請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66796
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 楊培珊 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chieh-Chou Lan | en |
dc.contributor.author | 藍介洲 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T01:08:32Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-02-13 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2020-02-13 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-01-31 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文書目
王文娟(2011)。〈智能障礙者雙老家庭壓力負荷之初探〉。《身心障礙研究》,9(2),96-110。 王志弘(2010)。〈人人需要「補缺式移動」:障礙者經驗的啟示〉。《文化研究》,10,139-164。 王育瑜(2005)。〈身心障礙者“個人協助”的定位探討:以“視力協助員”服務為例〉。《臺大社工學刊》,12,89-139。 王育瑜(2011)。〈「中途障礙」的概念內涵與障礙事件對個體及家庭之衝擊:南投縣服務提供者觀點的探究〉。《臺灣社會福利學刊》,9(2),185-234。 王國羽(2012)。〈障礙概念模式與理論發展〉。載於王國羽、林昭吟、張恆豪(主編),《障礙研究:理論與政策應用》(43-70頁)。台北:巨流。 王國羽、林昭吟、張恆豪(2012)。〈導論:從研究障礙到障礙研究〉。載於王國羽、林昭吟、張恆豪(主編),《障礙研究:理論與政策應用》(7-42頁)。台北:巨流。 王華沛(2014)。〈特殊教育體系〉。載於林萬億、劉燦宏(主編),《台灣身心障礙者權益與福利》(361-386頁)。台北:五南。 王增勇、唐文慧、陳伯偉、許甘霖、徐畢卿、陳志軒、梁莉芳(譯)(2012)。《為弱勢者畫權力地圖:建制民族誌入門》(原作者:Marie L. Campbell & Frances Greger)。臺北:群學。 內政部統計處(2019a)。〈107年第38週內政統計通報_生命表〉。取自 https://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/news_detail.aspx?sn=14818 內政部統計處(2019b)。〈內政統計月報〉。取自https://www.moi.gov.tw/files/site_stuff/321/1/month/month.html#1戶政、2民政 石泱(2010)。〈成功老化、活躍老化與生產老化對我國高齡者福利政策的省思。〉。《社區發展季刊》,132,234-251。 邱大昕(2009)。〈被忽略的歷史事實:從視障者工作演變看大法官釋字第六四九號解釋〉。《社會政策與社工學刊》,13(2),55-86。 邱大昕(2012)。〈為什麼需要特殊教育?臺灣早期視障教育研究1891-1973年〉。《教育與社會研究》,24,1-39。 邱大昕(2018)。〈「慈善」與「權利」之間:盲人團體爭取車船半價優待的過程(1950-1980)〉。《臺灣社會學》,36,167-188。 周月清、張家寧、陳毅、呂又慧(主編)(2019)。《我要我的自立生活》。台北:松慧。 李嵩義(2007)。《高齡學習者學習偏好、社會支持與幸福感關係之研究》(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所,高雄市。 吳亭芳、黃名嘉、陳雅玲、陳淑雲(2016)。〈隱性的職務再設計-淺談各國職場人力協助政策〉。《特殊教育季刊》,140,11-18。 呂寶靜(1999)。〈高齡者使用日間照護服務的決定過程:誰的需求?誰的決定?〉。《台大社工學刊》,1,181-229。 呂寶靜(2000)。〈高齡者朋友網絡支持功能之初探〉。《社會政策與社工學刊》,4(2),43-85。 林昭吟(2008)。〈身心障礙者老化現象之概念探討與初探性實證研究〉。《東吳社工學報》,19,37-80。 林萬億(2014)。〈瞭解身心障礙者:概念與觀點〉。載於林萬億、劉燦宏(主編),《台灣身心障礙者權益與福利》(14-42頁)。台北:五南。 施世駿(2002)。〈生命歷程研究對社會政策效果的探討〉。《社會政策與社工學刊》,6(1),101-157。 胡幼慧、姚美華(1996)。〈一些質性方法上的思考:信度與效度?如何抽樣?如何收集資料、登陸與分析?〉。載於胡幼慧(主編),《質性研究:理論與方法及本土女性研究實例》,(141-158頁)。台北:巨流。 高敬文(1996)。《質化研究方法論》。台北:師大書苑。 陳向明(2002)。《社會科學質的研究》。台北:五南圖書。 陳伯璋(1990)。《教育研究方法的新取向》。台北:南宏。 陳伯璋(2000)。《質的研究方法》。高雄:麗文文化。 陳伶珠(2008)。《中高齡長期障礙者老化經驗與老年生活期待之研究》(博士論文)。國立暨南國際大學社會政策與社工學系,南投縣。 陳曉萍、徐淑英、樊景立、鄭伯壎(編著)(2012),《組織與管理研究的實證方法》(2版)。台北:華泰。 畢恆達(2012)。〈研究倫理〉。載於瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國樞(主編),《社會科學及行為科學研究法(第一冊):總論與量化研究法》(35-62頁)。台北:東華。 黃惠雯、童琬芬、梁文秦、林兆衛(譯)(2002)。《質性方法與研究》。台北:韋伯文化。 黃瑞琴(1999)。《質性教育研究方法》。台北:心理。 黃寶園(譯)(2005)。〈中心議題〉。載於林世華(總校閱),《社會科學研究法:量化與質化取向》(原作者:Keith F, Punch)(21-52頁)。台北:心理。 惠明盲校(2019)。〈創校歷程〉。取自http://www.hmsh.tc.edu.tw/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=46&Itemid=87&fbclid=IwAR3Kru6cfzK92AqNF-el8Q4tEoG4X6U2Su0WjUCPWK11aEEut0bvPgqFQWc (瀏覽於2019/8/1) 舒昌榮(2008)。〈由積極老化觀點論我國因應高齡社會的主要策略~從「人口政策白皮書」談起〉。《社區發展季刊》,122,212-235。 程景煜(2003)。〈台灣地區高齡者視力與眼疾現況〉。載於中華民國眼科醫學會(主編),《中老年視覺問題診療指引手冊》。 楊培珊、梅陳玉嬋(2016)。《台灣高齡者社工:理論與實務》。台北:雙葉書廊。 新莊盲人重建院(2019)。〈財團法人私立新莊盲人重建院簡介〉。取自http://www.ibt.org.tw/RWD01/default.aspx (瀏覽於 2019/7/1) 經濟建設委員會(2012)。〈中華民國2012年至2060年人口推計報告〉。取自 http://iknow.stpi.narl.org.tw/Post/Files/policy/2012/policy_12_037_2.pdf 趙如錦(譯)(2005a)。〈質化研究:瀏覽、設計與扎根理論〉。載於林世華(總校閱),《社會科學研究法:量化與質化取向》(原作者:Keith F, Punch)(217-270頁)。台北:心理。 趙如錦(譯)(2005b)。〈蒐集質化資料〉。載於林世華(總校閱),《社會科學研究法:量化與質化取向》(原作者:Keith F, Punch)(271-306頁)。台北:心理。 慕光視障重建中心(2019)。〈財團法人私立宜蘭慕光視障重建中心簡介〉。取自http://www.mukuang.org.tw/link2-1.asp (瀏覽於 2019/7/1) 劉仲冬(1996)。〈民族誌研究法及實例〉。載於胡幼慧(主編),《質性研究:理論與方法及本土女性研究實例》。台北:巨流。 潘淑滿(2003)。《質性研究:理論與應用》。台北:心理。 蔡景耀(2003)。〈臺北市與馬祖地區高齡者視力障礙盛行率與原因的社區性研究〉。《中華民國眼科醫學會雜誌》,42(4),178-186。 衛生福利部統計處(2018)。〈身心障礙者人數按季統計〉。取自 https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/lp-2976-113.html 賴文福(譯)(2013)。《民族誌學》(原作者:Fetterman, D. M.)。臺北:弘智。 蕭文高(2010)。〈活躍老化與照顧服務:理論、政策與實務〉。《社區發展季刊》,132,42-58。 謝雨生(2012)。〈研究設計〉。載於瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國樞(主編),《社會科學及行為科學研究法(第一冊):總論與量化研究法》(63-102頁)。