請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/67047
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 闕蓓德(Pei-Te Chiueh) | |
dc.contributor.author | Hsin-Pei Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳欣沛 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T01:18:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-25 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2017-08-25 | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-08-11 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Adhikari, K. and Hartemink, A.E. (2016) Linking soils to ecosystem services — A global review. Geoderma 262, 101-111.
Assessment, M.E. (2005) Millennium ecosystem assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Biodiversity Synthesis, Published by World Resources Institute, Washington, DC. Bare, J.C., Hofstetter, P., Pennington, D.W. and De Haes, H.A.U. (2000) Midpoints versus endpoints: the sacrifices and benefits. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 5(6), 319-326. Bates, M.E., Fox-Lent, C., Seymour, L., Wender, B.A. and Linkov, I. (2015) Life cycle assessment for dredged sediment placement strategies. Science of The Total Environment 511, 309-318. Beames, A., Broekx, S., Heijungs, R., Lookman, R., Boonen, K., Van Geert, Y., Dendoncker, K. and Seuntjens, P. (2015) Accounting for land-use efficiency and temporal variations between brownfield remediation alternatives in life-cycle assessment. Journal of cleaner production 101, 109-117. Bouma, J. and McBratney, A. (2013) Framing soils as an actor when dealing with wicked environmental problems. Geoderma 200, 130-139. Brandão, M. and i Canals, L.M. (2013) Global characterisation factors to assess land use impacts on biotic production. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 18(6), 1243-1252. Cao, V., Margni, M., Favis, B.D. and Deschenes, L. (2015) Aggregated indicator to assess land use impacts in life cycle assessment (LCA) based on the economic value of ecosystem services. Journal of cleaner production 94, 56-66. Chee, Y.E. (2004) An ecological perspective on the valuation of ecosystem services. Biological Conservation 120(4), 549-565. Costanza, R. and Folke, C. (1997) Valuing ecosystem services with efficiency, fairness and sustainability as goals. Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems, 49-70. Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S.J., Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S. and Turner, R.K. (2014) Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 26, 152-158. Daily, G. (1997) Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems, Island Press. de Groot, R., Brander, L., van der Ploeg, S., Costanza, R., Bernard, F., Braat, L., Christie, M., Crossman, N., Ghermandi, A., Hein, L., Hussain, S., Kumar, P., McVittie, A., Portela, R., Rodriguez, L.C., ten Brink, P. and van Beukering, P. (2012) Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services 1(1), 50-61. DeFries, R.S., Foley, J.A. and Asner, G.P. (2004) Land‐use choices: Balancing human needs and ecosystem function. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2(5), 249-257. Efroymson, R.A., Nicolette, J.P. and Suter II, G.W. (2004) A framework for net environmental benefit analysis for remediation or restoration of contaminated sites. Environmental Management 34(3), 315-331. Farber, S., Costanza, R., Childers, D.L., Erickson, J., Gross, K., Grove, M., Hopkinson, C.S., Kahn, J., Pincetl, S. and Troy, A. (2006) Linking ecology and economics for ecosystem management. Bioscience 56(2), 121-133. Fertilizer Use and Price. Reports from the Economic Research Service, USDA (2013). Retrieved May 15, 2017, from http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/fertilizer-use-and-price.aspx#26727 Goedkoop, M. and Spriensma, R. (2000) The eco-indicator 99. Methodology Report April 2. Goedkoop, M., Heijungs, R., Huijbregts, M., De Schryver, A., Struijs, J. and Van Zelm, R. (2009) ReCiPe 2008. A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level 1. Guinée, J. (2001) Handbook on life cycle assessment—operational guide to the ISO standards. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 6(5), 255-255. Haines-Young, R. and Potschin, M. (2010) The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. Ecosystem Ecology: a new synthesis, 110-139. Hauschild, M., Krewitt, W. and Miiller-Wenk, R. (1999) Best Available Practice Regarding Impact Categories Category Indicators in Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Int. J. LCA 4(3), 167-174. Heijungs, R., Guinée, J., Kleijn, R. and Rovers, V. (2006) Bias in normalization: Causes, consequences, detection and remedies. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 12(4), 211. Hischier, R., Weidema, B., Althaus, H.-J., Bauer, C., Doka, G., Dones, R., Frischknecht, R., Hellweg, S., Humbert, S. and Jungbluth, N. (2010) Implementation of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods. Hoorman, J. and Islam, R. (2010) Understanding soil microbes and nutrient recycling, Fact sheet SAG-16-10. The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA. IPCC, “2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories ”, Volume 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (2006). ISO. Technical Committee ISO/TC 207, E.m.S.S., Life cycle assessment (2006) Jobbágy, E.G. and Jackson, R.B. (2000) The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecological applications 10(2), 423-436. Jolliet, O., Margni, M., Charles, R., Humbert, S., Payet, J., Rebitzer, G. and Rosenbaum, R. (2003) IMPACT 2002+: a new life cycle impact assessment methodology. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 8(6), 324 Koellner, T., de Baan, L., Beck, T., Brandão, M., Civit, B., Goedkoop, M., Margni, M., i Canals, L.M., Müller-Wenk, R., Weidema, B. and Wittstock, B. (2013b) Principles for life cycle inventories of land use on a global scale. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 18(6), 1203-1215. Koellner, T., de Baan, L., Beck, T., Brandao, M., Civit, B., Margni, M., Canals, L.M.I., Saad, R., Souza, D.M. and Muller-Wenk, R. (2013) UNEP-SETAC guideline on global land use impact assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services in LCA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 18(6), 1188-1202. Lemming, G., Chambon, J.C., Binning, P.J. and Bjerg, P.L. (2012) Is there an environmental benefit from remediation of a contaminated site? Combined assessments of the risk reduction and life cycle impact of remediation. Journal of Environmental Management 112, 392-403. Lemming, G., Hauschild, M.Z. and Bjerg, P.L. (2010b) Life cycle assessment of soil and groundwater remediation technologies: literature review. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 15(1), 115-127. Lemming, G., Hauschild, M.Z., Chambon, J., Binning, P.J., Bulle, C.c., Margni, M. and Bjerg, P.L. (2010) Environmental impacts of remediation of a trichloroethene-contaminated site: life cycle assessment of remediation alternatives. Environmental Milà i Canals, L., Bauer, C., Depestele, J., Dubreuil, A., Freiermuth Knuchel, R., Gaillard, G., Michelsen, O., Müller-Wenk, R. and Rydgren, B. (2007) Key Elements in a Framework for Land Use Impact Assessment Within LCA (11 pp). The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 12(1), 5-15. Naidoo, R., Balmford, A., Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Green, R.E., Lehner, B., Malcolm, T. and Ricketts, T.H. (2008) Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(28), 9495-9500. Nicolette, J., Burr, S. and Rockel, M. (2013) A Practical Approach for Demonstrating Environmental Sustainability and Stewardship through a Net Ecosystem Service Analysis. Sustainability 5(5), 2152. Nunes, L.M., Gomes, H.I., Teixeira, M.R., Dias-Ferreira, C. and Ribeiro, A.B. (2016) Electrokinetics Across Disciplines and Continents: New Strategies for Sustainable Development. Ribeiro, A.B., Mateus, E.P. and Couto, N. (eds), pp. 173-202, Springer International Publishing, Cham. O'Neill, R.V., Johnson, A. and King, A. (1989) A hierarchical framework for the analysis of scale. Landscape Ecology 3(3), 193-205. Pennington, D., Potting, J., Finnveden, G., Lindeijer, E., Jolliet, O., Rydberg, T. and Rebitzer, G. (2004) Life cycle assessment Part 2: Current impact assessment practice. Environment international 30(5), 721-739. Perie, C. and Ouimet, R. (2008) Organic carbon, organic matter and bulk density relationships in boreal forest soils. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 88(3), 315-325. Piñeiro, G., Paruelo, J.M., Oesterheld, M. and Jobbágy, E.G. (2010) Pathways of grazing effects on soil organic carbon and nitrogen. Rangeland Ecology & Management 63(1), 109-119. Slack, S. (2010) The incorporation of an ecosystem services assessment into the remediation of contaminated sites. Report for US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, Washington, DC. Sparrevik, M., Saloranta, T., Cornelissen, G., Eek, E., Fet, A.M., Breedveld, G.D. and Linkov, I. (2011) Use of life cycle assessments to evaluate the environmental footprint of contaminated sediment remediation, ACS Publications. Suer, P. and Andersson-Sköld, Y. (2011) Biofuel or excavation? - Life cycle assessment (LCA) of soil remediation options. Biomass and Bioenergy 35(2), 969-981. Vidal Legaz, B., Maia De Souza, D., Teixeira, R.F.M., Antón, A., Putman, B. and Sala, S. (2016) Soil quality, properties, and functions in life cycle assessment: an evaluation of models. Journal of cleaner production Wallace, K.J. (2007) Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions. Biological Conservation 139(3–4), 235-246. Weidema, B.P. and Lindeijer, E. (2001) Physical impacts of land use in product life cycle assessment. Technical University of Denmark, 1-52. WEN‐JIE, W., Ling, Q., YUAN‐GANG, Z., DONG‐XUE, S., Jing, A., HONG‐YAN, W., GUAN‐YU, Z., Wei, S. and XI‐QUAN, C. (2011) Changes in soil organic carbon, nitrogen, pH and bulk density with the development of larch (Larix gmelinii) plantations in China. Global Change Biology 17(8), 2657-2676. 中國石油化學工業開發股份有限公司,安順場址熱處理(旋轉窯)實廠試運轉計畫書,2014。 中國石油化學工業開發股份有限公司,臺南市中國石油化學工業開發股份有限公司安順廠及二等九號道路東側草叢區土壤污染整治場址污染整治第二次變更計畫,2015。 內政部國土測繪中心,全國第2次國土利用調查計畫執行工作報告,2012。 內政部統計處,登記土地面積統計年報,2016。 吳佩蓉,整合土地利用模式與水文模式於集水區景觀生態規劃管理,國立臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學研究所,2008。 宋德高、史麗芬,臺南市中石化安順廠整治場址土壤及地下水污染範圍調查及整治工作建議計畫,國科會EPA-93-GA12-03-A203,行政院環境保護署,2005。 李明儒,不同空間尺度下網格式土地使用變遷模型之敏感性分析,國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所,2008。 李珮蓓,結合IO-LCA與碳足跡評估分析研究:以IC業為例,國立成功大學環境工程學系,2010。 林再遷,中華民國103年台灣鑛冶工業之進展(下),中國鑛冶工程學會會刊,鑛冶,第3卷(第53期),第89-120頁,2014。 柯純涵,植生復育重金屬污染土壤及其生命周期評估計畫,行政院環保署土壤及地下水污染整治基金管理會,2015。 洪崢珮,臺灣西海岸平原土地使用變遷與生態系統服務之研究,國立臺北大學都市計劃研究所,2009。 馬鴻文、張魯鈞,綠色整治決策支援系統之建立,國科會EPA-99-GA103-03-A236-4,行政院環境保護署,2011。 梁瑞玲,土地利用管理策略對生態系統服務影響之研究,國立成功大學都市計劃學系,2014。. 許富翔,稻稈焙燒產製生質煤炭之生命週期評估,國立臺灣大學環境工程學研究所,2011。 黃韜,地景變遷對生態系統服務影響之研究,國立臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學研究所,2012。 經濟部能源局,能源統計年報,2015。 蔣在文,污染場址綠色及永續導向型整治試辦及推廣計畫,國科會EPA-103-GA13-03-A327,行政院環境保護署,2014。 蔣在文,區域性水資源耗用之生命週期衝擊評估,國立臺灣大學環境工程學研究所,2012。 蕭戎雯,不同單元尺度對土地利用及生態系統服務模擬之影響-以大屯溪流域為例,國立臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學研究所,2013。 謝宗恩,以乳化油淋洗結合生物降解處理受戴奧辛污染之土壤,國立中山大學環境工程研究所,2014。 魏佩如,產品碳足跡計算不確定性分析之研究,國立臺北科技大學環境工程與管理研究所,2010。 羅時麒,以系統性機率模式鑑定量化與整合生命週期評估之不確定性,國立臺灣大學環境工程學研究所,2005。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/67047 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 目前的生命週期衝擊評估方法大多以生物多樣性損失(Biodiversity loss)作為生態系統指標顯現土地利用產生的衝擊,然而土地利用衝擊對於其他生態系統服務亦會造成影響,例如糧食生產(Food production)、氣候調節(Climate regulation)及土壤性質(Soil quailty)等生態功能。由於人類高度依賴生態系統所提供之服務,為了維持生態系統服務的永續發展,必須評估土地利用對於生態系統服務造成的衝擊,因此本研究建立土地利用之生態系統服務的衝擊評估模式,主要目的為修正現有之生命週期衝擊評估方法中的土地利用衝擊計算,使其成為較完整的環境衝擊評估工具。近來研究建議整治方案的生命週期評估應考量土地利用的衝擊,因此本研究以污染場址整治方案做為案例,以修正後的生命週期衝擊評估方法評估整治方案,並探討整治過程中土地利用導致的衝擊。評估結果可做為未來進行整治行為的參考,也可應用在未來整治技術的選擇階段,比較不同整治方案可能佔用的土地資源,使整治方案能產生最佳的效益。
綜合案例分析的結果可知,即使整治方案以較少的能資源投入清除污染物,但是整治期間的污染土地佔用會造成生態系統服務衝擊,將土地佔用的生態系統服務衝擊經標準化計算後,最終單項得點評估結果使得整治方案的環境衝擊順序反轉,藉由本研究建立的土地利用的生態系統服務衝擊評估模式,可以呈現過去生命週期評估可能未考慮到的衝擊,決策者可以討論如何在資源、人體健康、生態系統損害之間取捨,選擇合適的整治方案。 本研究建立的土地利用之生態系統服務衝擊評估模式除了可用來修正生命週期衝擊評估方法,此模式同時可以結合地理資訊系統軟體繪製生態系統服務地圖。本研究以模式計算結果配合臺灣國土利用調查圖資,繪製全臺生態系統服務衝擊變化地圖以探討土地利用對臺灣的生態系統服務造成的影響。結果顯示臺灣全區因聚居地佔用造成的生態系統服務衝擊平均價值為$255(美元/公頃),其中最高的前1%生態系統服務衝擊值集中分布在臺北市、臺中市及高雄市三大都會區,其損失的生態系統服務價值皆超過$10,000(美元/公頃),可知臺灣的都市地區開發造成可觀的生態系統服務損失。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a widely used approach to assess the environmental impacts of a product or service at each step of its life cycle. Since land use can cause impacts on many aspects such as the loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services, it is important to assess land use impacts on these perspectiveS. However, land use impacts assessment in the current LCA only considered the loss of biodiversity.
Ecosystem provide a wide range of crucial functions to human society. For example, food production, climate regulation and soil quality are essential ecosystem services. DeFries et al. (2004) indicated that land use impacts would cause negative influence on these ecosystem services. In order to provide a more comprehensive evaluating results from LCA, this study established a characterization model to assess land use impacts for ecosystem services to enhance Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) method. LCA studies of the contaminated sites remediation have increasingly addressed that land use impacts should be included. Therefore, this study adopted two contaminated sites as case studies to evaluate the potential environmental impacts from remediation. By using the revised LCIA method which integrating evaluation of land use impacts from ecosystem services, the more completely environmental impacts resulted from the remediation of contaminated sites can be achieved. The valuation results acquired in this study can be regarded as a supporting information to help decision makers in selecting environmental friendly remediation scenarios. Except for the estimation of remediation alternatives, the value of ecosystem services can be expressed in monetary units. This is a directly and clearly way for people to realize the contribution of ecosystem services. Quantifying the loss of economic value from ecosystem services by land use impacts can assist in improving human well-being, health and survival. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T01:18:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R04541212-1.pdf: 7307128 bytes, checksum: 0cf0775b194d606df04649318fafde61 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 I
Abstract II 目錄 III 圖目錄 V 表目錄 VI 第一章 緒論 1 1.1研究背景與動機 1 1.2研究目的 2 第二章 文獻回顧 3 2.1 生態系統服務 3 2.1.1生態系統服務評估 4 2.1.2 土地利用與生態系統服務 6 2.2 生命週期評估與衝擊評估方法 8 2.2.1生命週期衝擊評估方法介紹 11 2.2.2生命週期之不確定性 14 2.2.3土地利用衝擊特徵化模式 18 2.3污染場址整治方案評估方法 21 2.3.1整治方案的生命週期衝擊評估 21 2.3.2整治方案的生態系統服務評估 24 第三章 研究方法 27 3.1研究流程 27 3.2研究對象 28 3.3以生態系統服務量化土地利用衝擊 30 3.4土地分類系統對照 33 3.5建立特徵因子 38 3.6建立標準化因子 43 3.7生態系統服務衝擊評估模式建立 48 第四章 結果與討論 50 4.1案例分析 50 4.1.1目標與範疇界定 57 4.1.2盤查分析 58 4.1.3修正後的生命週期衝擊評估結果 67 4.2繪製臺灣土地利用之生態系統服務衝擊地圖 75 4.2.1臺北市土地佔用之生態系統服務地圖 76 4.2.2臺灣土地佔用之生態系統服務地圖 82 4.3綜合討論 90 4.4不確定性分析 92 第五章 結論與建議 101 參考文獻 104 附錄 110 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 建立土地利用之生態系統服務衝擊評估模式 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Creating Ecosystem Services Impact Assessment Models for Land Use | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林鎮洋(Jen-Yang Lin),李育明(Yuh-Ming Lee) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 土地利用,生態系統服務,生命週期評估,整治方案, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Land use,Ecosystem Services,Life Cycle Assessment,Remediation, | en |
dc.relation.page | 123 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201703067 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2017-08-14 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 環境工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 環境工程學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-106-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 7.14 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。