Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 資訊管理學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/65533
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor翁崇雄(Chorng-Shyong Ong)
dc.contributor.authorYun-Ju Chiuen
dc.contributor.author邱韻如zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-16T23:48:54Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-23
dc.date.copyright2012-08-01
dc.date.issued2012
dc.date.submitted2012-07-23
dc.identifier.citation1. 資策會FIND. (2011). 財團法人資訊工業策進會-推動電子商務產業. 2011年10月18日 擷取自 財團法人資訊工業策進會: http://www.iii.org.tw/business/2_5_7.asp
2. 數位時代. (2010). Web 100 2010台灣網站100強. 數位時代(190).
3. MIC. (2011年10月). 財團法人資訊工業策進會-產業研究. (王義智, 編輯) 2012年06月06日 擷取自 財團法人資訊工業策進會: http://mic.iii.org.tw/aisp/reports/report_graphic.asp?pptno=PPT1001013-3
4. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 51 (6), pp. 1173-1182.
5. Bhattacharya, C., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review , 47 (1).
6. Bhattacharya, R., Devinney, T. M., & Pillutla, M. M. (1998). A formal model of trust based on outcomes. The Academy of Management Review , 23 (3), pp. 459-472.
7. Blomqvist, K. (1997). The many faces of trust. Scandinavian Journal of Management , 13, pp. 271-286.
8. Bowen, H. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper & Row .
9. Brunk, K. H. (2010). Exploring origins fo ethical company/brand perceptions - A consumer perceptive of corporate ethics. Journal of Business Research , 63, pp. 255-262.
10. Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society , 38 (3), pp. 268-295.
11. Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of Business Ethics , 84 (1), pp. 1-15.
12. Chang, H. H., & Chen, S. W. (2008). The impact of online store environment cues on purchase intention: Trust and perceived risk as a mediator. Online Information Review , 32 (6), pp. 818-841.
13. Commission of the European Communities. (2001, 7 18). Green Paper- Promoting a European framework for Corporate Social Responsibility.
14. Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. The Academy of Management Review , 23 (3), pp. 491-512.
15. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility(CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews , 12 (1), pp. 8-19.
16. Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer-seller relationships. The Journal of Marketing , 51 (2), pp. 11-27.
17. Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2000). Business ethics : ethical decision making and cases.
18. Frederick, W. C. (1994). From CSR1 to CSR2: The maturing of business-and-society thought. Business & Society , 33 (2), pp. 150-164.
19. Frederick, W. C. (1960). The growing concern over business responsibility. California Management Review , 2, pp. 54-61.
20. Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and Freedom. United States: University of Chicago Press.
21. Galavielle, J.-P. (2004). Business ethics is a matter of good conduct and of good conscience? Journal of Business Ethics , 53, pp. 9-16.
22. Ganguly, B., Dash, S. B., & Cyr, D. (2009). Website characteristics, trust and purchase intention in online stores: An empirical study in the Indian context. Journal of Information Science and Technology , 6 (2).
23. Garbarino, E., & Johnson, M. S. (1999). The different roles of satisfaction, trust, and commitment in customer relationships. The Journal of Marketing , 63 (2), pp. 70-87.
24. Gefen, D. (2000). E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust. Omega: The International Journal of Management Science , 28, pp. 725-737.
25. Hong, S. Y., & Rim, H. (2010). The influence of customer use of corporate websites: Corporate social responsibility, trust, and word-of-mouth communication. Public Relations Review , 36, pp. 389-391.
26. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., & Saarinen, L. (1999). Consumer trust in an Internet store: A cross-cultural validation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication , 5 (2).
27. Johnson, H. (1971). Business in contemporary society: Framework and issues. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth .
28. Komiak, S. X., & Benbasat, I. (2004). Understanding customer trust in agent-mediated electronic commerce, web-mediated electronic commerce, and traditional commerce. Information Technology and Management , 5, pp. 181-207.
29. Loiacono, E. T., Watson, R. T., & Goodhue, D. L. (2007). WebQual: An instrument for consumer evaluation of web sites. International Journal of Electronic Commerce , 11 (3), pp. 51-87.
