請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/65189
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 王泰昌(Tay-Chang Wang,),劉嘉雯(Chia-wen Liu) | |
dc.contributor.author | Ya-Wen Wu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 吳雅雯 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T23:29:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-07-27 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2012-08-03 | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2012-07-30 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 英文文獻
Amihud, Y. and H. Mendelson. 1986. Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread. Journal of Financial Economics 17 (2): 223–249. Aschwald, K. F. 2000. Restricted stock discounts decline as result of 1-year holding period – studies after 1990 'no longer relevant' for lack of marketability discounts. Shannon Pratt's Business Valuation Update 6: 1-5. Bajaj, M., D. J. Dennis, S. P. Ferris and A. Sarin. 2001. Firm value and marketability discounts. Journal of Corporate Law 27 (1): 89-115. Bingham, D., MCBA, BVAL KC Conrad, CBA, ASA, ABAR and CMEA. 2011 .An analysis of discount for lack of marketability models and studies, Business Appraisal Practice. Third Quarter 2011: 46-59. Comment, R. 2012. Revisiting the Illiquidity discount for private Companies:A new (and “Skeptical”) restricted-stock study . Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 24 (1): 80–91. Do, H. R. 1971. Discounts involved in purchases of common stock (1966-1969), Institutional Investor Study Report of the Securities and Exchange Commission: 92-64. 92nd Congress, 1st Session. 2444-2456. Emory, J. D. 1997. The value of marketability as illustrated in initial public offerings of common stock. Business Valuation Review 16 (3): 123-131. Emory, J. D., ASA, and F.R. Dengel III.2002. Discounts for lack of marketability,Emory Pre-IPO discount studies 1980-2000, as adjusted October 10. Business Valuation Review 21 (4): 190-191. Gelman, M. 1972. An economist financial analyst’s approach to valuing stock of a closely held company. Journal of Taxation 36 (6): 353-354. Harris W. 2009.Trugman Valuation Associates, Inc. (TVA) Restricted stock study Business Valuation Review 28 (3): 128-139. Hertzel, M. and R. L. Smith. 1993. Market discounts and shareholder gains from placing equity privately. Journal of Finance 48 (2): 459-486. Inget, R. 2009. Private equity placements and the illiquidity discount. Working Paper. SSRN. Johnson, B. 1999. Quantitative support for discounts for lack of marketability. Business Valuation Review 18 (6): 152-155. Koeplin, J., A. Sarin, and A. C. Shapiro. 2000. The private company discount. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 12 (4): 94-101 Maher, M. J. 1976. Discounts for lack of marketability for closely held business interests. Taxes 54 (9): 562-571. Moroney, R. 1973.Most courts overvalue closely held stocks. Taxes 51 (3): 144-155. Oliver, R. P. and R. H. Meyers. 2000. Discounts seen in private placements of restricted stock: The management planning,Inc., long-term study (1980-1996) in Robert F, Reilly and Robert P. Schweihs, eds. The Handbook of Advanced Business Valuations: 97-117. Pittock, W. F. and, C. H. Stryker. 1983. Revenue Ruling 77-287 Revisited, SRC Quarterly Reports: 1-3. Pratt, S. P., R. F. Reilly, and R. P. Schweighs. 1996. Valuing a Business: The Analysis and Appraisal of Closely Held Companies. 344-348. Robak, E. 2007. Discounts for illiquid shares and warrants:The LiquiStatTM database of transactions on the restricted Securities trading network. Plurus Valuation advisors White Paper: 25-26. Saunders, P.2000. Marketability discounts and risk in transactions prior to initial public offerings. Business Valuation Review 19 (4): 186-195. Silber, W. L. 1991. Discounts of restricted stock: The impact of illiquidity on stock price. Financial Analysts Journal 47 (4): 60-64. Trout, R. R. 1977. Estimation of the discount associated with the transfer of restricted securities. Taxes 55 (6): 381-385. Wruck, K. H. 1989. Equity ownership concentration and firm value: Evidence from private equity financings. Journal of Financial Economics 23 (1): 3-28. 中文文獻 李協昌,2006年,上市公司私募股權之資訊內涵及折價因素之探討,國立台灣大學會計研究所碩士論文。 吳啟銘,2010年,企業評價-個案實證分析,智勝出版社。 林立綺,2011年,全球電信業決戰大未來,創新發現誌月刊,第43期。 徐政義,1999年,股票交易市場之差異對流動性與公司價值之影響,中國財務學會1999年會暨財務金融學術論文研討會論文集,頁281-326。 陳宗玄,2009年,臺灣觀光旅館營運概況與發展分析,台灣經濟金融月刊,頁69-81。 許淑茵,2009年,評價未公開發行公司流動性價差之研究-以日本市場為例,國立政治大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。 張儒欣,2007年,私募股權之折價發行-公司治理機制、盈餘管理行為與無形資產之影響,國立臺灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 藍亦敏,2011年,公司財務特性對私募折價幅度之影響,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。 魏意紋,2010年,台灣造紙企業發展策略之研究,國立中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文。 網站 證券暨期貨法令判解查詢系統(http://www.selaw.com.tw) 公開資訊觀測站(http://mops.twse.com.tw/index.htm) 證券櫃檯買賣中心 (http://www.otc.org.tw) | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/65189 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 國際財務報導準則(IFRS)強調公允價值會計,其中IFRS9「金融工具」要求金融資產須以公允價值來入帳。未上市櫃股票因缺乏市價作為衡量基礎,過去係以成本來入帳,因此如何評估未上市櫃股票之公允價值成為目前企業共同面臨之考驗。未上市櫃股票因缺乏流動性,在其他條件相同之下,其價格應低於上市櫃股票,然而過去傳統之評價方法大都只適用於活絡市場交易之資產之評價,故於評估未上市櫃股票之價值時須調整因流動性限制所產生之折價。
