Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 園藝暨景觀學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/63559
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor張俊彥
dc.contributor.authorChih-Chan Tsaien
dc.contributor.author蔡至展zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-16T17:14:00Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-02
dc.date.copyright2012-08-22
dc.date.issued2012
dc.date.submitted2012-08-19
dc.identifier.citation1.王進禮、張月娟,(2005),記憶廣度團體紙筆測驗的編制,第四軍醫大學學報。
2.王震武,(2008),《心理學》,台北:學富。
3.李英弘、謝燕芬、何杰,(2009),歷史街道景觀懷舊生心理反應之研究,造園景觀學報,15(4),77-98。
4.黃創華,(1992),內外刺激的覺察習慣與心理適應的關係,國立台灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文,台北。
5.陳心怡、洪儷瑜,(2004),WISC-III 順序與逆序記憶廣度指標之建構分析與應用,師大學報:教育類,49(2),19-42。
6.陳一平,(2011),《視覺心理學》,台北:雙葉書廊。
7.張春興,(1995),《現代心理學》,台北:東華書局。
8.喬彗燕、薛漪平、古佳苓、陳蕙君、謝清麟,(2007),常用於中風研究的五種注意力測驗之心理計量特性比較,台灣復健醫誌,35(2),65-72。
9.游恆山,(1991),《生存的理由》,台北:遠流。
10.鄭昭明,(2010),《認知心理學理論與實踐》,台北:學富。
11.蔡涵如,(2008),工作記憶與類別學習中的知識分化現象,碩士論文,國立成功大學,認知科學研究所,台南。
12.賴明洲、李叡明譯,(1992),輿水肇著,《建築空間綠化手法》,台北:地景。
13.Balling, J. D. & Falk, J. H. (1982). Development of visual preference for natural environments. Environment and Behavior, 14(1), 5-28.
14.Baars, B.J. (1997). In the theater of consciousness: The workspace of the mind. Oxford: New York.
15.Berman, M. G., Jonides, J & Kaplan, S., 2008, ‘The Cognitive Benefits of Interacting With Nature’. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1207-1212.
16.Berto, R. (2005). Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 249-259.
17.Berto, R.(2008). Do eye movements measured across high and low fascination photographs differ? Addressing Kaplan’s fascination hypothesis. Journal of Environment Psychology, 28, 185-191.
18.Brown, K. W. & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822-848.
19.Cackowski, J. M., & Nasar, J. L. (2003). The restorative effects of roadside vegetation - Implications for automobile driver anger and frustration. Environment and Behavior, 35(6), 736-751. P.738
20.Chan, L.K.H., William, G., Hayward, W.G., & Theeuwes, J. (2009). Spatial working memory maintenance : Does attention play a role? A visual search study. Acta Psychologica , in press.
21.Cimprich, B. (1993). Development of an intervention to restore attention in cancer patients. Cancer Nursing, 16, 83-92.
22.Cimprich B, Ronis D. 2003. An environmental inter- vention to restore attention in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Cancer Nursing, 26(4), 284–292.
23.Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Cohen, L., Le Bihan, D., Mangin, J. F., Poline, J. B., & Riviere, D. (2001). Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming. Nature Neuroscience, 4(7), 752-758.
24.Francis, C., & Cooper Marcus, C. (1991). Place people take their problems. In J. Urbina Soria, P. Ortega Andeane, & R. Bechtel(Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd annual Conference of the Environmental design Research Association. Oklahoma City: Environmental Design Research Association, 178-184.
25.Globisch, J., H. A., F. Esteves, and A. Oehman. (1999). Fear appears fast:Temporal course of startle reflex potentiation in animal fearful subjects. Psychophysiology, 36, 66-75.
26.Goldstein, E. B. (2006). Sensation and Perception (7 ed.). Belmont, CA, USA Wadsworth Publishing.
27.Hartig, T. (1993). Nature experience in transactional perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 25, 17-36.
28.Hartig, T. A., Book, A., Garvill, J., Olsson, T., & Garling, T. (1996). Environmental influences on psychological restoration. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 37, 378-393.
29.Hartig, T., Kaiser F.G., & Bowler, P.A. (1997). Further development of a measure of perceived environmental restorativeness. Working paper No. 5, Institute for Housing Research, Uppsala University.
30.Hartig, T., & Staats, H. (2006). The need for psychological restoration as a determinant of environmental preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 215-226.
31.Herzog, T. R., Black, A. M. & Fountaine, K. A. & Knotts, D. J. (1997). Reflection and Attentional Recovery as Distinctive Benefits of Restorative Environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 17, 165-170.