30. Manne, H. G., & Wallich, H. C. (1972). The modern corporation and social responsibility. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research (Washington) .
31. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review , 20 (3), pp. 709-734.
32. McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. The Academy of Management Review , 23 (3), pp. 473-490.
33. McKnight, D., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an intergrative typology. Information Systems Research , 13 (3), pp. 334-359.
34. Morsing, M. (2006). Strategic CSR communication: Telling others how good you are. In Management Models for Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 238-246).
35. Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychology Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
36. Page, G., & Fearn, H. (2005). Corporate Reputation: What Do Consumers Really Care About? Journal of Advertising Research , 45, pp. 305-313.
37. Parasurman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service. Quality and Its Implications for Future Research. Journal of Marketing , 49 (Fall), pp. 84-106.
38. Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (2 Sub edition). Harcourt College Pub .
39. Perrini, F., Pogutz, S., & Tencati, A. (2006). Developing corporate social responsibility: A European Perspective.
40. Pivato, S., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2008). The impact of corporate social responsibility associations on consumer trust: the case of organic food. Business Ethics: A European Review , 17 (1).
41. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Havard Business Review .
42. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review , 80 (12), pp. 56-69.
43. Roberts, M. L., & Wortzel, L. H. (1979). New life-style determinants of women's food shopping behavior. Journal of Marketing , 43 (3), pp. 28-39.
44. Schurr, P. H., & Ozanne, J. L. (1985). Influences on exchange processes: buyers' preconceptions of a seller's trustworthiness and bargaining toughness. Journal of Consumer Research , 11 (4), pp. 939-953.
45. Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science , 34 (2), pp. 158-166.
46. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology , 13, pp. 290-312.
47. Thompson and, B., & Borrello, G. M. (1985). The importance of structure coefficients in regression research. Educational and Psychological Measurement , 45 (July), pp. 203-209.
48. Vlachos, P. A., Tsamakos, A., Vrechopoulos, A. P., & Avramidis, P. K. (2009). Corporate social responsibility: Attributions, loyalty, and the mediating role of trust. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science , 37, pp. 170-180.
49. Walczuch, R., & Lundgren, H. (2004). Psychological antecedents of institution-based consumer trust in e-retailing. Information & Management , 42, pp. 159-177.
50. Wood, D. J., & Logsdon, J. (2002). Business citizenship: From individuals to organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly , 3, pp. 59-94.
51. Yoon, S.-J. (2002). The antecedents and consequences of trust in online-purchase decisions. Journal of Interactive Marketing , 16 (2), pp. 47-63.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/65533-
dc.description.abstract隨著網際網路的普及,上網已成為人們生活中的一部分,進而推動了電子商務的蓬勃發展。而線上購物的不確定性使信任度在電子商務環境中尤為重要,眾多的研究亦證實了消費者對網站的信任度會正向影響其線上購買意圖,信任度的重要性已普遍獲得認同。近年來眾多學者投入心力探索信任度的前置因子,其中眾多因子皆明顯地與企業的社會責任導向有部分重疊,卻鮮少有將企業社會責任視為信任度前置因子的實證研究;而企業社會責任在近年來已逐漸發展為經營管理上的工具,對企業帶來之優勢雖已累積豐富的文獻,在網路環境中卻仍未受到重視。因此,在線上購物逐漸成為重要消費管道的今日,本研究提出知覺企業社會責任、信任度、及購買意圖三者間關係之研究模型,認為消費者的知覺企業社會責任對其信任度具有正向之影響,並進而影響其購買意圖。
  經本研究之實證研究,證實消費者知覺企業的社會責任水準會透過正向影響其信任度,進而影響消費者對該電子商務企業之購買意圖;因此,當電子商務企業之管理者在擬定策略時,應同時將企業社會責任活動納入考量。而在企業社會責任之構面中,又以消費者構面對信任度造成之影響最為顯著,其次為環境構面,最後為員工構面,但上述三個構面在已控制其他兩構面之影響後,對信任度之影響效果仍達顯著,表示企業不應忽視任何一項。此外,分析結果亦顯示在消費者眼中,現今電子商務的企業社會責任表現普通,甚至在環境相關議題上是稍微偏於負面的;相較之下信任度整體表現較好,與企業能力相關議題之信任度最高,而對於企業是否會在乎消費者的利益,受測者的態度反而較為保留。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractWith the popularity of the Internet, surfing the Internet has become part of people’s lives, which also facilitated the vigorous development of e-commerce. Uncertainty of online shopping makes trust particularly important in e-commerce environment, and numerous studies have confirmed that consumer’s trust toward an online retailer will positively influence their online purchase intention. The importance of trust has been generally recognized. Scholars have found several determinants of trust these years, and some of the determinants’ definitions obviously overlap the concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR). However, few of empirical studies treat corporate social responsibility as trust’s determinant. On the other hand, corporate social responsibility initiate has gradually developed as a management tool in recent years. While the advantages of corporate social responsibility initiate have accumulated a wealth of literatures, it has yet to be taken seriously in e-commerce environment.
