請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/65805完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 蘇忠楨 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wei-Tse Liao | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 廖唯喆 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T00:12:27Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2020-02-18 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2020-02-18 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2020-02-14 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中央氣象局。中央氣象局觀測資料查詢系統。Retrieved May 1, 2019, from http://e-service.cwb.gov.tw/HistoryDataQuery/index.jsp
中央氣象局。2019。107氣候年報。Retrieved January 31, 2020, from https://www.cwb.gov.tw/Data/service/notice/download/publish_20191104141027.pdf 中華民國乳業協會。2016。乳牛產業精進策略論壇舉行凝聚共識,引導乳業走向未來。畜產報導月刊 200:13-39。 中華民國國家標準。2017。CNS 14046環境管理-水足跡-原則、要求事項及指導綱要。經濟部標準局。 內政部。主題資訊-人口政策及統計資料。Retrieved August 30, 2019, from https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/portal/346 王家宇、呂水淵、胡淵欽、楊德威。1993。夏季冷卻處理對荷蘭母牛泌乳及生殖性狀之影響。中畜會誌 22 (2):163-174。 王紓愍、陳嘉昇、謝文彰、游翠凰、劉信宏。2008。成熟度,接種處理與青貯保存時間對全株水稻青貯品質的影響。畜產研究 41:153-162。 丘坤華。2013。產品碳足跡與水足跡標示對綠色消費行為之影響研究 (碩士論文)。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。(系統編號101TKU05457039) 行政院國家發展委員會。2012。國家氣候變遷調適政策綱領。臺北市。行政院國家發展委員會。 行政院經濟建設委員會。2011。雲彰地區長期地層下陷具體解決方案。臺北市。行政院經濟建設委員會。 行政院農業委員會。2000。農業用水量化目標及總量清查報告。臺北市。行政院農業委員會。 行政院農業委員會。2014。黃金廊道資訊網。Retrieved January 26, 2020, from https://gac.triwra.org.tw/ 行政院農業委員會。2018a。107年臺灣主要畜禽產品生產成本與收益分析。Retri-eved March 31, 2019, from http://agrstat.coa.gov.tw/sdweb/public/book/Book.aspx 行政院農業委員會。2018b。2018年研商強化水資源調配措施相關事宜 (第二次)會議簡報。臺北市。行政院農業委員會。 行政院農業委員會。2018c。農業統計資料查詢專區-動態查詢。Retrieved January 31, 2020, from http://agrstat.coa.gov.tw/sdweb/public/inquiry/InquireAdvance.aspx 行政院農業委員會。2019。108年第3季各類畜禽飼養場數及在養量-按品項別分。畜禽統計調查結果。行政院農業委員會。 宋旻鴻。2019。淺層農業用水對地層下陷影響之研究:以濁水溪沖積扇為例 (碩士論文)。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。(系統編號107NCKU5397010) 李春芳。2001。乳牛的飲水品質。酪農天地雜誌45:28-32。 李善男、劉振發、許義明、楊德威、陳得財、古兆和、梁宗寶。1999。熱季應用噴水及吹風循環涼爽法對乳牛生理與繁殖之效應。畜產研究32 (2):137-146。 卓腕淇。2006。台北盆地地下水位變遷與地盤變動 (碩士論文)。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。(系統編號094NTU05138007) 周嫦娥。2015。台灣水資源需求現況與管理策略工具。土木水利 42 (4):19-29。 洪慧娟。2014。豬隻生命週期之碳足跡及水足跡評估-案例分析 (碩士論文)。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。(系統編號102FCU05515014) 國家災害防救科技中心。2018。「臺灣氣候的過去與未來《臺灣氣候變遷科學報告2017-物理現象與機制》重點摘錄」。新北市。國家災害防救科技中心,8-9。 張尊國。2007。水足跡概念介紹暨臺灣水稻水足跡分析。98年度農業工程研討會。 許晃雄、陳正達、盧孟明、陳永明、周佳、吳宜昭。2011。臺灣氣候變遷科學報告2011。臺北市。行政院國家科學委員會。 陳志毅、葉家舟、李國華、張菊犁、蕭宗法、謝昭賢、姜延年。2009。不同季節牛舍溫濕度指數與乳牛生產性狀之關係。畜產研究42 (1):1-12。 陳聖文、盧琛、廖翊丞、謝禮丞。2017。牧草圓包烘乾設備雛型機之研製。農林學報65 (2):63-68。 陳榮泰。2010。臺灣乳業現況。Retrieved May 31, 2019, from http://www.angrin.tlri.gov.tw/cow/20051031/2005cow_breed_1-1.htm 彭宗仁、謝永旭、劉滄棽。2005。雲林地區地下水之水化學特徵及鹽化。中華水土保持學報36 (2):173-189。 黃森源、吳明選、吳佩勳。1999。乳牛的營養管理。Retrieved May 31, 2019, from http://www.sbip.tlrihc.gov.tw/xoops25/uploads/tad_uploader/user_1/185_%E6%B3%8C%E4%B9%B3%E7%89%9B%E7%9A%84%E7%87%9F%E9%A4%8A%E7%AE%A1%E7%90%86.pdf 新竹縣政府。2014。101年度新竹縣地方氣候變遷調適計畫期末成果報告 (定稿版)。環興科技股份有限公司。 楊環慈。2015。家畜牧場水足跡估算之研究 (碩士論文)。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。(系統編號103NTTU0396014) 經濟部水利署。2010。氣候變遷下水庫排砂對策研究。經濟部水利署。 經濟部水利署。2011。由水文地質與地下水關係研析土地利用之方向–彰雲高鐵沿線地區。經濟部水利署。 經濟部水利署。2014。水資源領域行動方案 (102-106年)。經濟部水利署。 經濟部水利署。水資源運用實況。Retrieved December 12, 2019, from https://www.wra.gov.tw/media/27074/t1.pdf 董欣瑜。2016。台灣大型乳品企業行銷溝通及鮮乳製品之消費行為 (碩士論文)。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。(系統編號104THU00253001) 蔣在文。2012。臺灣區域性水資源耗用之生命週期衝擊評估。Retrieved October 5, 2019, from http://thesis.topco-global.com/TopcoTRC/2012Thesis/SA0018.pdf 謝昭賢、蕭宗法、楊德威、陳志成。2007。臺灣地區溫濕度指數之分布。畜產研究 40 (4):269-278。 羅佳原。2016。彰雲地區地層下陷管理策略之研究:協力治理觀點。(碩士論文)。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。(系統編號104NCHU5011035) Bai, X., Ren, X., Khanna, N. Z., Zhou, N., and Hu, M. 2018. Comprehensive water footprint assessment of the dairy industry chain based on ISO 14046: A case study in China. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 132: 369-375. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.021. Brugger, M. 2007. Water use on Ohio dairy farms. Fact Sheet of The Ohio State University Extension. pp.1-3. Retrieved from: http://www.puroxi.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Water_Use_Dairy-copy.pdf (accessed on 3 February, 2020) Cai, X. and Rosegrant, M. W. 2003. 10 World Water Productivity: Current Situation and Future Options. In: Water Productivity in Agriculture: Limits and Opportunities for Improvement (eds J.W. Kijne, R. Barker and D. Molden). pp.163-178. Chapagain, A., Orr, S., Anton, A., and Clift, R. 2009. Assessing freshwater use impacts in LCA: Part I-inventory modelling and characterisation factors for the main impact pathways. Int. J. Life Cycle Ass. 14: 28-42. David, K. B. 1993. Water nutrition and quality for dairy cattle. Proceedings of Western Large Herd Dairy Management Conference, Las Vigas Nevada. pp.193-205. De Boer, I. J. M., Hoving, I. E., Vellinga, T. V., Van de Ven, G. W. J., Leffelaar, P. A., and Gerber, P. J. 2013. Assessing environmental impacts associated with freshwater consumption along the life cycle of animal products: the case of Dutch milk production in Noord-Brabant. Int. J. Life Cycle Ass. 18 (1): 193-203. doi:10.1007/s11367-012-0446-3. Eenige, M., Counotte, G., and Noordhuizen, J. 2013. Drinking water for dairy cattle: Always a benefit or a microbiological risk? Tijdschrift voor Diergeneeskunde 138 (2): 86-99. Guinée, J.B., Reinout H., and Gjalt H., 2004. Economic allocation: Examples and derived decision tree. Int. J. Life Cycle Ass. 9 (1): 23-33. Hansen, P., Drost, M., Rivera, R., Paula-Lopes, F., Al-Katanani, Y., Krininger III, C., and Chase Jr, C. 2001. Adverse impact of heat stress on embryo production: causes and strategies for mitigation. Theriogenology 55 (1): 91-103. Hemme, T., Uddin, M., and Ndambi, O. 2014. Benchmarking Cost of Milk Production in 46 Countries. J. Rev. Global Econ. 3: 254-270. doi:10.6000/1929-7092.2014.03.20. Hess, T. M., Chatterton, J., and Williams, A. 2012. The water footprint of Irish meat and dairy products. Retrieved from https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/ 1826/8756/The_Water_Footprint_of_Irish_Meat_and_Dairy_Products-2012.pdf;jsessionid=0B66E0B02B1FC93C37FDC3A2F3D33FEF?sequence=3. Huang, J., Xu, C., Ridoutt, B., Liu, J., Zhang, H., Chen, F., and Li, Y. 2014. Water availability footprint of milk and milk products from large-scale dairy production systems in Northeast China. J. Clean. Prod. 79: 91-97. ISO, 2014. ISO 14046: Environmental Management—Water Footprint: Principles, Requirements and Guidelines. ISO, Geneva. IDF. A Common Carbon Footprint Approach for Dairy: The IDF Guide to Standard Lifecycle Assessment Methodology for the Dairy Sector; Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation, International Dairy Federation (IDF): Brussels, Belgium, 2010; Available online: http://www.ukidf.org/documents/bulletin445.pdf (accessed on 8 November 2019). Kounina, A., Margni, M., Bayart, J.-B., Boulay, A.-M., Berger, M., Bulle, C., Frischknecht, R., Koehler, A., Milà i Canals, L., Motoshita, M., Núñez, M., Peters, G., Pfister, S., Ridoutt, B., van Zelm, R., Verones, F., and Humbert, S., 2013. Review of methods addressing freshwater use in life cycle inventory and impact assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Ass. 18: 707-721. Kuoppala, K., Khalili, H., and Jaakkola, S. 2004. Water intake and drinking behaviour of dairy cows offered grass silage. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 38th international congress of the ISAE-International Society for Applied Ethology, Helsinki, Finland 2004/Editors Laura Hänninen and Anna Valros. International Society for Applied Ethology. p. 149. Liao, W. T. and Su, J. J. 2019. Evaluation of Water Scarcity Footprint for Taiwanese Dairy Farming. Animals 9: 956 (total 14 pages). doi:10.3390/ani9110956. Mekonnen, M. M. and Hoekstra, A. Y. 2012. A Global Assessment of the Water Footprint of Farm Animal Products. Ecosystems 15 (3): 401-415. doi:10.1007/s10021-011-9517-8. Murphy, E., de Boer, I. J. M., van Middelaar, C. E., Holden, N. M., Shalloo, L., Curran, T. P., and Upton, J. 2017. Water footprinting of dairy farming in Ireland. J. Clean Prod. 140: 547-555. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.199. Nilsson, C., Reidy, C.A., Dynesius, M., and Revenga, C., 2005. Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world's large river systems. Science 308: 405-408. Payen, S., Falconer, S., and Ledgard, S. F. 2018. Water scarcity footprint of dairy milk production in New Zealand-A comparison of methods and spatio-temporal resolution. Sci. Total Environ. 639: 504-515. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv. 2018.05.125. Pfister, S. and Bayer, P. 2014. Monthly water stress: spatially and temporally explicit consumptive water footprint of global crop production. J. Clean Prod. 73: 52-62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.031. Pfister, S., Koehler, A., and Hellweg, S. 2009. Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Freshwater Consumption in LCA. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43 (11): 4098-4104. doi:10.1021/es802423e. Ridoutt, B.G. and Pfister, S., 2010. A revised approach to water footprinting to make transparent the impacts of consumption and production on global freshwater scarcity. Global Environ. Change 20: 113-120. Ridoutt, B. and Hodges, D. 2017. From ISO14046 to water footprint labeling: A case study of indicators applied to milk production in south-eastern Australia. Sci. Total Environ. 599-600: 14-19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.176 Ridoutt, B., Williams, S., Baud, S., Fraval, S., and Marks, N. 2010. The water footprint of dairy products: Case study involving skim milk powder. J. Dairy Sci. 93 (11): 5114-5117. Usva, K., Virtanen, E., Hyvärinen, H., Nousiainen, J., Sinkko, T., and Kurppa, S. 2019. Applying water scarcity footprint methodologies to milk production in Finland. Int. J. Life Cycle Ass. 24 (2): 351-361. doi:10.1007/s11367-018-1512-2. West, J. W. 2003. Effects of heat-stress on production in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 86 (6): 2131-2144. Zonderland-Thomassen, M. A. and Ledgard, S. F. 2012. Water footprinting-A comparison of methods using New Zealand dairy farming as a case study. Agr. Syst. 110: 30-40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.03.006 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/65805 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 為使臺灣乳業發展與淡水環境永續間取得平衡,有必要評估生產活動對淡水環境產生之衝擊,釐清二者因果關係。本研究依照 ISO 14046 對新竹縣 5 場乳牛場之生乳生產過程進行盤查,盤查時間為 2018 年 5 月至 2019 年 4 月,系統邊界為「搖籃至大門」,功能單位為 1 kg 乳脂肪與乳蛋白校正乳 (Fat and Protein Corrected Milk, FPCM),以建立之模式與係數為基礎,運用水匱乏 (Water Scarcity)方法學評估其於當地及其他縣市生產時,對壓力加權水匱乏足跡 (stress-weighted Water Scarcity Footprint, WSF)的貢獻,並評估水匱乏生產力 (Water Scarcity Productivity, WSP),據以歸納改善策略。結果顯示,平均生產 1 kg FPCM 將消耗27 ± 7 L 的水;臺灣 16 個縣市之水資源緊迫指數 (Water Stress Index, WSI)為 0.05~1;stress-weighted WSF 之結果為 2.2~44.8 L H2Oeq/kg FPCM;WSP 之結果為0.037~0.749 kg FPCM/L water。於臺北市、桃園市、臺中市、彰化縣及雲林縣生產 1 kg FPCM 時,對淡水環境之衝擊相當於消耗 44.8 L 的水,WSP 僅 0.037 kg FPCM/L water (WSI = 1);於南投縣或嘉義縣生產而產生之衝擊則僅相當於消耗2.2 L 的水,WSP 則高達 0.749 kg FPCM/L water (WSI = 0.05)。於水資源緊迫程度低之區域進行生產活動,有助於減緩對淡水環境之衝擊,而基於水資源運用與生乳生產無法脫鉤,改善WSP 可能比改善 stressed-weighted WSF 更具方向性。
提高生乳生產效率或限制乳牛場至 WSI 高之區域設置,可能具有減緩對淡水環境衝擊之潛力,未來若有更精準之時空間尺度資料,並探討其他環境機制時,有助於制定更完善的產業發展策略。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In order to achieve a balance between the development of Taiwan dairy industry and the sustainability of the freshwater environment, it is necessary to assess the impact of the production on the freshwater environment and clarify the causal relationship between the two. In this study, five dairy farms in Hsinchu County were inventoried in accordance with ISO 14046, from May 2018 to April 2019. The system boundary was 'cradle to gate'. Functional unit was 1 kg of fat and protein corrected milk (FPCM). According to the established model, use the methodology of Water Scarcity assess the contribution to stress-weighted Water Scarcity Footprint (WSF) when producing in local and other counties and cities, and assess Water Scarcity Productivity (WSP). Then summarize the improvement strategies. The results show that the average production of 1 kg of FPCM consumed 27 ± 7 L of water; the Water Stress Index (WSI) of 16 counties and cities in Taiwan was 0.05−1; the result of stress-weighted WSF was 2.2−44.8 L H2Oeq/kg FPCM; the result of WSP was 0.037−0.749 kg FPCM/L water. When producing 1 kg of FPCM in Taipei City, Taoyuan City, Taichung City, Changhua County, and Yunlin County, the impact on the freshwater environment was equivalent to consuming 44.8 L of water, and WSP was only 0.037 kg FPCM/L water (WSI = 1). The impact conducted by production in Nantou County or Chiayi County was equivalent to consuming 2.2 L of water, and WSP was as high as 0.749 kg FPCM/L water (WSI = 0.05). Production activities in areas with low water stress can help mitigate the impact on the freshwater environment. The consumption of water cannot be decoupled from raw milk production, improving WSP may be more directional than improving stressed-weighted WSF.
Improving production efficiency or restricting dairy farms to high WSI region may have the potential to mitigate the impact on the freshwater environment. A more accurate study of space-time data and other environmental mechanisms will lead to the formulation of a more complete industrial development strategy. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T00:12:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-109-R06626023-1.pdf: 5343582 bytes, checksum: aa23ff7702ec5bc0f12254ce776c6a81 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝誌 I
摘要 II Abstract III 圖目錄 VII 表目錄 IX 第壹章、 文獻回顧 1 一、 近年臺灣氣候變遷與調適策略 1 二、 臺灣生乳生產趨勢可能對水資源環境造成之衝擊 19 三、 ISO 14046-環境管理─水足跡─原則、要求與指引 27 四、 水資源匱乏 34 五、 近年國內外生乳水匱乏足跡研究結果 38 六、 研究動機和目的 41 第貳章、 研究方法 42 一、 生乳生命週期評估 42 二、 水匱乏生產力評估 46 第參章、 結果與討論 47 一、 生乳生命週期評估結果 47 二、 臺灣16縣市之WSI及stress-weighted WSF評估結果 56 三、 臺灣16縣市之WSP評估結果 58 四、 水資源運用與生乳生產間之關聯 60 五、 區域發展與水資源緊迫程度之探討 67 六、 探討stress-weighted WSF與WSP之運用與限制 68 七、 減緩生乳生產對淡水環境衝擊之方式 70 第肆章、 結論與未來研究方向 71 第伍章、 政策建議 72 第陸章、 參考文獻 73 附錄一、名詞定義 79 附錄二、各縣市政府推行水足跡 (Water Footprint)管理策略情形 83 附錄三、新竹縣生乳生命週期盤查調查表 84 附錄四、已發表論文全文 86 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 生乳 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 永續性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 環境衝擊 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 水匱乏 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Water scarcity | en |
| dc.subject | Environmental impact | en |
| dc.subject | Raw milk | en |
| dc.subject | Sustainability | en |
| dc.title | 運用水匱乏方法學評估臺灣生乳生產之潛在淡水環境衝擊 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Application of water scarcity methodology to assess potential impact on freshwater environment of raw milk production in Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 108-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 許桂森,黃振芳 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 水匱乏,環境衝擊,生乳,永續性, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Water scarcity,Environmental impact,Raw milk,Sustainability, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 98 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202000470 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2020-02-15 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 動物科學技術學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 動物科學技術學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-109-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 5.22 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
