請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/64653完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 黃慕萱 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hsiao-Wen Yang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 楊曉雯 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T22:56:57Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-08-19 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2012-08-19 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2012-08-09 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Albert, M. B., Avery, D., Narin, F., & McAllister, P. (1991). Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents. Research Policy, 20(3), 251-259.
Allen, T. (1977). Managing the flow of technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the research and development organization. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Anderson, J., Williams, K., Seemungal, D., Narin, F., & Olivastro, D. (1996). Human genetic technology: Exploring the links between science and innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 8(2), 135-156. Azoulay, P., Ding, W., & Stuart, T. (2009). The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality and direction of (public) research output. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 57(4), 637-676. Balconi, M., Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2004). Networks of inventors and the role of academia: An exploration of Italian patent data. Research Policy, 33(1), 127-145. Banerjee, P., Gupta, B., & Garg, K. (2000). Patent statistics as indicators of competition an analysis of patenting in biotechnology. Scientometrics, 47(1), 95-116. Barnes, B. (1982). The science-technology relationship: A model and a query. Social studies of science, 12(1), 166-172. Bassecoulard, E., & Zitt, M. (2004). Patents and Publications. In H. Moed, W. Glänzel & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 665-694). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Bhattacharya, S., Kretschmer, H., & Meyer, M. (2003). Characterizing intellectual spaces between science and technology. Scientometrics, 58(2), 369-390. Bhattacharya, S., & Meyer, M. (2003). Large firms and the science-technology interface patents, patent citations, and scientific output of multinational corporations in thin films. Scientometrics, 58(2), 265-279. Bonaccorsi, A., & Thoma, G. (2007). Institutional complementarity and inventive performance in nano science and technology. Research Policy, 36(6), 813-831. Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2008). Measuring science-technology interaction using rare inventor-author names. Journal of Informetrics, 2(3), 173-182. Branstetter, L., & Ogura, Y. (2005). Is academic science driving a surge in industrial innovation? evidence from patent citations. National bureau of economic research working paper (Vol. 11561). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Breschi, S., & Catalini, C. (2010). Tracing the links between science and technology: An exploratory analysis of scientists’ and inventors’ networks. Research Policy, 39(1), 14-26. Brooks, H. (1994). The relationship between science and technology. Research Policy, 23(5), 477-486. Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A., & Pavitt, K. (2001). Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make? Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 597-621. Butcher, J., & Jeffrey, P. (2005). The use of bibliometric indicators to explore industry-academia collaboration trends over time in the field of membrane use for water treatment. Technovation, 25(11), 1273-1280. Calvert, J., & Patel, P. (2003). University-industry research collaborations in the UK: Bibliometric trends. Science and Public Policy, 30(2), 85-96. Carpenter, M. P., Cooper, M., & Narin, F. (1980). Linkage between basic research literature and patents. Research Management, 23(2), 30-35. Cassiman, B., Veugelers, R., & Zuniga, P. (2008). In search of performance effects of (in) direct industry science links. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(4), 611-646. Chakrabarti, A. K. (1991). Competition in high technology: Analysis of patents of US, Japan, UK, France, West Germany, and Canada. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 38(1), 78-84. Collins, P., & Wyatt, S. (1988). Citations in patents to the basic research literature. Research Policy, 17(2), 65-74. Coward, H., & Franklin, J. (1989). Identifying the science-technology interface: Matching patent data to a bibliometric model. Science, Technology & Human Values, 14(1), 50-77. Czarnitzki, D., Glänzel, W., & Hussinger, K. (2007). Patent and publication activities of German professors: An empirical assessment of their co-activity. Research Evaluation, 16(4), 311-319. D'Este, P., & Fontana, R. (2007). What drives the emergence of entrepreneurial academics? A study on collaborative research partnerships in the UK. Research Evaluation, 16(4), 257-270. de Solla Price, D. (1965). Is technology historically independent of science? A study in statistical historiography. Technology and Culture, 6(4), 553-568. Ellis, P., Hepburn, G., & Oppenheim, C. (1978). Studies on patent citation networks. Journal of Documentation, 34(1), 12-20. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The triple helix of University-industry-government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. Easst Review, 14(1), 14-19. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and 'Mode 2' to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123. Fuel Cell Today. (2011). The fuel cell today industry review 2011. Retrieved Oct. 14, 2011, from http://www.fuelcelltoday.com/analysis/industry-review/2011/the-industry-review-2011 Gardner, P. (1999). The representation of science-technology relationships in Canadian physics textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 21(3), 329-347. Garfield, E. (1964). Science citation index a new dimension in indexing. Science, 144(3619), 649-654. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., & Scott, P. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage. Gittelman, M., & Kogut, B. (2003). Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citation patterns. Management Science, 49(4), 366-382. Glänzel, W. (2002). Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980-1998): A bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies. Library Trends, 50(3), 461-473. Glänzel, W., & Meyer, M. (2003). Patents cited in the scientific literature: An exploratory study of 'reverse' citation relations. Scientometrics, 58(2), 415-428. Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2004). Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. In H. Moed, W. Glänzel & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 257-276). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Tratjenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools (Working Paper 8498). Cambridge, MA.: National Bureau of Economic Research. Harhoff, D., Scherer, F., & Vopel, K. (2003). Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research Policy, 32(8), 1343-1363. Hicks, D. (2000). 360 Degree linkage analysis. Research Evaluation, 9(2), 133-143. Hicks, D., Breitzman, T., Olivastro, D., & Hamilton, K. (2001). The changing composition of innovative activity in the US: A portrait based on patent analysis. Research Policy, 30, 681-703. Hicks, D., & Hamilton, K. (1999). Does university industry collaboration adversely affect university research? Issues in Science and Technology, 15(4), 74-75. Huang, K., & Murray, F. (2009). Does patent strategy shape the long-run supply of public knowledge? Evidence from human genetics. The Academy of Management Journal, 52(6), 1193-1221. Huang, K. G., & Murray, F. E. (2010). Entrepreneurial experiments in science policy: Analyzing the Human Genome Project. Research Policy, 39(5), 567-582. Iversen, E. J. (2000). An excursion into the patent-bibliometrics of Norwegian patenting. Scientometrics, 49(1), 63-80. Jaffe, A. B. (1989). Real effects of academic research. The American Economic Review, 79(5), 957-970. Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2002). Patents, citations, and innovations: A window on the knowledge economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577-598. Kalhammer, F. R., Kopf, B. M., Swan, D. H., Roan, V. P., & Walsh, M. P. (2007). Status and prospects for zero emissions vehicle technology report of the ARB independent expert panel 2007. Sacramento, California: State of California Air Resources Board. Karki, M. M. S. (1997). Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool. World Patent Information, 19(4), 269-272. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18. Klitkou, A., Nygaard, S., & Meyer, M. (2007). Tracking techno-science networks: A case study of fuel cells and related hydrogen technology R&D in Norway. Scientometrics, 70(2), 491-518. Kneller, R. (2007a). The beginning of university entrepreneurship in Japan: TLOs and bioventures lead the way. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(4), 435-456. Kneller, R. (2007b). Japan's new technology transfer system and the pre-emption of university discoveries by sponsored research and co-inventorship. Industry and Higher Education, 21(3), 211-220. Kyvik, S. (2003). Changing trends in publishing behaviour among university faculty, 1980-2000. Scientometrics, 58(1), 35-48. Leydesdorff, L. (2004). The university-industry knowledge relationship: Analyzing patents and the science base of technologies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(11), 991-1001. Leydesdorff, L., & Meyer, M. (2003). The triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Scientometrics, 58(2), 191-203. Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. (2008). Inventorship and authorship in patent-publication pairs: An enquiry into the economics of scientific credit (Working Papers 224). Milano, Italy: Centre for Knowledge, Internationalization and Technology Studies, Universita' Bocconi. Lubango, L. M., & Pouris, A. (2010). Is patenting of technical inventions in university sectors impeding the flow of scientific knowledge to the public? A case study of South Africa. Technology in Society, 32(3), 241-248. Lundvall, B. (1992). National system of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Anthem Press. Martín-Sempere, M. J., Rey-Rocha, J., & Garzón-García, B. (2002). The effect of team consolidation on research collaboration and performance of scientists: Case study of Spanish university researchers in geology. Scientometrics, 55(3), 377-394. Martyn, J. (1993). Bibliographic coupling. Journal of Documentation, 20(4), 236. McMillan, G., Narin, F., & Deeds, D. (2000). An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: The case of biotechnology. Research Policy, 29(1), 1-8. Melin, G., & Persson, O. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36(3), 363-377. Metcalfe, J. (1995). Technology systems and technology policy in an evolutionary framework. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 25-46. Meyer-Krahmer, F., & Schmoch, U. (1998). Science-based technologies: University-industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27(8), 835-851. Meyer, M. (2000). Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature. Research Policy, 29(3), 409-434. Meyer, M. (2002). Tracing knowledge flows in innovation systems. Scientometrics, 54(2), 193-212. Meyer, M. (2006). Are co-active researchers on top of their class? An exploratory comparison of inventor-authors with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology (Working Paper 144). University of Sussex, Science and Technology Policy Research. Meyer, M. (2006). Are patenting scientists the better scholars? An exploratory comparison of inventor-authors with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology. Research Policy, 35(10), 1646-1662. Meyer, M., Siniläinen, T., & Utecht, J. (2003). Towards hybrid triple helix indicators: A study of university-related patents and a survey of academic inventors. Scientometrics, 58(2), 321-350. Murray, F. (2002). Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: Exploring tissue engineering. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1389-1403. Murray, F., & Stern, S. (2004). Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? Evidence from patent-paper pairs. Northwestern University and MIT Sloan School: unpublished paper. Murray, F., & Stern, S. (2007). Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? An empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63(4), 648-687. Murray, F., & Stern, S. (2008). Learning to live with patents: A dynamic model of a knowledge community's response to legal institutional change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Nagaoka, S. (2007). Assessing the r&d management of a firm in terms of speed and science linkage: Evidence from the US patents. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16(1), 129-156. Narin, F. (1994). Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 30(1), 147-155. Narin, F., CSIRO., & Council, A. R. (2000). Inventing our future: The link between Australian patenting and basic science. Canberra: AusInfo. Narin, F., Hamilton, K., & Olivastro, D. (1997). The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Research Policy, 26(3), 317-330. Narin, F., & Noma, E. (1985). Is technology becoming science? Scientometrics, 7(3), 369-381. Narin, F., & Olivastro, D. (1988). Technology indicators based on patents and patent citations. In A. F. J. V. Raan (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology (pp. 465-507). North Holland: Elsevier Publishers. Narin, F., & Olivastro, D. (1998). Linkage between patents and papers: An interim EPO/US comparison. Scientometrics, 41(1), 51-59. Nelson, R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science : Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Noyons, E., Buter, R., van Raan, A., Schmoch, U., Heinze, T., Hinze, S., & Rangnow, R. (2003a). Mapping excellence in science and technology across Europe: Life sciences. Leiden: Centre for Science and Technology Studies. Noyons, E., Buter, R., van Raan, A., Schmoch, U., Heinze, T., Hinze, S., & Rangnow, R. (2003b). Mapping excellence in science and technology across Europe: Nanoscience and nanotechnology. Leiden: Centre for Science and Technology Studies. Noyons, E. C. M., van Raan, A. F. J., Grupp, H., & Schmoch, U. (1994). Exploring the science and technology interface: Inventor-author relations in laser medicine research. Research Policy, 23(4), 443-457. OECD. (1996). The knowledge-based economy. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD. (1997). National innovation systems. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD, Hertog, P., & Remoe, S. (2001). Innovative clusters: Drivers of national innovation systems. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation Development. Owen-Smith, J. (2003). From separate systems to a hybrid order: Accumulative advantage across public and private science at rresearch one universities. Research Policy, 32(6), 1081-1104. Peri, G. (2004). Knowledge flows and productivity. Rivista di Politica Economica, 94(2), 21-59. Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2009). The two faces of collaboration: Impacts of university-industry relations on public research. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(6), 1033-1065. Persson, O., Glänzel, W., & Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 60(3), 421-432. Price, D. J. d. S. (1965). Is technology historically independent of science? A study in statistical historiography. Technology and Culture, 6(4), 553-568. Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348-349. Rabeharisoa, V. (1992). A special mediation between science and technology: When inventors publish scientific articles in fuel cells research. In H. Grupp (Ed.), Dynamics of science-based innovation (pp. 45-72). New York: Springer Verlag. Rip, A. (1992). Science and technology as dancing partners. In P. Kroes & M. Bakker (Eds.), Technological development and science in the industrial age (pp. 231-270). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Sampat, B., Mowery, D., & Ziedonis, A. (2003). Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole Act: A re-examination. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9), 1371-1390. Schmoch, U. (1993). Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicators. Scientometrics, 26(1), 193-211. Schmoch, U. (1997). Indicators and the relations between science and technology. Scientometrics, 38(1), 103-116. Schmoch, U. (2004). The Technological Output of Scientific Institutions. In H. Moed, W. Glänzel & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 717-731). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Schmookler, J. (1996). Invention and economic growth. London: Harvard University Press. Shapley, D., & Roy, R. (1985). Lost at the frontier: US science and technology policy Adrift. Philadelphia: ISI Press. Smith, K., Ekland, A., Iversen, E., Kaloudis, A., Patel, P., & Narula, R. (1998). Understanding science, technology and innovation indicators: A guide for policymakers. IDEA-Report. Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. Sun, Y., Negishi, M., & Nishizawa, M. (2007). Coauthorship linkages between universities and industry in Japan. Research Evaluation, 16(4), 299-309. Tamada, S., Naito, Y., Gemba, K., Kodama, F., Suzuki, J., & Goto, A. (2004). Science linkages in technologies patented in Japan discussion paper series 04-E-034: Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry. Tijssen, R. (2004). Measuring and evaluating science: Technology connections and interactions. In H. Moed, W. Glänzel & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 695-715). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Tijssen, R., Buter, R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2000). Technological relevance of science: Validation and analysis of citation linkages between patents and research papers. Scientometrics, 47(2), 389-412. Tijssen, R., & Korevaar, J. (1997). Unravelling the cognitive and interorganisational structure of public/private r&d networks: A case study of catalysis research in the Netherlands. Research Policy, 25(8), 1277-1293. Tijssen, R. J. W. (2001). Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: Patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows. Research Policy, 30(1), 35-54. Tijssen, R. J. W. (2002). Science dependence of technologies: Evidence from inventions and their inventors. Research Policy, 31(4), 509-526. Tomov, D., & Mutafov, H. (1996). Comparative indicators of interdisciplinarity in modern science. Scientometrics, 37(2), 267-278. Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. The Rand Journal of Economics, 21(1), 172-187. U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission. (2010). Horizontal merger guidelines. Retrieved Oct. 14, 2010, from http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/guidelines/hmg-2010.html. Van Looy, B., Callaert, J., & Debackere, K. (2006). Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing? Research Policy, 35(4), 596-608. van Vianen, B. G., Moed, H. F., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1990). An exploration of the science base of recent technology. Research Policy, 19(1), 61-81. Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., Luwel, M., Andries, P., Zimmermann, E., & Deleus, F. (2002). Linking science to technology: Using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes. Scientometrics, 54(3), 399-420. Verspagen, B. (1997). Measuring intersectoral technology spillovers: Estimates from the European and US patent office databases. Economic Systems Research, 9(1), 47-65. Verspagen, B. (2000). The role of large multinationals in the Dutch technology infrastructure: A patent citation analysis. Scientometrics, 47(2), 427-448. von Wartburg, I., Teichert, T., & Rost, K. (2005). Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis. Research Policy, 34(10), 1591-1607. Wang, G., & Guan, J. (2010). The role of patenting activity for scientific research: A study of academic inventors from China's nanotechnology. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 338-350. Wang, G., & Guan, J. (2011). Measuring science–technology interactions using patent citations and author-inventor links: An exploration analysis from Chinese nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 13(12), 6245-6262. Wilson, E. (1999). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Vintage. Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036-1039. Zitt, M., & Bassecoulard, E. (1998). Internationalization of scientific journals: A measurement based on publication and citation scope. Scientometrics, 41(1), 255-271. Zucker, L. G., & Darby, M. R. (1995). Virtuous circles of productivity: Star bioscientists and the institutional transformation of industry. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research. Zucker, L. G., & Darby, M. R. (1996). Star scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. The National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93(23), 12709-12716. 尤如瑾（2007）。燃料電池市場發展。工業材料雜誌，250，103-105。 尤如瑾、洪傳獻、黃楓台、王啟川、陳金銘、唐震宸（2003）。微奈米技術於電機能源產業之應用研究。新竹縣：工業技術研究院。 毛宗強（2010）。加速發展氫能，積極推進低碳能源。上網日期：2010年5月24日。網址：http://www.npf.org.tw/post/12/7952。 向宸蔚（2010）。應用層級分析法評估臺灣燃料電池產業政策。未出版之碩士論文，國立交通大學管理學院碩士在職專班科技管理組，新竹市。 江愛群（2009）。燃料電池車(FCEV)發展之產業驅動力與限制因素。上網日期：2010年5月24日。網址：http://www2.itis.org.tw/netreport/NetReport_Detail.aspx?rpno=160720748。 行政院國家科學委員會（2004）。科技統計名詞定義手冊。台北：行政院國家科學委員會。 行政院經濟建設委員會（2000）。知識經濟發展方案。上網日期：2010年5月24日。網址：http://www.cepd.gov.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0001546。 余鑑（2003）。科技與科學關係之探討。生活科技教育月刊，36（7），3-10。 宋隆裕、張文振、楊昌中 (2011)。日本「家用定置型燃料電池CHP系統」發展現況。能源報導，2011(11)，14-16。 林勝賢（2009）。酵素型生物燃料電池奈米質傳模擬與實作實驗量測。未出版之碩士論文，國立清華大學動力機械工程學系，新竹市。 高洪善 (2009)。歐盟科研計畫體制的創新之舉：歐盟聯合技術行動—歐盟在重大科技專項中首次引入私人資金。全球科技經濟瞭望，24(2)，5-8。 國立清華大學 (2011)。中國大陸燃料電池產業發展現況與臺灣競合策略分析報告。經濟部能源局99年度能源科技研究中心推動計畫-能源產業科技策略研究中心研究報告，經濟部能源局，台北市。 康志堅（2010）。韓國燃料電池產業發展現況。上網日期：2010年5月24日。網址：http://www.taiwangreenenergy.org.tw/Article/article-more.aspx?id=8B749DC032E000BA。 郭爵華（2009）。綠色能源產業發展之新契機。臺灣經濟研究月刊，32（6），20-26。 陳世榮、李河清（2011）。中國燃料電池研發及其環境溝通。中國大陸研究，54（3），33-69。 黃元鶴（2009）。由巨磁阻相關文獻探究科學與技術間的互動。圖書資訊學刊，7（1/2），53-76。 黃慕萱、陳達仁、張瀚文（2003）。從專利計量的觀點評估國家科技競爭力。中國圖書館學會會報，70，18-30。 黃樑傑（2010）。各國氫燃料電池車推動概況。上網日期：2011年2月24日。網址：http://www.artc.org.tw/chinese/03_service/03_02detail.aspx?pid=1593。 楊志忠、林頌恩、韋文誠（2003）。燃料電池的發展現況。科學發展，367期，30-33。 經濟部能源局（2010）。2010年能源產業技術白皮書。台北市：編者。 趙文衡、黃慧文（2009）。綠色能源產業的商機與挑戰。震旦月刊，458期，8-11。 劉信良（民92）。國家創新體系運作之觀察-以育成中心政策為實證研究。未出版之碩士論文，東海大學政治學系，台中縣。 蔡宜良（2010a）。國際燃料電池車輛發展策略與推動現況（上）。上網日期：2010年5月24日。網址：http://www.artc.org.tw/chinese/03_service/03_02detail.aspx?pid=1667。 蔡宜良（2010b）。國際燃料電池車輛發展策略與推動現況（下）。上網日期：2010年5月24日。網址：http://www.artc.org.tw/chinese/03_service/03_02detail.aspx?pid=1682。 蔡明月（民92）。資訊計量學與文獻特性。台北市：國立編繹館。 賴俊吉 (民98)。厭氧醱酵與生質氫能。中工高雄會刊，17(1)，21-27。 顏君聿（2008）。日本氫能燃料電池園區－橫濱JHFC Park。能源報導，2008（6），17-18。 羅法聖（2008）。燃料電池專利分析與創新趨勢。物理雙月刊，30（4），399-405。 羅思嘉（2005）。從專利分析看台日韓遺傳工程研究之發展。圖書資訊學刊，2（3/4），45-57。 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/64653 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨在以科技合著、共活躍、專利論文對及科技互引分析等書目計量方法，探討1991年至2010年間燃料電池領域科學與技術互動的特質，包含科學與技術的研發現況、科學與技術間雙重身分與雙重知識的發展、科學與技術相互影響的情況，及科學與技術的互動樣態與趨勢。
本研究以燃料電池領域在1991年至2010年20年間，在美國專利商標局 (U.S. Patent and Trademark Office，USPTO) 的專利全文資料庫 (Patent Full-Text and Image Database, PatFT) 所檢索到的8,112篇發明專利 (invention patent)，及利用美國Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) 公司所出版的Web of Science (WOS) 資料庫所獲得之20,758篇期刊論文為對象，據以個別建立不同資料檔，以利進行相關分析。 研究結果顯示，在科學與技術成果發展現況方面，論文與專利數量皆呈現指數成長的趨勢，且論文的成長速度較快；整體論文與專利的數量高度集中在少數國家；機構的論文與專利產出分布符合80-20法則，其中學術機構為論文主要來源，其專利數亦逐年穩定增加，而產業機構為專利主要擁有者，近年來則積極投入學術研究；產業機構的論文平均數量比學術機構的平均專利數量為多。 在科學與技術的雙重身分與雙重知識特質方面，機構科技合著的論文與專利數及專利論文對仍屬少量；產業機構的共活躍情況較學術機構明顯；專利論文對主要由學術機構的成員所產出；產業機構的論文科技合著比率很高，但專利的科技合著比率很低；個人共活躍者的論文與專利平均產量較整體平均值高，是各類機構跨界成果的主要產出者，但個別產量差距大且近年來較偏重論文發表；個人共活躍者會優先以專利論文對的形式發表科技互動成果，其中又以專利申請為最優先的發表行為；機構間的科技互動可歸納為高互動、低互動、自我互動與外求互動四種類型。 在科學與技術的相互影響方面，論文與專利的相互引用情況日益增加，尤其是專利引用論文的平均數量更逐年提高；論文引用專利的時效性較專利引用論文為快；學術研究者傾向引用學術機構的研發成果。整體而言，學術與產業機構參與科技互動的數量增加，互動之科技成果產量亦逐步提升。 就本研究的分析結果，在科技互動的研究方面，建議可利用論文逐年數量的成長幅度，推測產業政策帶動研發的成效；另機構的科技互動特質應結合共活躍及科技合著現象共同探討；個人層級的科技互動分析可優先以共活躍之作者與發明者為對象。至於臺灣發展燃料電池產業方面，則建議應促進產業機構的論文發表及學術機構的專利取得、獎勵產業機構與學術機構的提案合作、提升科技合著、共活躍及專利論文對等科技互動成果數量，藉由促進臺灣燃料電池領域的科技互動，進而帶動科技成果的數量提升。此外亦應持續關注韓國在燃料電池領域的科技發展，知己知彼尋求最佳產業競爭策略。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T22:56:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-D92126004-1.pdf: 2994936 bytes, checksum: ff6a130edabc89be2b3f81caf503c51a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 I
誌謝 III 中文摘要 V 英文摘要 VII 圖目錄 XV 表目錄 XVII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 問題陳述 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 6 第三節 研究範圍及限制 7 第四節 名詞解釋 8 第二章 文獻探討 11 第一節 科學與技術之關係 11 第二節 科技合著、共活躍及專利論文對分析 22 第三節 科技互引分析 37 第四節 燃料電池的發展與各國推動政策 47 第三章 研究方法與實施 57 第一節 研究設計 57 第二節 研究對象 63 第三節 研究步驟與流程 64 第四節 資料處理與分析 67 第四章 結果分析 71 第一節 燃料電池領域科技成果產出現況 71 一、整體論文與專利數量分析 71 二、各國論文與專利數量分析 76 三、機構論文與專利數量分析 81 四、個人論文與專利數量分析 95 第二節 燃料電池領域科技雙重身分及雙重知識特質 99 一、燃料電池領域的科技合著分析 99 二、燃料電池領域的共活躍情況分析 110 三、燃料電池領域的專利論文對情況分析 124 第三節 燃料電池領域科學與技術之相互影響 133 一、論文引用專利之分析 133 二、專利引用論文之分析 140 第四節 燃料電池領域科學與技術的互動特質與類型 146 一、科學與技術的整體互動 146 二、機構層級的科技互動 149 三、個人層級的科技互動 154 第五章 結論與建議 159 第一節 結論 159 第二節 建議 166 第三節 研究貢獻 170 第四節 進一步研究之建議 172 參考文獻 175 附錄 189 附錄一：論文數前50名之作者 189 附錄二：專利數前50名之發明者 191 附錄三：科技合著專利之機構 193 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 引用分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 燃料電池 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 書目計量 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 專利 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 科技互動 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 科技合著 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 共活躍 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 專利論文對 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | citation analysis | en |
| dc.subject | patent-paper pairs | en |
| dc.subject | co-activity | en |
| dc.subject | science & technology coauthorship | en |
| dc.subject | interaction | en |
| dc.subject | patent | en |
| dc.subject | fuel cell | en |
| dc.subject | bibliometrics | en |
| dc.title | 燃料電池領域科學與技術互動之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Study of the Interaction between Science and Technology in Fuel Cells | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 100-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳明德,朱則剛,陳昭珍,陳達仁 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 燃料電池,書目計量,專利,科技互動,科技合著,共活躍,專利論文對,引用分析, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | bibliometrics,fuel cell,patent,interaction,science & technology coauthorship,co-activity,patent-paper pairs,citation analysis, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 194 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2012-08-10 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 圖書資訊學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 圖書資訊學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-101-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.92 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。