020e86ee928e7b5dbb75f1c64ea8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 II 摘要 IV Abstract V 前言 1 方法 6 結果 14 討論 17 參考文獻 25 表 33 圖 38 附錄 42 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 金門栗喉蜂虎種內托卵寄生與棄蛋行為 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Intraspecific brood parasitism and Egg-rejection behavior in Blue-tailed Bee-eaters Merops philippinus in Kinmen | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王穎(Ying Wang),蔡若詩(Jo-Szu Tsai),丁宗蘇(Tzung-Su Ding) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 棄蛋行為,種內托卵寄生,替代繁殖策略,巢洞繁殖,親緣分析, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | egg-rejection,intraspecific brood parasitism,alternative reproductive tactics,cavity nesting,kinship analysis, | en |
dc.relation.page | 47 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202003548 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-08-17 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 森林環境暨資源學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 森林環境暨資源學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-1608202000141500.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.95 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。