請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/63186完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 李存修 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ssu-Tsai Liu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 劉思采 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T16:27:00Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-02-01 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2013-02-01 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2013-01-18 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1.Altman, E. I., 1986, “Financial Ratios, Discriminate Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy,” Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589-609.
2.Bharath, S.T. and T. Shumway, 2008, “Forecasting Default with the Merton Distance to Default Model,” The Review of Financial Studies, 21(3), 1339-1369. 3.Black, F. and M. Scholes, 1973, “The pricing of options and corporate liabilities,” Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637-654. 4.Boyle, P. P., 1977, “Options: A Monte Carlo Approach,” Journal of Financial Economics,” 4, 323-38. 5.Boyle, P. and S. H. Lau, 1996, “Bumping Up Against the Barrier with the Binomial Method,” Journal of Derivatives, 1(4), 6-14. 6.Brockman, P. and H. J. Turtle, 2003, “A Barrier Option Framework for Corporate Security Valuation,” Journal of Financial Economics, 67, 511-529. 7.Cheuk, T. and T. Vorst, 1996, “Complex Barrier Options,” Journal of Derivatives, 4(1), 8-22. 8.Chou, H. C. and D. Wang, 2007, “Performance of Default Risk with Barrier Option Framework and Maximum Likelihood Estimation: Evidence from Taiwan,” Physica A, 358, 270-280. 9.Cox, J., S. Ross and M. Rubinstein, 1979, “Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach,” Journal of Financial Economics, 7, 229-64. 10.Duan, J. C., 2000, “Correlation: Maximum Likelihood Estimation Using Price Data of the Derivate Contract,” Mathematical Finance, 10(4), 461-462. 11.Duan, J.C. and M. T. Yu, 1994, “Assessing the Cost of Taiwan’s Deposit Insurance,” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2, 73-90. 12.Duan, J.C., Moreau, A. and C. W.Sealey, 1995, “Deposit Insurance and Bank Interest Rate Risk: Pricing and Regulator Implications,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 19, 1091-1108. 13.Ericsson, J. and J. Reneby, 2004, “Estimating Structural Bond Pricing Models,” Journal of Business, 78, 707-736. 14.Geske, R., 1977, “The Valuation of Corporate Liabilities as Compound Options,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 12,541-552. 15.Geske, R., 1979, “The Valuation of Compound Options,” Journal of Financial Economics, 7, 63-81. 16.Huadong, H. P., 2009, “A Novel Simple but Empirically Consistent Model for Stock Price and Option Price,” 17.Ingersoll, Jonathon, 1997, “A Contingent-Claims Valuation of Convertible Securities,” Journal of Financial Economics, vol.4, no.3(May):289-321. 18.Kealhofer, S., 2003, “Quantifying Credit Risk I: Default Prediction,” Financial Analysts Journal, 59(1), 30-44. 19.Leland, H.E. and K. B. Toft, 1996, “Optimal Capital Structure, Endogenous Bankruptcy, and the Term Structure of Credit Spreads,” Journal of Finance, 51(3), 987-1019. 20.Liao, S.L. and C.W. Wang, 2003, “The Valuation of Reset Options with Multiple Strike Resets and Reset Dates,” The Journal of Futures Markets, vol.23, no.1, 87-107. 21.Merton, R., 1973, “Theory of rational option pricing,” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science,4,141-183. 22.Merton, R. C., 1974, “On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates,” Journal of Finance, 29, 449-470. 23.Reisz, A. S. and C. Perlich, 2007, “A Market-Based Framework for Bankruptcy Prediction,” Journal of Financial Stability, 3(2), 85-131. 24.Rich D. R., 1994, “The Mathematical Foundations of Barrier Option-Pricing Theory,” Advances in Futures and Options Research, 7, 267-311. 25.Ritchken, P., 1995, “On Pricing Barrier Options,” Journal of Derivatives, 3(2), 19-28. 26.Ronn, E. and A. Verma, 1986, “Pricing Risk-Adjusted Deposit Insurance: An Option-Based Model,” Journal of Finance, 41,871-895. 27.Rubinstein, M. and E. Reiner, 1993, “Exotic options,” Unpublished working paper, University of California, Berkeley. 28.Stoll, H.R. and R.E., Whaley, 1993, “Futures and Options: Theory and Applications,” South-Western Publishing Co., Cincinnati, OH. 29.Tudela, M. and G. Young, 2003, “Predicting Default Among UK Companies,” Financial Stability Review, 13, 104-114. 30.Wong, H. and T. Choi, 2009, “Estimating Default Barriers from Market Information,” Quantitative Finance,9(2),187-196. 31.李存修, 林岳賢,1999,“重設選擇權之評價與避險操作,” 財務金融學刊, 7卷, 2期, 113-150. 32.周恆志, 2009,“障礙選擇權違約風險模型之績效與應用,” 管理學報, 26卷, 3期, 275-289. 33.詹傑仲, 2006,“國家金融安定基金的價值及其市場的影響: 界限選擇權的應用,” 國立中山大學財務管理學系未出版博士論文. 34.藍新仁, 2010,“共同基金創新之研究-分級基金,”國立台灣大學管理學院碩士在職專班未出版碩士論文. 35.蘭利兵, 2010, “關於期權分解的分級基金定價研究,” 大陸證券期貨, 3卷,26-27. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/63186 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 大陸共同基金市場總資產規模已達 2.1 兆人民幣(2011 年底)，約為台灣共同基金規模的五倍大。雖然發展歷程僅短短十三年(1998-2011 年)，但幾乎所有類型之基金均已齊全，其中出現於2007 年的分級基金更是全球鮮少見到的創新之舉，截至2011 年底，已有三十檔分級基金發行，總規模超過624 億人民幣，但相關的文獻除藍新仁(2010)的介紹性文章以及大陸部分期刊敘述性的介紹外，尚未有聞。所謂分級基金乃是將一個股票型(或指數型、債券型、平衡型)切割成固定收益級與槓桿收益級二個子基金，二者共同承擔母基金的收益與風險，收益分配的型態有多樣化的設計，以迎合不同需求的投資人。
本研究以修正的二項式選擇權評價法來評估分級基金之價值。評價模型可以處理各種不同的收益分配規則，除可評價現有的分級基金外，也可在設計不同的分級基金時，做為規劃階段的先行評估工具。本研究也將進行多方面的敏感度分析，包括各級別之規模占比、到期日、固定收益級之利率和母基金資產的波動性等對基金價值的影響。 就學術的角度而言，本研究是第一個利用財務工程技巧建立分級基金評價模型的研究；就實務的角度而言，本文除提供投資人及業者做為投資決策與風險控管的參考外，國內業者也可用以研發類似產品。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The total assets under management of mutual funds in China has amounted to RMB 2.1 trillion by the end of 2011, which is around five times as large as that of Taiwan. The classified funds was introduced in 2007 is by far the most innovative product, which is rarely seen even in developed countries. Up to end of 2011, there have been seen thirty classified funds launched with total asset size more than RMB 62.4 billion.
The basic structure of a classified fund contains two tranches of sub-funds: fixed income tranche (FIT) and leveraged income tranche (LIT). The two sub-funds share the return and risk of the parent fund according to a set of predetermined rules. Our project tries to evaluate the value and risk of various classified funds via a modified binomial option pricing model. The model is capable of accommodating various sharing rules, which is useful in pricing existing classified funds as well as in structuring new types of classified funds. Sensitivity analysis from different angles will also be conducted, which include the changes in the shares of sub-fund, participation provision, promised yield to FIT, asset volatility and fund maturity. The resulting changes in fund value will be documented and discussed. Academically, this project represents the first research concentrated on modeling classified funds using financial engineering techniques. Practically, the models developed in this project will help investors and fund companies in investment decision marking and risk management. Local fund business may also be benefitted when developing similar fund products. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T16:27:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-R99723032-1.pdf: 1483588 bytes, checksum: 03e50f6e04fcf8ca8e058119aa7520bb (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 ...........................................i
摘要............................................ii ABSTRACT....................................... iii 壹、 緒論.......................................1 貳、 分級基金之發行與分配結構...................3 參、 文獻探討...................................6 一、 結構式模型(Structural Model) ............. 6 二、 障礙選擇權(Barrier Option) ................8 三、 二項式模型(Binomial Model) .............. 10 肆、 研究方法與實證結果........................14 一、 評價模型 ................................ 15 二、 實證結果 ................................ 17 三、 敏感度分析 .............................. 22 四、 其他複雜收益分配方式之處理 .............. 25 伍、 結論與建議................................27 參考文獻.......................................29 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 分級基金 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 固定收益級基金 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 槓桿收益級基金 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 二項式選擇權 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | fixed income tranche | en |
| dc.subject | classified funds | en |
| dc.subject | binomial option | en |
| dc.subject | leveraged income tranche | en |
| dc.title | 大陸共同基金創新型槓桿商品-分級基金評價 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Leverage Innovation for Mutual Funds in Mainland China- Pricing Classified Funds | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 101-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李賢源,王耀輝 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 分級基金,固定收益級基金,槓桿收益級基金,二項式選擇權, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | classified funds,fixed income tranche,leveraged income tranche,binomial option, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 31 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2013-01-18 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 財務金融學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 財務金融學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-101-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.45 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。