Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 公共衛生學院
  3. 公共衛生碩士學位學程
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66873
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor陳雅美
dc.contributor.authorChih-Ying Wangen
dc.contributor.author王智瑩zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-17T01:10:02Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-12
dc.date.copyright2020-03-12
dc.date.issued2020
dc.date.submitted2020-01-16
dc.identifier.citation1.行政院國家發展委員會(2016)。中華民國105至150年人口推估。
2.行政院衛生署(2000)。國民長期照護需要調查,中華民國99-100年。
3.Hardy SE, Gill TM. Recovery from disability among community-dwelling older persons. Jama 2004;291:1596-602. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.13.1596.
4.Gill TM, Allore HG, Hardy SE, Guo Z. The dynamic nature of mobility disability in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006;54:248-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00586.x.
5.Hardy SE, Gill TM. Factors associated with recovery of independence among newly disabled older persons. Archives of internal medicine 2005;165:106-12. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.1.106.
6.Boyd CM, Ricks M, Fried LP, et al. Functional decline and recovery of activities of daily living in hospitalized, disabled older women: the Women's Health and Aging Study I. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009;57:1757-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02455.x.
7.Gill TM, Robison JT, Tinetti ME. Predictors of recovery in activities of daily living among disabled older persons living in the community. Journal of general internal medicine 1997;12:757-62.
8.Yu HW, Chen DR, Chiang TL, Tu YK, Chen YM. Disability trajectories and associated disablement process factors among older adults in Taiwan. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics 2015;60:272-80. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2014.12.005.
9.den Ouden ME, Schuurmans MJ, Mueller-Schotte S, van der Schouw YT. Identification of high-risk individuals for the development of disability in activities of daily living. A ten-year follow-up study. Experimental gerontology 2013;48:437-43. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2013.02.002.
10.Chen YM, Chen DR, Chiang TL, Tu YK, Yu HW. Determinants of rate of change in functional disability: An application of latent growth curve modeling. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics 2016;64:21-8. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2015.11.012.
11.Palleschi L, De Alfieri W, Salani B, et al. Functional recovery of elderly patients hospitalized in geriatric and general medicine units. The PROgetto DImissioni in GEriatria Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2011;59:193-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03239.x.
12.Chen YM, Chuang YW, Liao SC, et al. Predictors of functional recovery (FR) for elderly hospitalized patients in a geriatric evaluation and management unit (GEMU) in Taiwan. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics 2010;50 Suppl 1:S1-5. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4943(10)00041-5.
13.Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. Maryland state medical journal 1965;14:61-5.
14.Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. International disability studies 1988;10:61-3.
15.Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability? International disability studies 1988;10:64-7.
16.Wade DT, Hewer RL. Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry 1987;50:177-82. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.50.2.177.
17.Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. Journal of clinical epidemiology 1989;42:703-9. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(89)90065-6.
18.Manton KG. A longitudinal study of functional change and mortality in the United States. Journal of gerontology 1988;43:S153-61.
19.Hoogerduijn JG, Schuurmans MJ, Duijnstee MS, de Rooij SE, Grypdonck MF. A systematic review of predictors and screening instruments to identify older hospitalized patients at risk for functional decline. Journal of clinical nursing 2007;16:46-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01579.x.
20.Gill TM, Allore HG, Holford TR, Guo Z. Hospitalization, restricted activity, and the development of disability among older persons. Jama 2004;292:2115-24. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.17.2115.
21.Buurman BM, Hoogerduijn JG, de Haan RJ, et al. Geriatric conditions in acutely hospitalized older patients: prevalence and one-year survival and functional decline. PloS one 2011;6:e26951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026951.
22.Covinsky KE, Palmer RM, Fortinsky RH, et al. Loss of independence in activities of daily living in older adults hospitalized with medical illnesses: increased vulnerability with age. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003;51:451-8.
23.Gill TM, Allore HG, Gahbauer EA, Murphy TE. Change in disability after hospitalization or restricted activity in older persons. Jama 2010;304:1919-28. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1568.
24.Covinsky KE, Pierluissi E, Johnston CB. Hospitalization-associated disability: 'She was probably able to ambulate, but I'm not sure'. Jama 2011;306:1782-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1556.
25.Abizanda Soler P, Paterna Mellinas G, Martinez Sanchez E, Lopez Jimenez E. [Comorbidity in the elderly: utility and validity of assessment tools]. Revista espanola de geriatria y gerontologia 2010;45:219-28. doi: 10.1016/j.regg.2009.10.009.
26.Rosas-Carrasco O, Gonzalez-Flores E, Brito-Carrera AM, et al. [Assessment of comorbidity in elderly]. Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social 2011;49:153-62.
27.Zelada Rodriguez MA, Gomez-Pavon J, Sorando Fernandez P, Franco Salinas A, Mercedes Guzman L, Baztan JJ. [The interrater reliability of four common comorbidity indexes used in elderly patients]. Revista espanola de geriatria y gerontologia 2012;47:67-70. doi: 10.1016/j.regg.2011.09.012.
28.Forti P, Rietti E, Pisacane N, Olivelli V, Maltoni B, Ravaglia G. A comparison of frailty indexes for prediction of adverse health outcomes in an elderly cohort. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics 2012;54:16-20. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2011.01.007.
29.Sternberg SA, Wershof Schwartz A, Karunananthan S, Bergman H, Mark Clarfield A. The identification of frailty: a systematic literature review. J Am Geriatr Soc 2011;59:2129-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03597.x.
30.Theou O, Brothers TD, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K. Operationalization of frailty using eight commonly used scales and comparison of their ability to predict all-cause mortality. J Am Geriatr Soc 2013;61:1537-51. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12420.
31.Cawthon PM, Marshall LM, Michael Y, et al. Frailty in older men: prevalence, progression, and relationship with mortality. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007;55:1216-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01259.x.
32.Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. The journals of gerontology Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences 2001;56:M146-56.
33.Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne 2005;173:489-95. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050051.
34.Chan DC, Tsou HH, Chen CY, Chen CY. Validation of the Chinese-Canadian study of health and aging clinical frailty scale (CSHA-CFS) telephone version. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics 2010;50:e74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2009.06.004.
35.Basic D, Shanley C. Frailty in an older inpatient population: using the clinical frailty scale to predict patient outcomes. Journal of aging and health 2015;27:670-85. doi: 10.1177/0898264314558202.
36.Wu C, Kim DH, Xue QL, Lee DSH, Varadhan R, Odden MC. Association of Frailty With Recovery From Disability Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Results From Two Large U.S. Cohorts. The journals of gerontology Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences 2019;74:575-81. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gly080.
37.Hardy SE, Dubin JA, Holford TR, Gill TM. Transitions between states of disability and independence among older persons. American journal of epidemiology 2005;161:575-84. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi083.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66873-
dc.description.abstract研究背景與目的:台灣65歲以上人口約佔總人口的14%,已邁入「高齡社會」,老化速度為全球第二,預計在2026年,台灣老年人口將超過20%。隨著人口結構老化,老年失能人口逐年增加,推估至2032年,老年失能人數將高達95萬人。而過去的研究紛紛指出高齡患者特別容易因急性病症或住院導致日常生活功能的下降,且相較於年輕患者,失能的老年患者容易在功能恢復後經歷再度失能。因此本研究針對因急性病症出院的高齡患者,探討其出院後的日常生活功能恢復情形,希望能夠找出影響高齡患者功能恢復的影響因素。
研究方法:本研究為單一機構、前瞻性的世代研究。研究對象為2018年4月至11月12日至台大醫院老年醫學病房出院之患者,符合年齡65歲(含)以上的非機構住民,並排除住院期間死亡或病危自動出院患者,總共收案131人。本研究的依變項為日常生活功能恢復,其定義為簡式巴氏量表與出院時相比增加2分。周全性評估和日常生活功能評估在住院和出院時執行。出院後日常生活功能評估在出院後第30天、90天及180天進行電話追蹤。本研究探討自變項(年齡、共病症、身體質量指數、臨床衰弱分級、出院時簡式巴氏量總分和出院後執行身體活動)與患者出院後日常生活恢復是否相關。
研究結果:本研究高齡患者的出院後日常功能恢復率約36%,多數患者在出院後第30天達到功能恢復,其中大於80歲的患者僅佔2成。功能恢復比率在出院後90天最高,人數總共51人,佔總人數38.93%。多變項分析顯示出院後有執行身體活動的患者,相較於未執行身體活動者,日常功能恢復的機會為9.68倍(OR 9.68,95% CI 2.48-37.79,p=0.001),達統計上顯著。針對出院時功能較差的患者(出院時簡式巴氏量表總分<12 )進行分析,出院後執行身體活動的患者,出院後第30天、出院後第90天以及出院後第180天,其功能恢復的機會分別為5.79倍(95% CI 2.05-16.32, p=0.0009)、6.59倍( 95% CI 2.25-19.34, p=0.0006)和8.75倍( 95% CI 2.78-27.47, p=0.0002),也就是說,出院時功能較差的患者,出院後執行身體活動為功能恢復的有利因子,且該變項隨時間演進,影響力更為顯著。此外,出院時身體質量指數愈高,出院後第30天日常生活功能的恢復機會較高(OR 1.13,95% CI 1.00-1.27,p=0.049)。而住院前臨床衰弱分級1-4級的患者相較臨床衰弱分級5-9級的患者,在出院後第180天有較高的日常生活功能恢復機會(OR 2.06,95% CI 0.63-6.72,p=0.002)。最後,出乎意料的是,出院時巴氏量表總分愈高的患者,日常生活功能的恢復機會較低,但未達統計上差異。
結論:高齡患者出院的30天內為功能恢復的重要時期,然而年齡大於80歲患者的功能恢復可能較慢,宜持續追踨至出院後第90天。身體質量指數愈高以及臨床衰弱分級較低可能為出院後功能恢復有利因子,因此建議在住院時常規性監測患者的營養情形,身體質量指數較低的患者建議積極介入治療。出院後執行身體活動為出院後日常生活功能恢復的重要因子,建議應常規衛教患者出院後如何執行身體活動,尤其是出院時功能較差的患者,應強調出院後執行身體活動的重要性,建議出院後身體活動應持續至少到出院後6個月。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractBackgrounds:Taiwan's population ageing is the second fastest in the world. Taiwan has been an “aged society” country and will become a super-aged society where at least 20 percent of the population are 65 or older by year 2026. With the population ageing, by 2032, it is estimated that at least night hundred and fifty thousand individuals live with one or more disabling conditions. Disability is thought to arise whenever older adults are hospitalized . Factors contributing to recovery were not clear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate factors predicting elder patients’ functional recovery after being discharged from a geriatric ward in a medical center in Taiwan.
Methods: This study was an observational prospective cohort study. We studied 131 patients, who were ≥65 years and discharged from a geriatric ward of the National Taiwan University Hospital between April 11,2018 and November 12, 2018. Comprehensive evaluations were conducted during older adults’ hospital stay, including demographic, nutrition status, fall history, comorbidities, delirium history, clinical frailty scale, length of stay and activities of daily living (ADL) function, evaluated by the Barthel Index (BI)(Collin et al.,1988). ADL function was assessed at discharge, 30 days after discharge, 90 days after discharge, and 180 days after discharge. Levels of physical activities were also collected during follow-up. The main outcome was the recovery of ADL function, defined as at least 2 points improvement in the Barthel Index (BI) compared to discharge. Logistic regressions were used to predict function recovery at each follow-up time point and generalized estimating equation was used to identify possible factors associated function recovery over time.
