請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/64994完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭瑋(Wei Jeng) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hsin-Yuan Hu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 胡馨元 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T23:13:42Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-03-03 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2020-03-03 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2020-02-24 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Babbie, E. R.(2013)。研究方法:基礎理論與技巧(第二版;蔡毓智譯)。臺北市:雙葉。(原作2011年出版)
Bernard, R. H., & Ryan, G. W.(2015)。質性研究分析:系統取向(藍依勤、羅育齡、林聖曦譯)。臺北市:心理。(原作2010年出版) Sternberg, R. J. (2010)。認知心理學(第五版;李玉琇、蔣文祁譯)臺北市:雙葉。(原作2008年出版) 王雲東(2016)。社會研究方法:量化與質性取向及其應用(第三版)。新北市:揚智文化。 呂佩怡(2013)。策展(Curating)/策展(Curation)?檢自https://mag.ncafroc.org.tw/single.aspx?cid=112&id=117 呂智惠、謝建成、黃琬姿、黃毓絜(2016)。網站資訊架構之使用者經驗研究:以臺師大科普閱讀網建置與使用性測試為例。大學圖書館,20(1),63-87。 施淑娟、郭伯臣(1995)。基模的評量(上)。檢自http://ntcuir.ntcu.edu.tw/bitstream/987654321/11435/2/07-2.pdf 陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。臺北市:五南。 陳啟亮(2010)。廣義的資訊架構,狹義的資訊架構:資訊架構師在台灣。中華民國圖書館學會會訊,18(2),68-72。 陳啟亮(2011)。資訊架構、使用性與使用者經驗設計。檢自https://www.academia.edu/12253827/%E8%B3%87%E8%A8%8A%E6%9E%B6%E6%A7%8B_%E4%BD%BF%E7%94%A8%E6%80%A7%E8%88%87%E4%BD%BF%E7%94%A8%E8%80%85%E7%B6%93%E9%A9%97%E8%A8%AD%E8%A8%88 賴玲玲、鍾閔衛(2007)。建構資訊服務II:以網頁設計人員為例。教育資料與圖書館學,45(1),33-53。 謝建成、丁依玲、陳慧倫(2011)。大學圖書館網站資訊尋獲度之研究。資訊管理學報,18(3),25-49。 謝建成、林黃瑋(2012)。基於網站廣度與深度之網站尋獲度研究。教育資料與圖書館學,50(2),255-288。 瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國樞(2015)。社會及行為科學研究法:質性研究法。臺北市:東華。 Babich, N. (2017). A beginner’s guide to information architecture for UX designers. Retrieved from https://theblog.adobe.com/a-beginners-guide-to-information-architecture-for-ux-designers/ Bogner, A., Littig, B., & Menz, W. (2009). Interviewing experts. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Brown, D. (2010). Eight principles of information architecture. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 36(6), 30-34. Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84. Burford, S. (2011). Complexity and the practice of Web information architecture. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(10), 2024-2037. Carmichael, C. (2019). How to design a website in 2019? 8 simple steps. Retrieved from https://www.websitebuilderexpert.com/designing-websites/ Covert, A. (2014). How to make sense of any mess: Information architecture for everybody. Scotts Valley, CA: CreateSpace. Dillon, A. (2002). Information architecture in JASIST: Just where did we come from? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(10), 821-823. Ding, W., Lin, X., & Zarro, M. (2017). Information architecture: The design and integration of information spaces (2nd ed.). San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool. Dong, A., & Agogino, A. M. (2001). Design principles for the information architecture of a SMET education digital library. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 314-321). New York, NY: ACM. Garrett, J. J. (2010). The elements of user experience: User-centered design for the Web and beyond (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: New Riders. Geissler, G. L. (2001). Building customer relationships online: The Web site designers’ perspective. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(6), 488-502. Guglieri, C. (2018). 27 Steps to the perfect website layout. Retrieved from https://www.creativebloq.com/web-design/steps-perfect-website-layout-812625 Gullikson, S., Blades, R., Bragdon, M., McKibbon, S., Sparling, M., & Toms, E. G. (1999). The impact of information architecture on academic Web site usability. The Electronic Library, 17(5), 293-304. Hinton, A. (2014). Understanding context: Environment, language, and information architecture. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly. Horton, S. (2006). Access by design: A guide to universal usability for Web designers. Berkeley, CA: New Riders. Interaction Design Foundation. (2019a). Design thinking: Get a quick overview of the history. Retrieved from https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/design-thinking-get-a-quick-overview-of-the-history Interaction Design Foundation. (2019b). 5 Stages in the design thinking process. Retrieved from https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/5-stages-in-the-design-thinking-process International Organization for Standardization. (2019). Usability. Retrieved from https://iso25000.com/index.php/en/iso-25000-standards/iso-25010/61-usability Krug, S. (2006). Don’t make me think: A common sense approach to web usability (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: New Riders. Morville, P. (2004). A brief history of information architecture. In A. Gilchrist & B. Mahon (Eds.), Information Architecture: Designing Information Environments for Purpose. New York, NY: Neal-Schuman. Morville, P. (2005). Ambient findability. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media. Parandjuk, J. C. (2010). Using information architecture to evaluate digital libraries. The Reference Librarian, 51(2), 123-134. Resmini, A., & Rosati, L. (2009). Information architecture for ubiquitous ecologies. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems (pp. 196-199). New York, NY: ACM. Resmini, A., & Rosati, L. (2012). A brief history of information architecture. Journal of Information Architecture, 3(2). Rosenfeld, L., Morville, P., & Arango, J. (2015). Information architecture: For the Web and beyond (4th ed.). Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media. Singh, N., & Pereira, A. (2005). The culturally customized web site: Customizing web sites for the global marketplace. Burlington, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann. Spencer, D. (2011). A practical guide to information architecture. London, England: Five Simple Steps. Spool, J., Scanlon, T., Snyder, C., & DeAngelo, T. (1998). Web site usability: A designer’s guide. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufman. Tan, F. B., & Tung, L. L. (2003). Exploring website evaluation criteria using the repertory grid technique: A Web designers’ perspective. Proceedings of Second Annual Workshop on HCI Research in MIS, USA, 2003, 65-69. Techopedia. (2019). Web designer. Retrieved from https://www.techopedia.com/definition/23888/web-designer The Information Architecture Institute. (2019). What is information architecture? Retrieved from https://www.iainstitute.org/what-is-ia Toms, E. G. (2002). Information interaction: Providing a framework for information architecture. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(10), 855-862. Toub, S. (2000). Evaluating information architecture: A practical guide to assessing web site organization. Ann Arbor, MI: Argus Center for Information Architecture. Van Dijck, P. (2003). Information architecture for designers: Structuring websites for business success. Mies, Switzerland: Rotovision. Wodtke, C., & Govella, A. (2009). Information architecture: Blueprints for the Web (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: New Riders. Wroblewski, L. (2002). Site-seeing: A visual approach to Web usability. New York, NY: Hungry Minds. Wurman, R. S. (1997). Information architects. New York, NY: Graphis. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/64994 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 在資訊服務蓬勃發展的時代,資訊架構學做為資訊產品內容與結構的設計指南,過去學者們亦多提倡資訊架構學對有效的資訊互動能發揮重要的功用。然而現今卻鮮少研究以設計者觀點探究資訊架構學應用在資訊產品設計過程之情形。為填補過往文獻之空隙,本研究旨在探討資訊產品設計者在設計過程中對資訊架構學的實踐與認知情況,瞭解設計者是如何使用資訊架構學中的概念與方法應用於設計階段中,以及設計者學習與傳承架構資訊的方法。
本研究使用半結構式深度訪談法,訪談18位來自臺灣北區某一大學負責校務資訊產品設計的職員,搭配資訊架構四大體系、使用者經驗要素模型、設計思維流程三個現存的模型作為研究對應的框架予以分析,以瞭解資訊產品設計者的設計流程,以及設計者對資訊架構的認知與重視程度。 本研究發現資訊產品設計者的設計流程,大致可歸納為「目標確立」、「資料分析」、「介面實作」、「開發建置」四個階段,在歷經流程中的各個階段時,受訪者則會依據資訊產品特質、合作關係、單位時程安排或習慣而有相應的處理細節。 在受訪者對於資訊架構的認知方面,絕大多數受訪者未曾聽過資訊架構之概念,但是在設計資訊產品的過程中依然會展現與實踐資訊架構學概念。本研究也發現,受訪者對於資訊架構四個體系亦有不同程度的重視,體現在其設計時考量的優先順序。在學習設計與架構資訊方法方面,受訪者的學習資訊來源包括網路或實體資源、人際網絡、學科養成、工作經歷,乃至於平時使用其他資訊產品所累積的生活經驗都是形塑受訪者對資訊產品設計概念。綜整以上研究發現,本研究亦提出資訊產品設計者之設計階段與資訊架構對應之概念框架,供實務工作者在執行設計流程中參考。 本研究透過實徵研究,理解設計者的設計流程與其對資訊架構學的實踐與認知情況,提出整合相關學說之框架詮釋設計者如何設計、建構網站等資訊產品之內容與元素,橋接現今資訊架構學在實務與學術之間的缺口,對資訊服務專業社群是為助益。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | As the booming development of information services continues, Information Architecture (hereafter: IA) is commonly used as a design guide for planning and implementing an information product’s structure and content. Previous studies pointed out that IA plays an important role in enhancing the effectiveness of information interaction in information products such as websites. However, there is still a lack of research investigating how IA can be applied in the design process of information products from designers’ perspectives. In order to fulfill the gap, this study aims to explore information product designers’ perception and practices of IA in their design processes, so as to understand how designers apply the concept of IA during design, and how they learn and pass on the approaches of how information objects can be constructed.
A semi-structured in-depth interview method was applied in this study. A total of 18 employees who are responsible for the design of school information products from a university of northern Taiwan were interviewed. Three existing models i.e., “IA four systems,” “the elements of user experience model,” and “design thinking process” were also adopted as the corresponding research frameworks to help analyze the interviews in order to understand the design process of designers, and their perception and awareness toward IA. Based on the interview results, the design process of information product designers could be summarized into four stages: “target establishment,” “data analysis,” “interface composition,” and “development and construction.” Throughout these stages, interviewees made different decisions according to the characteristics of the product, the relations of cooperation, the schedule or practice of the department, etc. In terms of the perception of IA, although the majority of the interviewees had never heard of the concept of IA, they would still practice the concept of IA while designing the information product during their design process. The study also found that interviewees paid different attention to the four systems of IA, which reflected in the priorities of their design considerations. As for the learning of design and structuring information, the learning sources of the interviewees include online or physical resources, personal networks, discipline background, working experience, and the experience accumulated from using other information products in their daily lives, which all shaped the interviewees’ concept of information product design. Based on the findings, this study also proposed a conceptual framework presenting information product designer’s design stage with IA, which could become a reference to design practitioners. This empirical uncovered the designers’ design process as well as their practice and perception of IA during their design works. By developing an integrated framework covering related theories, this study helps interpret how designers design and construct the content and elements of information products, which bridges the gap of IA between academic and practical communities. The results of this study would bring insights to information service professions and communities. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T23:13:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-109-R06126001-1.pdf: 7948550 bytes, checksum: 93cff52ceba6308a8be9c089ead7cbd4 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 圖目次 ix
表目次 xi 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 4 第二章 文獻回顧 7 第一節 資訊架構概述 7 第二節 資訊架構與設計之相關研究框架 11 第三節 資訊架構與網站設計 18 第四節 網站設計者觀點 21 第三章 研究設計與實施 23 第一節 研究架構與研究方法 23 第二節 研究對象 26 第三節 資料蒐集 27 第四節 研究流程 30 第五節 前測實施 32 第六節 資料處理與分析 32 第七節 研究框架詮釋與分析 37 第四章 研究結果與討論 41 第一節 受訪者背景與資訊產品描述 41 第二節 設計者設計資訊產品的設計過程 44 第三節 設計者在設計過程展現資訊架構之情形 58 第四節 研究框架對應 78 第五節 受訪者手稿紀錄回報與其他發現 84 第五章 綜合討論 91 第六章 結論與建議 97 第一節 結論 97 第二節 建議 98 參考文獻 103 附錄一:先導問卷 107 附錄二:訪談提綱 109 附錄三:故事板 115 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 資訊架構 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 資訊產品 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 設計者 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 設計階段 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 設計者觀點 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | designer | en |
| dc.subject | information product | en |
| dc.subject | design process | en |
| dc.subject | designer’s perspective | en |
| dc.subject | Information Architecture | en |
| dc.title | 資訊產品設計者在設計階段對資訊架構之認知 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Information Product Designers’ Perception of Information Architecture in the Design Process | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 108-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 唐牧群(Muh-Chyun Tang),林維真(Weijane Lin) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 資訊架構,資訊產品,設計者,設計階段,設計者觀點, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Information Architecture,information product,designer,design process,designer’s perspective, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 116 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202000189 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2020-02-24 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 圖書資訊學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 圖書資訊學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-109-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 7.76 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
