請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/63106
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 宋麗梅(Li-May Sung) | |
dc.contributor.author | Tzu-Ying Wu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 吳姿瑩 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T16:23:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-02-01 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2013-02-01 | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2013-01-28 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Anglin, J. M. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58 (10), Serial #238.
Au, T., Knightly, L., Jun, S., & Oh, J. (2002). Overhearing a language during childhood. Psychological Science, 13, 238-243. Bassano, D. (2000). Early development of nouns and verbs in French: Exploring the interface between lexicon and grammar. Journal of Child Language, 27, 521-559. Berko, J. (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150-177. Berman, R. A. (2000). Children’s innovative verbs vs. nouns: Structured elicitations and spontaneous coinages. In L. Menn & N. Bernstein-Ratner, (Eds.), Methods for studying language production (pp. 69–93). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Bertram, R., Laine, M., and Karvinen, K. (1999). The interplay of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity in lexical processing: Evidence from a morphologically rich language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(3), 213-226. Bowerman, M. (1982). Reorganizational processes in lexical and syntactic development. In E. Wanner & L. Gleitman (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art. New York: Cambridge University Press. Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Carlisle, J. F. (2010). Effects of instruction in morphological awareness on literacy achievement: An integrative review. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(4), 464–487. Caselli, M. C., Bates, E., Casadio, P., Fenson, J., Fenson, L., Sanderl, L., et al. (1995). A cross-linguistic study of early lexical development. Cognitive Development, 10, 159-200. Chen, S. R. (2002). Relations between indigenous language teaching effect and ways of promotion: A case study of Ulay Atayal teaching. MA Thesis, National Cheng-Chi University, Taiwan. Cheng, H. R. (2012). Learning to encode motion events in Atayal:A case study of heritage language learning in an elementary school in HsinChu. MA Thesis, National Taiwan University, Taiwan. Clark, E. V. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Cummins, J. (2005). A proposal for action: Strategies for recognizing language competence as a learning resource within the mainstream classroom. Modern Language Journal, 89, 585-591. De Houwer, A. (2007). Parental language input patterns and children’s bilingual use. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 411-424. Fisher, C., Hall, D. G., Rakowitz, S., & Gleitman, L. R. (1994). When it is better to receive than to give: Syntactic and conceptual constraints on vocabulary growth. Lingua, 92, 333-375. Fishman, J. (2006). Acquisition, Maintenance and recovery of heritage languages. In G. Valdes, J. Fishman, R. Chavez, W. & Perez (Eds.), Developing minority language resources: The case of Spanish in California (pp. 12-22). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. Freyd, P., and Baron, J. (1982). Individual differences in acquisition of derivational morphology. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 21, 282-295. Gentner, D. (1982). Why Nouns are Learned Before Verbs: Linguistic Relativity versus Natural Partitioning. In S. A. Kuczaj (Ed.), Language development: Vol. 2. Language, thought and culture. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Gopnik, A. & Choi, S. (1995). Names, relational words, and cognitive development in English and Korean speakers: Nouns are not always learned before verbs. In M. Tomasello & W. E. Merriman (Eds.), Beyond names for things: Young children’s acquisition of verbs (pp. 83-90). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Gordon, P. (1989). Levels of affixation in the acquisition of English morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 519-530. Hayung, T. (2008). A study of prefixes in Jianshi Atayal. MA Thesis, National Hsinchu University of Education, Taiwan. Horng, C. C. (2006). The teaching of indigenous languages in elementary schools: A case study of Puyuma language leaching. MA Thesis, National Taitung University, Taiwan. Huang, L. M. (1993). A study of Atayal syntax. Taipei: Crane. Huang, L. M. and Hayung, T. (2008). Syntax and semantics of p- in Squliq Atayal. Language and Linguistics, 9(3), 491-521. Ku, Y. M., and Anderson, R. C. (2003). Development of morphological awareness in Chinese and English. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 399–422. Li, P. J. (2011). The distribution of Austronesian languages and immigration in Taiwan. Chienwei: Taipei. Liu, H., M., Tsao, F. M. (2010). Mandarin-Chinese Communicative Development Inventory (Taiwan). Taipei: Psychological Publishing. Lowie, W.M. (2000). Cross-linguistic influence on morphology in the bilingual mental lexicon. Studio Linguistica, 54(2), 175-185. Lu, L., & Liu, H. X. (1994). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised (Taiwan). Taipei: Psychological Publishing. Lucas, R. & Bernardo, A. (2008). Exploring noun bias in Filipino-English bilingual children. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 169(2), 149-163. Lynch, A. (2003). The relationship between second and heritage language acquisition: Notes on research and theory building. Heritage Language Journal, 1, 1-18. Retrieved from http://www.heritagelanguages.org Montrul, S. (2002). Incomplete acquisition and attrition of Spanish tense/aspect distinctions in adult bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 1-18. Montrul, S. (2008). Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism. Re-examining the age factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Montrul, S., Foote, R., & Perpinan, S. (2008a). Gender agreement in adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers: The effects of age and context of acquisition. Language Learning, 58, 503–553. Montruls, S., Foote, R., Perpinan, S. (2008a). Gender agreement in adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers: The effects of age and context of acquisition. Language Learning, 58, 503-553. Nagy, W. E. (2007). Metalinguistic awareness and the vocabulary comprehension connection. In R. K. Wagner, A. E. Muse, & K. R. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension (pp. 52-77). New York: Guilford. Nagy, W., Anderson, R., Schommer, M., Scott, J. A., & Stallman, A. (1989). Morphological families in the internal lexicon. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 262- 281. Pearson, B. (2007). Social factors in childhood bilingualism in the United States. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 399-410. Polinsky, M. (1997). American Russian. Language loss meets language acquisition. Proceedings of the Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics (pp. 370-406). Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic. Polinsky, M. (2005). Word class distinctions in an incomplete grammar. In D. Ravid & H. Bat-Zeev Shyldkrot (Eds.), Perspectives on language and language development (pp. 419-436). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer. Polinsky, M. (2007). Incomplete acquisition: American Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 14, 191-262. Polinsky, M. (2008a). Russian gender under incomplete acquisition. Heritage Language Journal, 6(1), 2008. Polinsky, M. (2008b). Heritage language narratives. In D. Brinton, O. Kagan, & S. Bauckus (Eds.), Heritage language education. A new field emerging (pp. 149-164). New York: Routledge. Polinsky, M., & Kagan, O. (2007). Heritage languages: In the ‘wild’ and in the classroom. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(5), 368–395. Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M. & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382–439. Rothman, J. (2007). Heritage speaker competence differences, language change and input type: Inflected infinitives in heritage Brazilian Portuguese. International Journal of Bilingualism, 11, 359-389. Sherkina-Lieber, M., Perez-Leroux, T. & Johns, A. (2011). Grammar without speech production: The case of Labrador Inuttitut heritage receptive bilinguals. Bilingualism, Language and Cognition, 14 (3), 301-317. Siao, D. G. (2008). Indigenous language teaching: A study on the Paiwan language picture books edited by An Shuo elementary school, Taitung county. MA Thesis, National Taitung University, Taiwan. Starosta, S. (2002). Austronesian ‘focus’ as derivation: Evidence from nominalization. Language and Linguistics, 3(2), 427-479. Tardif, T. (1996). Nouns are not always learned before verbs: Evidence from Mandarin speakers’ early vocabularies. Developmental Psychology, 32(3), 492-504. Tardif, T., Shatz, M., & Naigles, L. (1997). Caregiver speech and children’s use of nouns versus verbs: A comparison of English, Italian and Mandarin. Journal of Child Language, 24, 535-565. Tomasello, M. et al. (1997). Differential productivity in young children’s use of nouns and verbs. Journal of Child Language, 24, 373–387. Tyler, A. and Nagy, W. (1989). The acquisition of English derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 649-667. Wysocki, K., & Jenkins, J. R. (1987). Deriving word meanings through morphological generalization. Reading Research Quarterly, 22(1), 66-81. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/63106 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨在探討:(1) 泰雅繼承語學習者的習得詞彙量; (2) 與衍生詞綴學習效果。本篇檢視了三個可能影響學習衍生詞綴的因素:名詞偏好、前綴改變衍生字詞性功能、與前綴同音異義。49位受試者來自新竹縣某國小,受試者全程參與實驗。實驗包括三部份:前測、兩週課堂訓練、及後測。前測包括圖片詞彙測驗、原型衍生型字理解測驗、語言經驗問卷,課堂訓練是在前測完成一週之後舉行,後測包括訓練目標字詞以及新測原型衍生型字理解測驗。前測結果顯示年齡與名詞偏好呈現顯著差異,但是受試者普遍沒有具備泰雅詞綴規則知識。後測的整體結果顯示詞根詞性為影響受試者學習的主要原因,受試者較容易在名詞上使用衍生詞綴規則。此外詞彙量與原型衍生型字理解測驗表現呈現正相關。受試者語言經驗無法預測受試者在測驗中的表現,他們在訪談中相似的回答實際上涵蓋相當大的範圍。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The present study aims to investigate (1) the vocabulary size and the acquired lexicon of the heritage language learners (HLLs) of Atayal and (2) the learning effect of derivational morphology learning. Three factors that might affect the learning of derivational morphological rules were examined: noun or verb bias, derivational change of prefixes, and prefix homonymy. The relationships between age, proficiency level, and language experiences at home and the performances in the tasks were all analyzed. The 49 participants were elementary school students from one elementary school in Hsinchu County, and all of them participated in every part of the procedure. The experiment included three parts: pretest, two weeks of classroom training, and post-test. The pretest consisted of three parts: vocabulary size task and bare-form and derived-form comprehension task using picture-matching technique, and a three-part guided survey. Classroom training took place one week following the pretest; the post-test included both bare-form and derived-form comprehension tasks on old sets and new sets of stimuli using picture-matching task technique. The results of the pretest showed age difference and noun bias in HLLs’ lexicon, and no knowledge of morphological rules in Atayal. The overall results of the post-test showed that the lexical category of the roots was the only influence on learning. HLLs could apply derivational rules better to nominal roots. A positive correlation was found between vocabulary proficiency levels and performances derived-form words comprehension task on old sets of stimuli. The self-reported language acquisition history and self-evaluated productive and receptive proficiency ultimately could not represent the HLLs’ performances in the tasks, and the HLLs’ similar responses in the guided survey actually covered quite a large spectrum. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T16:23:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R96142008-1.pdf: 4065344 bytes, checksum: b598ae8e37dd65fee6e3ca496e6663f3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | List of Tables vi
List of Figures vii Chapter 1 Introduction and Working Hypotheses 1 1.1 Background and Purpose 1 1.2 Literature Review 2 1.2.1 Lexical Acquisition 2 1.2.2 Atayal Morphology 4 1.2.3 Word Class Distinction in L1 and L2 Lexicon Acquisition 6 1.2.4 Acquisition of Derivational Morphology 9 1.2.5 Heritage Language 11 1.3 Research Questions and Hypotheses 16 1.4 Organization 19 Chapter 2 Heritage Language Learners’ Background 20 2.1 Language Acquisition Circumstances of the HLLs 20 2.2 Guided Survey and Data Discussion 25 Chapter 3 Methodology 30 3.1 Participants 30 3.2 Experimental Design 30 3.3 Materials and Procedure 32 3.3.1 Materials 32 3.3.2 Procedure and Scoring 37 3.4 Results 39 3.4.1 Pretest 40 3.4.2 Post-test 41 3.4.2.1 Noun or Verb Bias 44 3.4.2.2 Derivational Change of the Prefixes 47 3.4.2.3 Prefix Homonymy 51 3.4.3 Relations between Acquisition History and Performances 54 3.4.4 Summary 59 Chapter 4 General Discussion and Concluding Remarks 61 4.1 HLLs’ Performance 61 4.2 Concluding Remarks 67 4.3 Limitations and Future Studies 71 References 74 Appendices 80 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 泰雅語衍生詞綴習得:以新竹某國小為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The acquisition of derivational morphology in Atayal: A case study of heritage language learning in an elementary school in Hsinchu | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 101-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張顯達(Hintat Cheung),葉美利(Mei-Li Yeh) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 繼承語學習,泰雅習得詞彙,衍生詞綴習得,語言經驗, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | heritage language learning,Atayal acquired lexicon,acquisition of derivational morphology,language experience, | en |
dc.relation.page | 84 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2013-01-28 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 語言學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 語言學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-102-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.97 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。