Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 理學院
  3. 心理學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66230
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor周泰立
dc.contributor.authorYing-Siou Liaoen
dc.contributor.author廖盈琇zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-17T00:26:30Z-
dc.date.available2017-04-24
dc.date.copyright2012-04-24
dc.date.issued2011
dc.date.submitted2012-02-16
dc.identifier.citationBadre, D., Poldrack, R. A., Pare-Blagoev, E. J., Insler, R. Z., & Wagner, A. D. (2005). Dissociable controlled retrieval and generalized selection mechanisms in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Neuron, 47, 907-918.
Badre, D., & Wagner, A. D. (2007). Left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and the cognitive control of memory. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2883-2901.
Blumenfeld, H. K., Booth, J. R., & Burman, D. D. (2006). Differential prefrontal– temporal neural correlates of semantic processing in children. Brain and Language, 99, 226-235.
Bokde, A. L. W., Tagamets, M. A., Friedman, R. B., & Horwitz, B. (2001). Functional interactions of the inferior frontal cortex during the processing of words and word-like stimuli. Neuron, 30, 609-617.
Booth, J. R., Burman, D. D., Meyer, J. R., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B., & Mesulam, M. M. (2002). Modality independence of word comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 16, 251-261.
Bosshardt, S., Schmidt, C. F., Jaermann, T., Degonda, N., Boesiger, P., Nitsch, R. M.,…Henke, K. (2005). Effects of memory consolidation on human hippocampal activity during retrieval. Cortex, 41, 486-498.
Cappa, S.F., Perani, D., Schnur, T., Tettamanti, M., & Fazio, F. (1998). The effects of semantic category and knowledge type on lexical-semantic access: A PET study. NeuroImage 8, 350– 359.
Casey, B.J., Durston, S., & Fossella, J.A. (2001). Evidence for a mechanistic model of cognitive control. Clinical Neuroscience Research, 1, 267–282.
Chao, L.L., Haxby, J.V., & Martin, A. (1999). Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing objects. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 913-914.
Chou, T.L., Booth, J.R., Bitan, T., Burman, D.D., Bigio, J.D., Cone, N.E.,…Cao, F. (2006). Developmental and skill effects on the neural correlates of semantic processing to visually presented words. Human Brain Mapping, 27, 915–924.
Damasio, H., Grabowski, T. J., Tranel, D., Hichwa, R. D., & Damasio, A. R. (1996). A neural basis for lexical retrieval. Nature, 380, 499–505.
de Zubicaray, G.I., Zelaya, F.O., Andrew, C., Williams, S.C., & Bullmore, E.T. (2000). Cerebral regions associated with verbal response initiation, suppression and strategy use. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1292–1304.
de Zubicaray, G.I., Wilson, S.J., McMahon, K.L., & Muthiah, S. (2001). The semantic interference effect in the picture-word paradigm: An event-related fMRI study employing overt responses. Human Brain Mapping, 14, 218 –227.
Dudai, Y. (2004). The neurobiology of consolidations, or, how stable is the engram? Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 51-86.
Duffau, H., Gatignol, P., Mandonnet, E., Peruzzi, P., Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., & Capelle, L. (2005). New insights into the anatomo-functional connectivity of the semantic system: A study using cortico-subcortical electrostimulations. Brain, 128, 797-810.
Durrant, S., & Lewis, P. A. (2009). Memory consolidation: Tracking transfer with functional connectivity. Current Biology, 19, 860-862.
Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340-347.
Fassbender, C., & Schweitzer, J. B. (2006). Is there evidence for neural compensation in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder? A review of the functional neuroimaging literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 445–465.
Gerlach, C., Aaside, C.T., Humphreys, G. W., Gade, A., Paulson, O.B., & Law, I. (2002). Brain activity related to integrative processes in visual object recognition: Bottom-up integration and the modulatory influence of stored knowledge. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1254-1267.
Gorno-Tempini, M.L., Cipolotti, L., & Price, C.J. (2000). Which level of object processing generates category specific differences in brain activation? Proceedings of the Royal Society, 267, 1253-1258.
Philips, J. A., Noppeney, U., Humphreys, G. W., & Price, C. J. (2002). Can segregation within the semantic system account for category-specific deficits? Brain, 125, 2067-2080.
Frankland, P. W., & Bontempi, B. (2005). The organization of recent and remote memories. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 119-130.
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Worsley, K. J., Poline, J. P., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1994). Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach. Human Brain Mapping, 2, 189-210.
Gitelman, D.R., NobreAnna, C., Sonty, S., Parrish, T.B., & Mesulam, M.M. (2005). Language network specializations: An analysis with parallel task designs and functional magnetic resonance imaging. NeuroImage, 26, 975-985.
Gold, B.T., Balota, D.A., Jones, S.J., Powell, D.K., Smith, C.D. & Andersen, A.H. (2006). Dissociation of automatic and strategic lexical-semantics: Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for differing roles of multiple frontotemporal regions. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 6523-6532.
Hart, J.J., & Gordon, B. (1990). Delineation of single-word semantic comprehension deficits in aphasia, with anatomical correlation. Annals of Neurology, 27, 226-231.
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2004). Dorsal and ventral streams: A framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition, 92, 67-99.
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007). The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 393-402.
Lau, E. F., C., P., & Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics: (De)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 920-933.
Liu, P., Qin, W., Zhang, Y., Tian, J., Bai, L., Zhou, G.,...Liu, Y. (2009). Combining spatial and temporal information to explore function-guide action of acupuncture using fMRI. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 30, 41-46.
McGaugh, J. L. (2000). Memory- A century of consolidation. Science, 287, 248-251.
MacLeod, C.M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.
Marshall, L., & Born, J. (2007). The contribution of sleep to hippocampus-dependent memory consolidation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 442-450.
Martin, M. (2001). Functional neuroimaging of semantic memory. In Cabeza RKA (Eds.) Handbook of functional neuroimaging of cognition (pp. 153–186). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Martin, A. (2007). The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 25-45.
Mechelli, A., Sartori, G., Orlandi, P., & Price, C.J. (2006). Semantic relevance explains category effects in medial fusiform gyri. Neuroimage, 30, 992-1002.
Nadel, L., Samsonovich, A., Ryan, L., & Moscovitch, M. (2000). Multiple trace theory of human memory: Computational, neuroimaging, and neuropsychological results. Hippocampus, 10, 352–368.
Naya, Y., Yoshida, M., & Miyashita, Y. (2003). Forward processing of long-term associative memory in monkey inferotemporal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 2861-2871.
Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001). A default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 676-682.
Sakai, K., & Miyashita, Y. (1991). Neural organization for the long-term memory of paired associates. Nature, 354, 152-155.
Squire, L. R., Cohen, N. J., Nadel, L. (1984). The medial temporal region and memory consolidation: A new hypothesis. In H. Weingartner, & E.S. Parker (Eds.), Memory consolidation: Psychobiology of cognition(pp. 185–210). New Jersey: Hillsdale.
Squire, L. R., & Alvarez, P. (1995). Retrograde amnesia and memory consolidation: A neurobiological perspective. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 5, 169-177.
Takashima, A., Nieuwenhuis, I. L. C., Jensen, O., Talamini, L. M., Rijpkema, M., & Fernandez, G. (2009). Shift from hippocampal to neocortical centered retrieval network with consolidation. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 10087-10093.
Tambini, A., Ketz, N., & Davachi, L. (2010). Enhanced brain correlations during rest are related to memory for recent experiences. Neuron, 65, 280-290.
Wang, H., Hu, Y., & Tsien, J. Z. (2006). Molecular and systems mechanisms of memory consolidation and storage. Progress in Neurobiology, 79, 123-135.
Yamashita, K.I., Hirose, S., Kunimatsu, A., Aoki, S., Chikazoe, J., Jimura, K.,…Konishi, S. (2009). Formation of long-term memory representation in human temporal cortex related to pictorial paired associates. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 10335-10340.
Zola-Morgan, S., & Squire, L. (1990). The primate hippocampal formation: Evidence for a time-limited role in memory storage. Science, 250, 288-290.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66230-
dc.description.abstract記憶的形成如何從短期變成長期記憶,而其中涉及到的大腦變化是神經科學家長久以來關切的議題。至今多數記憶固化的研究多以動物作為研究對象,而本研究用非侵入性的磁振造影、及平靜狀態實驗(resting state fMRI)來研究人類記憶固化時序上的歷程。15位慣用手為右手並以中文為母語、平均年齡為23歲的受試者參與本實驗。我們利用配對連結典範(pair-association paradigm)進行記憶的干擾作業,使用(幾何圖形-無生命名詞)作為記憶材料;而(幾何圖形-有生命名詞)作為干擾材料,並操弄記憶固化與干擾之間的時間差異(立即干擾、延宕干擾)來研究干擾後、以及24小時後的平靜狀態腦區連結變化。
結果發現,第一、延宕干擾在兩側顳葉下迴(bilateral ITG)以及左側海馬迴(left hippocampus)的活化顯著大於立即干擾,此項功能性連結是由記憶階段而來,不是由干擾階段而來。第二、記憶24小時後的海馬迴仍參與固化作用。第三、左側額葉下迴(left IFG)與左側顳葉中迴(left MTG)在記憶作業中形成語意處理網絡。第四、在延宕干擾的再認作業中,再認學習過的配對在左側顳葉中迴(left MTG)的活化顯著大於再認重組過的配對,推論與提取語意訊息有關。
本研究為第一個利用記憶干擾實驗、操弄干擾時間來研究記憶固化歷程,並利用平靜狀態實驗進行固化歷程分析的人類研究,使我們對於記憶固化歷程的腦區連結改變有更進一步的了解。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractMost work on memory consolidation is from animal studies, showing that memory consolidation requires protein synthesis and the growth of new hippocampal synapses within 24 h. However, much less research is done on this issue in the human. In the present study, we examined whether resting BOLD correlations, or functional connectivity, between hippocampal and cortical regions are affected by time-dependent interference during learning. Fifteen right-handed participants participated in the present study (9 males, mean age = 23 years, aged 20-29 years). In the MRI scanner, each participant received two sessions, immediate interference and delay interference. The timing of retroactive interference between a memory task and an interference task was 0 sec (immediate interference) and 30 min (delay interference). A recognition task was given to participants 24 hours after the memory task. We analyzed both resting data and fMRI data. First, the resting results showed that bilateral ITG and left hippocampus were significantly activated in the delay versus immediate comparison. This functional connectivity was from the memory task, not from the interference task. Second, our resting finding suggests that the hippocampus is continuously involved over time rather than fading out in related memory traces after 24 hours memory consolidation. Third, the contrast of the memory versus interference task produced greater activation in left IFG and MTG, which are related to semantic networks. Last, during the retrieval in the recognition task 24 hours after the memory task, the contrast of intact versus recombined pairs produced greater activation in left MTG for retrieving semantic information in the delay interference. The present study was the first study using time-dependent interference paradigm, which was originally from animal studies and now transfer onto human studies, giving us the image of differential rest patterns of interregional interactions during memory consolidation.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T00:26:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-100-R98227107-1.pdf: 3017622 bytes, checksum: caa0c75bb6ba1db6e3249ce49405cdb5 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2011
en
dc.description.tableofcontents1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………….1
2. Methods……………………….................………………………………………..7
2.1. Participants……………………………………………………………………7
2.2. Procedures…………………………………………………………………….7
2.3. Memory and Interference Tasks………………………………………………8
2.4. Recognition Task………..…………………………………………………….8
2.5. fMRI Data Acquisition………………………………………………………..9
2.6. Resting Data Acquisition……………...…………… …….........10
2.7. fMRI Data Analysis……………………………………………………….....10
2.8. Resting Data Analysis……………………………………………………......11
3. Results…………………………………………………………………………...13
3.1. Resting Connectivity Data………………………………………………......14
3.1.1. Posttask versus Pretask……………………………………………….14
3.1.2. 24hour Consolidation………………………………………………...14
3.2. fMRI Imaging Data……………………………………………………….....15
3.2.1. Memory Task………………………………………………………....15
3.2.2. Interference Task…………………………………………………......15
3.3.3. Correlation Between Imaging and Resting……………15
3.3. Recognition Task…………………………………………………………….16
3.3.1. Behavioral Data………………………………………………………16
3.3.2. fMRI Imaging Data…………………………………………………..16
4. Discussion………………………………………………………………….........18
4.1. Rest: The Posttask Right After a Memory Task………………18
4.2. Rest: 24-hour After a Memory Task…………………………………………20
4.3. fMRI: The Memory and Interference Tasks……………………………21
4.3. fMRI: The Recognition Task………………………………………………...22
4.4. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………...23
References…………………………………………….………………………….......24
Tables….……………………………………………………………………………..29
Figures……………………………………………………………………………….31
Appendix……….…………………………………………………………................ 43
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject顳葉下迴zh_TW
dc.subject平靜狀態實驗zh_TW
dc.subject記憶固化zh_TW
dc.subject人類記憶研究zh_TW
dc.subject語意記憶zh_TW
dc.subject後向干擾zh_TW
dc.subject海馬迴zh_TW
dc.subject平靜狀態實驗zh_TW
dc.subject記憶固化zh_TW
dc.subject人類記憶研究zh_TW
dc.subject語意記憶zh_TW
dc.subject後向干擾zh_TW
dc.subject海馬迴zh_TW
dc.subject顳葉下迴zh_TW
dc.subjectretroactive interferenceen
dc.subjecthippocampusen
dc.subjectResting state functional connectivity (RSFC)en
dc.subjectinferior temporal gyrus (ITG)en
dc.subjectResting state functional connectivity (RSFC)en
dc.subjectmemory consolidationen
dc.subjecthuman studyen
dc.subjectsemantic memoryen
dc.subjectretroactive interferenceen
dc.subjecthippocampusen
dc.subjectinferior temporal gyrus (ITG)en
dc.subjectmemory consolidationen
dc.subjecthuman studyen
dc.subjectsemantic memoryen
dc.title記憶固化之造影研究
-干擾時間差異對固化作用之影響
zh_TW
dc.titleMemory Consolidation
-Resting State fMRI and Time Dependent Interference Study
en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear100-1
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.coadvisor梁庚辰
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee游一龍,吳昌衛
dc.subject.keyword平靜狀態實驗,記憶固化,人類記憶研究,語意記憶,後向干擾,海馬迴,顳葉下迴,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordResting state functional connectivity (RSFC),memory consolidation,human study,semantic memory,retroactive interference,hippocampus,inferior temporal gyrus (ITG),en
dc.relation.page44
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2012-02-17
dc.contributor.author-college理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept心理學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:心理學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-100-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
2.95 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved