Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 社會科學院
  3. 政治學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/64833
標題: 2008年俄羅斯對南奧塞梯衝突之決策:一個理性決策模式分析
Russia's Policy Decision in the 2008 South Ossetia Conflict: A Rational Actor Model Analysis
作者: CHIEH-HAO HSIEH
謝介豪
指導教授: 包宗和
關鍵字: 南奧塞梯,理性決策模式,宗屬關係,效用之最大化,民族自決,認知成本,
South Ossetia,Rational Actor Model,suzerain-vassal relationship,utility maximization,self-determination,perceived costs,
出版年 : 2012
學位: 碩士
摘要: 南奧塞梯與喬治亞的族群紛爭,是高加索動盪不安的來源之一。喬治亞境內的南奧塞
梯,與俄羅斯境內的北奧塞梯屬於同一民族,兩者在歷史的轉折與地理的阻隔之下,
形成了當今的分治局面。相對於俄羅斯庇護之下的北奧塞梯,南奧塞梯的民族歷程,
並不如預期般順遂平和,而是在與喬治亞的長期對抗之下逐步完成。
南奧塞梯與喬治亞的衝突,在納入俄羅斯與喬治亞的因素之後顯得更為複雜。早在蘇
聯時期俄喬之間的利益基礎即有所動搖,而在冷戰結束之後迅速瓦解。喬治亞在經歷
了幾次政權更替之後,意識形態的立即轉變導致了俄喬關係的持續惡化。2008年喬治
亞偵察機事件的爭議,提供了喬治亞一次挑戰俄羅斯的契機,也成為日後俄喬之間爆
發戰爭的導火線。喬治亞因不滿南奧塞梯與北奧塞梯的密切聯繫,而採取了先發制人
的軍事鎮壓,此時俄羅斯亦發動了反制喬軍的武裝行動。俄喬戰事在兩軍實力懸殊之
下,以俄羅斯擊潰喬治亞暫時結束,並在法國的調停之下,雙方簽訂了六項停火協議
。俄羅斯隨後更承認南奧塞梯的國際地位,而聯合國安全理事會、歐洲安全暨合作組
織等,亦陸續召開緊急會議予以回應。
俄羅斯與喬治亞的武裝衝突成為俄羅斯處理民族自決議題,以及分離主義問題的重要
參考。本研究試圖以理性決策模式的架構,透過目標確立、選項排列、後果評估、抉擇
完成的途徑,逐步檢視俄羅斯的決策行為是否理性。由於南奧塞梯的情勢發展,與國
際社會其他利害關係者息息相關,如何將決策各方納入研究分析,於是成為本論文的主
要挑戰。
武裝途徑對於俄羅斯而言,是否為回應喬南衝突的最適選項,而非其他方案所能取代
。同時俄喬戰爭的後續結果,是否又符合效用效大的決策效果,成為本研究分析所欲
探討的核心議題。
The ethnic conflict between South Ossetia and Georgia, is considered to be
one of the sources of unrest in Caucasus. Despite sharing a common ethnicity
and religion, South Ossetia and North Ossetia have become separate entities
in Georgia and Russia, under different historical and geographical contexts.
Unlike in North Ossetia, how political development flourished gradually under
the protection of Russia, South Ossetia’s national course has progressed
unsteadily in its long-term struggle with Georgia.
The complexity of the Georgia-South Ossetia conflict heightens, as Russia and
Georgia continue to cast variables into the dispute. As early as the Soviet
period, the foundation of Russia and Georgia’s interests have shattered to an
extent, that it finally collapsed not long after the end of the Cold War.
Georgia, after several transitions of regimes, has rapidly shifted its ideology
which eventually led to the deterioration of its fragile relationship with Russia.
The 2008 Georgian reconnaissance craft incident, offered Georgia an
opportunity to stand before Russia, which also brought the two adversaries
into war. Georgia’s discontent with South Ossetia’s intercourse with North
Ossetia, has led to an execution of preemptive military suppression, where
simultaneously Russia also launched a military counteraction in response. As
a result of asymmetrical military capacity, the 2008 Russia-Georgia war ended
instantly, as a cease-fire agreement was carried out by France and signed by
the two contestants. Russia then established official diplomatic relations with
South Ossetia, where a series of discussion on how to cope with the aftermath
of the incident, also took place within the United Nations Security Council, the
Organization for Security and Co- operation in Europe and many other
multilateral platforms.
The military confrontation between Russia and Georgia, has become a crucial
reference for Russia’s management of issues such as self-determination and
separatism. This research attempts to examine the rationality of Russia’s
policy decision, under the theoretical structure of the Rational Actor Model, by
deconstructing Russia’s objectives, options, consequences and choice towards
the South Ossetia incident. Taking into account other international
stakeholders that may have been involved in the South Ossetia dispute, the
challenge to contain all potential actors into one analytic body, therefore
becomes a major task of this research.
Whether or not Russia considers a military resolution, rather than diplomatic
negotiation or non-intervention, the best possible solution to the conflict in
South Ossetia, remains a crucial debate in this research. In addition, whether
or not the result of the Russia-Georgia conflict is compatible to a maximized
utility of national interests, also remains as the most essential course of this
research.
URI: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/64833
全文授權: 有償授權
顯示於系所單位:政治學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-101-1.pdf
  目前未授權公開取用
7.36 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件完整紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved