請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/64999
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 蕭朱杏(Chuhsing K. Hsiao) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yung-Hsiang Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃詠詳 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T23:14:19Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-09-17 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2012-09-17 | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2012-08-03 | |
dc.identifier.citation | References
Barrett JC, Hansoul S, Nicolae DL, Cho JH, Duerr RH, Rioux JD, Brant SR, Silverberg MS, Taylor KD, Barmada MM and others. 2008. Genome-wide association defines more than 30 distinct susceptibility loci for Crohn's disease. Nature Genetics 40(8):955-962. Becker T, Knapp M. 2004. Maximum-likelihood estimation of haplotype frequencies in nuclear families. Genetic Epidemiology 27(1):21-32. Cordell HJ. 2006. Estimation and testing of genotype and haplotype effects in case-control studies: comparison of weighted regression and multiple imputation procedures. Genetic Epidemiology 30(3):259-275. Daly MJ, Rioux JD, Schaffner SF, Hudson TJ, Lander ES. 2001. High-resolution haplotype structure in the human genome. Nature Genetics 29(2):229-232. Durrant C, Zondervan K, Cardon L, Hunt S, Deloukas P, Morris A. 2004. Linkage disequilibrium mapping via cladistic analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphism haplotypes. American Journal of Human Genetics 75:35 - 43. Falk CT, Rubinstein P. 1987. Haplotype relative risks: an easy reliable way to construct a proper control sample for risk calculations. Annals of Human Genetics 51(3):227-233. Fang S, Sha Q, Zhang S. 2012. Two Adaptive Weighting Methods to Test for Rare Variant Associations in Family-Based Designs. Genetic Epidemiology 36(5):499-507. Guo W, Lin S. 2009. Generalized linear modeling with regularization for detecting common disease rare haplotype association. Genetic Epidemiology 33(4):308-316. Herold C, Becker T. 2009. Genetic association analysis with FAMHAP: a major program update. Bioinformatics 25(1):134-136. Holliday EG, Handoko HY, James MR, McGrath JJ, Nertney DA, Tirupati S, Thara R, Levinson DF, Hayward NK, Mowry BJ and others. 2006. Association study of the dystrobrevin-binding gene with schizophrenia in Australian and Indian samples. Twin Research and Human Genetics 9(4):531-539. Horvath S, Xu X, Lake SL, Silverman EK, Weiss ST, Laird NM. 2004. Family-based tests for associating haplotypes with general phenotype data: Application to asthma genetics. Genetic Epidemiology 26(1):61-69. Hwu HG, Faraone SV, Liu CM, Chen WJ, Liu SK, Shieh MH, Hwang TJ, Tsuang MM, OuYang WC, Chen CY and others. 2005. Taiwan schizophrenia linkage study: The field study. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics 134B(1):30-36. Kraft P, Stram DO. 2007. The use of inferred haplotypes in downstream analysis. American Journal of Human Genetics 81(4):863-865. Krishna A, Bondell HD, Ghosh SK. 2009. Bayesian variable selection using an adaptive powered correlation prior. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 139(8):2665-2674. Lee MH, Tzeng JY, Huang SY, Hsiao CK. 2011. Combining an evolution-guided clustering algorithm and haplotype-based LRT in family association studies. BMC Genetics 12(1):48. Lin DY. 2006. Likelihood-based inference on haplotype effects in genetic association studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association 101(473):89. Lin SH, Liu CM, Liu YL, Fann CSJ, Hsiao PC, Wu JY, Hung SI, Chen CH, Wu HM, Jou YS and others. 2009. Clustering by neurocognition for fine mapping of the schizophrenia susceptibility loci on chromosome 6p. Genes, Brain and Behavior 8(8):785-794. Liu CM, Liu YL, Fann CSJ, Yang WC, Wu JY, Hung SI, Chen WJ, Chueh CM, Liu WM, Liu CC and others. 2007. No association evidence between schizophrenia and dystrobrevin-binding protein 1 (DTNBP1) in Taiwanese families. Schizophrenia Research 93(1-3):391-398. Mensah FK, Gilthorpe MS, Davies CF, Keen LJ, Adamson PJ, Roman E, Morgan GJ, Bidwell JL, Law GR. 2007. Haplotype uncertainty in association studies. Genetic Epidemiology 31(4):348-357. Molitor J, Marjoram P, Thomas D. 2003. Fine-scale mapping of disease genes with multiple mutations via spatial clustering techniques. American Journal of Human Genetics 73(6):1368-1384. Molitor J, Zhao K, Marjoram P. 2005. Fine mapping - 19th century style. BMC Genetics 6(Suppl 1):S63. Morris AP. 2005. Direct analysis of unphased SNP genotype data in population-based association studies via Bayesian partition modelling of haplotypes. Genetic Epidemiology 29(2):91-107. Morris AP. 2006. A flexible Bayesian framework for modeling haplotype association with disease, allowing for dominance effects of the underlying causative variants. American Journal of Human Genetics 79(4):679-694. Paschou P, Mahoney MW, Javed A, Kidd JR, Pakstis AJ, Gu S, Kidd KK, Drineas P. 2007. Intra- and interpopulation genotype reconstruction from tagging SNPs. Genome Research 17(1):96-107. Purcell S, Daly MJ, Sham PC. 2007. WHAP: haplotype-based association analysis. Bioinformatics 23(2):255-256. Rioux JD, Daly MJ, Silverberg MS, Lindblad K, Steinhart H, Cohen Z, Delmonte T, Kocher K, Miller K, Guschwan S and others. 2001. Genetic variation in the 5q31 cytokine gene cluster confers susceptibility to Crohn disease. Nature Genetics 29(2):223-228. Ross CA, Margolis RL, Reading SAJ, Pletnikov M, Coyle JT. 2006. Neurobiology of schizophrenia. Neuron 52(1):139-153. Saha S, Chant D, Welham J, McGrath J. 2005. A systematic review of the prevalence of schizophrenia. PLoS Medicine 2(5):413-433. Schaid D, Rowland C, Tines D, Jacobson R, Poland G. 2002. Score tests for association between traits and haplotypes when linkage phase is ambiguous. American Journal of Human Genetics 70:425-434. Seltman H, Roeder K, Devlin B. 2001. Transmission/disequilibrium test meets measured haplotype analysis: family-based association analysis guided by evolution of haplotypes. American Journal of Human Genetics 68(5):1250-1263. Sham P, Rijsdijk F, Knight J, Makoff A, North B, Curtis D. 2004. Haplotype association analysis of discrete and continuous traits using mixture of regression models. Behavior Genetics 34:207-214. Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, Van Der Linde A. 2002. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 64(4):583-639. Tsuang HC, Lin SH, Liu SK, Hsieh MH, Hwang TJ, Liu CM, Hwu HG, Chen WJ. 2006. More severe sustained attention deficits in nonpsychotic siblings of multiplex schizophrenia families than in those of simplex ones. Schizophrenia Research 87(1-3):172-180. Tsuang M. 2000. Schizophrenia: genes and environment. Biological Psychiatry 47(3):210-220. Tzeng JY. 2005. Evolutionary-based grouping of haplotypes in association analysis. Genetic Epidemiology 28(3):220-231. Waldron ERB, Whittaker JC, Balding DJ. 2006. Fine mapping of disease genes via haplotype clustering. Genetic Epidemiology 30(2):170-179. Walker E, Kestler L, Bollini A, Hochman KM. 2004. Schizophrenia: etiology and course. Annual Review of Psychology 55(1):401-430. Zaykin D, Westfall P, Young S, Karnoub M, Wagner M, Ehm M. 2002. Testing association of statistically inferred haplotypes with discrete and continuous traits in samples of unrelated individuals. Human Heredity 53:79-91. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/64999 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 相較於單點的遺傳標記分析研究,多點遺傳標記分析研究除了可能可以納入多點標記之間的生物關係,也較能提供有用的資訊且檢力較高的分析結果。例如,能考慮連鎖不平衡的單倍體就是一個多點遺傳標記的例子。只是,單倍體的分析仍然存在一些困難需要克服,比如說單倍體組成狀態的不明確、或者是在我們有興趣的某個基因區段的單倍體個數過多,甚至是在家族性研究中,親代傳遞單倍體給子代時的傳遞路徑也存在著不確定性。在本篇論文中,我將會分兩個階段來針對家族性研究提出一種不確定性編碼矩陣來解釋這些不確定性。首先,我會以三元體資料為主,以貝式羅吉斯迴歸模式來找出單倍體特異的估計值;其次,我會使用貝式廣義混合模式來納入所有子代的基因資訊,來偵測是否存在著罕見變異的關聯性分析。這裡所提出的不確定性編碼矩陣可以同時考慮單倍體組成狀態不明,以及單倍體傳遞狀態的不確定性,並且會使用一種以演化為基礎的資料分群法來降低維度。模擬分析與實際應用已經完成,相較於現有的分析工具,我這裡提出的方法有比較好的分析結果。以上這些演算法都將以R程式語言來完成,未來將會放在網路上提供研究者免費下載使用。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Compared with single marker analysis, marker-set analysis usually contains more biological interpretation and can provide more informative and powerful results. For instance, the haplotype with linkage-disequilibrium among SNP markers is one marker-set presentation. Such analysis, however, does not come free. There are difficulties need to be overcome. For example, the determination of haplotype phase and the large number of haplotypes in the genetic region of interest may cause problem in statistical inference. In addition, for family study designs, there exists the uncertainty of transmission/non-transmission status from parents to affected offspring. In this thesis, I will construct an uncertainty-coding matrix of marker-set based on collected genotype data, and apply to association studies with family design for two stages. First, I will base on trios design to conduct the transmission/non-transmission haplotype and employ the Bayesian conditional logistic regression. Second I use Bayesian generalized mixed effect model to incorporate the whole marker-set information of the other offspring in family. Such design matrix can cope with the phase uncertainty and the transmission uncertainty among family studies. Furthermore, an evolutionary-based clustering method can avoid the curse of dimensionality. The simulation studies and real data applications are presented and compared with other tools. These proposed methods are implemented in R and will be available for free download in the future. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T23:14:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-D95842002-1.pdf: 713173 bytes, checksum: ae4f4eb6841738ff2eeb52f705fa2d69 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | CONTENTS
中文摘要 2 ABSTRACT 3 LIST OF TABLES 7 LIST OF FIGURES 9 Chapter 1 Introduction 12 Chapter 2 Methods 18 2.1 Haplotype-based Association Studies for Family Data 18 2.1.1 Haplotype Coding with no Uncertainty 18 2.1.2 Haplotype Coding with Phase Uncertainty 20 2.1.3 Haplotype Coding with Ancestry Uncertainty 23 2.2 A Marker-set Approach with All offspring Phase Information 26 2.2.1 Bayesian Random-Effect Logistic Regression 29 2.2.2 Comparison with the Collapsing Approach 31 2.3 Computational Notes 32 Chapter 3 Results 33 3.1 Simulation Study for Estimate Haplotype Specific Risk 33 3.1.1 Sampling Scheme and Computation 33 3.1.2 Performance Evaluation 35 3.2 Real Data Application for Estimate Haplotype Specific Risk 36 3.2.1 Taiwan Schizophrenia Linkage Study 36 3.2.2 The Crohn’s Disease 38 3.3 Simulation Study for Association Detection under CDRV 40 3.3.1 Sampling Scheme and Computation 40 3.3.2 Performance Evaluation 41 Chapter 4 Discussion 43 References 48 Appendix 1: Using an Uncertainty-Coding Matrix in Bayesian Regression Models for Haplotype-Specific Risk Detection in Family Association Studies 72 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 利用不確定性編碼矩陣進行多點遺傳相關研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Marker-set Genetic Association Studies with An Uncertainty-coding Matrix | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 100-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 陳為堅(Wei J. Chen) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蕭金福,楊欣洲,李美賢 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 家族性研究,貝式統計,遺傳標記集合,單倍體,消失的遺傳性, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | family study,Bayesian,marker-set,haplotype,missing heritability, | en |
dc.relation.page | 73 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2012-08-03 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 流行病學與預防醫學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 流行病學與預防醫學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-101-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 696.46 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。