請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/65075完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳惠美 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ching-Hsuan Lee | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李璟玄 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T23:21:06Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2014-08-10 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2012-08-10 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2012-08-01 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. 王世傳,(2010),第12屆休閒、遊憩、觀光學術研討會暨國際論壇論文集,國人旅遊動機與低碳旅遊認知之研究,(P152-153),南投:中華民國戶外遊憩學會暨國立師範大學地理學系。
2. 王鑫,(1987),環境保護教育理念架構之規劃報告,國科會科教處及台大地理系合作計畫。 3. 北縣環保局低碳中心網站,(2011),下載日期:2010/7/31,取自http://www.epb.tpc.gov.tw/_file/1150/SG/31292/D40000001150000001_0.html 4. 交通部觀光局網站,(2002),生態旅遊白皮書,下載日期:2012/4/6,取自http://www.cpami.gov.tw/chinese/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=10059&catid=40&Itemid=53。 5. 行政院環保署網站,(2011),節能減碳十大無悔措施全民行動方案,下載日期:2011/8/5,取自http://ecolife.tenki.tw/loud/photo.php#。 6. 行政院環保署網站,(2011),環保低碳活動平台,下載日期:2011/10/22,http://greenevent.epa.gov.tw/apple_frist.asp。 7. 低碳旅遊網站,(2011),低碳主題旅遊,下載日期:2011/11/16,lowcarbon-travel.com。 8. 吳忠宏,(2001),解說員在自然保育上的應用,自然保育期刊,(36)6-13。 9. 吳漢恩,(2008),阿里山森林鐵路遊客旅遊行為特性之研究,碩士論文,南台科技大學休閒事業管理研究所碩士論文,台南。 10. 李青峰,(1987),解說服務效果之研究,碩士論文,台灣大學森林研究所,台北。 11. 汪靜明,(1990),國內環境教育活動設計架構與特色之探討,環境教育學刊,(5)58-66。 12. 汪靜明,(1995),社會環境教育之推動與落實,教育資料集刊,(20)213-235。 13. 坪林自遊自在網站,(2011),下載日期:2010/7/31,取自http://www.pingling.com.tw/ 14. 坪林鄉公所網站,(2011),下載日期:2011/2/21/,取自http://www.pinglin.tpc.gov.tw/news_detail.asp?id=634033037549350000 15. 周儒譯,(2003),環境教育最佳實務準則Best Pratices for Environmental Education:Guidelines for Success (原作者:Joyce Meredith等編著)。台北市:中華民國環境教育協會。 16. 林子平,(2011),台灣國內旅遊碳排放與生態足跡之調查與分析,2011第十三屆休閒、遊憩、觀光學術研討會暨國際論壇論文集(P1040-1055),臺北:中華民國戶外遊憩學暨國立虎尾科技大學休閒遊憩系 17. 邱皓政,(2006),量化硏究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析(基礎版),臺北:五南。 18. 高雪芳,(2006),北宜高坪林交流道開放通行問題之研究-永續發展觀點,碩士論文,國立台北大學公共行政暨政策學系研究所,台北。 19. 張子超,(2000),九年一貫課程環境教育融入的內涵與教學。台灣教育,(589)12-21。 20. 許心欣,(1994),參與環境保護工作之民間團體主要幹部環境態度調查,碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學環境教育研究所,台北。 21. 陳世賢,(2008),遊客個人碳足跡與低碳旅遊行為意向之研究-以坪林鄉為例,碩士論文,逢甲大學景觀與遊憩研究所,台中。 22. 陳怡君、郭文貴、蕭美玲,(2004),環保紡織品之綠色行銷與綠色消費行為關係之研究—以台北市為例,華岡紡織期刊,(2)117-131。 23. 曾孟蘭,(2002),消費者對行動廣告態度之研究,碩士論文,國立中山大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文,高雄。 24. 童玉芬,(2008),女性汽車消費者購買決策因素之研究,碩士論文,淡江大學國際貿易學系,台北。 25. 新北市坪林區公所網站,(2012),坪林區地理位置,下載日期:2011/9/12, http://www.pinglin.ntpc.gov.tw/_file/1778/SG/39362/FG0000001778000000_3_2.html。 26. 新北市政府低碳生活網站,(2011),低碳社區推廣成果,下載日期:2011/4/8,取自http://www.epd.ntpc.gov.tw/web66/_file/1150/upload/news/lowco2/result05.html。 27. 新北市政府環境保護局網站,(2010),低碳城市,下載日期:2011/11/12,http://video.epd.ntpc.gov.tw/~joomla/index.php/component/content/article/13--/407--9908。 28. 新北市政府環境保護局網站,(2011),低碳中心簡介,下載日期:2011/6/2,取自http://www.epd.ntpc.gov.tw/_file/1150/SG/31292/42039.html。 29. 新北市政府環境保護局網站,(2011),從低碳城市走向綠色城市,下載日期:2012/4/4,取自:http://video.epd.ntpc.gov.tw/~joomla/index.php/component/content/article/13--/407--9908。 