台北:東華。 魏惠娟(2012)。《台灣樂齡學習》。臺北:五南。 謝國雄(2007)。《以身為度、如是我做-田野工作的教與學》。台北:群學。 瞿海源(2012)。〈社會科學研究方法的發展〉。載於瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國樞(主編),《社會科學及行為科學研究法(第一冊):總論與量化研究法》(1-34頁)。台北:東華。 簡春安、鄒平儀(1998)。《社工研究法》。台北:巨流。 貳、外文書目 Adams, R., Dominelli, L., & Payne, M. (Eds.). (2009). Social Work:Themes, Issues and Critical Debates (3rd ed.). Basingstoke, UK:Palgrave Macmillan. Adams, T. E., Jones, H. S., & Ellis, C. (2015). Autoethnography:Understanding Qualitative Research. New York:Oxford University Press. Al-Halhoulia, A. A., Qitouqab, H., Malkoshb, N., Shubbaka, A., Al-Gharablib, S., & Hamadb, E. (2016). LEGO mindstorms NXT for elderly and visually impaired people in need:A platform. Technology and Health Care, 24, 579-585. Alma, M. A., et al. (2011). Loneliness and self-management abilities in the visually impaired elderly. Journal of Aging & Health, 21(5), 843-861. Alma, M. A., et al. (2012). Effects of a multidisciplinary group rehabilitation programme on participation of the visually impaired elderly:A pilot study. Disability & Rehabilitation, 34(20), 1677-1685. Barker, J. C. (2002). Neighbors, friends, and other nonkin caregivers of community-living dependent elders. Journal of Gerontology, 57(3), 158-167. Bauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. (Eds.). (2000). Qualitative Researching:With Text, Image and Sound. London:Sage. Bigby, C. (2008). Beset by obstacles:A review of australian policy development to support ageing in place for people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 33, 76-86. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. Breitenbach, N. (2001). Ageing with intellectual disabilities; discovering disability with old age:Same or different? In Priestley, M. (Ed.). Disability and the Life Course:Global Perspectives (pp. 231-239). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. Brekke, J. S. (2012). Shaping a science of social work. Research on Social Work Practice, 22(5), 455-464. Campbell, F. K. (2012). Stalking ableism:Using disability to expose ‘abled’ narcissism. In Goodley, D., Hughes, B., & Davis, L. (Eds.), Disability and Social Theory:New Developments and Directions. London, UK:Palgrave Macmillan. Carlson, M. C., Erickson, K. I., Kramer, A. F., Voss, M. W., Bolea, N., Mielke, M., & Fried, L. P. (2009). Evidence for neurocognitive plasticity in at-risk older adults:The experience corps program. Journal of Gerontology, 64(12), 1275-1282. Chang, H. (2015). Autoethnography:Raising cultural consciousness of self and others. Methodological Developments in Ethnography. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/S1529-210X(06)12012-4 Christensen, K., Dobhammer, G., Rau, R., & Vaupel, J. W. (2009). Ageing populations:The challenges ahead. Lancet, 374, 1196-1208. Cimarolli, V. R., & Wang, S. (2006). Differences in social support among employed and unemployed adults who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 100(9), 545-556. Corker, M. (2001). Revisiting deaf transitions. In Priestley, M. (Ed.). Disability and the Life Course:Global Perspectives (pp. 123-135). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. Crews, J. E. (2003). The role of public health in addressing aging and sensory loss. Generations, 27, 83-90. Dunkle, R., Roberts, B., & Haug, M. (2001). The Oldest Old in Everyday Life. New York:Springer Publishing Company. Elder, G. H. Johnson, M. K. & Crosnoe, R. (2003). The emergence and development of life course theory. In J. T. Mortimer & S. M. hanahan (Eds.), Handbok of the Life Course(pp. 3-19). New York, New York:Springer Science+Busines Media. Elder, G. H., & George, L. K. (2016). Age, cohorts, and the life course. In M. J. Shanahan, J. T. Mortimer, & M. K. Johnson (Eds), Handbook of the Life Course (Volume II) (pp. 59-86). Dordrecht London, NY:Springer International Publishing. Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, and personal reflexivity. In Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage. Ellis, C. (2004). The Ethnographic I:A Methodological Novel About Autoethnography. Walnut Creek:AltaMira Press. Ellingson, L. L., & Ellis, C. (2008). Autoethnography as constructionist project. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of Constructionist Research (pp. 445-466). New York:Guilford Press. Ellison, C., White, A., & Chapman, L. (2011). Avoiding institutional outcomes for older adults living with disability:The use of community-based aged care supports. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 36(3), 175-183. Esteban, N. J. J., et al. (2008). Visual impairment and quality of life:Gender differences in the elderly in cuenca, spain. Quality of Life Research, 17(1), 37-45. Falvo, D. R. (2014). Medical and Psychosocial Aspects of Chronic Illness and Disability (5th ed.). Boston:Jones and Bartlett. Fox, K., Morrow-Howell, N., Herbers, S., Battista, P., & Baum, C. M. (2017). Activity disengagement:Understanding challenges and opportunities for reengagement. Occupational Therapy International, 24(1), 1-7. Fried, L. R., et al. (2004). A social model for health promotion for an aging population:Initial evidence on the experience corps model. Journal of Urban Health, 81, 64-78. Gelo, O., Braakmann, D., & Benetka, G. (2008). Quantitative and qualitative research:beyond the debate. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science,42(3), 266-290. Ghai, A. (2001). Marginalisation and disability:Experiences from the third world. In Priestley, M. (Ed.), Disability and the Life Course:Global Perspectives (pp. 26-37). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. Gibson, R. C. (1995). Promoting successful and productive aging in minority populations. In L. A. Bond, S. J. Cutler, & A. Grams (Eds.), Promoting Successful and Productive Aging (pp. 279-288). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage. Gill, R. (2000). Discourse analysis. In Bauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. (Eds.), Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound. London:Sage. Gobo, G. (2011). Doing Ethnography. London:Sage. Guth, D. A., Rieser, J. J. & Ashmead, D. H. (2010). Perceiving to move and moving to perceive:Control of locomotion by students with vision loss. In Wiener, W. R., Welsh, R. L., & Blasch, B. B. (Eds.), Foundations of Orientation and Mobility (Volume. I) (3rd ed.) (pp. 3-44). New York:American Foundation for the Blind. Hinterlong, J., Morrow-Howell, N., & Rozario, P. (2007). Productive engagement and late life physical and mental health. Research on Aging, 29(4), 348-370. Hong, S. I., & Morrow-Howell, N. (2010). Health outcomes of experience corps:A high-commitment volunteer program. Social Science & Medicine, 71, 414-420. Hong, S. I., & Morrow-Howell, N. (2013). Increasing older adults' benefits from institutional capacity of volunteer programs. Social Work Research, 37(2), 99-108. Hooyman, N. R. (2005). Conceptualizing productive aging. In L. W. Kaye (Ed.), Perspectives on Productive Aging (pp. 37-57). Washington, DC:NASW Press. Horowitz, A., Reinhardt, J. P., & Boerner, K. (2005). The effect of rehabilitation on depression among disabled elders. Aging and Mental Health, 9(6), 563-570. House, J. S., & Kahn, R. L. (1985). Measures and concepts of social support. Academic Press Inc, 83-108. Hughes, B. (2012). Civilising modernity and the ontological invalidation of disabled people. In Goodley, D., Hughes, B., & Davis, L. (Eds.), Disability and Social Theory:New Developments and Directions. London, UK:Palgrave Macmillan. Humphries, B. (2008). Social Work Research for Social Justice. New York:Palgrave MacMillan. Hung, Y. (2017). The body mechanical:Building a caring community, crafting a functioning body. Health, 21(4), 392-408. Hutchison, E. (2008). Dimension of Human Behavior:The Changing Life Course. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage. International Federation of Social Workers. (2013). Definition of social work. Retrieved from http://ifsw.org/get- involved/global-definition-of-social-work/ Irwin, S. (2001). Repositioning Disability and the Life Course:A Social Claiming Perspective. In Priestley, M. (Ed.), Disability and the Life Course:Global Perspectives (pp. 15-25). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. Iwakuma, M. (2001). Ageing with disability in Japan. In Priestley, M. (Ed.), Disability and the Life Course:Global Perspectives (pp. 219-230). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. Kasthuri, A. (2012). Visual and hearing impairment among rural elderly of south india:A community-based study. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 12(1), 116-122. Kaye, H. S., Harrington, C., & LaPlante, M. P. (2010). Long-term care:Who gets it, who provides it, who pays, and how much? Health Affairs, 29(1), 11-21. Keleher, H. (2003). Community care in Australia. Home Health Care Management & Practice, 15, 367-374. Kerschner, H., & Pegues, J. A. M. (1998). Productive aging - A quality of life agenda. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 98(12), 1445-1448. Khan-Lim, D., & Pearce, C. (2006). Visual impairment in the elderly. Update on Aging, 72(6), 82-89. King, E. A., Gilson, S., & Peveler, R. C. (2006). Psychosocial needs of elderly visually impaired patients:Pilot study of patients' perspectives. Primary Care Mental Health, 4(3), 185-197. Kingdon, J. W. (2003). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York:Longman. Knipscheer, K. (2010). The early concept of successful ageing in gerontology. In J. Bouwer (Ed.), Successful Ageing, Spirituality and Meaning (pp. 15-28). Leuven, Belgium:Peeters. Krause, N. (2006). Neighborhood deterioration, social skill, and social relationships in late life. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 62(3), 185-207. Leonard, P. (1997). Postmodern Welfare:Reconstructing an Emancipatory Project. London:Sage. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2003). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonnas S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Landscape of Qualitative Research, Theories and Issues (pp. 253-291). London:Sage Publication. Lipson, J. G. (1994). Ethical issues in ethnography. In Morse. J. M. (Ed.), Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA.:Sage. Longhofer, J., & Floersch J. (2014). Values in a science of social work:Values-informed research and research-informed values. Research on Social Work Practice,24(5):527-534. Manion, P. S., & Rantz, M. J. (1995). Relocation stress syndrome:A comprehensive plan for long-term care admissions. Geriatric Nursing, 16(3), 108-110. McGrath, C. E. & Rudman, D. L. (2013). Factors that influence the occupational engagement of older adults with low vision:A scoping review. Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76(5), 234-241. Morley, C. (2014). Using critical reflection to research possibilities for change. British Journal of Social Wor, 44, 1419-1435. Morrow-Howell, N. (2010). Volunteering in later life:Research frontiers. Journal of Gerontology:Social Sciences, 65B, 461-469. Morrow-Howell, N., Hong, S., & Tang, F. (2009). Who benefits from volunteering? Gerontoloiiist, 49, 91-102. Morrow-Howell, N., & Mui, A. (2013). Productive engagement of older adults:International research, practice, and policy introduction. Ageing International, 38(1), 1-3. Morrow-Howell, N., & Wang, Y. (2013). Productive engagement of older adults:Elements of a cross-cultural research agenda. Ageing International, 38(2), 159-170. Neuman, W. L. (1997). Social Research Methods:Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Boston:Allyn and Bacon. Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding Disability:from Theory to Practice. New York, NY:St Martin's Press. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2005). On becoming a pragmatic researcher:The importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(5), 375-387. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). Policies for healthy ageing:An overview. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=DELSA/HEA/WD/HWP(2009)1&docLanguage=En Osmond, J., & Connor, I. O. (2006). Use of theory and research in social work practice:Implications for knowledge-based practice. Australian Social Work,59(1), 5-19. Overbury, O., Wittich, W., & Spadafora, P. (2005). United nations' principles for older persons viewed through the eyes of visually impaired seniors. International Congress Series,1282, 428-432. Philipsen, G. (1992). Speaking Culturally:Explorations in Social Communication. Albany, New York:State University of New York Press. Philpott, S., & Sait, W. (2001). Disabled children:An emergency submerged. In Priestley, M. (Ed.), Disability and the Life Course Global Perspectives (pp. 151-166). Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press. Priestley, M. (2001). Epilogue. In Priestley, M. (Ed.), Disability and the Life Course:Global Perspectives (pp. 240-248). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. Reeve, D. (2012). Cyborgs, cripples and icrip:Reflections on the contribution of haraway to disability studies. In Goodley, D., Hughes, B., & Davis, L. (Eds.), Disability and Social Theory:New Developments and Directions. London, UK:Palgrave Macmillan. Rowlands, A. (2001). Breaking my head in the prime of my life:Acquired disability in young adulthood. In Priestley, M. (Ed.), Disability and the Life Course:Global Perspectives (pp. 179-191). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. Rozario, P., Hinterlong, J., & Morrow-Howell, N. (2004). Role enhancement or role strain. Research on Aging, 26(4), 413-428. Saaddine, J. B., Narayan, K. M., & Vinicor, F. (2003). Vision loss:A public health problem? Ophthalmology, 110(2), 253-254. Salasche, S. J., Shore J. W., & Olbricht, S. M. (1992). Periocular tumors. Dermatologic Clinics, 10(6), 69-85. Shakespeare, T. (2002). The social model of disability:An outdated ideology? Journal of Research in Social Science and Disability, 2, 9-28. Shanahan, M. J., Mortimer, J. T., & Johnson, M. K. (2016). Introduction:Life course studies - trends, challenges, and future directions. In Shanahan, M. J., Johnson, M. K., & Mortimer, J. T. (Eds.), Handbook of the Life Course (Volume II) (pp. 1-26). New York:Springer International Publishing. Shaw, B. A., Krause, N., Laing, J., & Bennett, J. (2007). Tracking changes in social relations throughout late life. Journal of Gerontology, 62(2), 90-99. Soydan, H. (2012). Understanding social work in the history of ideas. Research on Social Work Practice, 22, 468-480. Thurston, M. (2010). An inquiry into the emotional impact of sight loss and the counselling experiences and needs of blind and partially sighted people. Counselling & Psychotherapy Research, 10(1), 3-12. Tilden, V. P., & Weinert, C. (1987). Social support and the chronically ill individual. Nursing Clinics of North America, 22(3), 613-620. Tisdall, K. (2001). Failing to make the transition? Theorising the transition to adulthood for young disabled people. In Priestley, M. (Ed.), Disability and the Life Course:Global Perspectives (pp. 167-178). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. Tolman, J., Hill, R. D., Kleinschmidt, J. J., & Gregg, C. H. (2005). Psychosocial adaptation to visual impairment and its relationship to depressive affect in older adults with age-related macular degeneration. The Gerontologist, 45(6), 747-753. Trieschmann, R. B. (1987). Aging with A Disability. New York:Demos Medical Pub. Tsirmpas, C., Rompas, A., Fokou, O., & Koutsouris, D. (2015). An indoor navigation system for visually impaired and elderly people based on radio frequency identification (RFID). Information Sciences, 320, 288-305. Turmusani, M. (2001). Work and adulthood:Economic survival in the majority world. In Priestley, M. (Ed.), Disability and the Life Course Global Perspectives (pp. 192-205). Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press. Tuttle, D. W, & Tuttle, N. R. (2004). Self-Esteem and Adjusting with Blindness:The Process of Responding to Life's Demands (3rd ed.). Springfield, IL:Charles C. Thomas. Verstraten, P. F., Brinkmann, W. L., Stevens, N. L., & Schouten, J. S. (2005). Loneliness, adaptation to vision impairment, social support and depression among visually. International Congress Series, 1282, 317-321. Wall, S. S. (2016). Toward a moderate autoethnography? International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2016, 1-9. Walker, A. (2002). A strategy for active ageing. International Social Security Review, 55, 121-139. Walters, S. (2015). Case study or ethnography? Defining terms, making choices and defending the worth of a case. Methodological Developments in Ethnography. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/S1529-210X(06)12006-9 Warnke, J. (1991). The role of the family in the adjustment to blindness or visual impairment. In Greenblatt, S. (Ed.), Meeting the Needs of People with Vision Loss. Lexington, MA:Resources for Rehabilitation. Welsh, R. L. (2010). Psychosocial dimensions of orientation and mobility. In Wiener, W. R., Welsh, R. L., & Blasch, B. B. (Eds.), Foundations of Orientation and Mobility (Volume. I) (3rd ed.) (pp. 173-210). New York:American Foundation for the Blind. World Health Organization. (2002). Active aging:A policy framework. Retrieved from http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2002/WHO_NMH_NPH_02.8.pdf World Health Organization(2014). Visual impairment and blindness. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs282/en/ Wortman, C., & Conway, T. (1985). The role of social support in adaptation and recovery form physical illness. In S. Cohen & S. Syme (Eds.). Social Support and Health (pp. 281-302). New York, NY:Academic Press. Yang, P. (2010). What is productive in taiwanese centenarians' lives? A challenge for the definition of productive ageing. China Journal of Social Work, 3(2-3), 125-137. Yang, P. & Lin, S.J. (2019). Digital aging as an essential component of active aging:A literature review. International Journal of Liberal Arts and Social Science, 7(4), 113-132. Zandt, P. L. V., & Zandt, S. L. V. (1994). The role of support groups in adjusting to visual impairment in old age. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 88(3), 244-253. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66796 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 全球人口趨勢已朝向高齡化,國內也即將邁入超高齡社會。人們平均餘命的拉長,加上醫療及公共衛生的改善,有越來越多的障礙者更有可能跨過高齡階段,以及有越來越多的高齡者在人生晚期更有可能成為障礙者,而使高齡障礙者的人口數逐年增加。對於高齡障礙者的生活樣貌及晚年發展,已成為各界所關注的重要議題之一,故本研究以高齡視障者的生活為研究對象。
高齡視障者目前的生活樣態,多受到其過去剝奪經驗和資產累積的影響。為了能深入解析他們過去的經歷及目前的生活,本研究分別採用生命歷程和生產老化等兩項理論視角,以及自我民族誌此一研究方法。在過去經歷的發掘上,本研究是將焦點放在報導人生命歷程中的視障因應調適為主。而在目前的老年生活探析上,則以廣義的生產老化為重點。 有關高齡視障者生命歷程的研究發現,報導人在視障失明之後,其生命歷程深受內外在多項線條的牽引交織。內在線條有失明創傷、創傷復原、視障身分認同、獨立與依賴情節、心靈救贖等。外在線條則有機會剝奪與資產累積、機會之窗開啟、交通行動限制與支持、家庭風暴與支持、明盲磨合與調整等。 有關高齡視障者生產老化的研究發現,在工作與服務投入主要有服務使用者與提供者的界線重疉、個人選擇與信念的遵從、主場優勢的關鍵等。休閒與社會投入則有視障主體性的設計、視障團體社會力的展現、志工人力資源的善用、工具媒介的選擇使用等。科技投入則有輔助功能與通用設計的強化、科技投入的支持與助力、社會性觀看等。 本研究建議則是當事人在視障發生之後,應針對其個人及家庭盡速聯結視障重建與訓練資源、視障同儕支持、其他支持資源(如教育、就業、交通、經濟等),協助重新累積其因視障而中斷之各項資產。另外不應以健全主義或老年歧視主義看待高齡視障者,他們雖已步入老年,只要提供所需的支持,他們仍可克服障礙與老化的限制,展現其發展和生產的潛能。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The global population trend has become aging, and Taiwan will enter the ultra-aging society. With the increase of people's average life-expectancy, and the improvement of medical care and public health, more and more people with disabilities are more likely to enter the aging stage, and more and more older adults are more likely to become disabilities in later life. The number of the disabled older people has increased year by year. Their life situation has become one of the important concerned issues. Therefore, this study focuses on the life of older adults with visual impairments.
The current life situation of the visually impaired older people are mostly affected by their past deprivation experience and asset accumulated. In order to deeply analyze their past experience and current life, this research adopts two theoretical perspectives, including life course and productive aging, and the research method of autoethnography. This study focuses on their adaptation of vision loss in life course and the broader productive aging. This research has found that their life course is deeply influenced by multiple internal and external elements since their vision loss. Internal elements are including blindness trauma, trauma recovery, visually impaired identity, independence and dependence plots, and soul salvation. External ones are involving deprivation and accumulated asset, windows of opportunity, restrictions and support on movements, family storms and support. This study also has found that their productive aging are involving the elements of crossing boundaries between service users and providers, persisting in personal choices and beliefs, using home advantage within the work and services engagement; specific designing for visually impaired, displaying the social power of visually impaired groups, using volunteer resources within the leisure and social engagement; having accessible features, universal design, and technology support and assistance within the technology engagement. This study suggests that we should deliver rehabilitation resources, peer support, and other resources to the visually impaired and their family as soon as possible after losing vision. In addition, the visually impaired older people should not be oppressed by ableism and ageism. Although they have entered the aging stage, they still can perform developmental and productive potential and overcome the restrictions of disability and aging as long as they receive the support required. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T01:08:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-109-D02330002-1.pdf: 5499686 bytes, checksum: d56a8d862544523b3cf7cb809a2235a9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 I
致謝詞 III 中文摘要 V 英文摘要 VI 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究源起 1 第二節 相關名詞釋義 7 壹、視覺障礙之定義 7 貳、老化之定義 10 參、生命歷程 11 肆、生產老化 12 第三節 研究意識與研究問題 12 壹、研究意識 12 貳、研究目的 15 參、研究問題 16 第二章 文獻探究與對話 17 第一節 老人學相關文獻路徑與對話 18 壹、老化的心智改變及人格發展 18 貳、高齡者相關社會學理論 20 第二節 高齡身心障礙與視覺障礙者心理與社會相關研究之論述與對話 24 壹、功能、健康及障礙的概念化 24 貳、健康與功能狀況改變後的心理及社會要素 28 參、高齡身心障礙者的心理與社會相關研究論述 30 第三節 生命歷程研究與論述 33 壹、生命歷程觀點的基本概念 33 貳、生命歷程的典範原理 36 參、生命歷程與障礙研究的關聯 38 第四節 老化觀點相關研究與論述 40 壹、成功老化概念內涵 40 貳、康老化概念內涵 41 參、生產老化概念內涵 42 肆、活躍老化概念內涵 43 伍、數位老化概念內涵 45 第五節 高齡身心障礙者社會支持之理論與實務探討 47 壹、社會關係、社會網絡與社會支持 48 貳、高齡身心障礙者社會支持之相關研究 49 第三章 研究設計 51 第一節 研究典範的選取 51 壹、研究典範的比較 51 貳、實證主義、建構主義及批判主義的研究典範 52 第二節 質化研究及自我民族誌研究方法的選取 55 壹、質化研究方法的選取 56 貳、民族誌研究取向的知識論 58 參、自我民族誌的方法學 61 第三節 研究對象與資料收集分析 64 壹、研究田野及參與者的選取 64 貳、資料收集與分析 68 第四節 研究倫理與政治 74 壹、面對研究對象的倫理與政治 74 貳、面對研究品質的倫理與政治 79 第四章 高齡視障者生命歷程-過去的生命故事拼湊 81 第一節 先天或學齡時期失明之高齡視障者的生命歷程 82 壹、教育剝奪與資產累積 82 貳、按摩就業資產累積 97 第二節 成年中早期失明之高齡視障者的生命歷程 101 壹、視障創傷歷 101 貳、家庭風暴與磨合 106 參、就業歷程的改寫與延續 109 第三節 成年晚期或老年時期失明之高齡視障者的生命歷程 111 壹、視障調適的現在進行式 111 貳、家庭支持及磨合 114 參、就業歷程轉折 115 第四節 高齡視障者生命歷程的線條交織及支持 118 壹、生命歷程內在線條 119 貳、生命歷程外在線條 128 第五章 高齡視障者生產老化的民族誌-現在的生活投入刻畫 143 第一節 高齡視障者的工作與服務投入及支持 144 壹、高齡視障者有酬工作的工作與服務投入場景 144 貳、高齡視障者無酬志願服務的工作與服務投入場景 148 參、小結 157 第二節 高齡視障者的休閒與社會投入及支持 161 壹、高齡視障者休閒與社會投入的場景及實錄 162 貳、高齡視障者休閒與社會投入的動念及起因 174 參、小結 177 第三節 高齡視障者的科技投入及支持 183 壹、高齡視障者學習使用智慧手機現場實錄 183 貳、高齡視障者智慧手機學習心得與建言 187 參、使用智慧手機對高齡視障者的益處 191 肆、小結 196 第六章 高齡視障者生命歷程與生產老化之研究結論及展望 201 第一節 研究結論 201 壹、高齡視障者的視障與老化因應歷程之研究結論 201 貳、不同視障發生時點之高齡視障者的視障與老化因應歷程之研究結論 203 參、高齡視障者生產老化之經驗與表現之研究結論 208 肆、高齡視障者正式與非正式支持服務及資源的使用與期待之研究結論 214 第二節 研究建議及貢獻展望 217 壹、研究建議 217 貳、研究貢獻 221 參、研究限制及展望 223 參考書目 225 壹、中文書目 225 貳、外文書目 229 附錄 239 附錄一 研究參與者知情同意書 239 附錄二 訪談大綱 247 附錄三 視力協助員服務說明 249 附錄四 視力協助員結訓證書 251 附錄五 研究倫理審查核可證明書 253 表目次 表1-1我國總人口數與障礙人口數之年齡比較表(2018年底) 5 表1-2 我國障礙人口數與視障人口數之年齡比較表(2018年底) 6 表1-3 視覺障礙程度標準表 8 表1-4 我國視障人口等級分布表(2018年底) 9 表1-5 老化分類摘要表 11 表2-1 高齡者相關社會學理論摘要表 23 表2-2 障礙觀點相關論述摘要表 26 表2-3 生命歷程觀點基本概念摘要表 36 表2-4 生命歷程典範原理摘要表 38 表3-1 實證主義、建構主義及批判主義之比較表 54 表3-2 研究參與者之基本資料表 66 表3-3 引用資料編碼表 71 表3-4 教育歷程相關主題要素共通性比較範例表 72 表3-5 研究資料收集與分析流程表 73 表4-1 教育剝奪與現今因應策略表 93 表4-2 機會之窗類型表 131 表4-3 明盲相處對應調整支持摘要表 137 表4-4 報導人之視障因應生命歷程線條交織與支持摘要表 138 表5-1 報導人社會活動課程表 164 表5-2 高齡視障者手機教學之特色分析表 184 表5-3 高齡視障者科技產品(如手機)學習心得建言之分析表 190 表5-4 智慧手機對高齡視障者的益處分析表 196 表5-5 報導人生產老化各項投入及產出摘要表 200 表6-1 研究建議摘要表 220 圖目次 圖1-1 研究架構圖 16 圖2-1 文獻路徑圖 17 圖2-2 活躍老化三大支柱圖 44 圖3-1 自我民族誌三元模型圖 63 圖4-1 教育剝奪原因路徑分析圖 90 圖4-2 按摩笛片 99 圖4-3 個人調適模式路徑圖 122 圖4-4 視障者行走技巧示意圖 132 圖4-5 公車號碼牌(以672為例照片) 133 圖4-6 影響創傷復原之線條關係圖 139 圖4-7 報導人失明時間與視障服務重大事蹟時間關係圖 141 圖5-1 高齡視障者按摩志工服務照片 150 圖5-2 高齡視障者導覽志工服務照片 154 圖5-3 界線重疊示意圖 158 圖5-4 高齡視障者工作與服務投入成因分析圖 159 圖5-5 高齡視障者學習照型氣球照片 164 圖5-6 高齡視障者騎協力車照片 168 圖5-7 高齡視障者登山健行照片 170 圖5-8 高齡視障者共餐照片 172 圖5-9 報導人吳大哥造型氣球成品照片 175 圖5-10 高齡視障者休閒與社會投入起因動念分析圖 182 圖5-11 社工帶報導人顏大哥從捷運站至協會之引導照片 185 圖5-12 社工帶報導人王大姐搭復康巴士的照片 186 圖5-13 報導人王大姐、馬大哥上智慧手機的課程照片 187 圖5-14 生產老化線條交織關係圖 199 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 障礙與老化的交織
—高齡視覺障礙者的生命歷程與生產老化 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Interweaving Disability and Aging - The Life Course and Productive Aging of Older Adults with Visual Impairments | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張恆豪,姜義村,吳亭芳,邱大昕 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 高齡視障者,生命歷程,生產老化,自我民族誌,質化研究, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | older adults with visual impairment,life course,productive aging,autoethnography,qualitative research, | en |
dc.relation.page | 253 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202000265 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-02-03 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 社會工作學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 社會工作學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-109-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 5.37 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。