請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/63209
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 馬鴻文 | |
dc.contributor.author | I-Chun Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳怡君 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T16:28:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-01-16 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2013-01-16 | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2013-01-09 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 英文文獻
Adams, D., Disberry, A.N, Hutchison, N., Munjoma, T., 2000. Taxes, subsidies and the behaviour of brownfield owners. Land Use Policy, 17, 135-145. Alastair A., Jim B., Stanley M., Bill D., Suzanne H., 2000. The financing of urban regeneration. Land Use Policy, 17, 147-156. Alberini, A., Longo, A., Tonin, S., Trombetta, F., Turvani, M., 2005. The role of liability, regulation and economic incentives in brownfield remediation and redevelopment: evidence from surveys of developers. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35, 327-351. Alberini, A., Stefania T., Margherita T., Aline C., 2007a. Paying for Permanence: Public Preferences for Contaminated Site Cleanup. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 35, 155-178. Alberini, A., Aline C., 2007b. Urban Environmental Health and Sensitive Populations: How Much are the Italians Willing to Pay to Reduce their Risks?. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 37(2), 239-258. Arens, S.B., 1997. The Valuation of Defective Properties: A Common Sense Approach, The Appraisal Journal, 65(2), 143-148. ASTM, 2000. E2081–00 Standard Guide for Risk-Based Corrective Action. Babiker I.S., Mohamed A.A., Hiyama T., Kato K., 2005. A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Kakamigahara Heights, Gifu Prefecture, central Japan, Science of the Total Environment, 345, 127– 140. Bartsch, C., Wells, B., 2005. State brownfield financing tools and strategies. Northeast-Midwest Institute. Bell, R., 1998. The Impact of Detrimental Conditions on Property Values. The Appraisal Journal, 65(4), 380-391. Bell R., 1999. Real Estate Damages: Analysis of Detrimental Conditions. Chicago: Appraisal Institute. Bie’n, J.D., Meer, J. T., Rulkens, W.H., Rijnaarts, H.H.M., 2004. A GIS-based approach for the long-term prediction of human health risks at contaminated sites. Environ Model Assess. 9, 221-226. Bonano, E.J., Apostolakis, G.E., Salter, P.F., Ghassemi, A., Jennings, S., 2000. Application of risk assessment and decision analysis to the evaluation, ranking and selection of environmental remediation alternative. J. Hazard. Mater., 71, 35-57. Borisov, B.G., 2006. Risk management in brownfields redevelopment. Brown Victoria, S.A., 1998. Brownfield site redevelopment planning liability, risk assessment and management-A city of winnipeg case study. Department of City Planning, University of Manitoba. Chalmers, J.A., Jackson, T.O., 1996. Risk factors in the appraisal of contaminated property, The Appraisal Journal, 64(1), 44-58. Chalmers, J. A., Roehr, S. A., 1993. Issues in the Valuation of Contaminated Property, The Appraisal Journal, 61(1), 28-41. Chen, Y.C., Ma, H.W., 2007. Combining the cost of reducing uncertainty with the selection of risk assessment models for remediation decision of site contamination. J. Hazard. Mater., 141, 17-26. Chen, Y.C., Ma, H.W., 2006. Model comparison