請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/63069
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 黃俊堯(Chun-Yao Huang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Cho-Yu Lee | en |
dc.contributor.author | 李卓彧 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T16:21:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-02-16 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2013-02-16 | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2013-01-30 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Aldersey-Williams, H. (1995). A change of habitat for design. Management Today, pp, 62-62.
Barney, J.B., (1991), Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management; 17, (1), pp.99–120. Cliff Ed. in Ridgefield Park, NJ, Moon Ihlwan in Seoul, and Pete Engardio,in Suwon. (2003, Jun 16). THE SAMSUNG WAY it thrives in low-margin consumer electronics. it favors hardware over software. its still a conglomerate that makes everything itself. can samsung keep defying conventional wisdom? Business Week, pp, 56-64 Darlin, D. (1995, Oct 09). Whats in a name? Forbes, 156, 58-58. Heidi B., Stephane F., and Brett N., October 10, 2004., “Follow-Through,” Forbes Henry W.C Y. From followers to market leaders: Asian electronics firms in the global economy. Article first published online: 23 MAR 2007 Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C.K. 1994, Competing for the future. Harvard Business Review, 72(4): 122-129. “How do you take a brand global.” Qn.som.yale.edu., April 2009 John Q, & Anna H. 2004, “Samsung Electronics Company: Global Marketing Operations,” Harvard Business Review Kevin L.K, 2001, Building Customer-Based Brand Equity, Marketing Management; 10, 2001, p.19. Lee D.Y (2006), “Samsung Electronics- The Global Inc.,” p.23, 25, 26, 27, 60, 61, 79 Moon Ih. and Pete En. in Seoul, with Irene Kunii in Tokyo and Roger Crockett,in Chicago. (1999, Dec 20). Samsung: The making of a superstar. Business Week, , 136-140. Needham, Dave (1996). Business for Higher Awards. Oxford, England: Heinemann. Porter, M.E. (1979) How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy, Harvard Business Review, March/April 1979. Robert Sh.,(2005). OPINION: Profit-focused marketing. Brand Strategy, 14-14. Sea-Jin C. (2008), “Sony vs Samsung, The Inside Story Of The Electronics’ Giants Battle For Global Supremacy” 'Samsung Electronics Company.' 123HelpMe.com. 17 Dec 2012 “Sue-Shim Samsung.”, Articles and interviews., interbrand.com. 2012 'Samsung - The TOP Brand in the World.' 123HelpMe.com. 06 Jul 2012 <http://www.123HelpMe.com/view.asp?id=47241>. Tim J., (2006)., BRAND PAPERS - INNOVATION: Practice makes perfect. Brand Strategy, pp, 32-32. Tony M. (2010)., “Samsung Electronics- And The Struggle For Leadership OF The Electronics Industry” Yu, S. (1998). The growth pattern of samsung electronics: A strategy perspective. International Studies of Management & Organization, 28(4), pp, 57-72. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/63069 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Samsung Electronics Co., one of Samsung’s subsidiaries, is now one of the world’s leading top-tier companies in semiconductor, digital media, telecommunication, and digital convergence technologies. It is the world’s largest IT company by sales revenue in 2011 for the first time. Samsung Electronics enjoys a strong market leader position in most of its product lines. It is the world’s largest producer of DRAM, SRAM, and flash memory. In 2012, Samsung Electronics became the world's number one mobile phone manufacturer by unit sales, overtaking Nokia, which had been the market leader since 1998. It is the market leader in TVs and monitors. Samsung is the world’s second-largest chipmaker after Intel and it is well known around the world for its electronics products and is also one of the most successful brands in the electronics industry.
This thesis is based on two main questions: (i) How Samsung developed and grew its brand to the top? and, (ii) Can Taiwanese companies do it? The study includes four literature reviews and a methodology of case study of Samsung, attempting to analyze Samsung Electronics’ global branding strategies and marketing operations from 1987 until now, which presents extensive and detailed review of the development of Samsung brand from Samsung Electronics status quo to back then when Samsung was doing OEM and ODM for other major brands. The internal management decisions has great impacts on pushing the change forward both internally and internally. Back in the early 1990s, people thought of Samsung as a cheap, generic brand with poor quality, which was famous for its microwave oven. The perception was especially strong in the U.S. market back then. I intentionally divided the development of Samsung brand into five stages to have a clear segmentation of Samsung’s ongoing marketing progress. Starting from chairman Kun Hee Lee’s “ New management initiative,” Samsung Electronics redoubled its efforts on enhancing product quality and design strengths. Then former CEO Yun Jong Yong initiated the downsizing and restructuring of Samsung organization to focus on major businesses with competitive advantage and survived from the impact of Asian Financial Crisis. Succeeding former internal revolution change, Eric Kim’s marketing initiative helped Samsung to establish internal marketing evaluation and management mechanism. Externally, Samsung gradually transformed its brand image into strong and favorable and built up a positive and accessible premium position in consumer feeling and judgments by good product and brand performance. After 2005, Samsung branding power started to exert all over the world with high brand resonance and prevalence of digital convergence. It is Samsung’s total portfolio that allows it to take the lead in the consumer electronics area. Samsung can now be the master of each technical change because of its lead in basic component supply (monitor, chip, memory), which most of its competitors lack. Besides, the combination of resources including R&D, talents, key technology, innovations, know-hows, the combination of each factor, process and stage, etc, which are valuable to both to Samsung and consumers. If these conditions hold, the firm’s bundle of resources can assist the firm sustaining above average returns. What’s more, the real driver of the cost of a modern consumer electronic product is in the core components. As long as Samsung maintains forefront of component technology, Samsung Electronics can be both a winner in consumer electronics segment and component manufacturer. Given the below thesis analysis, we can draw a conclusion that Taiwanese companies cannot be like Samsung but Taiwanese companies can still learn from Samsung experience in its way of resource utilization, strategy planning, and global marketing operations. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T16:21:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R00749020-1.pdf: 5373565 bytes, checksum: bcadcf006c6819cb0cd91dbe674d69fe (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Abstract..................................................................................................................................................2
Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………………………………..4 List of Tables…………………………………………………………………………………………………6 List of Figures………………………………………………………………………………………………..6 Chapter 1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………..……8 1.1 Motivation…..………...…………………………………………………………………………...10 1.2 Purpose……….…………………………………………………………………………………….11 Chapter 2 Literature review……………………………………………………………………...12 2.1 Resource-based view……………………………………………………………………….....12 2.2 Five forces model………….……………………………………………………………………13 2.3 Brand equity pyramid model…………………………….………………………………...14 2.4 Marketing mix 4Ps…….………………………………………………………………………..15 2.5 Methodology………………………………………………………………………………………16 Chapter 3 Methodology………………………….………………………………………………….19 3.1 The coming of age of Kun Hee Lee………………….…………………………………...19 3.2 CEO of SEC Yun Jong Yong revolution…………….……………………………………24 3.3 Eric Kim marketing initiative revolution……………………………………………..28 3.4 Gregory Lee marketing age…………………………………………………………………34 3.5 Post Kun Hee Lee and Yun Jong Yong leading era…………………………………38 Chapter 4 Samsung global marketing operations……………….…………………….43 4.1 The coming of age of Kun Hee Lee………………….…………………………………....43 4.2 CEO of SEC Yun Jong Yong revolution…………….……………………………………46 4.3 Eric Kim marketing initiative revolution……………………………………………..49 4.4 Gregory Lee marketing age…………………………………………………………………62 4.5 Post Kun Hee Lee and Yun Jong Yong leading era…………………………………67 Chapter 5 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………...72 5.1 Samsung’s winning strategy………………………………………………………………..72 5.2 How Samsung got here?..................................................................................................73 5.3 Can Taiwanese companies do it?.................................................................................74 5.4 What’s next?.........................................................................................................................76 5.5 Limitations and future research…….……………………………………………………77 References…………………………………………………………………………………………………..78 Appendices Appendix I - Timeline……………………………………………………………………………...…80 Appendix II- Samsung transition summary…………………………………………………83 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 從策略行銷角度來分析三星發展品牌過程 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Samsung branding – from strategic marketing perspective | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 101-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳俊忠(Chun-Chung Chen),林修葳(Hsiou-Wei Lin) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 三星,品牌,行銷,策略, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Samsung,branding,marketing,strategy, | en |
dc.relation.page | 85 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2013-01-30 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 企業管理碩士專班 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 管理學院企業管理專班(Global MBA) |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-102-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 5.25 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。