請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/67172
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 闕蓓德(Pei-Te Chiueh) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chao-Pu Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳炤璞 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T01:22:11Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-01 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2020-09-22 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-08-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Askariyeh, M.H., Kota, S.H., Vallamsundar, S., Zietsman, J. and Ying, Q. (2017). AERMOD for near-road pollutant dispersion: Evaluation of model performance with different emission source representations and low wind options. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 57, 392-402. Badach, J., Voordeckers, D., Nyka, L. and Van Acker, M. (2020). A framework for Air Quality Management Zones-useful GIS-based tool for urban planning: Case studies in Antwerp and Gdańsk. Building and Environment, 106743. Bowker, G.E., Baldauf, R., Isakov, V., Khlystov, A. and Petersen, W. (2007). The effects of roadside structures on the transport and dispersion of ultrafine particles from highways. Atmospheric Environment 41(37), 8128-8139. Carslaw, D.C. and Beevers, S.D. (2002). The efficacy of low emission zones in central London as a means of reducing nitrogen dioxide concentrations. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 7(1), 49-64. Chen, H., Bai, S., Eisinger, D., Niemeier, D. and Claggett, M. (2009). Predicting near-road PM2.5 concentrations: comparative assessment of CALINE4, CAL3QHC, and AERMOD. Transportation research record 2123(1), 26-37. Conrad, E., Misenar, S. and Feldman, J. (2016) Eleventh Hour CISSP®: Study Guide, Syngress. Da Silva, F.N., Custódio, R.A.L. and Martins, H. (2014). Low Emission Zone: Lisbon’s Experience. Journal of Traffic and Logistics Engineering Vol 2(2). DieselNet. (2020) EU: Low Emission Zones (LEZ). https://dieselnet.com/standards/eu/lez.php European Federation for Transport and Environment. (2019). Low-Emission Zones are a success - but they must now move to zero-emission mobility. Font, A., Guiseppin, L., Blangiardo, M., Ghersi, V. and Fuller, G.W. (2019). A tale of two cities: is air pollution improving in Paris and London? Environmental pollution 249, 1-12. Frigerio, I., Ventura, S., Strigaro, D., Mattavelli, M., De Amicis, M., Mugnano, S. and Boffi, M. (2016). A GIS-based approach to identify the spatial variability of social vulnerability to seismic hazard in Italy. Applied Geography 74, 12-22. Gokhale, S. and Raokhande, N. (2008). Performance evaluation of air quality models for predicting PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations at urban traffic intersection during winter period. Science of the total environment 394(1), 9-24. Göteborgs Stad (2006) Göteborgs Stad Assessment of Environmental Zone in Göteborg: A Report for the Traffic and Public Transport Authority of the City of Göteborg, Sweden. Gurram, S., Stuart, A.L. and Pinjari, A.R. (2019). Agent-based modeling to estimate exposures to urban air pollution from transportation: Exposure disparities and impacts of high-resolution data. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 75, 22-34. Holman, C., Harrison, R. and Querol, X. (2015). Review of the efficacy of low emission zones to improve urban air quality in European cities. Atmospheric Environment 111, 161-169. Host, S., Honoré, C., Joly, F., Saunal, A., Le Tertre, A. and Medina, S. (2020). Implementation of various hypothetical low emission zone scenarios in Greater Paris: Assessment of fine-scale reduction in exposure and expected health benefits. Environmental Research, 109405. Karaca, F. (2012). Determination of air quality zones in Turkey. Journal of the Air Waste Management Association 62(4), 408-419. Lai, H.-C., Ma, H.-W., Chen, C.-R., Hsiao, M.-C. and Pan, B.-H. (2019). Design and application of a hybrid assessment of air quality models for the source apportionment of PM2. 5. Atmospheric Environment 212, 116-127. Li, N., Chen, J.-P., Tsai, I.-C., He, Q., Chi, S.-Y., Lin, Y.-C. and Fu, T.-M. (2016). Potential impacts of electric vehicles on air quality in Taiwan. Science of the total environment 566, 919-928. Lin, W.-Y., Hsiao, M.-C., Wu, P.-C., Fu, J.S., Lai, L.-W. and Lai, H.