Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66590Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 練乃華(Nai-Hwa Lien) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shu-Chi Chuang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 莊書齊 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T00:44:59Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2014-02-16 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2012-02-16 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2012-01-09 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分
1. 周軒逸、練乃華(2010)。時間距離對負面競選廣告效果之影響。《臺灣民主季刊》,第七卷,第二期 (2010年6月):33-76。 2. 姜定宇、虞邦祥、陳至芸 (譯) (2004)。消費心理學。台北:桂冠。(Gordon Foxall & Ronald Oldsmith & Stephen Brown, 1996) 3. 陳銘慧(2002)。溝通策略、消費者衝動性特質、產品特質對衝動性消費行為之影響。國立台灣大學商學研究所博士論文,台北。 4. 廖彥宜(2010)。消費者在放棄產品資訊下,產品特質與產品涉入程度對購後悔恨程度影響之研究。天主教輔仁大學經營管理碩士學程碩士論文,台北。 5. 蔡宜臻(2010)。社會距離對送禮行為之影響。臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文,台北。 6. 簡秀芬(2010)。時間距離對於消費者選擇贈品促銷方案之影響。臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文,台北。 英文部分 1. Aaker, David A. and Erich Joachimsthaler (2000), Brand Leadership, The Free Press: New York, NY. 2. Batra, Rajeev and Olli T. Ahtola (1990), “Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Sources of Consumer Attitudes,” Marketing Letters, 2(2), 159-170. 3. Belch, George E. and Michael A. Belch (2004), Advertising and Promotion: An Integrated Marketing Communications Perspective, 6th Ed., McGraw Hill: New York, NY. 4. Castano, Raquel, Mita Sujan, Manish Kacker, and Harish Sujan (2008), “Managing Consumer Uncertainty in the Adoption of New Products: Temporal Distance and Mental Simulation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 45(3), 320-336. 5. Chernev, A. (2004), “Goal-Attribute Compatibility in Consumer Choice,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1-2), 141-150. 6. Chitturi, R., Raghunathan, R. & Mahajan, V. (2007, November), “Form Versus Function: How the Intensities of Specific Emotions Evoked in Functional Versus Hedonic Trade-Offs Mediates Product Preferencese,” Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 702-714. 7. Fazio, Russell H., Paul M. Herr, and Martha C. Powell (1992), “On the Development of Strength of Category-Brand Associations In Memory: The Case of Mystery Ads,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1(1), 1-13. 8. Hirschman, Elizabeth C. and Morris B. Holbrook (1982), “Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods, and Propositions,” Journal of Marketing, 46(Summer), 92-101. 9. Kamins, Michael A., and Assael, Henry(1990), “Cognitive Response Involvement Model of the Process of Product Evaluation Through Advertising Exposure and Trial,” Journal of Business Research, 20, 191-215. 10. Kardes Frank R., Maria Cornley, and John Kim(2006), “Construal Level Effects of Preference Stability, Preference-Behavior Correspondence, and the Suppression of Competing Brands,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(2), 135-144. 11. Keller, Kevin Lane (1993), “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity,” Journal of Marketing, 57(January), 1-22. 12. Kim, Hakkyun, Akshay R. Rao, and Angela Y. Lee (2009). “It’s Time to Vote: The Effect of Matching Message Orientation and Temporal Frame on Political Persuasion.” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 35, No. 6:877-89. 13. Kotler, Philip (2003), Marketing Management, 11th Ed., Prentice Hall: New York, NY. 14. Liberman, Nira and Yaacov Liberman (1998), “The Role of Feasibility and Desirability Considerations in Near and Distant Future Decisions: A Test of Temporal Construal Theory,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 5-18. 15. Lilly, Bryan and Rockney Walters (1997), “Toward a Model of New Product Preannouncing Timing,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14, 4-20. 16. Lynch, John, G. Zauberman (2007), “When Do You Want It? Time, Decisions, and Public Policy,” Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 25(1), 67-78. 17. Maheswaran, Durairaj and Sternthal, Brian (1990), “The Effects of Knowledge, Motivation, and Type of Message on Ad Processing and Product Judgments,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17(1), 66-73. 18. Mano, Haim and Richard L. Oliver (1993), “Assessing the Dimensionality and Structure of the Consumption Experience: Evaluation, Feelings, and Satisfaction,” Journal of Consumer Research, 20(December), 451-466. 19. Menon, Satya and Dilip Soman (2002), “Managing the Power of Curiosity for Effective Web Advertising Strategies,” Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 1-14. 20. Mogilner, Cassie, Jennifer L. Aaker, and Ginger L. Pennington (2008), “Time Will Tell: The Distant Appeal of Promotion and the Imminent Appeal of Prevention,” Journal of Consumer Research, 34(February), 670-681. 21. Munch, James, Gregory Boller, and John Swasy (1993), “The Effects of Argument Structure and Effective Tagging on Product Attitude Formation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (September), 294-302. 22. Park, C. Whan, Sandra Milberg, and Robert Lawson (1991), “Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency,” Journal of Consumer Research, 18(September), 185-193. 23. Park, C. Whan, Robert Lawson, and Sandra Milberg (1989), “Memory Structure of Brand Names,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 16, ed. Thomas Srull, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 726-731. 24. Park, C. Whan, Bernard J. Jaworski, and Debra J. MacInnis (1986), “Strategic Brand Concept-Image Management,” Journal of Marketing, 50(October), 135-145. 25. Petty, Richard E., and Duane T. Wegener (1998). “Matching versus Mismatching Attitude Functions: Implications of Scrutiny of Persuasive Messages.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 24, No. 3:227-40. 26. Reber, Rolf, Norbert Schwarz, and Piotr Winkielman (2004). “Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver’s Processing Experience?” Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 8, No. 4:364-82. 27. Trope, Yaacov and Nira Leberman (2000), “Temporal Cosntrual and Time-Dependent Changes in Preference,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 876-889. 28. Trope, Yaacov and Nira Leberman (2003), “Temporal Cosntrual,” Psychological Review, 110(3), 403-421. 29. Voss, R. E., Spangenberg, E. R. & Grohmann, B. (2003), “Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Consumer Attitude,” Journal of Marketing Research, 40(3), 310-320. 30. Zhang, Yong, & Gelb, Betsy. (1996), “Matching advertising appeals to culture: The influence of products' use conditions,” Journal of Advertising, 25, 29-46. 31. Ziamou, Paschalina (Lilia) and Robert W. Veryzer (2005), “The Influence of Temporal Distance on Consumer Preferences for Technology-Based Innovations,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22, 336-346. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66590 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 「前導廣告」已成為近年來廣告界的新寵,在各種產品、各種品牌皆可發現其蹤跡。所謂「前導」意指為了即將要發生的事情做預告,旨在挑起消費者的興趣、好奇心、期待感,好比電影預告片一般。在時間上會早於其主要的廣告、產品上市、行銷事件等,更由於為了挑起消費者的好奇心與興趣,其能揭露的訊息相對地受限,藉以保留神祕感。
故此,本研究以Trope and Liberman(2003)提出的時間解釋理論(Temporal Construal Theory, TCT)為基礎,結合品牌概念的差異(Voss, Spangenberg, and Grohman, 2003),並進一步探討廣告訊息與品牌概念的適配性,分別設計兩組實驗。實驗一為2(時間距離近/遠)x2(功能性品牌/享樂性品牌)的多因子設計,探討時間距離與品牌概念產生的交互作用如何影響前導廣告的效果;實驗二為2(時間距離近/遠)x2(功能性品牌/享樂性品牌) x2(功能利益訴求/心理利益訴求)的多因子設計,探討在時間距離的影響下,品牌概念與廣告訊息的適配性如何影響前導廣告的效果。 本研究結果顯示,當時間距離較遠時,消費者對於享樂性品牌的廣告較為偏好,與時間解釋理論的解釋水平層級相符;其次,同樣在時間距離較遠時,消費者對於品牌概念與廣告訴求適配的前導廣告會產生較佳的產品態度,再次符合時間解釋理論提出的概念。然而,在時間距離較近時,消費者仍然偏好品牌概念與廣告訴求適配的前導廣告,故本研究提出了內部適配性與外部適配性的概念,進一步將適配性的概念提出層級之分。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Teaser advertising has been overwhelming popular recently, and it has become a favorite choice for advertising agent as well. “Teaser” means to tease the audiences in order to evoke their interest, curiosity, and possibly, cultivate their anticipation about what’s going to happen next, no matter what it might be.
Therefore, as a “teaser ads”, we expected that its launch time will be earlier than the main events, and what it can say is actually quite limited, in which might only contain brand name, simple slogan and the exact date the main events will take place, in order to keep the mystery and create the curious ambience for audience. We first investigated the effect of temporal distance and different brand concepts on teaser advertising, which is based on the Temporal Construal Theory, proposed by Trope and Liberman (2003), and combine with the brand concept idea (Voss, Spangenberg, and Grohman, 2003). This study focused on under which temporal distance conditions (near future/distant future), the audience’s preference towards an teaser ads will switch from the ads presented by an utilitarian brand to a hedonic brand, and vice versa. Secondly, we add another variable into our experiment: advertising message, in order to further investigate the effect of different advertising message appeals (functional/hedonic) matches with different brand concept (utilitarian/hedonic) on teaser ads under different temporal distance conditions (near future/distance future). Result from the first experiment indicates that the teaser advertisement presented by hedonic brand is more effective under the distant future, which is corresponded with Temporal Construal Theory. Result from the second experiment indicates that the teaser ad which the message appeal matches with brand concept is more effective under the distant future, specifically, on the product attitude evoked by the teaser ads, which is corresponded with Temporal Construal Theory as well. As a matter of fact, subjects also prefer the teaser ad which message appeal matches with brand concept under the near future, especially hedonic message appeal alone with hedonic brand concept. Managerial implications are discussed. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T00:44:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R98741058-1.pdf: 6545278 bytes, checksum: 381a252ecbafbcdf31a22465deb1151e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 …………………………………………………………………………I
ABSTRACT ………………………………………………………………………II 第壹章、 緒論 1 第貳章、 文獻探討與研究假說 4 第一節 解釋水平理論 4 第二節 時間解釋理論 6 第三節 品牌概念 10 第參章、 研究架構與研究方法 14 第一節 研究架構 14 第二節 研究方法 14 第肆章、 實驗結果 16 第一節 前測 16 第二節 實驗一 18 第三節 實驗二 27 第四節 研究假設驗證結果 38 第伍章、 研究結論與建議 40 第一節 研究結論 40 第二節 理論與行銷意涵 41 第三節 研究限制 45 第四節 未來研究建議 46 參考文獻 ………………………………………………………………………48 附錄 ………………………………………………………………………53 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 品牌概念 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 功能性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 享樂性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 廣告訊息 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 適配性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 時間距離 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 前導廣告 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Utilitarian | en |
| dc.subject | Hedonic | en |
| dc.subject | Brand Concept | en |
| dc.subject | Teaser Advertising | en |
| dc.subject | Matching | en |
| dc.subject | Advertising Message | en |
| dc.subject | Temporal Distance | en |
| dc.title | 時間距離、品牌概念與廣告訊息對前導廣告效果之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Effect of Temporal Distance, Brand Concept and Advertisement Message on Teaser Ads | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 100-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 謝依靜(Yi-Ching Hsieh),陳建維(Chien-Wei Chen) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 前導廣告,時間距離,品牌概念,功能性,享樂性,廣告訊息,適配性, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Teaser Advertising,Temporal Distance,Brand Concept,Utilitarian,Hedonic,Advertising Message,Matching, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 81 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2012-01-09 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
| Appears in Collections: | 商學研究所 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-100-1.pdf Restricted Access | 6.39 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
