請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/63461
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林萬億 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chung-Chia Kuo | en |
dc.contributor.author | 郭仲珈 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T16:43:19Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-02-10 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2012-08-29 | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2012-08-23 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 內政部(2011)。遊民處理人數【原始數據】。未出版之統計數據。取自http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/10/new10.htm
臺北市政府社會局(2011)。遊民處理情形季報表【原始數據】。未出版之統計數據。取自http://www.bosa.tcg.gov.tw/i/i0300.asp?fix_code=1018002&group_type=1&l1_code=10&l2_code=18 內政部(2004)。內政部社會司考察報告書。臺北:作者。 方孝鼎(2011年1月)。遊民身體與習性的自我照顧與社會規訓-臺灣遊民服務的觀察筆記。「2011文化研究學會年會」發表之論文,新北市真理大學。 方孝鼎(1991)臺灣底層階級研究:以臺中市遊民、拾荒者、原住民勞工、外籍勞工為例(未出版之博士論文)。私立東海大學,臺中市。 王順民(2009年3月4日)。關於遊民現象及其相關福利作為。國政評論。取自http://www.npf.org.tw/post/1/5516 王偉忠(1998)。臺灣地區遊民服務網絡的初探分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義市。 吳瑾嫣(2000)。女性遊民研究:家的另類意涵。應用心理研究,8,83-120。 李正賢(譯)(2009)。訪談研究法(原作者:Irving S.著)。臺北市:五南。(原著出版年:2009) 林萬億、陳東升(1995)。遊民問題之調查分析。行政院研究發展考核委員會委託研究報告(編號:84001449)。臺北市:行政院研考會。 林萬億(2010)。社會福利。臺北:五南。 林萬億、鄭麗珍(2012)。臺北市遊民輔導計畫研究。臺北市政府研究發展考核委員會委託研究報告(編號:市政專題研究報告第380輯),未出版。 林淑容(2006)。街友服務之研究-以臺中市干城區為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義市。 胡幼慧、姚美華(2009)。一些質性方法上的思考:信度與效度?如何抽樣?如何收集資料、登錄與分析。載於胡幼慧(主編),質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例(二版二刷)(頁117-132)。臺北:巨流。 徐宗國(譯)(2009)。質性研究概論(原作者:Anselm S., Juliet C.)。臺北市:巨流。 張英陣(譯)(2000)。質化研究與社會工作(原作者:Deborah K. P.)。臺北市:洪葉文化。(原著出版年:1998) 陳自昌(1995)。遊民的社區生活與服務(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北市。 陳大衛(2010)。社會關懷與遊民服務之省思-從臺北縣、市之遊民服務現況探討。社區發展季刊,130,259-266。 黃玫玲(1995)。臺北市遊民生活適應問題之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北市。 潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。臺北:心理。 潘淑滿(2005)。漂浪人生:遊民、家與公共政策。臺灣社會工作學刊,4,171-210。 潘淑滿(2007)。女性遊民之路:遊民的福利論述。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(編號:NSC 94-2412-H-003-001-),未出版。 潘淑滿(2009)。遊民政策與服務的意識形態。臺灣社會工作學刊,7,49-83。 鄭麗珍、張宏哲(2004)。遊民問題調查、分析與對策研究。行政院內政部社會司委託研究報告(編號:PG9304-0478),未出版。 鄭麗珍(2009)。遊民的行程途徑和因應對策。福利社會季刊,124,6-7。 謝錦芳(2011年08月21日)。日韓立專法制度化輔導脫貧。中國時報,A6版。 簡春安、鄒平儀(2004)。社會工作研究法(2004年修訂版)。臺北市:巨流。 Anderson,I. (2007). Tackling Street Homelessness in Scotland: The Evolution and Impact of the Rough Sleepers Initiative. Journal of Social Issues, 63(3), 623-640. Anderson, I., Kemp, P. & Quilgars, D. (1993). Single homeless people. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Practice guidelines for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Washington, DC: Author. Apicello, J.(2010). A Paradigm Shift in Housing and Homeless Services: Applying the Population and High-Risk Framework to Preventing Homelessness. The Open Health Services and Policy Journal, 3,41-52. Badiaga, S., Raoult, D., & Brouqui, P. (2008). Preventing and controlling emerging and reemerging transmissible diseases in the homeless. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 14(9), 1353–1359. doi: 10.3201/eid1409.080204 Bauer, M.W.&Gaskell, G.(Eds.)(2000). Qualitative Researching: with Text,Image and Sound. London,UK: Sage Publications. Belcher, J. and Erphross, P. (1989). Towards an Effective practice Model for the Homeless mentally Ill., Social Casework, 70(7): 421-427. Benjaminsen, L.&Dyb, E. (2008). The Effectiveness of Homeless Policies-Variations among the Scandinavian Countries. European Journal of Homelessness, 2, 45-67. Benzies, K., Rutherford, G., Walsh,C. A., Nelson, A. and Rook, J. (2008). Homeless shelter residents: Who are they and what are their needs within a context of rapid economic growth? New Scholarship in the Human Services,7,1-18. Blid, M., Gerdner, A. & Bergmark, Å. (2008). Prediction of homelessness and housing provisions in Swedish municipalities. European Journal of Housing Policy, 8, 399-421. Burt, M., Laudan, Y., Aron, E. L., & Valente, J. (Eds.). (2001). Helping America’s homeless: Emergency shelter or affordable housing? Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press. Cougnard, A., Grolleau, S., Lamarque, F., Beitz, C., & Brugere, S. (2006). Psychotic disorders among homeless subjects attending a psychiatric emergency service. Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 41, 904–910. doi: 10.1007/s00127-006-0109-4 Crabtree,B. F., Miller, W.L.(1999). Doing Qualitative Research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications. Cunningham, M., McDonald, S., & Suchar, N. (2008). Promising strategies to end homelessness. In R. H. McNamara (Ed.). Homelessness in America , 3, 1-16. New York: Praeger Publishers. Daly, G. (1996). Homeless: Policies, Strategies, and Lives on the Street. London, UK: Routledge. Doherty, J., Edgar, B., & Meert, H. (2002). European observatory on homelessness: Homelessness research in the EU—a summary, Brussels: FEANTSA. Edgar, W. (2009). European Review of Statistics on Homelessnes. Brussels: FEANTSA. Edgar, W., Doherty, J. and Meert, H. (2002) .Review of Statistics on Homelessness in Europe. Brussels: FEANTSA. Edgar, W., Doherty, J. and Meert, H. (2004). Third Review of Statistics on Homelessness in Europe. Developing an Operational Definition of Homelessness. Brussels: FEANTSA. FEANTSA. (2003). Good practices in the fight against homelessness, Brussels: Author. Fitzpatrick, S. Kemp, P., & Klinker, S. (2000). Single homelessness: An overview of research in Britain. Bristol, UK: Policy Press. Fleetwood, M. (2010). Homeless Services in the U.S.: Looking Back, Looking Forward: An Open Letter to Policymakers, Advocates, and Providers. The Open Health Services and Policy Journal, 3,27-29. Forrest, R. (1999). The new landscape of precariousness. In P. Kennett & A. Marsh (Eds.), Homelessness: Exploring the new terrain (pp. 17–36). Bristol: The Policy Press. Gaubatz, Kathlyn T. (2001). Family homeless in Britain: More than just a housing issue, Journal of Children & Poverty, 7 (1), 3-22. Gulcur, L., Stefancic, A., Shinn, S., Tsemberis, S. and Fischer, S. N. (2003). Housing, hospitalization, and cost outcomes for homeless individuals with psychiatric disabilities participating in continuum of care and housing first programmes. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 13, 171-186. Hertzberg, E. L. (1992). The Homeless in the United States: conditions, typology and intervention, International Social Work, 35, 149-161. Hansen, F. K. (2010). The Homelessness Strategy in Denmark. European Journal of Homelessness, 4, 113-125. John , J., Aaron, L. & Leide, P. (2011).Street to Home The Experiences of Long-term Unsheltered Homeless Individuals in an Outreach and Housing Placement Program. Qualitative Social Work, 0(0), 1-20. Johnsen, S.&Teixeira, L. (2010). Staircases, Elevators and Cycles of Change ‘Housing First’ and Other Housing Models for Homeless People with Complex Support Needs. Retrieved from http://www.crisis.org.uk Johnson, D. (1995). Developing an Approach to Educational Management Development in South Africa, Comparative Education, 31(2), 223-242. Kane, M. N., Green, D. and Jacobs, R. J. (2010). Perceptions of Students about Younger and Older Men and Women who May Be Homeless. Journal of Social Service Research, 36, 261–277. Kertesz, S., Mullins, A. N., Schumacher, J. E., Wallace, D., Kirk, K. and Milby, J. B. (2006). Long term work and housing outcomes among treated cocaine-using homeless persons. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 34, 17-33. Kresky-Wolff, M., Larson, M. J., O’Brien, R. W. and McGraw, S. A. (2010). Supportive housing approaches in the Collaborative Initiative to help end Chronic Homelessness (CICH). Journal of Behavioral Services & Research, [on-line first, accessed 5/3/10]. Larimer, M., Malone, D., Garner, M., Atkins, D., Burlingham, B., Lonczak, H., Tanzer, K., Ginzler, J., Clifasefi, S., Hobson, W. and Marlatt, G. (2009). Health care and public service use and costs before and after provision of housing for chronically homeless persons with severe alcohol problems. Journal of the American Medical Association, 301, 1350-1357. Lincoln,Y. S.&Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Lofland, J.&Lofland, L.(1995). Analyzing social settings: Aguide to qualitative observation and analysis (3rd ed.).Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Mackenzie, D. & Chamberlain, C. (2003). Homeless careers: Pathways in and out of homelessness. Reportfor Counting the Homeless 2001 Project. Melbourne: Swinburne and RMIT Universities. Retrieved September 27, 2005, from www.salvationarmy.org.au/reports/Homeless Careers 2003.pdf Ministry of Internal and Social Affairs (2009). The Government’s Homelessness Strategy – A Strategy to Reduce Homelessness in Denmark 2009–2012 (Kobenhavn : Indenrigs- og Socialministeriet and Ramboll Management Consulting) : www.feantsa.org/code/en/pg.asp?Page=1169. Minnery, J.and Greenhalgh, E. (2007). Approaches to Homelessness Policy in Europe, the United States, and Australia. Journal of Social Issues, 63(3), 641-655. Neale, J. (1997). Theorising Homelessness: Contemporary Sociological and Feminist Perspectives, in Burrows, R., Pleace, N., & Quilgars, D.(Eds.), Homelessness and Social Policy, 35-49, London: Routledge. O’Connell, M. E. (2003). Responding to Homelessness: An Overview of US and UK Policy Interventions, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 13, 158-70. Okamoto, Y. (2007). A Comparative Study of Homelessnessin the United Kingdom and Japan, Journal of Social Issues, 63(3), 525-542. Olivet, J., Bassuk,E., Elstad, E., Kenney, R. and Jassil, L. (2010). Outreach and Engagement in Homeless Services: A Review of the Literature. The Open Health Services and Policy Journal, 3,53-70. Padgett, D. K., Gulcur, L. and Tsemberis, S. (2006). Housing first services for people who are homeless with co-occurring serious mental illness and substance abuse. Research on Social Work Practice, 16, 74-83. Pearson, C., Montgomery, A. E. and Locke, G. (2009). Housing stability among homeless individuals with serious mental illness participating in Housing First programs. Journal of Community Psychology, 37, 404-417. Robinson, C. (2003). Understanding iterative homelessness: The case of people with mental disorders. Final report. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute. Shelton, K.H., Taylor,P.J., Bonner, A. and van den Bree, M. (2009). Risk Factors for Homelessness: Evidence From a Population-Based Study. Psychiatric services,60(4),465-472. Sirin, S. R., McCreary, D. R., & Mahalik, J. R. (2004). Differential reactions to men and women’s gender role transgressions: Perceptions of social status, sexual orientation, and value dissimilarity. Journal of Men’s Studies, 12(2), 119–132. doi: 10.3149/jms.1202.119 Snow,D. A. and Anderson, L. (1993).Down on Their Luck: A Study of Homeless Street People. California: University of California Press. Speak, S. and Tipple, G. (2006). Perception, Persecution and Pity: The Limitations of Interventions for Homelessness in Developing Countries. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(21): 172-88. Stefancic, A. and Tsemberis, S. (2007). Housing First for long-term shelter dwellers with psychiatric disabilities in a suburban county: a four-year study of housing access and retention. Journal of Primary Prevention, 28, 265-279. Steinmeta,A. M. (1991). Doing qualitative research:Circles within circles. London: Falmer. Tagg, S.K. (1985). Life story interviews and their interpretations. In M. Brenner, J.Brown, &D. Canter (Eds.), The research interview: Uses and approaches .London:Academic Press. Tainio, H. (2008). SOCCA. The Centre of Expertise on Social Welfare in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area. (Unpublished licenciatiates’s thesis. University of Helsinki : Faculty of Social Sciences). Tainio, H. & Fredriksson, P. (2009).The Finnish Homelessness Strategy : From a‘Staircase’Model to a‘Housing First’Approach to Tackling Long-Term Homelessness. European Journal of Homelessness, 3, 181-199. Toro, P., Tompsett, C., Philipott, P., Nachtergael, H., Galand, B., Schlienz, N. et al. (2007). Homelessness in Europe and the United States: a comparison of prevalence and public opinion, Journal of Social Issues, 63(3), 505-524. Toro, P.A. (2007). Toward an International Understanding of Homelessness, Journal of Social Issues, 63(3), 461-481. Tsemberis, S. and Asmussen, S. (1999). From streets to homes: the Pathways to Housing consumer preference supported housing model. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 17, 113-131. Tsemberis, S. and Eisenberg, R. F. (2000). Pathways to housing: supported housing for streetdwelling homeless individuals with psychiatric disabilities, Psychiatric Services, 51, 487-493. Tsemberis, S., Gulcur, L. and Nakae, M. (2004). Housing first, consumer choice, and harm reduction for homeless individuals with a dual diagnosis. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 651-656. Von Mahs, J. (2005). The Sociospatial Exclusion of Single Homeless People in Berlin and Los Angeles, American Behavioral Scientist, 48(8), 928-960. Wearing, B. (1996). Gender: The pain and pleasure of difference. Melbourne: Longman. Wong, Y. L. I., Park, J. M. and Nemon, H. (2006). Homeless service delivery in the context of continuum of care. Administration in Social Work, 30, 67-94. Wright, J. D. (1989). Address Unknown: The Homeless in America. New York: Aldine De Gruyter. Zufferey, C. (2008). Responses to Homelessness in Australian Cities: social worker perspectives, Australian Social Work, 61(4), 357-371. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/63461 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 在社會建構體制下,遊民普遍給予社會大眾負面的刻板印象,再加上政府單位的漠視使得遊民問題被邊緣化。然而遊民議題演變至今已非僅僅是貧窮問題而已,現已擴大到成為一個社會現象甚至是遭遇到社會排除。對此世界各國紛紛提出相關遊民輔導策略,依據臺灣的經驗來看,大臺北地區的遊民社會福利服務體系較其他縣市完善值得深入探究,而遊民是動態且複雜的群體,其成因多重,難以用單一視角來看待,就此本研究採用質性研究中的半結構式訪談法,主要探討遊民使用社會福利服務的經驗以及轉變。以6位曾經流浪者的生命故事出發,脈絡化地呈現個人進入街頭、流浪於街頭的生活樣貌,以及使用社會福利服務的經驗和影響,延伸到脫離街頭生活的歷程。經分析討論後發現,每一位受訪對象皆是獨特且充滿異質性的,但從他們的經驗軌跡中仍可以發現一些相類似之處,根據研究發現與分析獲得以下結論:
一、遊民進入街頭生活歷程呈現向下螺旋的態樣 (一)「貧窮」與「缺乏支持網絡」是遊民進入街頭生活的主因。 (二)個人進入街頭流浪生活並非一蹴可幾,而是反覆進出的循環歷程,若未能取得平衡則易成為長期性遊民。 (三)參與「勞動市場的不穩定性」使遊民難以脫離街頭生活。 二、社會福利服務有助於協助遊民脫離街頭生活 (一)非自願型遊民較自願型遊民容易離開街頭生活。 (二)「基本生活照顧」以及「臨時工作機會」是維繫遊民街頭生活所必須。 (三)「居住服務」與「就業輔導」相互搭配是遊民脫離街頭生活所必需。 (四)遊民相關社會福利服務缺乏積極性、整合性及連續性。 三、回歸社區生活是遊民最終的目標 (一)「個人改變的動機與意願」、「流浪時間長短」、「收入穩定性」、「獨立住居所的有無」、「與工作人員關係」等五項是影響遊民能否脫離街頭生活的關鍵。 (二)追蹤關懷、支持網絡的建立促使遊民持續生活在社區。 (三)脫離街頭生活後遊民的生活適應能力提升。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Under social constructivism, the negative stereotype of homeless and the ignored attitude of government make the homeless issue on the edge. However, the homeless issue is enlarged to be a social phenomenon or even to be social exclusion at present, and it is not just simply the problem about poverty. In order to deal with the intricate issue, governments around the world successively bring up solutions of homeless consultation. In Taiwan, in comparison of the social welfare services, Taipei area is better than other counties, thus it is used as the studied population