請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6721
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 王道一 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yen Kuo | en |
dc.contributor.author | 郭彥 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-17T09:16:53Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-01 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-17T09:16:53Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2012-08-01 | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2012-07-30 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Aldrich, J. A. (1997). ' When is it rational to vote?', in (D. Mueller, ed.), Perspectives on
Public Choice, a Handbook, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 379-390. Amrita, D. and P. Susana (2002). 'Economic Theories Of Voter Turnout.' Economic Journal 112(480): F332-F352. Copyright 2002 Royal Economic Society Brandts, J. and G. Charness (2011). 'The strategy versus the direct-response method: a first survey of experimental comparisons.' Experimental Economics 14(3): 375-398. Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row. Duffy, J. and M. Tavits (2008). 'Beliefs and Voting Decisions: A Test of the Pivotal Voter Model.' American Journal of Political Science 52(3): 603-618. Feddersen, T. J. and Sandroni, A. (2001). 'A theory of ethics and participation in elections', http://www.stanford.edu/group/SITE/sandroni.pdf. Jordi, B. and C. Gary (2011). 'The strategy versus the direct-response method: a first survey of experimental comparisons.' Experimental Economics 14(3): 375-398. Schram, A. and J. Sonnemans (1996). 'Why people vote: Experimental evidence.' Journal of Economic Psychology 17(4): 417-442. Thomas, R. P. and R. Howard (2001). A Strategic Calculus of Voting, David K. Levine. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6721 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 為了解決投票矛盾問題,已經有很多論文發表。在我們的文章中,我們以策略式方法模仿Levine and Palfrey在2007年的投票賽局。我們的資料支持弱勢者效果以及競爭效果,但無論我們使用直接回應方法或是策略式方法,皆無法複製Levine and Palfrey在2007年的結果。我們也發現受試者並不使用嚴格的斷點策略。最後我們發現受試者的確會針對歷史的關鍵事件做出回應,這也是理性選擇模型最重要的意涵。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Many papers have been published for solving paradox of voter turnout. In this paper, we adopt the strategy method to mimic Levine and Palfrey (2007)' voting games. We find the underdog effect and competition effect supported by our data, but we cannot replicate the Levine and Palfrey (2007)’ result for neither the strategy method, nor direct response method. We also find evidences indicates that subjects don't use fixed cut-off strategies. Finally, out data shows that voters are highly responsive to historical pivotal event, which the most important implication of rational choice model. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-17T09:16:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-R99323026-1.pdf: 405370 bytes, checksum: 6bb3c224424a051223c9b42acc64de57 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭……………………………………………………………………………….... i
中文摘要…………………………………………………………………………... ii 英文摘要………………………………………………………………………….. iii 第一章 介紹…………………………………………………………………....... 1 第二章 理論解釋………………………………………………………………... 4 第三章 實驗設計………………………………………………………………... 8 第四章 實驗結果………………………………………………………………. 10 第五章 結 論………………………………………………………………. 17 參考文獻…………………………………………………………………….…… 19 附錄1……………………………………………………………………………. 20 附錄2……………………………………………………………………………. 23 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 策略式方法在投票賽局實驗中的使用 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Use of Strategy Methods in Experimental Pivotal-Voting Game | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 100-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張勝凱,黃貞穎,蔡崇聖 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 理性選擇模型,關鍵選民賽局,策略式方法,投票矛盾,實驗經濟學, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Rational Choice Model,Pivotal Voter Game,Paradox of Voter Turnout,Strategy Method,Experimental Economics, | en |
dc.relation.page | 28 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2012-07-31 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 經濟學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-101-1.pdf | 395.87 kB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。