本論文採用「限制性股票比較法」(The Restricted Stock Approach)以台灣上市櫃及興櫃公司私募普通股為樣本衡量流動性折價,並以迴歸模型探討影響流動性折價之相關因素,模型結果可應用於評價未上市櫃公司之流動性折價調整。研究結果發現財務表現、營運風險、交易市場別、公司規模、公司年齡及公司治理皆為影響折價幅度之重要因素。而過去文獻對於以「限制性股票比較法」衡量流動性折價存有諸多質疑,因而本文以台灣六家未上市櫃公司驗證模型衡量折價幅度之合理性。方法為以自由現金流量折現法與市場基礎法對個案公司評估其理論價格,其價格業已調整模型計算之流動性折價幅度,再將理論價格與市場價格作比較。驗證結果雖無法對價格差異原因明確之作歸屬,然以各公司評價結果仍可發現,部分公司於調整流動性折價後理論價格與市價較為接近,因此爾後於評估未上市櫃公司價值時,應考量流動性對價值之影響。本研究之結果可作為未來評價未上市櫃公司之參考。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) emphasis on fair value accounting, which IFRS9 “Financial Instruments” requires financial assets shall be recorded at fair value. In the past, accounting for unlisted stocks is based on historical cost due to lack of market prices as a measure of foundation. Therefore, how to assess the fair value of unlisted stock is a big challenge that companies is facing. Other things being equal, unlisted stock prices should be lower than listed stocks due to lack of liquidity. Past traditional methods of evaluation are only applicable to evaluation the asset in active markets, so valuing of unlisted stock required to adjust the liquidity discount.
This thesis uses the“restricted stock approach”to measure the liquidity discount and use regression model to investigate related factors that affet liquidity discount. Samples are collected from Taiwan’s listed, OTC, emerging companies who has raised fund from private placement. The regression model results can be applied to evaluate liquidity discount adjustment for the non-listed companies. The results showed that the financial performance, operational risk, the type of trading market, company size, company age, and corporate governance are important factors to affect the discount. Literature indicates that there are some problems with the restricted stock approach. So this study further uses six Taiwan non-listed and OTC companies to verify the rationality of this model. The verification mothod is to use discounted free-cash flow method and market-based approach to assess these companies’ theoretical price, its price has been to adjust the liquidity discount of this model calculation, and finally will be evaluated from the theoretical and the market prices for comparison. Though the causes of price differences can’t be clearly identified and attribution, results indicates part of the company the theoretical price and the market price is closer after adjusting the liquidity discount.So investors should consider the impact of liquidity on the value in assessing the value of the unlisted companies. The results of this study can be used as reference of valuation of unlisted companies in the future. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T23:29:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-R99722034-1.pdf: 623088 bytes, checksum: 08451478f3391d09516237da04e61d17 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 I
Abstract II 表目錄 IV 附錄目錄 V 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與背景 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 研究架構 4 第二章 文獻探討與相關理論 5 第一節 流動性定義及相關理論 5 第二節 流動性折價方法及實證研究 6 第三章 研究方法 14 第一節 研究步驟 14 第二節 研究設計 15 第三節 研究期間及樣本選擇 22 第四節 實證模型與變數定義 24 第四章 模型實證結果 30 第一節 敘述統計與相關性分析 30 第二節 迴歸模型結果 36 第五章 模型驗證與差異分析 38 第一節 評價分析 38 第二節 差異分析 75 第六章 結論與研究限制 82 第一節研究結論 82 第二節 研究限制 83 第三節 研究建議 84 參考文獻 104 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 公允價值估計相關議題之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Study on Related Issues of Fair Value Measurement | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 100-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李啟華(Qi-Hua Li),林瑞青(Ruey-Ching Lin) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 國際財務報導準則,公允價值,未上市櫃股票,限制性股票比較法,流動性折價, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | IFRS,fair value,unlisted stocks,restricted stock approach,liquidity discount, | en |
dc.relation.page | 106 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2012-07-31 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 會計學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-101-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 608.48 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。