請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/63368
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 杜震華 | |
dc.contributor.author | Cheng-Yueh Yeh | en |
dc.contributor.author | 葉承岳 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T16:37:26Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-04-28 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2012-10-12 | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2012-10-09 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻
王騰坤,2005,國際貿易原理與政策,台北市:三民書局股份有限公司。 吳家豪,2009,「淺論亞洲國家服務貿易輸出之發展概況」,台灣經濟研究月刊,32(1),頁 75-83。 李佳頤,2009,「亞洲服務業發展與趨勢」,台灣經濟研究月刊,32(1),頁 68-74。 杜巧霞,2009,「阻礙杜哈回合談判進展之主要因素與展望 」,中華經濟研究院(台灣WTO中心)專題分析。2012年4月15日,取自:http://www.wtocenter.org.tw/SmartKMS/do/www/readDoc?document_id=97093 林長慶,2010,「台灣服務貿易之現況與未來發展」,WTO電子報,中華經濟研究院(台灣WTO中心) ,209。2012年3月15日,取自:http://www.wtocenter.org.tw/SmartKMS/www/Epaper/wtoepaper/article209.htm 李紀珠、林靖,2001,「從歐盟整合經驗看歐盟及大中華經濟體雙邊貿易之特徵」,國政研究報告,財團法人國家政策研究基金會,財金(研)090-068號。 金潔妮,2008,服務業貿易的決定因素,台北:台灣大學經濟學研究所,碩士論文。 周添城、賴金瑞,2006,「台灣服務業國際化發展策略之研究─以餐飲服務業為例」,行政院經濟建設委員會委託研究成果報告,編號:(95) 067.604。 郭迺峰、劉孟俊、詹立宇、游淑慧,2004,「企業聚集化程度、電子化傾向及研發活動對勞動生產力的影響:台灣製造業引力模型(Gravity Model)之應用」,經濟情勢暨評論,10(1),頁 140-161。 黃登興、徐逸炫,1997,「殖民關係與貿易型態在台灣日據時期的驗證」,經濟論文叢刊,25(3),頁369-399。 黃登興、黃幼宜,2006,「兩岸三地貿易流量的變遷:引力模型的驗證」,台灣經濟政策與預測,中央研究院經濟研究所,36(2),頁 47-75。 黃璀娟、郭迺峰、李國賓,2004,「全球化下區域貿易組織對雙向貿易的影響:二十八國追蹤資料的實證研究」,經濟情勢暨評論,10(2),頁41-62。 路豐璟、呂逸卉,2006,「WTO服務業貿易談判之主要議題與可能影響」,貿易政策論叢, (5),頁 75-106。 經濟部國貿局,2008,「服務貿易總協定─中文」,2012年4月15日,取自:http://www.trade.gov.tw/cwto/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeID=434&pid=322852 英文文獻 Anderson, J.E. (1979). “A Theoretical Foundation for Gravity Equation,” American Economic Review, 69, 106-116. Balassa, B. (1961). “Towards a Theory of Economic Intergration,” Kyklos, 14(1), 1-17. Bergstrand, J. H. (1989). “The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor-Proportions Theory in International TradeThe Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor-Proportions Theory in International Trade,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71 (1), 143-153. Bhagwati J.N. (1984). ”Splintering and Disembodiment of Services and Developing Nations,” The World Economy, 7 (2), 133-144. Corden, W.M. (1970), “A Note on Economies of Scale, the Size of the Domestic Market and the Pattern of Trade”, in I.A. McDougall and R.H. Snape, eds., Studies in International Economics, Amsterdam, North-Holland. Deardorff, Alan V. (1988). “Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World?” The Regionalization of the World Economy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. De Santis, R. & C. Vicarelli. (2006). “The European Union Trade Strategy: An Empirical Evaluation of the Preferential Trade Agreements’ Effect on EU Import Flows,” Paper presented at the 8th Annual Conference of the European Trade Study Group, September 7-9 2006, Vienna. Eaton, J., & S. Kortum. (2002). “Technology, Geography, and Trade,” Econometrica, 70(5), 1741-1779. Frankel, Jeffrey A. (1997). Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics. Francois, J.F. (1993). “Explaining The Pattern of Trade in Producer Services,” International Economic Journal, 7(3), 23-31. Grünfeld, L. A., & A. Monxes. (2003). “The Intangible Globalization: Explaining the Patterns of International Trade of Services,” Discussion Paper 657. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, Oslo. Helpman, E., & P. Krugman. (1985). Market Structure and Foreign Trade: Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competition, and the International Economy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Hill, P. (1999). “Tangibles, Intangibles and Services: A New Taxonomy for the Classification of Output,” The Canadian Journal of Economics, 32(2), 426-446. Hill,T.P. (1977). “On Goods and Services,” Review of Income and Wealth, 23(4), 315-338. Huang, D. S. (2008). “Market-driven Trading Blocs in East Asia: Empirical Evidence from Gravity Model,” Journal of Economic Integration, 23(2), 272-296. Kimura F. & Hyun-Honn Lee. (2004).”The Gravity Equation in International Trade in Services,” Paper presented at the meeting of the European Trade Study Group Conference, September 9-11 2004, Nottingham. Krugman, Paul R. (1980). 'Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade', The American Economic Review, 70(5), 950-959. Lejour, A., & J.-W. de Paiva Verheijden. (2007). “The Tradability of Services within Canada and the European Union,” The Service Industries Journal, 27(4), 389-409. Lennon, C. (2006). “Trade in Services and Trade in Goods: Differences and Complementarities,” Paper presented at the 8th Annual Conference of the European Trade Study Group, September 7-9 2006, Vienna. Linder, S. B. (1961). An Essay in Trade and Transformation, New York: Wiley. Linnemann, Hans. (1966). An Econometric Study of International Trade Flows, Amsterdam: North-Holland. Martinez-Zarzoso & Nowak-Lehmann. (2003). “Augmented gravity model: An empirical application to Mercosur-European Union trade flows,” Journal of Applied Economics, 6(2), 104-122. McCallum, J. (1995). “National Borders Matter: Canada-U.S. Regional Trade PatternsNational Borders Matter: Canada-U.S. Regional Trade Patterns,” The American Economic Review, 85(3), 615-623. OECD (2010). Statistics on International Trade in Services: Volume II - Detailed Tables by Partner Country. Paris: OECD. Pöyhönen, P. (1963). “A Tentative Model for the Volume of Trade between Countries,” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 90, 93-110. Tinbegen, J. (1962). Shaping the World Economy; Suggestions for an International Economic Policy, New York: The Twentieth Century Fund. World Trade Organization. (1991, July 10). Services Sectoral Classification List. Retrieved April 25, 2012, from http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/serv_e/mtn_gns_w_120_e.doc | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/63368 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 台灣的服務業產值在2011年佔國內生產毛額67%的比例;台灣服務業的就業人口在同年度佔總就業人口58.6%的比例,以上的數據顯示服務業現在為支撐台灣經濟的最重要產業。台灣是個具有貿易出口競爭力的國家,WTO的資料顯示,近年來我國出口貿易值為全世界第16名;從我國中央銀行國際收支表之統計數據來看,我國自1984年至2011年,平均每年的貿易都能維持約一百八十億美元的順差,有時甚至有高達三百億美元的貿易順差。相較之下,我國的服務貿易出口值在全世界排第24名;從中央銀行的統計數據來看,我國的服務貿易歷年來皆呈現逆差,自1984年至2007年,平均每年的服務貿易逆差為57億美元;與亞洲四小龍相比,我國自1998年以來,服務貿易出口方面在四小龍之中一直都是排名最後;1998年我國與香港、新加坡與韓國之服務貿易出口差距分別為171.3億美元、58億美元與81.7億美元;而至2009年與此三國之差距卻提高到550.8億美元、430.8億美元與250.8億美元,顯示香港、新加坡與韓國之服務貿易競爭力已與我國拉開差距,以上數據都顯示台灣的服務業出口競爭力不足。
我國政府近年亦正視發展服務業的重要性,故在2007年成立了商業發展研究院,並於2009年通過服務業發展方案,欲整合各部會的力量來發展服務業。若欲有效利用資源發展服務業,則必須以實證研究找出影響服務貿易流量的決定因素,才能有效擬定政策輔導服務業發展,但國內目前欠缺服務業貿易的相關研究,故本研究欲以引力模型對國際服務貿易流量做實證分析,找出影響服務貿易流量之關鍵因素,並藉此提出相關政策建議。 本研究建構五個模型分析2005年至2008年間OECD會員國彼此的服務貿易出口總額、通訊服務業、旅遊服務業、金融服務業和文創及個人服務業之出口額作分析。本研究的實證結果顯示,進口國的GDP、經濟自由度和產業結構;出口國對進口國的外人直接投資;貿易雙方是否有相鄰國境對服務貿易出口有顯著的正向影響。距離則對服務貿易出口有顯著的負向貿易阻隔效果。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The output value of service industry in Taiwan accounted for 67% of Taiwan’s Gross domestic product in the year 2011; in the same year, the working population of service industry accounted for 58.6% of total employment in Taiwan. These statistics show that the service industry has become the most important industry in Taiwan. Taiwan has always been an export-oriented country. Indeed, Taiwan’s export competitiveness is very strong, and the average trade surplus from 1984 to 2011 is 18 billion U.S. dollar per year. In contrast, Taiwan’s export competitiveness is not very good when it comes to the trade in services; the average trade deficit from 1984 to 2007 is 5.7 billion U.S dollar per year in Taiwan’s service industry. Comparing to the other three countries of the well-known Asia Dragons, also known as the Four Asia Tigers, Taiwan’s export value of trade in services has been the lowest among the Asia Dragons since 1998, and the gap of export value between the other members of Asia Dragons and Taiwan has been widened in the past decade. These signs all point out that Taiwan’s export competitiveness of trade in services, unlike its competitiveness of trade in goods, needs to be strengthened.
Since the global financial crisis of 2007, the Taiwan government has understood the risk of putting all the resources in only one major industry, and decided to promote the service industry. It is important to develop the service industry efficiently, since the resources are limited. In order to accomplish the goal, researches that target the determinants of trade in services are needed. As a matter of fact, Taiwan lacks this kind of study, so the main purpose of this thesis is to assess the impact of various factors on the flow of trade in services, and give policy recommendations according to the empirical result of this study. Using the standard gravity model, we ran regression on export of services between the OECD member countries from the year 2005 to 2008. The results indicated that the Gross domestic product, Freedom of the world index and industry structure of the import country; Adjacent border between export and import countries have significant positive influence on the export flow of trade in services. And the distances between export and import countries has significant negative effect on the export flow of trade in services. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T16:37:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-R99341040-1.pdf: 1528739 bytes, checksum: e74663b1ecffe4430e9ab34316935ed7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究問題與目的 3 1.3 研究架構與流程 4 1.4 研究流程與章節安排 5 第二章 相關概念介紹與文獻回顧 6 2.1 相關概念介紹 7 2.1.1 貿易自由化與區域經濟整合 7 2.1.2 服務業與服務貿易 9 2.1.3 重疊需求理論 11 2.1.4 國內市場效應 12 2.2 引力模型相關文獻回顧 13 2.2.1 引力模型之相關研究 13 2.2.2 引力模型在服務貿易研究上的應用 14 2.2.3 國內引力模型相關研究 15 第三章 研究方法 18 3.1 引力模型概述 18 3.2 模型設定與變數說明 20 3.3 資料來源 28 3.4 分析方法 31 第四章 服務貿易實證資料分析 32 4.1 服務貿易總額 32 4.2 通訊服務業的服務貿易 34 4.3 旅遊服務業的服務貿易 36 4.4 金融服務業之服務貿易 38 4.5 個人及文創服務業的服務貿易 40 第五章 結論與建議 42 5.1 主要研究發現 42 5.2 政策建議 44 5.3 後續研究建議 45 參考書目 47 附錄 50 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 以引力模型探討影響國際服務貿易流量之決定因素 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Determinants of International Trade in Services:A Gravity Approach | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 101-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃登興,盧信昌 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 引力模型,服務貿易,國內市場效應,重疊需求理論,OECD, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Gravity model,Trade in services,Home market effect,Linder effect,OECD, | en |
dc.relation.page | 59 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2012-10-09 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 國家發展研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 國家發展研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-101-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.49 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。