for risk assessment: A case study of contaminated groundwater. Chemosphere, 63, 751-761. Chiang, C.T., Hwang, Y.H., Su, C.C., Tsai, K.T., Lian, I.B., Yuan, T.H., and Chang, T.K. (2010a). Elucidating the Underlying Causes of Oral Cancer through Spatial Clustering in High-risk Areas of Taiwan with a Distinct Gender Ratio of Incidence. Geospatial Health, 4(2):230-242. Chiang, C.T., Lian, I.B., Su, C.C., Tsai, K.T., Lin, Y.P., and Chang, T.K. (2010b). Spatiotemporal Trends in Oral Cancer Mortality and Potential Risks Associated with Heavy Metal Content in Taiwan Soil. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7(11): 3916-3928. Coffin, S.L., 2002. The brownfield reality check a study of land value and the effects of brownfields on the location of section 8 housing. Georgia Institute of Technology. CLARINET, 2002a. Brownfields and redevelopment of urban areas, Umweltbundesamt Austria, Irene Edelgaard, Danish Environment Protection Agency. CLARINET, 2002b. Review of decision support tools for contaminated land management, and their use in Europe. Umweltbundesamt Austria, Irene Edelgaard, Danish Environment Protection Agency. De Sousa, Christopher A., 2000. The brownfield problem in urban canada issues, approaches and solutions (Ontario). Department of Geography, University of Toronto. De Sousa, Christopher A., 2002. Brownfield redevelopment in Toronto: an examination of past trends and future prospect. Land Use Policy, 19, 297-309. De Sousa, Christopher A., 2008. Brownfields redevelopment and the quest for sustainability. E.E.A., 2006. Towards an EEA Europe-wide assessment of areas under risk for soil contamination PRA.MS application. Fan, C., Wang, G.S., Chen, Y.C., Ma, H.W., 2009. Risk assessment of exposure to volatile organic compounds in groundwater in Taiwan. Science of Total Environment, 407, 2165-2174. Fritch T.G., McKnight C.L., Yelderman J.C., Arnold J.G., 2000. An aquifer vulnerability assessment of the Paluxy aquifer, central Texas, USA, using GIS and a modified DRASTIC approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 25, 337–345. Finnamore, J., 2000. Modelling the financial risks of remediation, NATO Committee on Challenges to Modern /society; NATO/CCMS Pilot Study Evaluation of Demmonstrated and Emerging Technologies for the Treatment and Clean Up of Conminated Land and Groundwater- Phase Ⅲ. 245, 83-91. Gentile, A.R., 2000. Management of contaminated sites in Western Europe. Umweltbundesamt Austria, Irene Edelgaard, Danish Environment Protection Agency. Groundwater Services, Inc., 2000. Risk-Based Corrective Action, GSI-RBCA. GSG Consultants, Inc., 2005. Smart growth for brownfields redevelopment. Guinee J., Heijungs R., 1993. A proposal for the classification of toxic substances within the framework of life cycle assessment of product, Chemosphere, 26, 1925-1993. Hammond, E. L., 1998. Incentive factors that affect the redevelopment of brownfield sites in New Jersey. Department of Humanities and Social Sciences. Hargrove, W.W., Levine, D.A., Miller, M.R., Coleman, P.R., Pack, D.L., Durfee, R.C., 1996. GIS and risk assessment: A fruitful combination. in: Proceedings, ESRI Arc/INFO Users Conference. Hellweger, F.L., Wilson, L.H., Naranjo, E.M., Anid, P.J., 2002. Adding human health risk analysis tools to geographic information systems. Transactions in GIS 6. International Agency for Research on Cancer, IARC. Integrated Risk Information System, IRIS. Ipek, E.A., 2002. An analysis of uncertainty in brownfield redevelopment using real option, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Carnegie Mellon University. Jackson, T.O., 2003. Methods and techniques for contaminated property valuation, The Appraisal Journal, 71(4), 311-320. Khadam, I.M., Kaluarachchi, J.J., 2003. Multi-criteria decision analysis with probabilistic risk assessment for the management of contaminated groundwater, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23, 683-721. Luo Q., Catney P., Lerner D., 2009. Risk-based management of contaminated land in the UK: Lessons for China?. J. Environ. Manage. 90, 1123-1134. Ma, H.W., 2002. Stochastic multimedia risk assessment for a site with contaminated groundwater. Stochastic Environmental Research Assessment, 16, 464-478. McCarthy, L., 2002. The brownfield dual land-use policy challenge: reducing barriers to private redevelopment while connecting reuse to broader community goals. Land Use Policy, 19, 287-296. Mckone T.E., 1993. CalTOX, A multimedia total-exposure model for hazardous-wastes sites, UCRL. Merchant J., 1994. GIS-Based Groundwater Pollution Hazard Assessment: A critical review of the DRASTIC model, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 60(9), 1117-1127. Michelle, V., 2000. Sustainable brownfields redevelopment, Royal Roads University. Ministry for the Environment, 2001. Contaminated land management guidelines-risk screening system, New Zealand. Morra, P., Bagli, S., Spadoni, G., 2006. The analysis of human health risk with a detailed procedure operating in a GIS environmrnt. Environment International, 32, 444-454. Morra, P., Lisi R., Spadoni, G., Maschio, G., 2009. The assessment of human health impact caused by industrial and civil activities in the pace valley of messina. Science of the Environment, 407, 3712-3720. Mundy, B., 1992. The Impact of Hazardous and Toxic Material on Property Value: Revisited, The Appraisal Journal, 60(4), 463-471. Nijkamp, P., Rodenburg, C.A., Wagtendonk, A.J., 2002. Success factors for sustainable urban brownfield development: a comparative case study approach to polluted site. Ecological Economics, 40, 235-252. Page, G.W., Berger, R.S., 2006. Characteristics and land use of contaminated brownfield properties in voluntary cleanup agreement programs. Land Use Policy, 23, 551-559. Patchin, P.J., 1988. Valuation of Contaminated Properties, The Appraisal Journal, 56(1), 7-16. Patchin, P.J., 1991. Contaminated Properties - Stigma Revisited, The Appraisal Journal, 167-172. Patchin, P.J., 1994. Contaminated Properties and the Sales Comparison Approach, The Appraisal Journal, 62(3), 402-409. Papazoglou, I.A., Nivolianitou, Z., Aneziris, O., Christou, M., 1992. Probabilistic safety analyses of chemical installations, J. Loss Prev. in Process Ind., 5, 181-191. Papazoglou, I.A., Bonanos, G.S., Nivolianitou, Z. S., Duijm, N. J., Rasmussen, B., 2000. Supporting decision makers in land use planning around chemical sites. case study: expansion of an oil refinery, J. Hazard. Mater., 71, 343-373. Paull, E., 2008. The environmental and economic impacts of brownfields redevelopment. Northeast-Midwest Institute. Prato T., 2007. Evaluating land use plans under uncertainty. Land Use Policy, 24, 165-174. Raab, A., Feldmann, J., Meharg, A.A., 2009. Levels of arsenic in rice: the effects of cooking. Food Standards Agency, United Kingdom. Rahman, M.A., Hasegawa, H., Miah, M.A.M., 2006. Influence of cooking method on arsenic retention in cooked rice related to dietary exposure. Science of the Total Environmental, 370, 51-60. Regeneration of European Sites in Cities and Urban Environments (RESCUE), 2004. Sustainable land use and urban design on brownfield sites. Rinalidi, A. J., 1991. Contaminated Properties - Valuation Solutions, The Appraisal Journal, 59(3), 377-381. Roddewig, R. J., 1999. Classifying the Level of Risk and Stigma Affecting Contaminated Property, The Appraisal Journal, 67(1), 98-102. Roddewig, R. J., 2000. Adjusting Environmental Case Study Comparables by Using an Environmental Risk Scoring System, The Appraisal Journal, 68(4), 371-374. Rodenburg, C., 2003. Land use policies in the United States and the European Union. Stella Focus Group 4 Meeting. Rupert M.G., 1999. Improvements to the DRASTIC groundwater vulnerability mapping method, U.S. geological survey fact sheet FS-066-99, Reston (USA). Schadler, S., Morio, M., Bartke, S., Rohr-Zanker, R., Finkel, M., 2011. Designing sustainable and economically attractive brownfield revitalization options using an integrated assessment model. J. Environ. Manage. 92, 827-837. Scholz, R. W., Schnabel, U., 2006. Decision making under uncertainty in case of soil remediation. J. Environ. Manage. 80, 132-147. Su, C.C., Lin, Y.Y., Chang, T.K., Chiang, C.T., Chung, J.A., Hsu, Y.Y., Lian, I.B., 2010. Incidence of oral cancer in relation to nickel and arsenic concentrations in farm soils of patients’ residential areas in Taiwan. BMC Public Health. Su, S.W., Liu, T.L., Chen, Z.S., 2009. Arsenic contaminated soil and crop food security: current research Guantu Plain literature review and the Global Case. Beitou District Conference Proceedings arsenic pollution (In Chinese). Tam, K.L.E., Byer, P.H., 2002. Remediation of contaminated lands: a decision methodology for site owners. J. Environ. Manage. 64, 387-400. Tedd, P., Charles, J.A., Driscoll, R., 2001. Sustainable brownfield redevelopment-risk management. Engineering Geology, 60, 333-339. Thomas, M.R., 2002. A GIS-based decision support system for brownfield redevelopment. Landscape and urban planning, 58, 7-23. Thomas, K., Joachim, H., Susanne, H., Thomas, C., Harald, F., 2008. Assessment of a groundwater contamination with vinyl chloride (VC) and precursor volatile organic compounds (VOC) by use of a geographical information system(GIS). Int. J. Hyg. Environ.-Health, 211, 308-317. Thornton G., Franz M., Edwards D., Pahlen G., Nathanail P., 2007. The challenge of sustainability: incentives for brownfield regeneration in Europe. Environmental science & policy, 10, 116-134. Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (TEPA), 2006. Site soil and groundwater pollution health risk assessment principles Comment, Taipei (In Chinese). Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (TEPA), 2008. The Guandu development plan and environmental impact analysis report, Taipei (In Chinese). Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (TEPA), 2009. Investigation on potential contaminated sites of abandoned factories in Taiwan, Taipei (In Chinese). Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (TEPA), 2010. Amendment, enhancement and consultation of the human health risk assessment protocol for soil and groundwater contaminated sites, Taipei (In Chinese). Taiwan Environmental Protection Bureau (TEPB), 2007. Soil and groundwater pollution investigation and verification work plan, Hsinchu (In Chinese). Taiwan Environmental Protection Bureau (TEPB), 2009. Taipei soil and groundwater pollution investigation and verification work plan, Taipei (In Chinese). United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1998a. Handbook of tools for managing federal superfund liability risks at brownfields and other sites. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1998b. Characteristics of Sustainanable Brownfields Projects. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2001. Risk assessment guidance for superfund: volume Ⅲ-part A, process for conducting probabilistic risk assessment. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2003a. Using the triad approach to streamline brownfields site assessment and cleanup. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2003b. Multimedia, multi-pathway, multi-receptor exposure and risk assessment (3MRA). United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2005. Road map to understanding innovative technology options for brownfields investigation and cleanup, Fourth Edition. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2007. Treatment Technologies for Site Cleanup: Annual Status Report, Internet Seminar. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2011. Analyses performed for the risk-screening environmental indicators (RSEI). Wedding, G.C., Crawford-Brown D., 2007. Measuring site-level success in brownfield redevelopments: A focus on sustainability and green building. Environmental Management, 85, 483-495. Wernstedt, K., Hersh, R., 2006. Brownfields regulatory reform and policy innovation in practice. Progress in Planning, 65, 7-74. Wilson, A. R., 1994. The Environmental Opinion: Basis for an Impaired Value Opinion, The Appraisal Journal, 62(3), 410-423. Wilson, A. R., 1996. Emerging approaches to impaired property valuation, The Appraisal Journal, 64(2), 155-170. World Health Organization, 2001. Environmental Health Criteria 224- Arsenic and Arsenic Compounds. 2nd edition. Yu, H.L., Chiang, C.T., Lin, S.D., Chang, T.K., 2010. Spatiotemporal analysis and mapping of oral cancer risk in changhua county (Taiwan): an application of generalized Bayesian Maximum Entropy method. Annals of Epidemiology. Zhao Q, Kaluarachchi J., 2002. Risk assessment at hazardous waste contaminated sites with variability of population characteristics. Environ Int, 28(6), 41– 53. Zhu, Y.G., Sun, G.X., Lei, M., Teng, M., Liu, Y.X., Chen, N.C., Wang, L.H., Carey, A.M., Deacon, C., Raab, A., Meharg, A., Williams, P.N., 2008. High percentage inorganic arsenic content of mining impacted and nonimpacted chinese rice. Environ. Sci. Technol, 42, 5008-5013. 中文文獻 土壤及地下水污染整治基金管理委員會, http://sgw.epa.gov.tw/public/. 李泳龍、黃宗誠、陳定國,2002,污染土地估價方法之研究-以台鹼安順廠污染區域為例,第二屆全國災害為基處理學術研討會,第267-281頁,台南縣 林子欽、陳振惟,2006,從國外經驗探討台灣受污染不動產之估價”,碩士論文,臺北大學不動產與城鄉環境學系,臺北市 林子欽、陳振惟,2009 ,受污染工業土地之風險、污名與價值:美國經驗的啟示”,住宅學報,第十八卷,第二期,第23-44頁 行政院國家科學委員會, 2003,褐地再利用政策之比較研究專題研究計畫成果報告 環保署,2006,土壤及地下水污染場址健康風險評估評析方法及撰寫指引 環保署,2011,全國重金屬高污染潛勢農地之管制及調查計畫(99年度)期末報告 環保署,2012,環境風險整合與土地污染篩檢網建置計畫期末報告 徐世榮、蕭新煌,2006 ,污染場址再利用政策之研究:美國與台灣之比較”,都市與計劃,第三十三卷,第二期,第143-167頁 徐世榮、陳知遠, 2003,褐地再利用政策之比較研究, 行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告 龔宇陽,2011,國際經驗綜述:污染場地管理政策與法規框架,世界銀行東亞及太平洋地區研究報告 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/63209 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 污染土地再利用(以下簡稱褐地再生) 為複雜而難解習題,執行關鍵涵蓋經濟面、社會面、環保面、法律面等需求,因此污染責任釐清、政府法規彈性誘因、污染場址清除範圍、以及開發資本支持…等議題,為近幾年褐地再生研究焦點。然而,諸多研究僅說明關鍵問題,卻尚無研究方法探討如何降低關鍵因子不確定性,此部分則為本研究主要探討範疇。另一方面,國內目前面臨污染場址管理不僅單一場址整治問題,同時亦面臨大範圍的土壤及地下水污染場址整治或土地再利用等問題,其涉及土地利用類型與受體暴露途徑複雜,管理者並非能以保守點估計風險值或機率風險值提出完整場址管理決策,若採以最保守性可接受致癌風險(10-6)以及非致癌商數(1)作為整治目標考量,導致整治決策者無法更彈性考量其他因素,例如污染土地用途變更成都市化讓污染土地可以永續發展。若污染場址整治決策僅考量環保議題,則大範圍污染土地因整治經費籌措困難而無法活絡。
有鑑於此,應有詳細估算污染土地造成健康風險及土地價值減損變動趨勢研究方法,以探討污染土地造成風險空間分布特性。依據國外文獻指出,褐地再生關鍵成功因素為「環境風險」及「經濟誘因」兩項因子最受利害相關者重視,同時污染土地因鄰近居民健康風險危害所衍生污名化之風險成本難以估價,亦導致污染土地價值鑑價考量時主要不確定性影響,因此本研究透過地理資訊系統結合健康風險評估,將健康風險評估納入褐地再生管理決策中,建置污染場址風險地圖模式(ArcGIS for Risk assessment management, 簡稱Arc-RAM),建立彈性風險值與土地價值間關係,以量化風險估算污染土地再利用之不確定性影響。 本研究第一部分透過蒐集風險問卷參數建立專一性污染場址風險地圖,探討族群暴露習慣所呈現污染場址之風險地圖分布差異,本研究透過機率值分析風險地圖空間分布,研究結果與傳統蒙地卡羅第三層次風險評估比對,發現風險地圖空間分布可以突顯污染範圍內暴露生活習慣差異,以解決蒙地卡羅無法分析風險空間分布問題。第二部分依據風險地圖繪製不同機率個別風險值(Individual risk, IR),顯示大範圍污染場址涵蓋各村里風險等級分布與影響暴露人口數,依照不同機率值呈現個別風險值(IR)下所影響各村里族群風險(Population risk, PR)變動情形,探討族群風險值(PR)與個別風險值(IR)相關性,依據累積機率10%; 50%; 90%; 100%設定,以族群風險變動趨勢圖作為決策可接受風險基準參考,進一步探討族群風險與土地價值減損關係。第三部份依據不同機率族群風險值(PR)或個別風險值(IR)設定彈性風險,估算彈性風險範圍所造成各村里土地價值影響(Land values at different risk levels, LVrv),依照風險變動情況下估算土地價值減損(Damaged land values of risk level, DLVrv),DLVrv變動斜率越大則代表該村里(或場址)具有污染土地再利用潛在誘因。第四部份則是引用Bell模式設定不同彈性風險整治目標情境,以估算污染土地鑑價之改善污染計畫誘因性及風險性成本,並且估算風險性成本所佔污染土地減損價值比例,透過案例研究發現污染場址在無考量整治過程逕行污染土地再利用,估算國內風險成本比率(42.79%)比起國外來得高,尤其個案場址之住宅區因健康風險影響導致劃定風險範圍程度大,此外土地價值減損程度介於假設情境一(R>1×10-6)與情境二(R>1×10-5)之間,依據本研究個案成果顯示在不損及鄰近居民健康風險下,將彈性風險設定為1×10-5造成土地價值減損幅度較小,因此透過本研究分析流程應須共同考量土地利用永續與居民健康保護,則可提出較經濟與高效益之褐地再生管理政策。 本研究結果證明建立污染場址專一性風險地圖評析方法,可以解決褐地再生涉及「土地價值」與「環境風險」等複雜不確定性影響,突破以往風險評估單點估計與蒙地卡羅不確定性分析方法,以風險地圖分布狀況探討污染場址周圍族群風險變化趨勢,並從空間角度共同考量環境風險與土地價值兩者變動趨勢,並進一步估算不同風險等級所影響土地價值減損,透過本研究可以清楚評析國內推動褐地再生管理決策機制,應以彈性風險設定條件與土地管理共同擬定較經濟與有效彈性管理策略,並以系統化機制降低褐地再生之風險成本不確定性影響,以避免褐地再生議題於環保政策與土地再利用脫鉤情形。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Land reuse of contaminated land (referred to as “brownfield regeneration”) is a complex and obscure issue. The crucial implementation of brownfield regeneration involves different aspects, including pollution liability, flexible regulations, contamination conditions, financial support, etc. Although many studies provide descriptions of critical problems, none of the research methods explore the issue of how to reduce the uncertainties of key factors. In addition, the problem that contaminated site management in Taiwan faces currently is not just single site remediation but large scale problems of soil and groundwater pollution remediation and land reuse. These problems involve different types of land categories and complicate exposure pathway of receptor. Complete site management decision cannot be made only based on conservative estimation of value at individual risk or probability risk. If the most conservative level of acceptable cancer risk (10-6) and non-carcinogenic quotient (1) are adopted to achieve the goal of remediation, decision makers of remediation will be unable to consider more flexibly in adopting other factors. For example, changing contaminated land use into urbanization to improve the sustainability development for contaminated sites. Then, a wide range of contaminated land will not be successfully resolved due to financing difficulties.
Therefore, a research method estimate the contaminated land which leads to health risk and damage to land value should be available. It can explore the characteristics of risk space distribution in contaminated land. Environmental risk and economic incentives are the two critical success factors of brownfield regeneration in the past studies. In addition, the cost of risk derived from stigmatization due to health hazard of nearby residents caused by contaminated land is incalculable. It also contributes to main uncertainties in assessing damage values of contaminated land. Therefore, we constructed a contaminated site risk map model (ArcGIS for risk assessment management, abbreviated as Arc-RAM) by combining the four major steps of risk assessment with the application of a geographical information (GIS) system. Risk maps estimate uncertainties of contaminated land reuse in order to establish relationship between flexible value at risk and land values. The first part of this research establishes a specific risk map of contaminated sites through collected risk questionnaire parameters. It can explore differences of risk map distribution of contaminated sites. The space distribution of risk map is analyzed using probability values. The results of this research are compared to the traditional Monte Carlo third-level risk assessment. We discover that risk map space distribution can highlight the differences of exposure habits within the scope of contamination and can resolve the analysis problem of risk space distribution which Monte Carlo risk assessment is unable to achieve. The second part of this research draws different population risk (PR) of probability based on risk maps to show villages’ affected population exposure. In accordance with different probability values under individual risk (IR), it is presented the correlation between population risk (PR) and individual risk (IR). According to the settings of cumulative probabilities of 10%, 50%, 90% and 100%, a risk variation drawing of population risk (PR) is regarded as a reference of acceptable risk benchmark for decision making. It further explores the relationship between population risk (PR) and damage to land value. The third part is to set flexible risk based on different probability risk of PR or IR in order to estimate the impact of land value in each village (LVrv) by flexible risk scope. The damaged land values of risk level (DLVrv) are estimated according to risk change. The greater the change slope DLVrv the more potential inducement of contaminated land reuse of a village (or site). The fourth part is to set different situations of flexible risk remediation goal by referencing Bell model in order to estimate improvement of contaminated plan incentives and cost of risk of contaminated land assessment. It also estimates the proportion of damage value of contaminated land accounted for by cost of risk in this research. If contaminated site reuse is directly conducted without remediation, it is estimated that domestic cost of risk ratio (42.79 %) is much higher the ratio of foreign countries. In particular, case of residential areas has greater degree of delimited scope of risk. In addition, flexibility risk is set to 1×10-5 is lower on damage to land values than other risk condition and directly redevelopment. It proves that if Taiwan wants to strengthen land management policy of brownfield regeneration, sustainability of land utilization and protection of the health of residents must be considered at the same time. The results of this research prove that establishment of specific risk map analysis of contaminated site is able to resolve complex uncertainties with respect to “land value” and “environmental risk” derived from brownfield regeneration. Given consideration to flexible risk setting condition and land value, this research formulates the economic and effective strategy of flexible management. Moreover, this research takes a systematic mechanism to reduce uncertainty of risk cost of brownfield regeneration. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T16:28:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-D95541008-1.pdf: 5661588 bytes, checksum: 89251d3561dd6f1fca7fb8699d5a4895 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 I
Abstract III 目錄 V 圖目錄 VII 表目錄 IX 一、緒論 1 1.1前言 1 1.2研究目的 2 1.3研究架構 4 二、文獻回顧 7 2.1褐地定義與土地再利用管理決策 8 2.2污染場址風險評估方法 17 2.3風險地圖建立與應用 22 2.4 污染土地再利用經濟模型分析 30 2.4.1歐盟土地處理價值等級評估法 30 2.4.2污染場址土地價值減損經濟分析法 35 2.5 國內污染土地管理評析與說明 41 三、研究方法 44 3.1土地再利用價值-風險矩陣分析 44 3.2小區域污染場址風險地圖 47 3.2.1污染場址風險地圖建置 47 3.2.2污染場址風險問卷設計與規劃 51 3.3污染場址族群風險與土地價值影響變動 56 3.3.1污染場址族群風險評估 58 3.3.2彈性風險值估算污染場址土地價值影響變動 59 四、研究背景資料說明 62 4.1大區域風險地圖篩選因子分析 62 4.2小區域風險參數與暴露情境說明 67 4.2.1地下水污染場址研究案例背景說明 67 4.2.2土壤污染場址研究案例背景說明 72 五、結果與討論 77 5.1廢棄工廠之土地利用風險矩陣分析 77 5.2污染場址風險地圖不確定性分布 79 5.3風險地圖暴露途徑敏感度分析 90 5.4族群風險地圖趨勢變化分析 94 5.5風險影響範圍下估算土地價值分析 98 5.6污染土地鑑價中風險性成本影響 106 六、結論與建議 113 參考文獻 119 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 應用風險地圖探討污染土地再生管理策略 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The development of land-use regeneration strategies on contaminated site by using risk maps | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 101-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳先琪,李公哲,王根樹,李泳龍,楊致行 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 褐地再生,風險地圖,族群風險,污染土地減損,不確定性,彈性風險管理, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Brownfield regeneration,Risk maps,Population risk,Land-value damage,Uncertainty,Flexible risk management, | en |
dc.relation.page | 127 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2013-01-09 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 環境工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 環境工程學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-102-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 5.53 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。