Therefore, a theoretical framework is raised, which argues that consumers’ perceived corporate social responsibility will positively influence their trust on certain online retailer, and further affect their purchase intention.
   Through the empirical study, trust is confirmed to have a significant mediation effect among consumer’s perceived corporate social responsibility and their purchase intention toward an e-commerce company. Showing that corporate social responsibility initiate should be taken into consideration when formulating strategies in e-commerce enterprises. In addition, within the dimensions of corporate social responsibility, consumer dimension causes most significant effect on trust, followed by the environment dimension, and the final is employee dimension. Noted that each of the dimension has significant impact on trust when the others’ effect are under control, indicating that corporate should not neglect any of them. Furthermore, the results show that current e-commerce enterprises have an ordinary social responsibility performance in consumers’ perspective, even slightly biased towards the negative side in environment-related issues. Most trust issues, by contrast, gets good evaluation, especially on the enterprise competence-related issues.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T23:48:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-101-R99725040-1.pdf: 656425 bytes, checksum: 1168aee55a374df8a5b6a55a2ae022ac (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2012
en
dc.description.tableofcontents中文摘要 一
英文摘要 二
圖目錄 五
表目錄 五
第一章、序論 1
第一節、研究動機 1
第二節、研究目的 2
第二章、文獻探討 3
第一節、企業社會責任 3
第二節、信任度 6
第三節、企業社會責任、信任度、及購買意圖 9
第三章、研究方法 11
第一節、研究模型 11
第二節、變數定義與衡量方法 12
第三節、研究假設 13
第四節、問卷設計 14
第四章、資料分析與結果 16
第一節、樣本資料初步分析 16
第二節、量表信度與效度分析 18
第三節、單純統計分析 21
第四節、影響效果分析 24
第五節、假設檢定 28
第五章、結論與建議 29
第一節、研究結論 29
第二節、研究貢獻 31
第三節、研究限制 31
第四節、未來研究建議 32
參考文獻 33
 
圖目錄
圖2.1、Komiak & Benbasat之信任度模型 6
圖2.2、網際網路信任模型 8
圖3.1、本研究之研究架構 11
表目錄
表4.1、樣本基本資料分布情形(N=223) 17
表4.2、信度分析結果 18
表4.3、驗證性因素分析結果 20
表4.4、知覺企業社會責任統計結果 22
表4.5、信任度統計結果 23
表4.6、假設一:迴歸式(1)之分析結果 25
表4.7、假設一:迴歸式(2)之分析結果 25
表4.8、假設一:迴歸式(3)之分析結果 25
表4.9、假設一:Sobel檢定結果 27
表4.10、假設二之分析結果 27
表4.11、假設檢定結果 28
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title企業社會責任對信任度及購買意圖之關係研究zh_TW
dc.titleThe Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Trust and Purchase Intentionen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear100-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee黃恆獎(Heng-Chiang Huang),盧信銘(Hsin-Min Lu)
dc.subject.keyword企業社會責任,信任度,購買意圖,電子商務,線上購物,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordCorporate Social Responsibility,Trust,Purchase Intention,Electronic Commerce,Online Shopping,en
dc.relation.page36
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2012-07-23
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept資訊管理學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:資訊管理學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-101-1.pdf
  目前未授權公開取用
641.04 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved