請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6307完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林建甫(Chien-Fu Lin) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Po-Yuan Wang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 王柏元 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-16T16:25:37Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2013-09-12 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-16T16:25:37Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2013-09-12 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2013-04-01 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 于宗先.王金利 (2005), 《台灣金融體制之演變》, 台北: 聯經出版社。
方文碩.張倉耀 (2002), “風險貼水與外匯市場效率性”, 《管理評論》, 21(2), 27–51。 吳中書 (1988), “台灣美元遠期外匯市場效率性之檢定”, 《經濟論文》, 16(1), 79–112。 李麗 (1992), 《我國外匯市場與匯率制度》, 台北: 金融人員研究訓練中心, 3版。 沈中華 (1993), “台灣遠期美元外匯市場效率性之再檢定-兩狀態 Markov 模型的應用”,《經濟論文》, 21(1), 87–115。 林昆英 (1998), “由無拋補利率平價說檢定資本移動性”, 碩士論文, 政治大學經濟學研究所。 林景源 (1981), 《台灣工業化之研究》, 台北: 台灣銀行。 張淑華.何宗武.陳佩伶 (2010), “新興國家短期名目利率之均數復歸”, 經濟論文, 38(4), 661–696. 張豐榮 (1993), “台灣地區無拋補利率平價說之研究”, 碩士論文, 台灣大學財務金融學研究所。 郭炳仲.何祖平.李政峰 (2001), “台幣/美元遠期外匯風險溢酬有多大?”, 《經濟論文》, 29(4), 383–413。 陳仕偉.陳麗雅 (2006), “台灣 90 年代台幣兌美元匯率之效率性檢定”, 《中國統計學報》, 44(3), 316–341。 黃志典 (1998), “台灣遠期美元市場風險溢酬之估測”, 《管理學報》, 15(1), 81–99。 黃桂香 (1988), “我國外匯市場效率性之研究–臺灣外匯管制開放前後之比較分析”, 碩士論文, 成功大學工業管理研究所。 廖四郎.徐守德.王銘杰 (1997), “台灣遠期美元外匯市場風險溢酬之研究”, 《中國財務學報》, 5(2), 27–57。 廖原益 (1996), “台灣地區資本移動自由化之衡量與探討”, 碩士論文, 東華大學國際經濟研究所。 Abuaf, Niso and Jorion, Philippe (1990), “Purchasing power parity in the long run”, The Journal of Finance, 45(1), 157–174. Alper, C. Emre, Ardic, Oya Pinar, and Fendoglu, Salih (2009), “The economics of the uncovered interest parity condition for emerging markets”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 23(1), 115–138. Baillie, Richard T. and Bollerslev, Tim (1989), “Common stochastic trends in a system of exchange rates”, The Journal of Finance, 44(1), 167–181. Baillie, Richard T. and Bollerslev, Tim (2000), “The forward premium anomaly is not as bad as you think”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 19(4), 471–488. Baillie, Richard T., Lippens, Robert E., and McMahon, Patrick C. (1983), “Testing rational expectations and efficiency in the foreign exchange market”, Econometrica, 51(3), 553–563. Baldwin, Richard E. (1990), “Re-interpreting the failure of foreign exchange market efficiency tests: Small transactions costs, big hysteresis bands”, Working Paper 3319, National Bureau of Economic Research. Bansal, Ravi and Dahlquist, Magnus (2000), “The forward premium puzzle: different tales from developed and emerging economies”, Journal of International Economics, 51(1), 115–144. Barnhart, Scott W. and Szakmary, Andrew (1991), “Testing the unbiased forward rate hypothesis: Evidence on unit roots, co-integration and stochastic coefficients”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 26(2), 245–267. Bilson, John F. O. (1981), “The “speculative efficiency” hypothesis”, Journal of Business, 54(3), 435–451. Cheung, Yin-Wong, Chinn, Menzie D., and Fujii, Eiji (2005), “Dimensions of financial integration in greater China: Money markets, banks and policy effects”, International Journal of Finance and Economics, 10(2), 117–132. Coleman, Mark (1990), “Cointegration-based tests of daily foreign exchange market efficiency”, Economics Letters, 32(1), 53–59. Delcoure, Natalya, Barkoulas, John, Baum, Christopher F., and Chakraborty, Atreya (2003), “The forward rate unbiasedness hypothesis reexamined: Evidence from a new test”, Global Finance Journal, 14(1), 83–93. Dickey, David A. and Fuller, Wayne A. (1979), “Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427–431. Dwyer, Gerald P., Jr. and Wallace, Myles S. (1992), “Cointegration and market efficiency”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 11(4), 318–327. Engel, Charles (1996a), “The forward discount anomaly and the risk premium: A survey of recent evidence”, Journal of Empirical Finance, 3(2), 123–192. Engel, Charles (1996b), “A note on cointegration and international capital market efficiency”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 15(4), 657–660. Engle, Robert F. and Granger, Clive W. J. (1987), “Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing”, Econometrica, 55(2), 251–276. Fama, Eugene F. (1970), “Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work”, The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417. Fama, Eugene F. (1984), “Forward and spot exchange rates”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 14(3), 319–338. Flood, Robert P. and Rose, Andrew K. (1996), “Fixes: of the forward discount puzzle”,The Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(4), 748–752. Frankel, Jeffrey A. (1992), “Measuring international capital mobility: A review”, The American Economic Review, 82(2), 197–202. Frenkel, Jacob A. (1980), “Exchange rates, prices and money: lessons from the 1920s”, The American Economic Review, 70(2), 235–242. Frenkel, Jacob A. (1981), “Flexible exchange rates, prices, and the role of ”news”: Lessons from the 1970s”, Journal of Political Economy, 89(4), 665–705. Froot, Kenneth A. and Frankel, Jeffrey A. (1989), “Forward discount bias: is it an exchange risk premium?”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104(1), 139–161. Froot, Kenneth A. and Thaler, Richard H. (1990), “Anomalies: Foreign exchange”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(3), 179–192. Goh, Soo Khoon, Lim, Guay C., and Olekalns, Nilss (2006), “Deviations from uncovered interest parity in malaysia”, Applied Financial Economics, 16(10), 745–759. Goodhart, Charles A. E. and Taylor, Mark P. (1992), “Why don’t individuals speculate in forward foreign exchange?”, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 39(1), 1–13. Granger, Clive W. J. and Newbold, P. (1974), “Spurious regressions in econometrics”, Journal of econometrics, 2(2), 111–120. Hakkio, Craig and Rush, Mark (1989), “Market efficiency and cointegration: An application to the sterling and deutschemark exchange markets”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 8, 75–88. Hansen, Lars and Hodrick, Robert J. (1980), “Forward exchange rates as optimal predictors of future spot rates: An econometric analysis”, Journal of Political Economy, 88(5), 829–853. He, Hua and Modest, David M. (1995), “Market frictions and consumption-based asset pricing”, Journal of Political Economy, 103(1), 94–117. Hodrick, Robert J. (1987), The empirical evidence on the efficiency of forward and futures foreign exchange markets, Chur, Switzerland, New York: Harwood Academic Publishers. Hsieh, David A. (1984), “Tests of rational expectations and no risk premium in forward exchange markets”, Journal of International Economics, 17(1-2), 173–184. Ito, Takatoshi (1988), “Use of (time-domain) vector autoregressions to test uncovered interest parity”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 70(2), 296–305. Krasker, William (1980), “The peso problem in testing efficiency of forward exchange markets”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 6(2), 269–276. Kwiatkowski, Denis, Phillips, Peter C. B., Schmidt, Peter, and Shin, Yongcheol (1992), “Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?”, Journal of Econometrics, 54(1–3), 159–178. Lai, Kon S. and Lai, Michael (1991), “A cointegration test for market efficiency”, The Journal of Futures Markets, 11(5), 567–575. Levich, Richard M. (1979), “On the efficiency of markets for foreign exchange”, in Rudiger Dornbusch and Jacob A. Frenkel (eds.), International Economic Policy Theory and Evidence, 246–267, Johns Hopkins University Press. Levin, Andrew and Lin, Chien-Fu (1992), “Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties”, University of California at San Diego, Discussion Paper, 92–93. Levin, Andrew and Lin, Chien-Fu (1993), “Unit root test in panel data: a new results”, University of California at San Diego, Discussion Paper, 93–156. MacDonald, Ronald (2000), “Expectations formation and risk in three financial markets: surveying what the surveys say”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 14(1), 69–100. Marey, Philip S. (2004a), “Exchange rate expectations: controlled experiments with artificial traders”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 23(2), 283–304. (2004b), “Uncovered interest parity tests and exchange rate expectations”, in Computing in Economics and Finance, volume 54, Society for Computational Economics. Marshall, Alfred (1885), The present position of economics: an inaugural lecture given in the Senate House at Cambridge, 24 February, 1885, London: Macmillan. Maynard, Alex and Phillips, Peter C. B. (2001), “Rethinking an old empirical puzzle: econometric evidence on the forward discount anomaly”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 671–708. McCallum, Bennett T. (1994), “A reconsideration of the uncovered interest parity relationship”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 33(1), 105–132. Meese, Richard and Singleton, Kenneth J. (1982), “On unit roots and the empirical modeling of exchange rates”, The Journal of Finance, 37(1), 1029–1035. Olmo, Jose and Pilbeam, Keith (2011), “Uncovered interest parity and the efficiency of the foreign exchange market: A re-examination of the evidence”, International Journal of Finance and Economics, 16(2), 189–204. Pesaran, M. Hashem and Weale, Martin (2006), “Survey expectations”, in G. Elliott, C.W.J. Granger, and A. Timmermann (eds.), Handbook of Economic Forecasting, volume 1, 715–776, Amsterdam: North-Holland. Phillips, Peter C. B. and Perron, Pierre (1988), “Testing for a unit root in time series regression”, Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346. Pippenger, John (2011), “The solution to the forward-bias puzzle”, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 21(2), 296–304. Quah, Danny (1992), “International patterns of growth: I. persistency in cross-country disparities”, Unpublished manuscript, London School of Economics. Said, Said E. and Dickey, David A. (1984), “Testing for unit roots in autoregressive-moving average models of unknown order”, Biometrika, 71(3), 599–607. Siegel, Jeremy J. (1972), “Risk, interest rates and the forward exchange”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 86(2), 303–309. Wang, Peijie and Jones, Trefor (2003), “The impossibility of meaningful efficient market parameters in testing for the spot-forward relationship in foreign exchange markets”, Economics Letters, 81(1), 81–87. Wang, Peijie and Wang, Ping (2009), “Does a ”correct” parameter estimate tell a better story about foreign exchange market efficiency?”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 28(2), 183–197. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6307 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本文針對新台幣兌美元、 日幣、 英鎊、 瑞郎、 澳幣、 加幣 6 種貨幣之外匯市場, 研究期間為1989 年 4 月至 2012 年 8 月之月資料 (加幣由於資料限制, 研究期間為 1990 年 5 月至2012 年 8 月), 進行有關效率市場假說的檢定。
傳統 uncovered interest rate parity (UIP) 的線性迴歸模型, 可能因為自變數與應變數變異數過大的差距, 造成 ordinary least squares (OLS) 估計式的偏誤; 另外在自變數單根檢定的部份, 也由於單根檢定之檢定力不足的先天缺陷, 讓傳統 UIP 線性迴歸模型 存在爭議空間。 本文除了考慮傳統 UIP 線性迴歸模型外, 另外從均數定態 (mean stationary) 來衡量 deviation from UIP (DUIP) , 當成傳統 UIP 線性迴歸模型的穩健性檢測。 針對台灣的外匯市場而言, 從上述 2 種模型中, 均得出新台幣兌美元、日幣、英鎊、瑞郎、澳幣、加幣 6 種貨幣之外匯市場, 不違反效率市場假說。 另外, 有別傳統 UIP 線性迴歸模型, 本文從直觀上外匯市場套利的投資策略, 提出 5 種資產收益性檢測法 (profitability tests), 藉由該 5 種資產收益性的檢測, 從外匯市場超額報酬的存在與否, 來評估市場效率假說的成立性。 從資產收益性檢測法之結果發現, 雖然新台幣兌日幣、英鎊、瑞郎、加幣之外匯市場,無論運用資產收益性檢測法之各種策略, 均無法得到超額報酬。 但於新台幣兌美元、澳幣之外匯市場卻存在套利空間。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper uses exchange rates of the U.S. dollar (USD)、 Japanese yen (JPY)、British pound (GBP)、Swiss franc (SFr)、Australian dollar (AUD) and Canadian dollar (CAD), relative to new Taiwan dollar (NTD), to test the efficient market
hypothesis. The period of study is from April 1989 to August 2012 (NTD-CAD rate is from May 1990 to August 2012 due to data limitations). Traditional approach to testing the uncovered interest rate parity (UIP) by ordinary least squares (OLS) regression could result in omitted variable bias because of the significant differences in volatility between the change in the log of the exchange rates and the change in the interest rates. Besides, the controversy of the OLS regression model also arises from the low power of the unit root tests to the change in the interest rates. In addition to considering the traditional UIP OLS regression model, we examine the deviation from UIP (DUIP) in the view of mean stationary, which serves as the robust test of the traditional UIP OLS regression model. The results show that both in the traditional UIP OLS model and in the DUIP model, the six currencies studied do not reject the efficient market hypothesis. Moreover, different from the traditional UIP OLS regression model, we propose five intuitional profitability tests from the arbitrage strategies in foreign exchange markets to detect the efficient market hypothesis from the perspective of excess return. From the profitability tests results, we find investors can not receive the excess return in the foreign exchange markets of NTD against JPY、 GBP、 SFr and CAD. However, there exists the room for arbitrage in the foreign exchange markets of NTD against USD and AUD. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-16T16:25:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-P99323005-1.pdf: 1389530 bytes, checksum: 00c9d2ab8e5ede9690654ed184b2efe5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書...........................................i
誌謝......................................................ii 中文摘要.................................................iii 英文摘要..................................................iv 1 緒論...................................................1 1.1 研究動機與目的.......................................1 1.2 研究架構.............................................2 2 文獻探討...............................................4 2.1 理論基礎.............................................4 2.1.1 效率市場假說......................................4 2.1.2 遠期匯率不偏性假說 (unbiased forward rate hypothesis) 與 UIP 條件....................................5 2.2 文獻回顧.............................................7 2.2.1 國外文獻回顧......................................7 2.2.2 台灣外匯市場之文獻回顧............................9 2.2.3 小結.............................................10 3 研究方法與資料說明....................................11 3.1 研究方法............................................11 3.1.1 ADF 檢定.........................................11 3.1.2 PP 檢定..........................................12 3.1.3 KPSS 檢定........................................12 3.2 資料說明............................................12 4 UIP 傳統迴歸模型......................................15 4.1 變數敘述統計........................................15 4.2 單根檢定............................................15 4.3 傳統線性迴歸模型....................................19 4.4 DUIP 模型...........................................20 4.5 傳統線性迴歸模型可能的偏誤..........................20 5 資產收益性檢測法模型..................................26 5.1 模型設定............................................26 5.1.1 策略 1: 投資外幣與本國貨幣之報酬比較.............26 5.1.2 策略 2: 投資於前期高報酬之貨幣與本國貨幣之報酬 比較......................................................26 5.1.3 策略 3: 投資於高利率與低利率貨幣之報酬比較.......27 5.1.4 策略 4: 投資於高利率貨幣與本國貨幣之報酬比較.....27 5.1.5 策略 5: 投資於低利率貨幣與本國貨幣之報酬比較.....27 5.2 單根檢定............................................28 5.3 結果分析............................................28 5.3.1 策略 1: 投資外幣與本國貨幣之報酬比較.............28 5.3.2 策略 2: 投資於前期高報酬之貨幣與本國貨幣之報酬 比較......................................................29 5.3.3 策略 3: 投資於高利率與低利率貨幣之報酬比較.......29 5.3.4 策略 4: 投資於高利率貨幣與本國貨幣之報酬比較.....29 5.3.5 策略 5: 投資於低利率貨幣與本國貨幣之報酬比較.....29 5.3.6 小結.............................................29 6 結論與建議............................................33 參考文獻..................................................35 A 附圖...................................................42 B 資產收益性檢測法各變數之單根檢定.......................49 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 台灣外匯市場效率性研究-資產收益性檢測法之應用 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Efficiency of Foreign Exchange Market in Taiwan: An Application of the Profitability Tests | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 101-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳大任(Dachrahn Wu),姚睿,盧陽正(Yang-Cheng Lu) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 未拋補利率平價說,外匯市場,效率市場假說,資產收益性檢測法, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | uncovered interest rate parity,foreign exchange market,efficient market hypothesis,profitability tests, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 54 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2013-04-01 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 經濟學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-102-1.pdf | 1.36 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