30. 楊世瑩,(2008),SPSS統計分析實務第二版,臺北:旗標出版股份有限公司。 31. 楊冠政,(1992),環境行為相關變項之類別與組織,環境教育季刊,(15)10-24。 32. 楊銀興,(2011),我國推動低碳旅遊政策之研究-政策執行影響因素的觀點,第十三屆休閒、遊憩、觀光學術研討會暨國際論壇論文集(P1026-1039),臺北:中華民國戶外遊憩學會暨國立臺中教育大學教育學系。 33. 臺北縣政府環保局、坪林區公所,(2009),坪林低碳全紀錄:一段坪林發展低碳旅遊的對話,臺北:旅遊。 34. 臺北縣政府環保局低碳生活網站,(2011),下載日期:2011/6/20,取自http://www.epb.tpc.gov.tw/web66/_file/1150/upload/news/lowco2/result05.html 35. 劉阿榮,(2001),台灣之永續發展-國家與社會的觀點,博士論文,國立台灣大學國家發展研究所,台北。 36. 蘇榮堯,(2009),觀光工廠服務場景、解說服務滿意度與紀念品購買意願關係之研究,碩士論文,南華大學旅遊事業管理學系碩士班,台北。 37. Ballantyne, R., Packer, J. & Beckmann, E. (1998). Targeted interpretation: Exploring relationships among visitors' motivations, activities, attitudes, information needs and preferences. Journal of Tourism Studies, 9(2), 14-25. 38. Barr, S., Shaw, G., Coles, T., & Prillwitz, J. (2010). 'A holiday is a holiday': Pacticing sustainability, home and away. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(3), 474-481. 39. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs of UK,(2012),Carbon offsetting the hierarchy of actions,下載日期:2012/5/2,取自http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/emissions/co2_offsetting/co2_offsetting.aspx 40. Dickinson, J.E., Robbins, D., & Lumsdon, L. (2010). Holiday travel discourses and climate change. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(3), 482-489. 41. Gossling, S., Hultman, J., Haglund, L., Kallgren, H. & Revahl, M. (2008). Voluntary carbon offsetting by Swedish Air Travellers: Opportunities and Obstacles. Current Issues in Tourism. 42. Hungerford, H.R. & Volk, T.L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8-21. 43. Kimmel, J.R. (1999). Ecotourism as environmental learning. Journal of Environment Education, 30(2), 40-44. 44. Knudson, D.M., Cable, T.T., & Beck, L. (1995). Interpretion of cultural and natural resources. State college, PA: Venture Publisging. 45. Liu, Z. (2003). Sustainable tourism development: A critique. Journal of Sustainable Tourism ,11(6), 459-475. 46. Madin, E.M.P. & Fenton, D.M. (2004). Environmental interpretation in the great barrier reef marine park: An assessment of programme effectiveness. Journal of Sustainable Tourism,12(2), 121-137. 47. Meadows, D.H. (1972). The Limits to Growth, Universe Books: New York. 48. Moscardo, G. (1998). Interpretation and sustainable tourism: Fuctions, examples and principle. Journal of Tourism Studies, 9(1), 2-13. 49. Mulugetta, Y. & Urban, F. (2010). Deliberating on low carbon development. Energy Policy. 38(12), 7546-7549. 50. Sharpe, G.W. (1982). Interpreting the environment. New York, Jone Wiley & Sons Inc. 51. Simmons, D.A. (1991). Are we meeting the goal of responsible environmental behavior. The Journal of Environmental Education, 22(3), 16-21. 52. Simpson, M.C., Gossling, S., Scott, D., Hall, C.M. and Gladin, E. (2008). Climate change adaptation and mitigation in the tourism sector: Frameworks, tools and practices, UNEP, University of Oxford, UNWTO, WMO: Paris, France. 53. Strasdas, W. (2010). Carbon management in tourism– A smart strategy in response to climate change. 10(2), 57-69. 54. Sustrans, (2007). Low carbon travel information sheet(FF44), Revised April 21, 2010, from Web site: http://www.sustrans.org.uk/assets/files/Info%20sheets/ff44.pdf. 55. Thogersen, J. (2006). Norms for environmentally responsible behaviour: An extended taxonomy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(2006), 247-261. 56. Tilden, F. (1977). Interpreting our heritage. Carolina, University of North Carolina Press. 57. Wiedmann, T. and Minx, J. (2008). A definition of 'carbon footprint'. In: C. C. Pertsova, Ecological Economics Research. Trends: 1, 1-11, Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge NY, USA. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/65075 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 由於人類頻繁的活動造成環境資源的耗損,並導致地球暖化等問題發生,溫室效應的議題已經成為全球關注的問題。因此政府部門便紛紛倡導利用節能減碳的方式來延緩地球暖化的情形,而利用低碳概念來進行環境資源的節約,已是全球一致努力的目標。根據世界旅遊組織統計顯示,全世界總體碳排放量約5%來自旅遊業,旅遊行為所產生的排碳量相當大。故為因應減碳議題以及永續發展的未來,低碳旅遊活動因而產生。低碳旅遊活動是以提倡大眾交通運輸工具的接駁、步行解說導覽、享用當地的低碳餐飲以及綠色消費為主要減碳模式的旅遊活動,活動的成功也讓地方觀光活動重新活絡起來。而低碳旅遊活動的主要目的即是希望能透過旅遊活動達成到教育遊客低碳概念的目的,讓遊客能從遊玩的活動體驗中了解低碳的概念以及低碳行為,進而能夠進一步推展到自身未來的旅遊行為上。
在坪林區低碳旅遊活動中,主要是透過活動的解說導覽員將低碳概念宣導給遊客,過去研究指出,在旅遊活動中解說導覽人員所帶領的遊程是最傳統也是遊客最熟悉的一種旅遊方式,而解員說通常也是遊客最喜愛也是最能夠影響遊客旅遊行為的角色,因此解說人員對於遊客的影響很大,而解說人員所傳達的解說內容相當重要。因此,本研究探討,遊客於低碳解說訊息之態度,是否會因遊客個人社經特性有所影響以及影響其未來之低碳旅遊行為、甚至是日常生活環保行為的傾向。本研究結果希望可提供政府、相關單位及旅遊業者,做為未來低碳旅遊行為在教育宣導、規劃之參考依據。 研究方法採結構式問卷調查,以報名參加新北市坪林區低碳旅遊活動遊客為研究對象。研究地點選在坪林區低碳旅遊活動接駁乘車處。調查方法採旅遊後之遊客意見調查,分別收集遊客之個人社經資料、低碳旅遊行為傾向,以及日常環保行為傾向等三個部分。現地一共回收213份回答旅遊前的問卷,扣掉無效問卷22份,有效問卷一共是191份。 研究結果顯示,在資料分析方面,關於遊客社經特性與低碳解說訊息的反應上,則是以不同的遊客性別會對低碳解說訊息產生影響,特別是以女性會受到低碳解說訊息中的環境保育概念而影響。另一方面,關於低碳解說訊息對遊客未來低碳行為傾向上,則是以低碳解說訊息中的環境保育概念訊息,會影響遊客未來的低碳行為傾向。在未來低碳旅遊活動行銷上的建議,則是可以多加利用與環境議題相關的解說內容進行講解,將能夠影響遊客未來的低碳旅遊行為以及日常環保行為。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The consumption of environmental resources due to human activities frequently, which lead to global warming and other problems, the greenhouse issue, has become a global concern. To slow global warming situation, government departments have advocated the energy conservation and reduce carbon emissions. It’s a global objective to savings environmental resources by using the concept of low-carbon. According to the World Tourism Organization statistics show, the world's total carbon emissions by around 5% from the tourism industry. It’s a large number of carbon emissions by travel behavior. Therefore, in response to carbon reduction issues and sustainable development, the low-carbon tourism activities have resulted. Low carbon tourist activity is a mode to reduce carbon emission by promotion the public transport connections, walking tour, enjoy the local low-carbon food, and green consumption. The successful activities are re-active the local tourism activities. The purpose of low-carbon tourism activity is to educate visitors the concept of low-carbon by tourism activities, and understanding the concept of low-carbon and low carbon behavior from the experience of visitors’ activities, and be able to promote their travel behavior in the future.
