請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/65949完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 吳宗祐(Tsung-Yu Wu) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chun-Hung Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林均鴻 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T00:16:20Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2030-12-31 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2020-02-18 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2020-02-13 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 王世明、周婉茹、吳宗祐、鄭伯壎（2018）：〈仁慈的雙面刃：仁慈領導對創造力績效的雙路徑模式〉。《中華心理學刊》，60，57-79。
林姿葶、鄭伯壎（2013）：〈組織中的時間與時間觀：回顧與展望〉。《本土心理學研究》，（40），143-195。 林姿葶、鄭伯壎（2014）：〈鑒往知來：領導研究中的時間議題〉。《中華心理學刊》，56，237-255。 彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽（2006）：〈管理研究中的共同方法變異：問題本質、影響、測試和補救〉。《管理學報》，23，77-98。 Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357-376. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-167. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview. Amabile, T. M., & Gryskiewicz, S. S. (1987). Creativity in the R & D laboratory (Tech. Rep. No. 30). Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154-1184. Ancona, D. G., Okhuysen, G. A., & Perlow, L. A. (2001). Taking time to integrate temporal research. Academy of Management Review, 26, 512-529. Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40, 1297-1333. Andrews, F. M., & Farris, G. F. (1972). Time pressure and performance of scientists and engineers: A five-year panel study. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 8, 185-200. Andrews, J., & Smith, D. C. (1996). In search of the marketing imagination: Factors affecting the creativity of marketing programs for mature products. Journal of Marketing Research, 33, 174-187. Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134, 779-806. Baer, M., & Oldham, G. R. (2006). The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 963-970. Bagozzi, R. P., & Edwards, J. R. (1998). A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 45-87. Bagozzi, R. P., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self-esteem. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 35-67. Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (2001). Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling. (pp. 269-296). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439-476. Bengtson, T. A. (1982). Creativity’s paradoxical character: A postscript to James Webb Young’s technique for producing ideas, Journal of Advertising, 11(1), 3-9. Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606. Blount, S., & Janicik, G. A. (2002). Getting and staying in-pace: The “in-synch” preference and its implications for work groups. In H. Sondak (Ed.), Toward phenomenology of groups and group membership. (pp. 235-266). New York: Elsevier Science. Bluedorn, A. C. (2002). The human organization of time: Temporal realities and experience. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Bluedorn, A. C., Kalliath, T. J., Strube, M. J., & Martin, G. D. (1999). Polychronicity and the inventory of polychronic values (IPV): The development of an instrument to measure a fundamental dimension of organizational culture. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14, 205-230. Bluedorn, A. C., Kaufman, C. F., & Lane, P. M. (1992). How many things do you like to do at once? An introduction to monochronic and polychronic time. Academy of Management Executive, 6(4), 17-26. Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 389-444). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among US managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 65-74. Chen, J., & Nadkarni, S. (2017). It’s about time! CEOs’ temporal dispositions, temporal leadership, and corporate entrepreneurship. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62, 31-66. Choi, J. N., Anderson, T. A., & Veillette, A. (2009). Contextual inhibitors of employee creativity in organizations: The insulating role of creative ability. Group & Organization Management, 34, 330-357. Claessens, B. J. C. (2004). Perceived control of time: Time management and personal effectiveness at work. Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Eindhoven University of Technology. Claessens, B. J. C., van Eerde, W., Rutte, C. G., & Roe, R. A. (2007). A review of the time management literature. Personnel Review, 36, 255-276. Conte, J. M., Mathieu, J. E., & Landy, F. J. (1998). The nomological and predictive validity of time urgency. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 1-13. Crawford, E. R., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2010). Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 834-848. Drazin, R., Glynn, M. A., & Kazanjian, R. K. (1999). Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sensemaking perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24, 286-307. Farmer, S. M., Tierney, P., & Kung-Mcintyre, K. (2003). Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 618-630. Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290-309. Freedman, J. L., & Edwards, D. R. (1988). Time pressure, task performance, and enjoyment. In J. E. McGrath (Ed.), The social psychology of time: New perspectives. (pp. 113-133). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513-524. George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 605-622. Gevers, J. M. P., Claessens, B. J. C., Van Eerde, W., & Rutte, C. G. (2009). Pacing styles, personality, and performance. In R. A. Roe, M. J. Waller, & S. R. Clegg (Eds.), Time in organizational research (pp. 80-102). London, UK: Routledge. Gevers, J. M. P., & Demerouti, E. (2013). How supervisors’ reminders relate to subordinates’ absorption and creativity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28, 677-698. Gevers, J. M. P., Mohammed, S., & Baytalskaya, N. (2015). The conceptualisation and measurement of pacing styles. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 64, 499-540. Gevers, J. M. P., Rispens, S., & Li, J. (2016). Pacing style diversity and team collaboration: The moderating effects of temporal familiarity and action planning. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 20, 78-92. Gevers, J. M. P., Rutte, C. G., & Van Eerde, W. (2006). Meeting deadlines in work groups: Implicit and explicit mechanisms. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55, 52-72. Gilson, L. L., & Shalley, C. E. (2004). A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of teams’ engagement in creative processes. Journal of Management, 30, 453-470. Gong, Y., Cheung, S.-Y., Wang, M., & Huang, J.-C. (2012). Unfolding the proactive process for creativity: Integration of the employee proactivity, information exchange, and psychological safety perspectives. Journal of Management, 38, 1611-1633. Gong, Y., Huang, J.-C., & Farh, J.-L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 765-778. Grant, A. (2016). Originals: How non-conformists move the world. New York: Viking. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Harris, T. B., Li, N., Boswell, W. R., Zhang, X.-A., & Xie, Z. (2014). Getting what’s new from newcomers: Empowering leadership, creativity, and adjustment in the socialization context. Personnel Psychology, 67, 567-604. Hayton, J. C. (2005). Promoting corporate entrepreneurship through human resource management practices: A review of empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15, 21-41. Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 113-135. Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513-524. Hon, A. H. Y., Chan, W. W. H., & Lu, L. (2013). Overcoming work-related stress and promoting employee creativity in hotel industry: The role of task feedback from supervisor. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 33, 416-424. Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1122-1131. Ivancevich, J. W., & Matteson, M. T. (1980). Stress at work: A managerial perspective. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692-724. Karasek, R. A. J. (1985). Job content questionnaire and user’s guide. Lowell, MA: University of Massachusetts Lowell, Department of Work Environment. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer. LePine, J. A., LePine, M. A., & Jackson, C. L. (2004). Challenge and hindrance stress: relationships with exhaustion, motivation to learn, and learning performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 883-891. Lepine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P., & Lepine, M. A. (2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor-hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 764-775. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. New York: Harpers. Lim, S. G.-S., & Murnigham, J. K. (1994). Phases, deadlines, and the bargaining process. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 153-171. Liu, D., Liao, H., & Loi, R. (2012). The dark side of leadership: A three-level investigation of the cascading effect of abusive supervision on employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 1187-1212. Madjar, N., Oldham, G. R., & Pratt, M. G. (2002). There’s no place like home? The contributions of work and nonwork creativity support to employees’ creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 757-767. Mainemelis, C. (2001). When the muse takes it all: A model for the experience of timelessness in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26, 548-565. Manmiller, J. L., Kumar, V. K., & Pekala, R. J. (2005). Hypnotizability, creative capacity, creativity styles, absorption, and phenomenological experience during hypnosis. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 9-24. McGrath, J. E., & Kelly, J. R. (1986). Time and human interaction: Toward a social psychology of time. New York: Guilford Press. Mohammed, S., & Harrison, D. A. (2013). The clocks that time us are not the same: A theory of temporal diversity, task characteristics, and performance in teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122, 244-256. Mohammed, S., & Nadkarni, S. (2011). Temporal diversity and team performance: The moderating role of team temporal leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 489-508. Moriarty, S. E., & VandenBergh, B. G. (1984). Advertising creatives look at creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 18, 162-174. Mumford, M. D. (2000). Managing creative people: Strategies and tactics for innovation. Human Resource Management Review, 10, 313-351. Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69, 96-104. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill. Oh, S. H., Shin, Y., & Kim, M. (2019). Are we in-sync? The role of employee–supervisor pacing fit in employee work outcomes. Current Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s12144-019-00258-1 Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607-634. Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. (pp. 17-59). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Perlow, L. A. (1999). The time famine: Toward a sociology of work time. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 57-81. Podsakoff, N. P., LePine, J. A., & LePine, M. A. (2007). Differential challenge stressor-hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 438-454. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903. Posthuma, R. A., & Campion, M. A. (2009). Age stereotypes in the workplace: Common stereotypes, moderators, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 35, 158-188. Proudfoot, D., Kay, A. C., & Koval, C. Z. (2015). A gender bias in the attribution of creativity: Archival and experimental evidence for the perceived association between masculinity and creative thinking. Psychological Science, 26, 1751-1761. Rego, A., Sousa, F., Marques, C., & Cunha, M. P. e. (2012). Authentic leadership promoting employees’ psychological capital and creativity. Journal of Business Research, 65, 429-437. Reiter-Palmon, R., & Illies, J. J. (2004). Leadership and creativity: Understanding leadership from a creative problem-solving perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 55-77. Ren, F., & Zhang, J. (2015). Job stressors, organizational innovation climate, and employees’ innovative behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 27, 16-23. Rothbard, N. P. (2001). Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 655-684. Runco, M. A. (1986). Maximal performance on divergent thinking tests by gifted, talented, and nongifted children. Psychology in the Schools, 23, 308-315. Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 66-75. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293-315. Schraw, G., Wadkins, T., & Olafson, L. (2007). Doing the things we do: A grounded theory of academic procrastination. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 12-25. Selye, H. (1956). The stress of life. New York: McGraw-Hill. Shalley, C. E. (1995). Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 483-503. Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 33-53. Shalley, C. E., Gilson, L. L., & Blum, T. C. (2009). Interactive effects of growth need strength, work context, and job complexity on self-reported creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 489-505. Shalley, C. E., & Zhou, J. (2008). Organizational creativity research: A historical overview. In J. Zhou & C. E. Shalley (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 3-31). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2010). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? In J. A. Wagner, III & J. R. Hollenbeck (Eds.), Readings in organizational behavior. (pp. 82-105). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2003). Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: Evidence from Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 703-714. Shipp, A. J., & Cole, M. S. (2015). Time in individual-level organizational studies: What is it, how is it used, and why isn’t it exploited more often? Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 237-260. Sirois, F. M. (2007). “I’ll look after my health, later”: A replication and extension of the procrastination-health model with community-dwelling adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 15-26. Staw, B. M. (1975). Attribution of the “causes” of performance: A general alternative interpretation of cross-sectional research on organizations. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 13, 414-432. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press. Tan, C. S., Lau, X. S., Kung, Y. T., & Kailsan, R. A. L. (2019). Openness to experience enhances creativity: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation and the creative process engagement. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53, 109-119. Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1137-1148. Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2004). The pygmalion process and employee creativity. Journal of Management, 30, 413-432. Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52, 591-620. Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. (pp. 43-75). New York: Cambridge University Press. Unsworth, K. L., Wall, T. D., & Carter, A. (2005). Creative requirement: A neglected construct in the study of employee creativity? Group & Organization Management, 30, 541-560. Van Eerde, W. (2000). Procrastination: Self-regulation in initiating aversive goals. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 372-389. Van Eerde, W., Beeftink, F., & Rutte, C. G. (2016). Working on something else for a while: Pacing in creative design projects. Time & Society, 25, 676-699. Vincent, A. S., Decker, B. P., & Mumford, M. D. (2002). Divergent thinking, intelligence, and expertise: A test of alternative models. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 163-178. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley. Wallace, J. C., Edwards, B. D., Arnold, T., Frazier, M. L., & Finch, D. M. (2009). Work stressors, role-based performance, and the moderating influence of organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 254-262. Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company. Waller, M. J., Conte, J. M., Gibson, C. B., & Carpenter, M. A. (2001). The effect of individual perceptions of deadlines on team performance. Academy of Management Review, 26, 586-600. Wang, A.-C., & Cheng, B.-S. (2010). When does benevolent leadership lead to creativity? The moderating role of creative role identity and job autonomy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 106-121. Wang, C.-J., Tsai, H.-T., & Tsai, M.-T. (2014). Linking transformational leadership and employee creativity in the hospitality industry: The influences of creative role identity, creative self-efficacy, and job complexity. Tourism Management, 40, 79-89. Webster, J. R., Beehr, T. A., & Christiansen, N. D. (2010). Toward a better understanding of the effects of hindrance and challenge stressors on work behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76, 68-77. Wright, T. A. (1997). Time revisited in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 201-204. Zanjani, S., Yunlu, D. G., & Beigh, J. N. S. (2020). Creative procrastinators: Mapping a complex terrain. Personality and Individual Differences. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109640 Zapf, D., Seifert, C., Schmutte, B., Mertini, H., & Holz, M. (2001). Emotion work and job stressors and their effects on burnout. Psychology & Health, 16, 527-545. Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010a). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 107-128. Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010b). The influence of creative process engagement on employee creative performance and overall job performance: A curvilinear assessment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 862-873. Zhou, J. (2003). When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: Role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 413-422. Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 682-696. Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2001). Enhancing creative performance: Effects of expected developmental assessment strategies and creative personality. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 151-167. Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271-1288. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/65949 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 實務界中常認為延遲工作任務會導致負向結果，但也發現有時候延遲工作任務亦可能導致正向結果，特別是創造力；可惜的是，過去僅有少數研究針對工作步調與創造力領域相關變項之關聯性進行探討，目前並無針對員工延遲任務的工作步調（即死線型、U型）與創造性績效關聯的實徵研究，本研究為了補足上述缺口，採用挑戰型壓力的觀點，說明相較於穩定的工作步調，延遲任務的工作步調會透過創造性挑戰壓力與創造力過程投入的中介歷程，產生創造性績效；本研究最終提出創造性挑戰壓力之投入歷程模型，為一連續中介的模型，來連結延遲任務的工作步調與創造性績效之關係。本研究選取跨產業樣本，採用主管與部屬的配對問卷，總計回收189筆有效對偶資料。結果顯示（1）U型步調分數高的員工與創造性挑戰壓力具有正向的影響關係，死線型步調與穩定型步調對創造性挑戰壓力則無影響關係；（2）創造性挑戰壓力會透過創造力過程投入，正向影響其創造性績效；（3）U型步調分數高的員工會透過創造性挑戰壓力之投入歷程（創造性挑戰壓力與創造力過程投入），正向影響其創造性績效，死線型步調與穩定型步調則無此預測效果。最後，本研究將針對此結果進行討論，並加以說明研究貢獻、限制以及未來研究方向。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Postponing tasks, one of the pacing styles, is usually considered to cause negative consequences, but it may sometimes have positive effects, especially on creativity. Unfortunately, no empirical study investigates the relationship between pacing styles of postponing tasks (deadline style & U-shaped style) and creative performance (CP), with only few studies examining the effect of pacing styles on creative-related variables. In order to fill the research gap, the present study drew on the perspective of challenge stress to elucidate that, relative to steady style, deadline style and U-shaped style have positive influences on CP through creative challenge stress (CCS) and creative process engagement (CPE). Accordingly, we proposed a process model of creative challenge stress which is a serial mediation model and can link postponing tasks and creative performance. Based on a sample of 189 supervisor-subordinate dyads, the results showed that (1) Higher degree of the U-shaped style produces higher level of creative challenge stress, but the degree of the deadline style and the steady style has no significant relationship with CCS. (2) CCS positively influences CP through CPE. (3) The degree of the U-shaped style positively influences CP through the process of creative challenge stress (CCS & CPE), but the degree of the deadline style does not undergo such a process. In the end, the implications of results, theoretical and practical contributions are discussed. Limitations and future research directions are also offered. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T00:16:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-109-R05227112-1.pdf: 1689322 bytes, checksum: 2cff42ab9709f7a6d84dc2682d6c593b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論……………………………………………………...………………….1
第二章 文獻探討……………………………………………………...…………….6 第一節 工作步調與創造性績效……………………………………...………….6 第二節 工作步調與創造性挑戰壓力………………………………….…....….20 第三節 由創造性挑戰壓力到創造性績效：創造力過程投入的中介歷程.. ….24 第四節 工作步調與創造性績效的理論模型………………………….…....….27 第五節 研究架構與假設…………………………………………........………..28 第三章 研究方法……………………………………………………..……..……..29 第一節 研究對象與程序……………………………………………........….….29 第二節 研究工具………………………………………………………………..32 第三節 資料分析方法………………………………………...………….……..38 第四章 研究結果………………………………………………..……......………..40 第一節 驗證性因素分析…………………………………………...….………..40 第二節 相關係數矩陣………………………………………………....………..42 第三節 結構方程模型…………………………………………...…….…….….44 第五章 討論與建議………………………………………...……………….….….47 第一節 結果討論………………………………………...…………….…….….47 第二節 研究貢獻…………………………………………...…………..…....….50 第三節 研究限制…………………………………………...…………..……….54 第四節 未來研究方向…………………………………………...……..……….56 第五節 結論……………………………………………...…………….…….….61 第六章 參考文獻……………………………………………...……………..…….62 附錄一 問卷施測說明……………………………………………...…………..….77 附錄二 主管問卷………………………………………………...…………….…..78 附錄三 部屬問卷………………………………………….…………...…..…...….81 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 創造力過程投入 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 創造性挑戰壓力 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 創造性績效 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 延遲任務之工作步調(死線型、U型) | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | pacing styles of postponing tasks (deadline style & U-shaped style) | en |
| dc.subject | creative challenge stress | en |
| dc.subject | creative process engagement | en |
| dc.subject | creative performance | en |
| dc.title | 延遲任務之工作步調與創造性績效之關聯性：創造性挑戰壓力之歷程模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Relationship Between Pacing Style of Postponing Task and Creative Performance: The Process Model of Creative Challenge Stress | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 108-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 鄭伯壎(Bor-Shiuan Cheng) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳怡靜(Yi-Ching Chen),林姿葶(Tzu-Ting Lin) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 延遲任務之工作步調(死線型、U型),創造性績效,創造性挑戰壓力,創造力過程投入, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | pacing styles of postponing tasks (deadline style & U-shaped style),creative performance,creative challenge stress,creative process engagement, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 84 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202000404 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2020-02-13 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-109-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.65 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。