in the thesis. In addition, the thesis is based on qualitative research due to the complex and dynamic characteristic of the homeless. Also, semistructured interview is adopted as the main technique. The purpose of the thesis is to investigate the homeless experience of using social welfare services and the follow-up changes. Six used-to-be-wanderer participants are interviewed in the study. The study chronologically exhibits each participant’s story of life wandering in the streets, the experience of using social welfare services, the changes of using social welfare services, and finally how to depart from drifted life. The result indicates that each interviewee is unique and diverse but some similarities could be generalized. The conclusions of analysis and discussion are listed below:
1.The wandering life of the homeless presents the downward spiral of survival. (1) Poverty and the lack of social support network are the main factors cause the situation. (2) The wandering life is a circulative course and it will not occur in a sudden. A one will possibly be chronically homeless if he/she cannot balance the life. (3) The instable labor market makes the homeless get stuck in wandering. 2.Social welfare services facilitate the homeless get rid of the drifted life. (1) In comparison of intentionally homeless, unintentionally homeless could leave the street life easier. (2) Fundamental daily care and temporary employment are essential for the homeless to maintain their life. (3) Residence service and career consultation are significant for the homeless (4) It is indicated that the social welfare services is not active, integrated, and seamless. 3.The ultimate objective is to assist the homeless in retuning to the community life (1) Motivations of self change, duration of wandering, income stability, independent resident, relationship of consulter are the key factors for the homeless to depart from wandering. (2) Sustained consultation, established support network facilitate the homeless live in the community continually. (3) It is showed that the ability of adapting life grow when the homeless return to normal life. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T16:43:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-R97330011-1.pdf: 1862120 bytes, checksum: 785e6e445e289b36409cbf07d15bf0ec (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 I
謝辭 I 中文摘要 III 英文摘要 V 目錄 VII 表目錄 IX 圖目錄 XI 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究議題 1 第二節 研究動機與目的 3 第二章 文獻探討 7 第一節 遊民的圖像 7 第二節 遊民服務的社會福利模式 28 第三節 各國的遊民政策與方案 34 第四節 臺灣的遊民政策與方案 52 第三章 研究方法 67 第一節 研究方法的選擇 67 第二節 研究設計 68 第三節 研究者角色與倫理 77 第四章 研究發現與分析 81 第一節 6位「曾經」流浪者的生命故事 81 第二節 流浪生活的樣貌 95 第三節 使用社會福利服務的經驗 112 第四節 使用社會福利服務後的轉變 144 第五章 結論與建議 175 第一節 研究結論 175 第二節 研究建議 180 第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 186 參考文獻 189 附錄一 訪談大綱 198 附錄二 訪談同意書 200 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 遊民使用社會福利服務之經驗與轉變:以大臺北地區為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The homeless experience of using social welfare services and their changes: A case study of Taipei area | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 100-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 鄭麗珍,潘淑滿 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 遊民,社會福利服務,經驗,轉變,大臺北地區, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Homeless,social welfare services,experience,change,Taipei area, | en |
dc.relation.page | 200 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2012-08-23 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 社會工作學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 社會工作學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-101-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.82 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。