32.Hsieh, P.-J., Colas, J.T., and Kanwisher, N. (2011). Pop-out without awareness: Unseen feature singletons capture attention only when top-down attention is available. Psychological Science. 22, 1220-1226.
33.James, W. (1890/1950). The Principles of Psychology, Vol 1. New York: Dover.
34.James, W. (1892). Psychology: The briefer course. New York: Holt.
35.Kahn, P, H, Jr. (1999). The Human Relationship with Nature: development and culture. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA., 9-15.
36.Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perpective, (PP.177-201). Cambridge University Press.
37.Kaplan, S.. (1995) The restorative benefits of nature: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169-182.
38.Kaplan, S. (2001). Meditation, restoration, and the management of mental fatigue. Environment and Behavior, 33, 1-16.
39.Kuo, F., (2001) Coping with poverty: Impacts of environment and attention in the inner city. Environment and Behavior, 33, 5–34.
40.Lamme, V.A. (2003). Why visual attention and awareness are different. Trends Cogn Sci, 7, 12-18.
41.Latham, A. (1991). To a stranger, Africa feels like home. The New York Times, November 10.
42.Laumann, K., Garling, T., & Stormark, K. M. (2001). Rating scale measures of restorative components of environments. Journal of Environment Psychology, 12(1), 31-44.
43.Laumann, K., Garling, T., & Stormark, K. M. (2003). Selective attention and heart rate responses to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 125-134.
44.Mirsky, A. F., Anthony, B. J., Duncan, C. C., Ahearn, M. B., & Kellam, S. G. (1991). Analysis of the elements of attention: A neuropsychological approach. Neuropsy- chology Review, 2, 109-145.
45.Oiri, M., Ohkura, M., & Kosugo, R. (1993). Improving amenity in confined underground workplaces. Psychological effects of embellished surroundings and artificial windows. Journal of Science of Labour, 69(4), 133-144.
46.Olds, A. R. (1989). Nature as healer. Children’s Environment Quarterly, 6, 27-32.
47.Parsons, R., Tassinary, L., Ulrich, R., & Grossman-alexander, M. (1998). The view from the road: implications for stress recovery and immunization. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, 113–139.
48.Sohlberg, M. & Mateer, C. (1989). Introduction to Cognitive Rehabilitation: Theory and Practice. New York: Guilford.
49.Sturm W. (1996) Evaluation in therapeutical contexts: attentional and neglect disorders. Eur Rev Appl Psychol, 46, 207-14.
50.Tennessen, C. H., & Cimprich, B. (1995). Views to nature: Effects on attention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 77–85.
51.Tong, F. (2003). Primary visual cortex and visual awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(3), 219-229.
52.Ulrich, R. S. (1981). Natural versus Urban Scenes Some Psychophysiological Effects. Environment and Behavior, 13, 523-556.
53.Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to nature environment. In I Altman & J. F. Wholwill (Eds.), Behavior and the natural environment, (pp. 85-125). New York: Plenum Press.
54.Ulrich, R.S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224(4647), 420-422.
55.Ulrich, R. S. (1986). Human responses to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 13(1), 29-44.
56.Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environment Psychology, 11, 201-230.
57.Ulrich, R. S. (1993). Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscape. In S. R. Kellert & E. O. Wilsons (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis, (pp. 73-137). Washinton, DC: Island/Shearwater Press.
58.Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/63559-
dc.description.abstract自工業革命後都市快速發展以來,環境心理與行為研究領域討論了許多關於自然景觀帶來的正向效益,其中包括減輕壓力、恢復注意力、提升正向情緒與美學價值等。其中,對於工作繁忙、節奏緊湊的現代生活,自然景觀的恢復性效益研究更顯重要。高密度都市常以街道綠化方式來增加自然景觀的比例,然而繁忙快速的生活方式下,是否會使人錯過此種知覺經驗所帶來的恢復性效益?本研究基於這樣的好奇,以大學生為研究對象,探討景觀覺察程度對恢復性效益之影響。
以上述概念發展,本研究透過操弄不同刺激物及指導語,來代表不同覺察程度概念。實驗共分為四組,包括三種不同景觀覺察程度組別,以及一組實驗對照組。研究題材選用生活周遭的街道綠化環境,以知覺恢復性量表(PRS)、恢復體驗程度(RE)及反序數字廣度測驗(DSBT)作為量測注意力表現及心理恢復性效益之指標,以台灣大學學生為主要受測對象。研究結果顯示在心理恢復性效益(PRS、RE)上,需要一定覺察程度的存在才會促使受測者獲得顯著的恢復;而在注意力表現上,即使是不同的實驗處理,只要給予受測者觀看擁有植栽之刺激物皆會使受測者的注意力表現獲得顯著的上升。透過研究結果也說明了,人可由閾下知覺(Subliminal Perception)途徑獲得自然景觀的恢復性效益,更可藉由提高覺察程度來獲得更好的效益。
本研究透過實證研究的方式討論低覺察及高覺察程度下,有自然元素之街景皆有助於人體健康,且覺察程度影響了恢復性效益的多寡。研究結果說明了人之知覺狀態與恢復性效益之關係,景觀實務設計師可於實務中提高使用者知覺狀態上著墨,以創造高恢復性效益之景觀設計。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractEver since the Industrial Evolution, cities have expanded fast and wide, studies in environmental psychology and behavior have discussed many benefits that natural environments can bring us reducing stress, restoring attention, elevating positive attitude, and aesthetic values, etc. Among all of these, the benefits of natural environment become even more important for people with hard work and fast-paced modern life. Cities with high density often try to make the streets look greener, in order to increase the proportion of natural environment, however, with such fast-pacing life, will people miss the restorative benefits that this sensual experience brings us? This study based on this question, and discussed about how the difference of awareness levels can effect a person’s restorative benefits.
Based on the above-mentioned concept, this study adopts different stimuli, different instructions to represent different levels of awareness. Experiment contains four groups, with three groups of different awareness levels, and one control group. Study using Perceived Restorativeness Scale (PRS) and Digit Span Backward Test (DSBT) as the indicators for measuring attention and restorative benefits, using National Taiwan University students as the main participant group.
Results on the PRS and DSBT show that we need a certain level of awareness to obtain restorative benefits. Even with different experiment strategies, once you give the participants to look at scenes with greenery, the attention performance will naturally rise. This study proved that human can obtain restorative benefits from natural environments through subliminal perception, and can have even better benefit if the awareness level is raised.
This study focused on daily streetscape, proved that both low and high awareness level of street scenes with greenery can improve human’s well-being. The level of awareness can influence the quantity of restorative benefits. Study reveals an approach for landscape architects to design higher restorative landscape through increasing more awareness.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T17:14:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-101-R99628302-1.pdf: 3509505 bytes, checksum: 647fc83c259d3eda038a5d1c7ca342b5 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2012
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書 i
中文摘要 ii
英文摘要 (Abstract) iii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究範圍與限制 3
第四節 研究重要性 5
第二章 文獻回顧 6
第一節 自然環境之恢復性效益 6
第二節 視覺注意力與視覺覺察相關理論 10
第三節 小結 17
第三章 研究方法 18
第一節 研究變項 18
第二節 研究架構與假設 19
第三節 各變項量測內容 22
第四節 實驗操作與流程 27
第五節 實驗資料蒐集與分析 31
第四章 研究結果與討論 33
第一節 樣本特性分析 33
第二節 研究假設驗證 36
第三節 結果討論 43
第五章 結論與建議 48
第一節 研究結論 48
第二節 後續建議 49
參考文獻 51
附錄一、實驗問卷 56
附錄二、部分文獻重點摘錄 60
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject街道景觀zh_TW
dc.subject注意力zh_TW
dc.subject覺察zh_TW
dc.subject恢復體驗zh_TW
dc.subject知覺恢復性量表zh_TW
dc.subject反序數字廣度測驗zh_TW
dc.subjectDSBT (digit span backward test)en
dc.subjectstreetscapeen
dc.subjectattentionen
dc.subjectawarenessen
dc.subjectrestorative experienceen
dc.subjectPRS (perceived restorativeness scale)en
dc.title視覺注意力與視覺覺察對景觀恢復性效益之影響zh_TW
dc.titleThe Influence of Visual Attention and Visual Awareness on Landscape Recovery Benefitsen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear100-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee歐聖榮,林晏州,趙芝良,鄭佳昆
dc.subject.keyword街道景觀,注意力,覺察,恢復體驗,知覺恢復性量表,反序數字廣度測驗,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordstreetscape,attention,awareness,restorative experience,PRS (perceived restorativeness scale),DSBT (digit span backward test),en
dc.relation.page64
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2012-08-20
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept園藝學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:園藝暨景觀學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-101-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
3.43 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved