請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/64455完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 闕蓓德(Pei-Te Chiueh) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tsai-Wen Chiang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蔣在文 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T17:48:11Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2017-08-20 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2012-08-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2012-08-13 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 江玄政、黃國恭、黃雪娟，2001。ISO 14000系列生命週期評估技術與應用手冊，經濟部工業局。
行政院主計處，2010。總體統計資料庫，取自http://ebas1.ebas.gov.tw/pxweb/Dialog/statfile9L.asp. 行政院農業委員會林務局，2004。台灣的自然資源與生態資料庫，生態資源資料庫網站，取自http://econgisdw.forest.gov.tw/Download/Books.aspx. 吳宜昭、陳永明、朱容練，2010。台灣氣候變遷趨勢，國研科技，第二十五期。取自http://www.narl.org.tw/tw/topic/topic.php?topic_id=111 汪中和，2005。臺灣降雨的長期變化及對水資源的衝擊，農業世界，第264期，62-70。 林國華，2010。99年第一期稻作停灌補償作業，農政與農情，第211期，取自http://www.coa.gov.tw/view.php?catid=20954 產業技術知識服務計畫，2012。2012年第一季我國半導體產業回顧與展望，取自http://www2.itis.org.tw/netreport/NetReport_Detail.aspx?rpno=325343396. 陳武雄，2011。全國糧食安全會議結論，農政與農情，第228期，取自http://www.coa.gov.tw/view.php?catid=23714 陳朝圳、吳守從、江彥鋒，2006。應用MODIS衛星影像推估台灣地區之蒸發散量。台灣林業科學，第21期，249-261。 黃淑玲，2011。農業用水哪來何處去，農政與農情，第230期，取自http://www.coa.gov.tw/view.php?catid=23990 楊偉甫，2010。台灣地區水資源利用現況與未來發展問題，用水合理化與新生水水源開發論壇。 楊智凱，2005。生命週期評估方法之分析比較-以HDPE塑膠製品為例，國立成功大學環境工程研究所碩士論文。 經濟水利署，100年6月1日修正。水利法。 經濟部水利署，經濟部水利署防災資訊服務網，取自http://fhy.wra.gov.tw/Pub_Web_2011/. 經濟部水利署，2009a。98年各項蓄水設施營運水量統計報告，經濟部水利署各項用水統計資料庫，取自http://wuss.wra.gov.tw/ 經濟部水利署，2009b。中華民國98年台灣水文年報。 經濟部水利署，2010。民國98年度各標的用水量報告。 經濟部水利署，2011。台灣重要河川水庫總覽。 葉欣誠、劉銘龍、蔡宜霖，2004。台灣地區水貧乏指數之研究與應用，經濟部水利署。 嘉南農田水利會，2010。春季第一次甘蔗雜作灌溉公告。 劉玉文，2011。99年我國糧食供需統計結果，農政與農情，第232期，取自http://www.coa.gov.tw/view.php?catid=24245 劉家豪，2004。IC製造業產品生命週期分析，國立成功大學環境工程研究所碩士論文。 聯華電子股份有限公司，2007 and 2009。Corporate Social Responsibility Report，取自http://www.umc.com/english/csr/b_2009.asp Alcamo, J.; Doll, P.; Herichs, T.; Kaspar, F.; Lehner, B.; Rosch, T.; Siebert, S. (2003) Development and testing of the WaterGAP 2 global model of water use and availability. Hydrological Sciences Journal-Journal Des Sciences Hydrologiques, 48, 317-337. Alcamo, J.; Thomas, H.; Thomas, R. (2000) World Water in 2025: Global modeling and scenario analysis for the World Commission on Water for the 21st Century. World Watrer Series 2, Center for Environmental Systems Research, University of Kassel, Germany. Bayart, J.B.; Bulle, C.; Deschenes, L.; Margni, M.; Pfister, S.; Vince, F.; Koehler, A. (2010) A framework for assessing off-stream freshwater use in LCA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15, 439-453. Berger, M.; Finkbeiner, M. (2010) Water footprinting: how to address water use in life cycle assessment? Sustainability, 2, 919-944. Boulay, A.M.; Bouchard, C.; Bulle, C.; Deschenes, L.; Margni, M.( 2011a) Categorizing water for LCA inventory. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 16, 639-651. Boulay, A.M.; Bulle, C.; Bayart, J.B.; Deschenes, L.; Margni, M. (2011b) Regional Characterization of Freshwater Use in LCA: Modeling Direct Impacts on Human Health. Environmental Science & Technology, 45, 8948-8957. Brown, A.; Matlock, M.D. (2011) A Review of Water Scarcity Indices and Methodologies. The Sustainability Consortium, University of Arkansas. Falkenmark, M.; Lundqvist, J.; Widstrand, C. (1989) Macro-scale water scarcity requires micro-scale approaches: Aspects of vulnerability in semi-arid development. Natural Resources Forum, 13, 258-267 Frischknecht, R.; Steiner, R.; Jungbluth, N. (2009) The Ecological Scarcity Method -Eco-Factors 2006. A Method for Impact Assessment in LCA. Gleick, P. H. (1996) Basic Water Requirements for Human Activities: Meeting Basic Needs. Water International 21. Goedkoop, M.; Spriensma,R. (2000) The Eco-indicator 99 Methodology Report, PRe Consultants B.V, The Netherlands. Goedkoop, M.; Spriensma,R. (2011) The Eco-indicator 99 A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Assessment-methodology annex. PRe Consultants B.V, The Netherlands. Guinee, J. (2001) Handbook on life cycle assessment - Operational guide to the ISO standards. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 6, 255-255. Jeswani, H. K.; Azapagic, A. (2011) Water footprint: methodologies and a case study for assessing the impacts of water use. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 1288-1299. Koehler, A. (2008) Water use in LCA: managing the planet's freshwater resources. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13, 451-455. Lautier, A.; Rosenbaum, R. K.; Margni, M.; Bare, J.; Roy, P.O.; Deschenes, L. (2010 Development of normalization factors for Canada and the United States and comparison with European factors. Science of the Total Environment, 409, 33-42. ISO. (2006) ISO14040-Environmental management-Life cycle assessment-Principles and framework. Lawrence, P.; Meigh, J.; Sullivan, C. (2002) The water poverty index:an international comparison. Keele economics research papers,KERP. Liu, C. H.; Lin, S. J.; Lewis, C. (2007) Life cycle impact assessment of the DRAM chip industry in Taiwan, in: Brebbia, C. A.; Popov, V. (Eds.), Energy and Sustainability. Wit Press/Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, pp. 135-143. Mila i Canals, L.; Chenoweth, J.; Chapagain, A.; Orr, S.; Anton, A.; Clift, R. (2009) Assessing freshwater use impacts in LCA: Part I-inventory modelling and characterisation factors for the main impact pathways. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 14, 28-42. Mila i Canals, L.; Chapagain, A.; Orr, S.; Chenoweth, J.; Anton, A.; Clift, R. (2010) Assessing freshwater use impacts in LCA, part 2: case study of broccoli production in the UK and Spain. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15, 598-607. Motoshita, M.; Itsubo, N.; Inaba, A. (2011) Development of impact factors on damage to health by infectious diseases caused by domestic water scarcity. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 16, 65-73. Motoshita, M.; Itsubo, N.; Inaba, A. (2008) Development of impact assessment method on health damages of undernourishment related to agricultural water scarcity, In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on EcoBalance, Tokyo, Japan. Nemani, R. R.; Keeling, C. D.; Hashimoto, H.; Jolly, W. M.; Piper, S. C.; Tucker, C. J.; Myneni, R. B.; Running, S. W. (2003) Climate-driven increases in global terrestrial net primary production from 1982 to 1999. Science, 300, 1560-1563. OECD. (2004) Key Environmental Indicators.OECD Environment Directorate: Paris, France. Ohlsson, L. (2000) Water conflicts and social resource scarcity. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth Part B-Hydrology Oceans and Atmosphere, 25, 213-220. Pfister, S.; Koehler, A.; Hellweg, S. (2009) Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Freshwater Consumption in LCA. Environmental Science & Technology, 43, 4098-4104. Pfister, S.; Saner, D.; Koehler, A. (2011) The environmental relevance of freshwater consumption in global power production. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 16, 580-591. Ponce, V. M. (1989) Engineering Hydrology:principles and practices. Prentice Hall. Rijsberman, F. R. (2006) Water scarcity: Fact or fiction? Agricultural Water Management, 80, 5-22. Smakhtin, V.; Revanga, C.; Doll, P. (2005) Taking into Account Environmental Water Requirements in Globalscale Water Resources Assessments. Report No.; IWMI The Global Podium. Stewart, M.; Weidema, B. (2005) A consistent framework for assessing the impacts from resource use - A focus on resource functionality. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 10, 240-247. UN. (2006) The United Nations World Water Development Report 2:Water—a shared responsibility, p 46. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/64455 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 水資源缺乏課題極為重要，然而目前國際間使用之生命週期衝擊評估模式僅評估水質劣化，針對水資源耗用之衝擊評估方法尚無定論。台灣地區由於降雨分布不均，導致各標的水資源使用存在競爭關係，缺水時期往往犧牲農業用水，實施休耕以補給生活用水與工業用水，影響正常農作收穫。本研究以水庫蓄水資料結合生命週期衝擊評估方法Eco-indicator 99評估臺灣北(石門水庫)、中(石岡壩水庫)、南(烏山頭水庫)三區域之水資源壓力指標與其水資源耗用衝擊；並以台灣某動態隨機存取記憶體之水資源耗用盤查資料為例，試算增加水資源耗用之生命週期評估影響。研究結果顯示三座水庫之水資源壓力皆為中等以上，而單位水資源耗用所造成之環境衝擊以中部石岡壩最大，北部石門水庫與南部烏山頭水庫次之。另以本研究分析之動態隨機存取記憶體案例，增加水資源耗用之生命週期衝擊可能達原衝擊之1.17倍。另一方面，為探討氣候變遷的影響，本研究以相對乾旱之2009年烏山頭水庫資料加以分析，研究結果顯示次年水資源壓力情形嚴重加劇，導致2010年前半年必須休耕因應。本研究提出之水資源耗用衝擊評估方式，可供後續生命週期評估研究參考。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Water scarcity has drawn great attention in Taiwan. According to the definition of the United Nations, Taiwan is one of the countries facing a water crisis in the 21th century.Although water scarcity is a global issue, there is no unified approach for the assessment of impacts of water consumption. While current life cycle assessments (LCA) evaluate impacts due to changes in water quality, assessment schemes and characterisation factors for the impacts of water use are still lacking. Our research establishes a method for assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in Taiwan based on current studies. The water stress level of three reservoirs in Taiwan were calculated by an water stress index. For impact assessment, Eco-indicator 99 method was used in this research. On the other hand, a case study of IC product-DRAM was discussed in this research to compare the original impact and the impact with freshwater consumption added.
The results indicated that the water stress index (WSI) of all three reservoirs was higher than medium level. Impact assessment revealed, Shihgang reservoir to have the highest total impact per m3 of water consumed.WuShanTou reservoir to have the highest impact per m3 of water consumed in human health impact category. Shihmen reservoir to have the highest impact per m3 of water consumed in Ecosystem quality impact category, and Shihgang reservoir to have the highest impact per m3 of water consumed in Resources impact category. In the case study of DRAM, impact with water cunsumption added may be 1.17 times more than the original impact. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T17:48:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-R99541208-1.pdf: 2127426 bytes, checksum: 706c033c3f5f1e1911d7ffce21d3055b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 I
Abstract II 目錄 III 圖目錄 V 表目錄 VII 第一章 緒論 1 1.1研究動機與目的 1 1.2研究流程與論文架構 3 第二章 文獻回顧 5 2.1水資源缺乏與水資源指標 5 2.2.1需求性水資源壓力指標 6 2.2.2資源性水資源壓力指標 8 2.2生命週期評估源起與方法 12 2.3水資源耗用生命週期評估 16 2.3.1水資源耗用生命週期評估架構 18 2.3.2水資源耗用生命週期盤查分析 22 2.3.3水資源耗用生命週期衝擊評估 25 2.4臺灣水資源 33 2.4.1臺灣水資源現況 33 2.4.2 臺灣水資源運用現況 34 2.4.3臺灣缺水潛在衝擊 37 第三章 研究方法 38 3.1 研究對象 38 3.1.2 三水庫基本資料 41 3.2 研究時間尺度 43 3.3 水資源壓力指標 46 3.4水資源耗用衝擊評估 50 3.4.1人體健康衝擊 52 3.4.2生態品質衝擊 54 3.4.3資源衝擊 61 3.4.4 標準化 63 3.4.5 權重化 65 第四章 結果與討論 66 4.1 水資源壓力指標 66 4.2 水資源耗用衝擊評估 67 4.2.1 人體健康衝擊 68 4.2.2 生態系統品質衝擊 74 4.2.3 資源衝擊 81 4.2.4 標準化與權重化 87 4.3 案例討論 89 4.3.1 臺灣水資源耗用衝擊全球排名 89 4.3.2 增加水資源耗用對DRAM生命週期評估之影響 90 4.4 氣候變遷對水資源耗用衝擊影響 99 第五章 結論與建議 102 5-1 結論 102 5-2 建議 104 參考文獻 106 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 生命週期評估 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 水資源 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 氣候變遷 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 水資源壓力指標 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Water resources | en |
| dc.subject | life cycle impact assessment | en |
| dc.subject | water stress index | en |
| dc.subject | climate change | en |
| dc.title | 區域性水資源耗用之生命週期衝擊評估 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Regional Water Consumption | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 100-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 駱尚廉(Shang-Lien Lo),李公哲(Kung-Cheh Li) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 水資源,生命週期評估,水資源壓力指標,氣候變遷, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Water resources,life cycle impact assessment,water stress index,climate change, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 112 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2012-08-14 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 環境工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 環境工程學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-101-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.08 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。