Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 資訊管理學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/64980
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor陳靜枝(Ching-Chin Chern)
dc.contributor.authorTzi-Yuan Chouen
dc.contributor.author周子淵zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-16T23:11:39Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-03
dc.date.copyright2012-08-03
dc.date.issued2012
dc.date.submitted2012-08-03
dc.identifier.citationReferences
1. Avkiran, N.K., Opening the black box of efficiency analysis: an illustration with UAE banks. Omega, 2009. 37: p. 930-941.
2. Banker, R.D., A. Charnes, and W.W. Cooper, Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 1984. 30(9): p. 1078-1092.
3. Banker, R.D., W.W. Cooper, L.M. Seiford, R.M. Thrall, and J. Zhu, Return to scale in different DEA models. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004. 154: p. 345-362.
4. Beamon, B.M., Supply chain design and analysis: models and methods. International Journal of Production Economics, 1998. 55: p. 281-294.
5. Beamon, B.M., Measuring supply chain performance. International Journal of Operation and Production Management, 1999. 19(3): p. 275-292.
6. Bhagwat, R. and M.K. Sharma, Performance measurement of supply chain management: a balanced scorecard approach. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 2007. 53: p. 43-62.
7. Castelli, L., R. Pesenti, and W. Ukovich, A classification of DEA models when the internal structure of the decision making units is considered. Annals of Operation Research, 2010. 173: p. 207-235.
8. Chan, F.T.S., Performance measurement in a supply chain. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2003. 21: p. 534-548.
9. Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978. 2: p. 429-444.
10. Chen, C. and H. Yan, Network DEA model for supply chain performance evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011. 213: p. 147-155.
11. Chen, Y. and J. Zhu, Measuring information technology's indirect impact on firm performance. Information Technology and Management, 2004. 5: p. 9-22.
12. Chen, Y., J. Du, H.D. Sherman, and J. Zhu, DEA model with shared resources and efficiency decomposition. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010. 207: p. 339-349.
13. Cook, W.D., M. Hababou, and H.J.H. Tuenter, Multicomponent efficiency measurement and shared inputs in data envelopment analysis: and application to sales and service performance in bank branches. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2000. 2000(14): p. 209-224.
14. Cook, W.D., L. Liang, and J. Zhu, Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: a review and furture perspective. Omega, 2010. 38: p. 423-430.
15. Cooper, W.W., L.M. Seiford, and J. Zhu, Data envelopment analysis: history, models, and interpretations. International Series in Operational Research and Management Science, 2001. 164: p. 1-39.
16. Fare, R. and S. Grosskopf, Optimization Models Applied to Productivity and the Environment, 2001.
17. Gunasekaran, A., C. Patel, and E. Tirtiroglu, Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain environment. International Journal of Operation and Production Management, 2001. 21(1/2): p. 71-87.
18. Gunasekaran, A., C. Patel, and R.E. McGaughey, A framework for supply chain performance measurement. International Journal of Production Economics, 2004. 87: p. 333-347.
19. Hsiao, B., Working Research, 2012.
20. Hsieh, L.-F. and L.-H. Lin, A performance evaluation model for international tourist hotels in Taiwan-an application of the relational network DEA. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2010. 29: p. 14-24.
21. Kao, C., Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis: a relational model. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009. 192: p. 949-962.
22. Kao, C. and S.-N. Hwang, Efficiency measurement for network systems: IT impact on firm performance. Decision Support System, 2010. 48: p. 437-446.
23. Lewis, H.F. and T.R. Sexton, Network DEA: efficiency analysis of organizations with complex internal structure. Computers and Operations Research, 2004. 31: p. 1365-1410.
24. Lewis, H.F., K.A. Lock, and T.R. Sexton, Organizational capability, efficiency, and effectiveness in Major League Baseball: 1901-2002. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009. 197: p. 731-740.
25. Liang, L., F. Yang, W.D. Cook, and J. Zhu, DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation. Annals of Operation Research, 2006. 145(1): p. 35-49.
26. Lin, Z.-H., A Heuristic Master Planning Algorithm for Supply Chain Network with Component Commonality, 2004.
27. Neely, A., M. Gregory, and K. Platts, Performance measurement systems design: a literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operation and Production Management, 1995. 15(4): p. 80-116.
28. Shepherd, C. and H. Gunter, Measuring supply chain performance: current research and future directions. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 2006. 55(3/4): p. 242-258.
29. Simchi-Levi, D., P. Kaminsky, and E. Simchi-Levi, Designing and managing the supply chain - concepts, strategies and case studies2003, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Publishing.
30. Vaz, C.B., A.S. Camanho, and R.C. Guimaraes, The assessment of retailing efficiency using network data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operation Research, 2010. 173: p. 5-24.
31. Wong, W.P. and K.Y. Wong, Supply chain performance measurement system using DEA modeling. Industrial Management and Data System, 2007. 107(3): p. 361-381.
32. Yang, F., D.D. Wu, L. Liang, and L. O'Neill, Competition strategy and efficiency evaluation for decision making units with fixed-sum outputs. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011. 212: p. 560-569.
33. Yu, M.-M., Assessing the technical efficiency, service effectiveness, and technical effectiveness of the world's railways through NDEA analysis. Transportation Research Part A, 2008. 42: p. 1283-1294.
34. Yu, M.-M. and E.T.J. Lin, Efficiency and effectiveness in railway performance using a multi-activity network DEA model. Omega, 2008. 36: p. 1005-1017.
35. Yu, M.-M. and B.C.Y. Lee, Efficiency and effectiveness of service business: evidence from international tourist hotels in Taiwan. Tourism Management, 2009. 30: p. 571-580.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/64980-
dc.description.abstract由於近年來受到全球化以及快速變遷的市場環境的影響,企業的生存除了仰賴有效的運用資源之外,更必須成功的與供應鏈上下游夥伴配合以達到整體的最大利益。為了正確的衡量一個的運作績效,績效評估系統必須要能夠接受來自不同領域的影響因子來提供決策者更完整的資訊。然而,傳統的績效評估方法往往局限於少數固定的影響因子,或是只針對供應鏈上的單一組織做績效評估,因此無法針對不同的影響因子提供完整的分析結果,或是忽略供應鏈上角色之間的互動關係。
資料包絡分析法在最近已成為一個普遍的績效評估方法,並且在過去的研究中已經被成功的套用在不同領域的生產系統上計算其效率。而網路資料分析法改進了傳統的資料分析法,藉由增加的限制式來維持系統內部結構與內部流程之間的互動及影響。使用資料分析法最大的好處之一,在於可以同時接受許多量化的因子,讓使用兩者之間沒有明確關聯的因子計算效率的方法得以實現。
本研究提出一個修改的網路資料包絡分析法模型。此修改模型將可以(1)以供應鏈整體的觀點來評估效率;(2)同時處理供應鏈網路中買方賣方的結構以及不同時間點或不同期數的影響;(3)能夠處理惡性產出-惡性產出會降低生產效率,且無法直接以傳統的資料包絡分析法模型處理。修改過的模型將可以接受更多種不同的影響因子作為輸入及輸出,以提供決策者在不同狀況時的需求。本研究最後將以情境分析及實例測試來驗證此修改模型可以有效地分辨出效率差異。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractRecently, due to globalization and the highly competitive and fast-changing environment, the survivability of an organization relies on not only the ability to use its resources effectively and efficiently, but the ability to cooperate with the its supply chain partners to optimize the overall profits. In order to assess the performance of an organization, the performance measurement system must be generic enough to provide an integrated view on important factors from different aspects. However, traditional means of performance measurement are either based on a small set of predefined factors, which prevent a complete view of the overall system, or limited to a single organization, which ignore the interaction between supply chain players.
Data envelopment analysis (DEA) has become a popular method to evaluate the performance in terms of efficiency, and has been applied to production systems in various fields. Network DEA improves the traditional DEA models by adding constraints to maintain the internal structure and operations of the subject being evaluated. One of the main benefits of using DEA is the model accepts multiple positive quantitative data as inputs and outputs of the system, making evaluating performance using factors with unknown relationship possible.
In this study, a modified network DEA model is proposed, which has the ability to (1) evaluate the efficiency of a supply chain as a whole; (2) consider the buyer-seller structure as well as multiple time periods when evaluating efficiency; (3) handle “undesirable outputs,” which cannot be used in traditional DEA models directly. The modified network DEA model may accept any quantitative factors as inputs and outputs depending on the decision makers’ needs. To prove the effectiveness of the model, a scenarios test and a real-world data test are conducted.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T23:11:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-101-R99725034-1.pdf: 1558996 bytes, checksum: e273883956ab9814b79b359edb88f831 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2012
en
dc.description.tableofcontentsContents
Contents iv
List of Figures vi
List of Tables vii
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Motivation 1
1.2 Objectives 4
1.3 Scope 5
Chapter 2 Literature Review 6
2.1 Performance Evaluation on a Supply Chain 6
2.2 DEA and Network DEA 7
2.3 Evaluation on Supply Chain Performance using DEA 9
2.4 Conclusion 10
Chapter 3 Problem Description 11
3.1 Problem description 11
3.1.1 Supply Chain Structure and Product Structure 11
3.1.2 Input and Output Parameters 13
3.1.3 Input- or Output- Oriented Based on Product 13
3.1.4 Time Period and Inventory 14
3.1.5 The Traditional DEA Model 15
3.2 Assumptions 21
3.3 Relational Network DEA Model 21
3.3.1 Parameter and Variables 22
3.3.2.1 Input-oriented Model – Ratio Form 23
3.3.2.2 Input-oriented Model – Envelopment Form 24
3.3.2.3 Output-oriented Model – Ratio Form 26
3.3.2.4 Output-oriented Model – Envelopment Form 27
3.3.3 Complexity Analysis 29
3.4 Summary 30
Chapter 4 31
The Modified Relational Network DEA Model 31
4.1 Modeling the Input and Output of a Supply Chain 31
4.2 Modeling the Inventory in a Supply Chain 33
4.3 Modeling the Delayed Demands or Shortages for a Supply Chain 37
4.4 Modified the DEA Model to Evaluate the Performance of Supply Chains 39
4.5 The Complexity Analysis 43
Chapter 5 45
Model Analysis 45
5.1 Data Source 45
5.2 The Effects on weighting inventory and delay 48
5.2.1 Multiplying IMax and DMax 48
5.2.2 Adjusting the value of inventory and delayed demand 49
5.3 Testing on a Real-world Case 50
Chapter 6 54
Conclusion and Future Works 54
6.1 Conclusion 54
6.2 Contributions 55
6.3 Future Works 56
Appendix 57
Table A1: Input and Output Data for Test Case 57
Table A2: Input and Output Data for Real Case Testing 87
References 92
dc.language.isoen
dc.title以資料包絡分析法評估供應鏈網路之效率zh_TW
dc.titleAssessing the Efficiency of a Supply Chain Network using the DEAen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear100-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee許鉅秉(Jiuh-Biing Sheu),蕭正平(Michael J. Shaw),魏志平(Chih-Ping Wei)
dc.subject.keyword供應鏈管理,績效評估,資料包絡分析法,網路資料包絡分析法,效率,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordSupply Chain Management,Performance Measurement,Data Envelopment Analysis,Network DEA,Efficiency,en
dc.relation.page96
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2012-08-03
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept資訊管理學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:資訊管理學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-101-1.pdf
  目前未授權公開取用
1.52 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved