請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66567完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 李吉仁(Ji-Ren Lee) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chun-Chieh Chiu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 邱俊傑 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T00:43:38Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2012-03-19 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2012-03-19 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2012-01-11 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 行政院經濟部, 2010,「電動車發展策略」
吳凱琳譯,二版,2007,創新的兩難,台北:商周出版。Christensen, C. M. The Innovator’s Dilemma, 1997, Boston, MC: Harvard Business School Press 宋德洤、江愛群、陳志洋,2009,台灣電動汽車產業發展電動驅動系統之機會與挑戰,新竹:工業技術研究院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心(IEK) 吳尊煇,2011,「中國大陸車市成長趨緩之下剖析新能源汽車推動路徑」,彎道超車新商機,破解電動車發展DNA研討會,台北 李芳齡譯,2008,1990年代成長策略:優勢資源戰,台北:哈佛商業評論。Collis, D. & Montgomery, C. 1995, Competing on Resources: Strategy in the 1990s, Harvard Business Review, July - August 李芳齡譯,2008,創新者的成長指南,台北:天下雜誌出版。Johnson, M. W. & Anthony, S. D. & Sinfield, J. D. & Altman, E. J. 2008, The Innovator’s Guide to Growth: How to Put Disruptive Innovation to Work, 2008, Boston, MC: Harvard Business School Press 林麗冠譯,2010,白地策略:打造無法模仿的市場新規則,台北:天下遠見出版社。Johnson, M. W., 2010, Seizing the White Space: Business Model Innovation for Growth and Renewal, Boston, MC: Harvard Business School Press 政府出版物:交通部運輸研究所合作研究計畫出版品 (2008):智慧化商用車隊資源管理系統整合之研究 (1/3) (編號No. 97-10-4220),台北:交通部運輸研究所 陳文仁,2010,電動車產業發展現況與趨勢,新竹:工業技術研究院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心(IEK) 陳文仁、陳志洋、江文書,2010,電動車充電商業模式與充電設備商機探討,新竹:工業技術研究院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心(IEK) 陳橙和譯,2000, 思科的十大秘訣,台北:聯經出版社。Stauffer, D. 2000, Business The CISCO Way: Secrets of the Company That Makes the Internet, Milford, CT: Capstone Press 溫蓓章,2011,「EV普及化策略與可能商業模式探討」,EV的普及化之路研討會,台北 葉俊德譯,2007,網絡互聯經濟,台北:中國生產力中心。Iansiti, M. & Levien, R. 2004, The Keystone Advantage, Boston, MC: Harvard Business School Press 薛乃綺、趙雨潔,2011,商用電動車商業模式個案分析,高雄:金屬工業研究發展中心 蘇俊連,2011,「打造智慧電網與電動車」,彎道超車新商機,破解電動車發展DNA研討會,台北 Amirault, J. & Chien, J. & Grag, S. & Gibbons, D. & Ross, B. & Tang, M. & Xing, J. & Sidhu, I. & Kaminsky, P & Tenderich, B. 2009, The Electric Vehicle Battery Landscape: Opportunities and Challenges, Center for Entrepreneurship & Technology , University of California, Berkeley, U.S.A. Basole, R. C. & Rouse, W. B. 2008, Complexity of Service Value Networks: Conceptualization and Empirical Investigation, IBM System Journal, Vol. 47, No. 1: 53-70 Butterworth, C. & Muralidharan, V. 2010, EU and NA Electric Buses, Vans and Trucks Market - Depot Based Delivery Vehicles expected to Account for 70% of overall Electrification Share, Frost & Sullivan, Mar 31 Chocteau, V & Drake, D. & Kleindorfer, P. R. & Orsato, R. J. & Roset, A. 2011, Collaborative Innovation for Sustainable Fleet Operations: The Electric Vehicle Adoption Decision, INSEAD Working Paper No. 2011/52/TOM/INSEAD Social Innovation Centre, France Electrification Coalition, 2010, Fleet Electrification Roadmap: Revolutionizing Transportation and Achieving Energy Security, Washington, DC: Electrification Coalition Electronic Documents: Ernst & Young, 2010, Cleantech Matters – The Electrification of Transportation: From Vision to Reality http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Electrification_of_transportation/$FILE/The%20electrification%20of%20transportation.pdf Electronic Documents: Frost & Sullivan, 2009, New Business Models for Electric Vehicle: Perspectives from Frost & Sullivan, GM, Peugeot, Citroen, and Think’s Senior Executives http://www.slideshare.net/FrostandSullivan/new-business-models-for-electric-vehicles-perspective-from-frost-sullivan-gm-peugeot-citron-and-thinks-senior-executives Electronic Documents: Frost & Sullivan, 2011, Market to Witness the Launch of More Than 300 Base Models by 100 Manufacturers between 2010 and 20117 http://www.frost.com/prod/servlet/press-release.pag?Src=RSS&docid=241216523 Hazeldine, T. & Kollamthodi, S. & Brannigan, C. & Morris, M. & Deller, L. 2009, Market Outlook to 2022 for Battery Electric Vehicles and Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles, AEA Technology plc, Oxford, U.K. Iansiti, M. & Levien, R. 2004, The Keystone Advantage, Boston, MC: Harvard Business School Press Johnson, M. W. & Suskewicz, J. 2009, How to Jump-Start the Clean Tech Economy, Harvard Business Review, November: 52-60 Johnson, M. W. & Christensen C. M. & Kagermann, H. 2008, Reinventing Your Business Model, Harvard Business Review, December: 51-59 Kar, S. & Muralidharan, V. 2010, Strategic Analysis of the North American and European Electric, Frost & Sullivan, 2010 Langezaal, M. & Bouman, C. 2010, Towards Winning Business Models for the EV-Charging Industry, Epyon B.V., Netherlands Stewart, A. 2011, Influences on the Market for Low Carbon Vehicles 2020-30, Element Energy, Cambridge, U.K. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66567 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 據統計造成全球暖化之主要因素為二氧化碳的大量排放,其中有16~20%來自於陸上交通運工具,而且其消耗石化燃料占比最高,因此,基於減緩地球暖化效應所造成對自然環境之破壞,以及油源逐漸枯竭及開採成本日益升高所造成之能源安全議題受到高度重視等主要因素考量下,世界各國對節能減碳已日趨重視,全球主要汽車領導廠商近年來已紛紛推出各式油電混和車型,並宣布全電池驅動之電動車輛生產時程,未來產品的規劃也以電動汽車為發展目標。
但是純電池驅動電動車因電池成本高、續航力不足、及充/換電基礎設施尚未完善等限制,而面臨普及化之發展瓶頸。各國政府及產學業界除持續在電池科技研發及相關服務商品的創新及整合外,由於電動車之能源補給方式迥異於傳統之內燃機引擎汽車,商業模式的創新也將是能否加速電動車發展的關鍵因素;本研究認為商業模式的創新有必要從產業現況及發展趨勢的觀點切入,進一步審視限制電動車發展的因素,據以辨識現在汽車市場與區隔中適合電動車先行導入的利基市場,並分析滿足利基市場內目標顧客價值主張之主要限制因素,以規劃具發展可行性的整合服務商營運模式。 本研究係採用Clayton Christensen破壞式創新理論及Mark Johnson商業模式設計流程,以顧客待完成的工作概念進行市場區隔分析,據以選定適合電動車先行切入之利基市場並形成假說及加以驗證,並推導具價值創新之商業模式;另外,為避免忽略汽車市場實際運作情勢及可能之競爭態勢,因此本研究運用價值網絡及企業生態系統等理論,深入分析限制利基市場目標顧客採用電動車的因素,及整合服務商所需建構之競爭資源,以印映證並強化本研究所提出之商業模式及關鍵資源發展策略等論述之合理性及可行性。 最終,本研究推導出輕型商用車隊為電動車可先行切入之利基市場,並提出成立「電能供應管理整合服務商」之中介者概念,及「透過與電動貨車製造商策略聯盟方式,提供輕型商用車隊簡單、取得便利、及較低總持有成本之穩定可靠的全生命週期電能供應管理整合服務解決方案」的建議,依用電量為計價單位(Pay-by-kWh)給付電池及電能管理租賃費用之創新電能供應管理整合服務商業模式,並提出滿足樞紐企業核心策略原則之智慧型充電站管理系統設計之建議。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | According to researches, the global warming is resulted from mass carbon dioxide emission, 16~20% of which are produced by ground transportation vehicles that take up the highest percentage of fossil fuel consumption. In order to relieve global warming impacts that have brought severe harms to the environment and to minimize energy security risks that have increasingly received attentions under rational concerns of fossil oil soon-to-be drained up and increasing cost for crude oil exploration, issue of carbon emission reduction has drew a great attention from all the countries around the world. To cope with those issues, major leading automotive manufacturers have been developing variety of fuel-electric hybrid vehicle models and declared timeline to get new electrified vehicle on the road as their goals for future development.
However, wide adoption of pure battery-powered vehicle has run into a corner because of unaffordable battery cost, limited driving range and yet-to-be well established infrastructure for battery recharging or swap. In addition to continuous efforts devoted from governments, industries and academies for battery technology/performance improvement and services innovation provided to electric vehicle users, it is believed that, due to completely different design for energy supply from the traditional internal combustion engine vehicle, an innovative business model for electrified vehicle plays an essential role to assure successful development. This study is aiming at developing a feasible and innovative business model for an integrated service provider in the electric vehicle industry by reiterating current market situation as well as its possible future development for further investigation on constraints against the industry, then identifying niche market among current automotive application segments which electric vehicle can first ideally provide value to, and analyzing constraints that might not meet value proposition held by the customer which is identified as a targeted customer in the niche market. Disruptive Innovation and Innovative Business Model Design introduced by Clayton Christensen and Mark Johnson respectively are two major concepts applied in this study. A niche market is identified and proved by applying concept of “job-to-be done” for potential market segment analysis as well as by performing a simulation with actual operating information. As a result, a business model with value creation to targeted customer is developed. In order to take up actual automotive market operations and possible competition into consideration, this study also applies concepts both of Value Network and Business Ecosystem for further assessment over possible constraints that might turn down decision made by the targeted customer for electric vehicle purchase as well as for an integrated service provider to develop required resources to cope with competition. By doing so, business model and key resource development strategy proposed by this study can prove to be more reasonable and feasible. Finally, this study identifies that commercial fleet is the most suitable market segment to adopt electric vehicle as first mover, and proposes an innovative business model that includes introduction of concept of “Energy Supply and Management Integrated Service Provider” as an intermediary and a total solution to provide light commercial fleet operators with stable and reliable life through integrated energy supply and management services in the way of simple, convenient and lower total cost of ownership. The proposed business model could be profitable if the proposed integrated service provider can provide light commercial fleet operators with battery leasing and charging station management as well as charge at total amount of electricity usage (Paid-by-kWh) as main revenue stream. In addition, this study also recommends the integrated service provider develop a Smart Charging Station Management System in order to successfully execute a keystone strategy for competition. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T00:43:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-P98746017-1.pdf: 4193909 bytes, checksum: 54fd122a73f56ee8063f3ec9c38d0ecd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究問題與目的 3 第三節 研究方法與流程 4 第四節 章節架構 6 第五節 研究範圍 7 第二章 文獻探討 8 第一節 電動車與商業模式 8 第二節 破壞性創新與商業模式設計 11 第三節 價值網絡與企業生態系統 15 第三章 電動車產業介紹及發展問題分析 19 第一節 電動車介紹 19 第二節 產業現況及趨勢分析 23 第三節 市場現況與規模預估 36 第四節 產業發展面臨之障礙 41 第五節 可能之解決方案及假說 43 第六節 小結 45 第四章 電動車利基市場分析 46 第一節 適合電動車切入之利基市場辨識 46 第二節 商用電動車隊之市場現況及預估 57 第三節 限制輕型商用車隊採用電動車之因素 62 第四節 小結 67 第五章 創新商業模式設計 68 第一節 價值創新解決方案 68 第二節 關鍵資源與發展策略 75 第三節 關鍵流程 82 第四節 利潤公式 84 第五節 小結 85 第六章 結論與建議 87 第一節 研究結論 87 第二節 研究建議 92 參考文獻 95 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 破壞性創新 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 電動車 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 商業模式 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 企業生態系統 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Electric Vehicle | en |
| dc.subject | Disruptive Innovation | en |
| dc.subject | Business Model | en |
| dc.subject | Business Ecosystem | en |
| dc.title | 電動車整合服務商之商業模式與發展策略之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Study on the Business Model and Strategy of An Integrated Service Provider in the Electric Vehicle Industry | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 100-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林世銘,陳俊忠 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 電動車,破壞性創新,商業模式,企業生態系統, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Electric Vehicle,Disruptive Innovation,Business Model,Business Ecosystem, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 97 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2012-01-12 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業管理組 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業管理組 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-101-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 4.1 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