-C. (2020). Analysis of air quality and health co-benefits regarding electric vehicle promotion coupled with power plant emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production 247, 119152. Liou, J.-L. (2019). Estimating the Health Benefit of Particulate Matter Reduction in Taiwan—Application of Benefit per Ton Method. Mueller, N., Rojas-Rueda, D., Khreis, H., Cirach, M., Andrés, D., Ballester, J., Bartoll, X., Daher, C., Deluca, A. and Echave, C. (2020). Changing the urban design of cities for health: The superblock model. Environment international 134, 105132. Pan, S., Roy, A., Choi, Y., Eslami, E., Thomas, S., Jiang, X. and Gao, H.O. (2019). Potential impacts of electric vehicles on air quality and health endpoints in the Greater Houston Area in 2040. Atmospheric Environment 207, 38-51. RTI, International. (2015). BenMAP community edition, environmental benefits mapping and analysis program community edition, users manual, appendices. Saha, P.K., Zimmerman, N., Malings, C., Hauryliuk, A., Li, Z., Snell, L., Subramanian, R., Lipsky, E., Apte, J.S. and Robinson, A.L. (2019). Quantifying high-resolution spatial variations and local source impacts of urban ultrafine particle concentrations. Science of the Total Environment 655, 473-481. Santos, F.M., Gómez-Losada, Á. and Pires, J.C. (2019). Impact of the implementation of Lisbon low emission zone on air quality. Journal of hazardous materials 365, 632-641. Schmitz, O., Beelen, R., Strak, M., Hoek, G., Soenario, I., Brunekreef, B., Vaartjes, I., Dijst, M.J., Grobbee, D.E. and Karssenberg, D. (2019). High resolution annual average air pollution concentration maps for the Netherlands. Scientific data 6, 190035. Schnell, J.L., Naik, V., Horowitz, L.W., Paulot, F., Ginoux, P., Zhao, M. and Horton, D.E. (2019). Air quality impacts from the electrification of light-duty passenger vehicles in the United States. Atmospheric Environment 208, 95-102. Scottish Government. (2019). National Low Emission Framework. Tögel, M. and Spicka, L. (2014). Low-Emission Zones in European Countries. Transactions on Transport Sciences 7(3), 97. Tartakovsky, D., Kordova–Biezuner, L., Berlin, E. and Broday, D.M. (2020). Air quality impacts of the low emission zone policy in Haifa. Atmospheric Environment, 117472. Thind, M.P., Tessum, C.W., Azevedo, I.L. and Marshall, J.D. (2019). Fine Particulate Air Pollution from Electricity Generation in the US: Health Impacts by Race, Income, and Geography. Environmental Science Technology 53(23), 14010-14019. TLR (2000). A Low Emissions Zone for London, Transport Research Laboratory Report 431, Crowthorne. U. S. EPA, (2010). Transportation conformity guidance for quantitative hot-spot analyses in PM 2.5 and PM 10 nonattainment and maintenance areas. U. S. EPA, (2012 a). “National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Proposed Rule,” Federal Register, Vol. 77, No. 126. U. S. EPA, (2012 b). “Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter,” EPA-452/R-12-005. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Health and Environmental Impacts Division. WHO (2006). Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide: global update 2005: summary of risk assessment, World Health Organization. WHO (2016). Ambient air pollution: A global assessment of exposure and burden of disease. WHO (2018) World health statistics 2018: monitoring health for the SDGs sustainable development goals, World Health Organization. Zou, Q., Zhou, J., Zhou, C., Song, L. and Guo, J. (2013). Comprehensive flood risk assessment based on set pair analysis-variable fuzzy sets model and fuzzy AHP. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 27(2), 525-546. 台中市環保局,2018,台中市空氣污染防制計畫書。 行政院研考會,2009,風險管理及危機處理作業手冊。 行政院環保署,2013 a,我國細懸浮微粒空品標準效益評估工具及實證研究。 行政院環保署,2013 b,台灣細懸浮微粒(PM2.5)成因分析與管制策略研擬。 行政院環保署,2019 a,臺灣空氣污染排放量[TEDS10]線源─排放量推估手冊。 行政院環保署,2019 b,建置AERMOD本土化模式及空品模式審驗制度專案工作計畫。 行政院環保署,2019 c,空氣污染排放清冊 [TEDS 10.0]。 衛生福利部國民健康署,2016,死因統計年報。 臺北市環保局,2020,柴油車排煙及油品檢測暨空氣品質維護區管制計畫。 曠永銓、王嘉弘、陳怡伶,2003,空氣汙染排放總量及背景空氣品質預測,中興工程季刊,財團法人中興工程顧問社。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/67172 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 空氣污染為各國政府及人民關注的議題,長期暴露於空氣污染對人體健康具有危害性並造成生命損失,我國政府於民國107年修正了<空氣污染防制法>,藉成立空氣品質維護區,管制高污染車輛以減少移動源污染的排放量,改善空氣品質。然而我國於移動源管制措施、移動源模擬相關的研究較少,在研究資料及措施評估不齊全之情況下,快速推行空氣品質維護區相關措施可能招致民眾反彈而受阻。 本研究目的為建立適用於我國空氣品質維護區之概念架構,並按現有法規探討管制措施施行後,空氣污染濃度減量之效果,最終以健康影響評估量化空氣品質改善可減少之死亡人數。本文之研究地點為台中市,首先盤查研究區域移動源污染排放佔比,結合半定量風險分析進行空氣品質維護區選址;管制措施以車輛出廠期數作為減量情境設定基礎,規定當交通運具使用達一定年限時需遵守加嚴排放標準;空氣品質模擬時採用AERMOD,進行移動源污染之增量模擬,並探討管制措施施行後,移動源排放之細懸浮微粒(PM2.5)以及氮氧化物(NOx)相較於基準情境濃度減量情形。結果顯示當空氣品質維護區施行後,在最佳情境下,移動源產生之細懸浮微粒年平均濃度減量可達71.8%,氮氧化物年平均濃度減量可達93.3%;以流行病學模式評估細懸浮微粒減量對於研究區域居民健康的影響,在最佳情境下可降低1.5%之細懸浮微粒全因致死率,研究區域內每年約有96人可避免死於空氣污染之相關疾病。 本研究建立適用於我國之空氣品質維護區之評估流程,並以現有可行之管制措施,評估移動源污染排放量降低對於研究範圍內居民之健康效益,可作為政府機關規劃空氣品質維護區政策,以及降低移動源污染評估之參考依據。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Long-term exposure to air pollution is hazardous to human health and causes loss of life. Improving air quality has become a critical issue for governments around the world. Our government revised the “Air Pollution Control Law” in 2018, by establishing air quality maintenance zone, it is hoped that the emission of mobile source pollution will be reduced to improved air quality through vehicle emission restriction. However, there are few studies on vehicle emission restriction, and Taiwan’s literatures on vehicle emission sources is also limited. There is an urgent need to conduct relevant research on air quality maintenance area to persuade the public and prove that it is effective to improve air quality by restricting vehicle emission sources. The aims of this study were to establish a conceptual framework of air quality maintenance area and discuss the expected impacts, including air quality and health effects. This study first used qualitative risk analysis to select high-risk areas affected by vehicle emission in Taichung City, and assumed four future scenarios based on regulations. We evaluated PM2.5 and NOx concentrations by AERMOD model and then estimated reduced all-cause mortality of PM2.5. The results showed that the most stringent scenario would lower the average PM2.5 concentration by 71.8%, and lower the average NOx concentration by 93.3%. In one year, this stringent scenario could prevent 96 deaths (-1.5%) from PM2.5. This study established conceptual framework of air quality maintenance area for Taiwan government, demonstrating a series of evaluation process based on real data, and presented the benefits of improving air quality. In general, this study can be used as a reference basis for the government to implement air quality maintenance areas. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T01:22:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1608202016544300.pdf: 5006932 bytes, checksum: 640e08878153db3842644f345f827545 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 i Abstract ii 目錄 iii 圖目錄 vi 表目錄 viii 第一章 緒論 1 1.1研究動機 1 1.2研究流程與目標 2 第二章 文獻回顧 5 2.1 空氣品質改善作為 5 2.1.1 國外低污染排放區推動 6 2.1.2 國家低污染排放架構 9 2.1.3 國外低污染排放區政策評估及執行成效 11 2.1.4 國內空污法規與空氣品質維護區推動現況 12 2.2 移動源排放量推估 14 2.2.1 排放量推估方法 14 2.2.2 國內移動污染源排放量資料庫 16 2.2.3車輛污染物排放空間分布 17 2.3 空氣品質模擬 18 2.3.1 空氣品質模式比較 18 2.3.2 空氣品質模式應用 19 2.3.3 台灣空氣品質模擬相關研究 22 2.4 風險分析與風險效益評估 26 2.4.1 風險分析種類 26 2.4.2 健康影響評估 31 2.4.3疾病負擔 33 第三章 研究方法 35 3.1 空氣品質維護區概念架構建立 35 3.1.1 空氣品質維護區政策探討 36 3.1.2 空氣品質維護區概念架構 37 3.2 空氣品質維護區設置 40 3.2.1 研究地點 40 3.2.2 研究區域空氣品質探討 41 3.2.3 空氣品質維護區選址 43 3.2.4空氣污染防制區情境設定 44 3.3 空氣污染傳輸模式 46 3.3.1 AERMOD模擬流程及參數 46 3.3.2 模擬控制碼設定 48 3.4 健康影響評估 49 第四章 結果與討論 51 4.1 空品問題辨認與空氣品質維護區選址 51 4.1.1 污染排放盤查 53 4.1.2 半定量風險分析 56 4.2 空氣污染增量模擬 59 4.2.1 空氣污染物減量情境比較 59 4.2.2 不確定性分析 61 4.2.3 空氣污染增量分佈 62 4.2.4 敏感度分析 83 4.3 健康影響評估 84 4.4 台中市空氣品質維護區政策施行建議 85 第五章 結論與建議 87 5.1 結論 87 5.2 建議 88 參考文獻 91 附錄 97 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 空氣品質維護區之移動源污染減量策略 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Traffic Source Restriction Policy in Air Quality Maintenance Area | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 龍世俊(Shih-Chun Lung),曠永銓(Yong-Quan Kuang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 空氣品質維護區,移動源污染,健康影響評估,低污染排放區,空氣品質模式, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Air quality maintenance area,Traffic,Health impact assessment,Low emission zone,Dispersion model, | en |
dc.relation.page | 99 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202003593 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-08-17 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 環境工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 環境工程學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-1608202016544300.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 4.89 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。