The main activity in Low-carbon tourism activities is to explain and guidance the concept of low-carbon to tourists from tour guides. In the past studies, the tour guide is the most influence role to influence the tourists' behavior in low-carbon tourism. The message conveyed by the tour guide is the concept of convince, and the most common applications is the concept of regulatory focus on message convince. According to regulatory focus theory, it can be divided into two regulatory focuses, Promotion Focus and Prevention Focus. Many studies use the response received by the regulatory focus theory to explore the different focus for its message. The research also confirmed, using a different focus of the individual, the presentation of the message will produce different attitudes and behavior of the reaction. It is different mechanism in convince process with individuals of different regulatory focus. Using different individuals in which to adjust the position to fit message can be achieved the best to convince. Therefore, the purpose of this study is using the concept of regulatory focus to explore the individual with promotion and prevention, whether to explain the message of promotion and prevention of low-carbon reaction is different. To identify visitors with different focus position which message type is suitable, as a reference to explain the improvement. In the same time, to study the attitude of tourists in the low-carbon interpretive messages will be affected by the characteristics of visitors personal community and influence its future low-carbon travel behavior, and the daily life of the environmental behavior. The results of this study want to be able to provide the government, and related agencies and tour operators, as reference for future low-carbon travel behavior in education advocacy and planning. Research methods use structured questionnaire survey, and consider the visitors who enroll in the low-carbon tourism activities in New Taipei City Pinglin district as the research object. The study site is located in the shuttle bus station of low-carbon tourism activities in Pinglin district, and using visitor survey after low-carbon tourism as survey method. Collect the personal information of visitors, the focus of regulation; promotion / prevention of low-carbon explain the message, the travel behavior tendencies, and regular environmental behavior tendency. Received a total of 213 were answered before travel questionnaire, after deducting 22 invalid questionnaires, we got the usable questionnaire were 191. In the data analysis, the results show that the reaction of the visitors' socioeconomic characteristics and low-carbon explanation message is based on different tourist gender, especially on women who will be affected in the low-carbon explanation message of environmental conservation concept. On the other hand, in the future, the low-carbon explanation message on the tendency of low-carbon in tourists, is based on the concept of environmental conservation message in the message of low-carbon explanation, it will affect low-carbon behavioral tendencies of tourists in the future. Suggested that in future low-carbon tourism marketing can make use of the explanation to explain environmental issues, will be able to affect tourist low-carbon travel behavior as well as day-to-day environmental behavior in the future. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T23:21:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-R99628316-1.pdf: 1227401 bytes, checksum: 68c4cfcd250f307b4c5e68d89f86be91 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要. i
Abstract. iv 目 錄 . vii 圖目錄 .. ix 表目錄 x 第壹章 緒論 1 第貳章 文獻回顧 5 第一節 低碳旅遊 5 第二節 解說訊息對旅遊行為的影響 13 第参章 研究方法 18 第一節 研究個案介紹 18 第二節 先驅研究 27 第三節 研究架構與假設 42 第四節 研究對象 44 第五節 研究工具 45 第六節 調查方法 49 第七節 分析方法 50 第肆章 結果分析 52 第一節 基本頻度描述 52 第二節 遊客社經特性與低碳解說訊息之關係 59 第三節 低碳解說訊息與低碳行為傾向之關係 61 第伍章 結論與建議 67 第一節 結果討論 67 第二節 建議 70 參考文獻 73 附錄 77 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 低碳旅遊 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 旅遊行為 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 環境教育 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | low-carbon tourism | en |
| dc.subject | travel behavior | en |
| dc.subject | environmental education | en |
| dc.title | 解說訊息對遊客行為傾向之影響-以坪林區低碳旅遊為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Effects of Interpretation on Tourists’ Behavioral Intentions by Low-Carbon Tourism-A Case Study of Pinglin | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 100-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林晏州,何昶鴛,張俊彥,歐聖榮 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 低碳旅遊,旅遊行為,環境教育, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | low-carbon tourism,travel behavior,environmental education, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 79 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2012-08-01 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 園藝暨景觀學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-101-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.2 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