Results: A total of 51 patients (38.93%) experienced functional recovery during study period; a majority of these recovered within 30 days after discharge and maintained their function. In multivariable analysis, patients with physical activity after discharge (OR 9.68, 95% CI 2.48-37.79, p=0.001), patients with higher body mass index (OR 1.13,95% CI 1.00-1.27,p=0.049) and those without frailty at baseline (OR 2.06,95% CI 0.63-6.72,p=0.002) were more likely to improve their functions. Besides, the effects of physical activities after discharge on functional recovery were stronger among patients with poorer BI (BI at discharge below 12); as the time goes, the effects became stronger with better chance of function recovery (at 30 days after discharge, OR 5.79, 95% CI 2.05-16.32, p=0.0009; at 90 days after discharge, OR 6.593, 95% CI 2.25-19.34, p=0.0006; at 180 days after discharge, OR 8.75, 95% CI 2.78-27.47, p=0.0002).
Conclusions: Physical activity after discharge, higher body mass index and no frailty were predictive factors of function recovery. The results suggested that body mass index should be monitored at routine among elderly hospitalized patients, and for those with poor nutrition status, interventions and education are recommended before discharge. In addition, physical activity after discharge has shown to be a strong effect to functional recovery and the effects were stronger among patients with poorer BI; as the time goes, the effects became stronger with better chance of functional recovery. Emphasizing the importance and how to perform physical activity to patients and their families after discharge, especially within 30 days of discharge, should be crucial components in patients’ discharge plans.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T01:10:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-109-R05847014-1.pdf: 1434342 bytes, checksum: 10864cc6e2bbee9456564293b6f43f26 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2020
en
dc.description.tableofcontents國立臺灣大學碩士學位論文口試委員會審定書 i
序言與謝辭 ii
中文摘要 iv
abstract vi
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 實習單位特色與簡介 1
第二節 研究背景 2
第三節 研究目的與研究問題 3
第二章 研究方法 7
第一節 研究架構 7
第二節 研究假設 7
第三節 研究設計 7
第四節 研究對象 8
第五節 研究流程與資料收集 9
第六節 研究變項以及操作型定義 11
第七節 分析與統計方法 16
第三章 研究結果 17
第一節 收案患者預後情形 17
第二節 收案患者特徵與變項分佈情形 19
第三節 研究變項與依變項之雙變項分析 21
第四節 日常生活功能恢復與各變項之相關性 25
第五節 醫療利用與功能恢復的相關性 27
第四章 討論 28
第一節 研究結果小結 28
第二節 日常生活功能恢復比率 29
第三節 身體活動與功能恢復的相關性 30
第四節 臨床衰弱分級與功能恢復的相關性 31
第五節 出院巴氏量表總分與功能恢復的相關性 32
第六節 年齡變項與功能恢復的相關性 34
第七節 營養狀況與功能恢復的相關性 35
第八節 查爾森共病症指標與功能恢復的相關性 35
第五章 結論與建議 36
參考文獻 37
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject高齡患者zh_TW
dc.subject功能恢復zh_TW
dc.subject日常生活功能zh_TW
dc.subject影響因素zh_TW
dc.subject出院zh_TW
dc.subjectFunctional recoveryen
dc.subjectDischargeen
dc.subjectActivities of daily livingen
dc.subjectElderlyen
dc.subjectPredictorsen
dc.title老年病患出院後影響功能恢復之相關因素探討zh_TW
dc.titlePredictors of Functional Recovery of Discharged Elderly Patientsen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear108-1
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee程蘊菁,陸鳳屏
dc.subject.keyword日常生活功能,高齡患者,出院,功能恢復,影響因素,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordActivities of daily living,Discharge,Elderly,Functional recovery,Predictors,en
dc.relation.page39
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202000113
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2020-01-17
dc.contributor.author-college公共衛生學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept公共衛生碩士學位學程zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:公共衛生碩士學位學程

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-109-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.4 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved