請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/63809
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陸怡蕙 | |
dc.contributor.author | Szu-Chi Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃思齊 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T17:19:42Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-08-20 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2012-08-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2012-08-16 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中國統計年鑑資料庫 (2012), AREMOS台灣經濟資料庫。
邵文賢 (2011),「知識活動與生產力成長─台灣生產農業之實證研究」, 碩士論文, 國立臺灣大學 農業經濟研究所。 陸怡蕙與施國珍 (2005),「國際研發外溢效果對生產力的貢獻─臺、日、韓三國之比較分析」,《臺灣經濟預測與政策》, 6, 103-130。 Acharya, R. C. and W. Keller (2008), “Estimating the Productivity Selection and Technology Spillover Effects of Imports,” NBER Working Paper, NO. 14079. Aghion, P. and P. Howitt (1998), Endogenous Growth Theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. AREMOS台灣經濟資料庫(2012), AREMOS台灣經濟資料庫. Baldwin, R., H. Braconier, and R. Forslid (1999), “Multinationals, Endogenous Growth and Technological Spillovers: Theory and Evidence,” CEPR Discussion Paper, NO. 2155. Barro, R. and X. Sala-i-Martin (1995), Economic Growth, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Bassanini, A., S. Scarpetta, and P. Hemmings (2001), “Economic Growth: the Role of Policies and Institutions. Panel Data Evidence from OECD Countries,” OECD Economics Department Working Papers, NO. 283. Bernstein, J. I. (1998), “Factor Intensities, Rates of Return, and International R&D Spillovers: The Case of Canadian and U.S. Industries,” Annales d’Economie et de Statistique, 49, 541-564. Bernstein, J. I. and P. Mohnen (1998), “International R&D Spillovers between U.S. and Japanese R&D Intensive Sectors,” Journal of International Economics, 44, 315-338. Branstetter, L. (2006), “Is Foreign Direct Investment a Channel of Knowledge Spillovers? Evidence from Japan’s FDI in the United States,” Journal of International Economics, 68, 325-344. Branstetter, L. (2001), “Are Knowledge Spillovers International or Intranational in Scope? Microeconometric Evidence from the U.S. and Japan,” Journal of International Economics, 53, 53-79. Carr, D., J. Markusen, and K. Maskus (2001), “Estimating the Knowledge-Driven Model of the Multinational Enterprise,” American Economic Review, 91, 693-708. Chavas, J. P. and T. L. Cox (1992), “A Nonparametric Analysis of the Influence of Research on Agricultural Productivity,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74, 583-591. Coe, D. T. and E. Helpman (1995), ”International R&D Spillovers,” European Economic Review, 39, 859-887. Coe, D., E. Helpman, and A. Hoffmaister (1997), “North-South Spillovers,” Economic Journal, 107, 134-149. Coe, D. and A. Hoffmaister (1999), “Are There International R&D Spillovers among Randomly Matched Trade Partners? A Response to Keller,” IMF Working Paper, NO. 18. Coelli, T. J., D. S. P. Rao, C. J. O’Donnell, and G. E. Battese (1998), An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, Springer, 2nd edition. Criscuolo, C., J. Haskel, and R. Martin (2004), “Import Competition, Productivity, and Restructuring in U.K. Manufacturing,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 20, 393-408. Easterly, W. and R. Levine (2001), ”It’s not Factor Accumulation: Stylized Facts and Growth Models,” World Bank Economic Review, 15, 177-219. Eaton, J. and S. Kortum (1999), “International Patenting and Technology Diffusion: Theory and Measurement,” International Economic Review, 40, 537-570. Engelbrecht, H. J. (1997), “International R&D Spillovers among OECD Economies,” Applied Economics Letters, 4, 315-319. Evenson, R. (1967), “The Contribution of Agricultural Research to Production,” Journal of Farm Economics, 49, 1415-1425. Fischer, C. and S. Schornberg (2007), “Assessing the Competitiveness Situation of EU Food and Drink Manufacturing Industries: An Index-Based Approach,” Agribusiness, 23, 473-495. Globerman, S., A. Kokko, and F. Sjoholm (2000), “International Technology Diffusion: Evidence from Swedish Patent Data,” Kyklos, 53, 17-38. Goto, A. and K. Suzuki (1989), “R&D Capital, Rate of Return on R&D Investment and Spillover of R&D in Japanese Manufacturing Industries,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 555-564. Griffith, R., R. Harrison, and J. V. Reenen (2004), “How Special is the Special Relationship? Using the Impact of U.S. R&D Spillovers on U.K. Firms as a Test of Technology Sourcing,” The American Economic Review, 96, 1859-1875. Griliches, Z. (1964), “Research Expenditures, Education, and the Aggregate Agricultural Production Function,” American Economic Review, 6, 961-974. Griliches, Z. (1980), “R&D and the Productivity Slowdown,” American Economic Review, 70, 343-348. Grossman, G. and E. Helpman (1991), Innovation and Growth in the World Economy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Guellec, H. and B. van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie (2001), “R&D and Productivity Growth : Panel Data Analysis of 16 OECD Countries,” OECD Economic Studies, 33, 103-126. Helliwell, J. F. (1992), “Trade and Technical Progress,” NBER Working Paper, NO. 4226. Huffman, W. E. and R. E. Evenson (1989), “Supply and Demand Functions for Multiproduct U.S. Cash Grain Farms: Biases Caused by Research and Other Policies,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71, 761-773. Ichniowski, C., G. Prennushi, and K. Shaw (1997), ”The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity: A Study of Steel Finishing Lines,” American Economic Review, 87, 291-313. Irwin, D. and P. Klenow (1994), “Learning Spillovers in the Semi-Conductor Industry,” Journal of Political Economy, 102, 1200-1227. Jaffe, A. and M. Trajtenberg (1998), “International Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Patent Citations,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8, 105-136. Jaffe, A., M. Trajtenberg, and R. Henderson (1993), “Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 577-598. Jaffe, A. (1986), “Technological Opportunity and Spillover of R&D: Evidence from Firm’s Patents, Profits, and Market Value,” American Economic Review, 76, 984-1001. Keller, W. (2004) , “International Technology Diffusion,” Journal of Economic Literature, 42, 752-782. Keller, W. (1995), “International R&D Spillover and Inter-sectorial Trade Flow: Do they Match? ” Yale University Manuscript. Keller, W. (1998), “Are International R&D Spillovers Trade-Related? Analyzing Spillovers among Randomly Matched Trade Partners,” European Economic Review, 42, 1469-1481. Keller, W. (2002), “Geographic Localization of International Technology Diffusion,” The American Economic Review, 92, 120-142. Klette, T. J. (1999), “Market Power, Scale Economies and Productivity: Estimates from a Panel of Establishment Data,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 47, 451-476. Kuroda, Y. (1997), “Research and Extension Expenditures and Productivity in Japanese Agriculture, 1960-1990,” Agricultural Economics, 16, 111-124. Lichtenberg, F. and B. van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie (1996), “International R&D Spillovers: A Re-examination,” NBER Working Paper, NO. 5688. Lall, S. (2001), Competitiveness, Technology and Skills, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA: Edard Elgar. Limao, N. and T. Venables (2001), “Infrastructure, Geographical Disadvantage, Transport Costs and Trade,” World Bank Economic Review, 15, 451-479. Luh, Y. H., C. C. Chang, and F. M. Huang (2008), “Efficiency Chang and Productivity Growth in Agriculture: A Comparative Analysis for Selected East Asian Economies,” Journal of Asian Economics, 19, 312-324. Luh, Y. H., and S. K. Chang (1997), “Building the Dynamic Linkages between R&D and Productivity Growth,” Journal of Asian Economics, 8, 525-545. Lumenga-Neso, O., M. Olarreaga, and M. Schiff (2005), “On ’Indirect’ Trade-related R&D Spillovers,” European Economic Review, 49, 1785-1798. MacDonald, J. M. (1994), “Does Import Competition Force Efficient Production?” Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 721-727. Mankiw, N. G. (1995), “The Growth of Nations,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 275-310. Nickell, S. (1996), “Competition and Corporate Performance,” Journal of Political Economy, 14, 724-746. OECD (2012), Main Economic Indicators Database, OECD. OECD (2012), OECD Employment and Labour Market Statistics Database, OECD. OECD (2012), OECD National Accounts Statistics Database, OECD. OECD (2012), OECD Productivity Statistics Database, OECD. OECD (2012), OECD Science, Technology and R&D Statistics Database, OECD. OECD (2012), STAN Bilateral Trade Database 2010 Database, OECD. OECD (2012), STAN: OECD Structural Analysis Statistics Database, OECD. Oulton, N. (1998), “Competition and the Dispersion of Labour Productivity amongst U.K. Companies,” Oxford Economic Papers, 50, 23-38. Parente, S. L. and E. C. Prescott (1994), “Barriers to Technology Adoption and Devlopment,” Journal of Political Economy, 102, 298-321. Parente, S. and E. Prescott (2000), Barriers to Riches, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Park, H. (1988), Chapter in Handbook of Development Economics, 1, 333-380. Peri, G. (2005), “Determinants of Knowledge Flows and Their Effect on Innovation,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 87, 308-322. Potterie, B. and F. Lichtenberg (2001), “Does Foreign Direct Investment Transfer Technology Across Borders?” Review of Economics and Statistics, 83, 490-497. Prescott, E. C. (1998), ”Needed: A Theory of Total Factor Productivity,” International Economic Review, 39, 525-551. Ram, R. (1987), “Exports and Economic Growth in Developing Countries: Evidence from Time-Series and Cross-Section Data,” Economic Development and Cultural Changes, 36, 51-72. Ram, R. and K. H. Zhang (2002), “Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth: Evidence from Cross-Country Data for the 1990s,” Economic Development and Cultural Changes, 51, 205-215. Roberts, M. J. and J. R. Tybout (1997), “The Decision to Export in Colombia: An Empirical Model of Entry with Sunk Costs,” American Economic Review, 87, 545-564. Romer, P. M. (1990), “Endogenous Technical Change,” Journal of Political Economy, 98, 71-102. Scarpetta, S., A. Bassanini, D. Pilat, and P. Schreyer (2000), “Economic Growth in the OECD Area: Recent Trends at the Aggregate and Sectoral Level,” OECD Economics Department Working Papers, NO. 248. Schiff, M. and Y. Wang (2010), “North-South Technology Spillovers: The Relative Impact of Openness and Foreign R&D,” International Economic Journal, 24, 197-207. Segerstrom, P., T. Anant, and E. Dinopoulos (1990), “A Schumpeterian Model of the Product Life Cycle,” American Economic Review, 80, 1077-1092. Sekkat, K. (2009), “Does Competition Improve Productivity in Developing Countries?” Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 12, 145-162. Sjoholm, F.(1996), “International Transfer of Knowledge: the Role of International Trade and Geographic Proximity,” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 132, 97-115. Solow, R. M. (1957), “Technical Chang and The Aggregate Production Function,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 312-320. The World Bank (2012), The World Bank Database, The World Bank. Thirtle, C., L. Lin, J. Holding, L. Jenkins, and J. Piesse (2004), “Explaining the Decline in U.K. Agricultural Productivity Growth,” Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55, 343-366. Thirtle, C., J. Piesse, and D. Schimmelpfennig (2008), “Modeling the Length and Shape of the R&D Lag: an Application to U.K. Agricultural Productivity,” Agricultural Economics, 39, 73-85. Todo, Y. (2006), “Knowledge Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment in R&D Evidence from Japanese Firm-level Data,” Journal of Asian Economics, 17, 996-1013. Unel, B. (2008), “R&D Spillovers through Trade in a Panel of OECD Industries,” The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 17, 105-133. UNIDO (2010), Industrial Statistics Guidelines and Methodology, UNIDO. Xu, B. and J. Wang (1999), “Capital Goods Trade and R&D Spillovers in the OECD,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 32, 1258-1274. Zhang, K. H. (2010), “How does Globalization Affect Industrial Competitiveness?” Contemporary Economic Policy, 28, 502-510. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/63809 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 在經濟發展的理論中,技術進步一直是解釋國家之間所得差距的重要因素。由於國際技術外溢與總要素成長力的成長息息相關,因此過去之文獻多著重在世界主要研發國的研發活動,檢視由主要研發國傳遞之國際技術外溢對其他國家之影響。近年來除了衡量透過貿易關係傳遞的直接技術外溢外,更有學者提出不須透過直接貿易關係,無貿易第三國就能間接透過其他貿易夥伴接收主要研發國傳遞之技術外溢的觀點。此外,除了觀察到國際技術外溢對生產力之正向影響,近年來也有部份文獻觀察到負向的效果,並推論此負向技術外溢效果與產業之競爭力相關,但這些文獻均只限於觀點的提出,而未具體地檢視國際技術外溢與產業競爭力之關係。因此,本研究選定1990至2009年之OECD會員國作為觀察對象,並將生產力成長與產業競爭力作一連結,嘗試由直接與間接技術外溢的角度解釋產業競爭力與總要素生產力的變動。
在研究方法上,本研究採用三階段最小平法來分析國際技術外溢對OECD會員國的生產力成長與產業競爭力之影響。本研究之實證模型包含三個重點。首先,本文設定G5加二(即美國、日本、德國、法國、英國與中國及韓國等七國)為主要研發國,並假設主要研發國為唯一的技術外溢來源。在基本模型中,本研究將OECD會員國區分為主要研發國與非主要研發國兩個群組,以觀察直接與間接技術外溢對其生產力成長與產業競爭力之影響。其次,本研究在延伸模型中進一步依是否為主要東亞新興研發國,將技術外溢來源分為中韓與G5兩類,藉以檢視外溢來源國之不同是否會造成技術外溢效果的差異,並與主要文獻做一區隔。最後,本研究在第三組模型設定架構下,依照非主要研發國之生產力成長速度與國家所得水準再進行分組,觀察國際技術外溢對不同類型之國家是否存在影響程度與影響方向上的差異。 本研究之實證結果顯示,不論在生產力成長或產業競爭力之模型中,間接技術外溢效果皆大於直接技術外溢效果,且直接與間接的技術外溢均可能產生負向的影響。此外,當觀察群組之研發存量占國家生產毛額之比例較低時,外溢效果不僅較小,甚至對生產力成長與產業競爭力均產生負向的影響;反之,當非主要研發國積極從事研發活動時,來自主要研發國之技術外溢將有助於成長速度與產業競爭力之提昇。本研究亦觀察到來自G5主要研發國的技術外溢對OECD會員國之影響較大,但中韓等東亞新興研發國之技術外溢效果亦不可忽視。 綜觀言之,本研究的實證結果顯示,不論是直接技術外溢或是間接技術外溢,均是在討論生產力成長與產業競爭力之決定因素時必須納入考量的,且自身研發活動較為積極之國家通常較能接收到正向之技術外溢效果。此外,雖然來自G5主要研發國之技術外溢效果較強,中韓等東亞新興研發國之技術外溢效果仍具有顯著影響力,這些實證結果亦進一步說明國與國之間的貿易為傳遞技術外溢之重要管道。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In the theory of economic development, technological progress has always been an important factor in explaining the income gap between countries. Since international spillover is closely related to the growth of total factor productivity (TFP), most past literature emphasizes the importance of R&D activities of G5 countries (United States, Japan, Germany, United Kingdom, and France). During the last two decades, international technology spillover transmitted through trade has become the major focus of empirical studies. Among them, several recent studies propose the notion of indirect technology spillover which might be as important as direct spillovers from major R&D countries. By trading with other countries, indirect technological spillover implies that any country can benefit from major R&D country’s available stock even if they do not trade with each other.
Most empirical studies concluded international spillover impact productivity positively, but there are some observed a negative effect, which infer the negative spillover effect is related to the industrial competitiveness. Therefore, in addition to examining international spillovers between the OECD countries during 1990-2009, this study also links productivity growth to industrial competitiveness while attempting to explain the change in TFP growth and industrial competitiveness by direct and indirect technology spillovers. Assuming G5 plus two (United States, Japan, Germany, United Kingdom, France, Korea and China) as the major R&D countries and these seven countries are the only sources of technology spillover, three-stage least squares method is used in this study to analyze the impact of international technology spillovers on productivity growth and industrial competitiveness of OECD countries. Empirical model in this study consists of three identification strategy. In the basic model, the OECD countries are divided into two groups including major R&D countries and other OECD countries to observe the effect of direct and indirect spillover. Secondly, to take into account possible differences between spillovers from the traditional R&D countries (the G5) and emerging R&D countries (China and Korea), this study further divides the source of technology spillover into two groups (G5 and East Asian NICs). Finally, according to the growth rate and national income, in the third model we divide other OECD countries into 3 groups to investigate if the magnitude and sign of international spillovers will be different for different groups of countries. The empirical results of this study indicate that the indirect spillover effects are greater than direct spillovers and both the direct and indirect technology spillovers can produce negative effects. When the observed group’s R&D stock takes a smaller proportion in gross national product, the spillover effect is not only smaller but also negative in sign. In contrast, when the other OECD countries actively engage in R&D activities, technology spillover received from the major R&D countries will improve their TFP growth and industrial competitiveness. It is also found that although the spillover effect from G5 countries is much greater, R&D spillovers originated from emerging R&D countries should be explicitly taken into account. In conclusion, the empirical results of this study demonstrated that both direct and indirect technology spillover effects are major determinants of OECD country’s TFP growth and industrial competitiveness, and countries pursuing active R&D activities usually benefit more from international technology spillover. Moreover, even though trade-related spillover effects from G5 countries is stronger, spillover effects from China and South Korea are still influential factors for the productivity growth and industrial competitiveness in the OECD countries. This study, therefore, provides further evidence supporting the view that trade is an important channel for international transmission of R&D. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T17:19:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-R99627006-1.pdf: 784455 bytes, checksum: 986287f026fcc36d05f690ff19bebd32 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 i
摘要 iii Abstract v 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與目的 1 第二節 研究架構與步驟 3 第二章 文獻回顧 5 第一節 研發存量、直接技術外溢與技術進步 5 第二節 國際技術之間接外溢 9 第三節 產業競爭力之相關文獻 11 第四節 小結 14 第三章 模型設定 15 第一節 理論模型 15 第二節 實證模型 20 第四章 資料概述與變數說明 26 第一節 資料來源與處理過程 26 第二節 變數定義與說明 27 第三節 樣本基本統計 32 第五章 實證結果 49 第一節 基本模型之估計結果 50 第二節 區分技術來源之估計結果 52 第三節 非主要研發國分組之估計結果 56 第六章 結論 82 參考文獻 85 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 國際研發與產業競爭力之研究─兼論國際經濟組織內之知識外溢 | zh_TW |
dc.title | International R&D and Industrial Competitiveness: Intra-Organization Spillovers for the OECD | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 100-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 楊志海,黃芳玫 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 直接技術外溢,間接技術外溢,G5加二,總要素生產力,產業競爭力, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | direct technology spillover,indirect technology spillover,G5 plus two,total factor productivity,industrial competitiveness, | en |
dc.relation.page | 92 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2012-08-17 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 農業經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 農業經濟學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-101-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 766.07 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。