請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/62975
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 唐牧群(Muh-Chyun Tang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Hsing-Wen Liu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 劉幸玟 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T16:17:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-02-21 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2013-02-21 | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2013-02-05 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Alling, E. N., R. (2007). Protocol analysis of a federated search tool: Designing for users. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 12(1-2), 195-210.
Baer, W. (2004). Federated searching: Friend or foe? College & Research Libraries News, 65(9), 518-519. Boock, M. N., J. and Kristick, L. (2006). Continuing the Quest for the Quick Search Holy Grail: Oregon State University Libraries' Federated Search Implementation. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 11(4), 139-153. Dorman, D. (2008). The Potential of Metasearching as an 'Open' Service. Library Hi Tech, 26(1), 58-67. Elliott, S. A. (2004). Metasearch and usability: toward a seamless interface to library resources Retrieved May. 26, 2011, from http://www.lib.uaa.alaska.edu/tundra/msuse1.pdf Genius, S. K. (2004). Web site usability testing: A critical tool for libraries. Feliciter, 50(4), 161-164. George, C. A. (2008). Lessons learned: Usability testing a federated search product. The Electronic Library, 26(1), 5-20. Gerrity, B. L., T. andTallent Ed (2002). Blurring Services and Resources: Boston College's Implementation of Metalib and Sfx. Reference Services Review 30(3), 229-241. Hane, P. J. (2003). The truth about federated searching. Information Today, 20(9), 24. Haya, G., Nygren,E. & Widmar, W. (2007). MetaLib and Google Scholar. A user study. Online Information Review, 31(3), 365. Helfer, D. W., J. (2005). Metasearching: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Making It Work in your Library. Searcher, 13(2), 40-41. Jeng, J. (2005). Usability Assessment of Academic Digital Libraries: Effectiveness, Efficiency, Satisfaction, and Learnability. Libri, 55, 96-121. Jin, Y. a. P., J. (2009). Information portal development and practice at Shanghai Jiao Tong University Library. Online Information Review, 33(3), 537-547. Jung, S. e. a. (2008). LibraryFind: system design and usability testing of academic metasearch system. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(3), 375-389. Korah, A. C., E. D. (2010). Students and Federated Searching. Reference & User Service Quarterly, 49(4), 325-332. Lockwood, C. M., P. (2007). Implementation of a Federated Search System in the Academic Library: Lessons Learned. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 12(1/2), 73-91. Luther, J. (2003). Trumping google? Metasearching's promise. Library Journal, 128(16), 36-39. McHale, N. (2007). Accidental Federated Searching: Implementing Federated Searching in the Smaller Academic Library. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 12(1-12), 93-110. Moghaddam, A. I. (2007). Web metasearch engines. Online Information Review, 31(3), 300-309. Neubauer, W. P. A. (2009). The Knowledge Portal, or the vision of easy access to information. Library Hi Tech, 27(4), 594-601. Nielsen, J. (2000). Why you only need to test with 5 users Retrieved May 23, 2011, from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20000319.html NISO (2003). Metasearch Initiative Retrieved May 1, 2012, from http://niso.org/apps/group_public/workgroup.php?wg_abbrev=mi Ochoa, M. et. al. (2007). Testing the federated searching waters: A usability study of MetaLib. Journal of Web Librarianship, 1(3), 47-66. Ponsford, B. C. v., W. (2007). User expectations in the time of google:Usabality testing of federated searching. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 12((1-2)), 159-178. Randall, S. (2006). Federated Searching and Usability Testing: Building the Perfect Beast. Serials Review, 32(3), 181-182. Rubin, J. (1994). Handbook of Usability Testing: How to plan, design, and conduct effective teses. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Sadeghi, H. (2008). Assessing Metasearch Engine Performance. Online Information Review, 33(6), 1058-1065. Sadeh, T. (2004a). The Challenge of metaseearching. New Library World, 105(3/4), 104-112. Sadeh, T. (2004b). To Google or Not to Google: Metasearch Design in the Quest for the Ideal User Experience. Paper presented at the 28th Library systems seminar. Sadeh, T. (2006). Google scholar versus metasearch systems. High Energy Physics Libraries Webzine, 12. Sadeh, T. (2007). Transforming the metasearch concept into a friendly user experience. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 12(1), 1-25. Saracevic, T. (2000). Digital Library Evaluation: Toward an Evolution of Concepts. Library Trends, 49(2), 350-369. Tacoma Public Library (2005). OneSearch help: WebFeat federated searching at Tacoma Public Library Retrieved May 1, 2012, from http://www.tacomapubliclibrary.org/webfeat/webfeathelp.pdf Tallent, E. (2004). Metasearching in Boston College Libraries-a Case Study of User Reactions New Library World 105(1196/1197), 69-75. Tang, R., Hsieh-Yee, I, & Zhang, S. (2007). User perceptions of MetaLib combined search:An investigation of how users make sense of federated searching. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 12((1-2)), 211-236. Tennant, R. (2003). The right solution: federated search tools. Library Journal, 128(11), 28-30. Thong, Y. L., Hong, W. & Tam, K.Y. (2002). Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: What are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context and individual differences? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57(3), 215-242. Tullis, T. A., W. (2008). Measuring the User Experience: Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics San Fransisco: Morgan Kaufmann. Usability Definitions, ISO 9241-11: Guidance on usability (1998). Retrieved May, 12, 2012, from http://www.usabilitynet.org/tools/r_international.htm Webster, P. (2004). Metasearching in an academic enviroment. Online, 28(2), 20-23. Webster, P. M. (2007). Challenges for Federated Searching. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 12(3-4), 357-368. Williams, S. C. e. a. (2009). Student Feedback on Federated Search Use, Satisfaction, and Web Presence. Reference & User Service Quarterly, 49(2), 131-139. Wrubel, L., and Schmidt, K. (2007). Usability Testing of a Metasearch Interface: A Case Study. College & Research Libraries, 68(4), 292-311. 吳敏萱(2000)。公共圖書館使用者對電子資源資源需求及尋求行為研究-以臺北市立圖書館為例。未出版之碩士論文,私立輔仁大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。 吳樹華(2009)。圖書館異質資源整合檢索系統之使用者介面評估研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。 李靜宜、柯皓仁(2012)。電子資源整合查詢系統使用者接受度與使用行為研究。教育資料與圖書館學,49(3),31-63。 杜飛燕(2011)。電子資源整合查詢系統功能需求之探討。未出版之碩士論文,私立淡江大學資訊與圖書館學研究所,臺北市。 林彣瑾(2003)。公共圖書館使用者對資訊需求及尋求行為之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立彰化師範大學商業教育學研究所,彰化縣。 林佳慧(2012)。電子資源整合查詢系統對圖書館服務之提升。上網日期:101年3月8日,檢自:http://concert.stpi.narl.org.tw/Images/ upload/2012/03/S2_2012.pdf 林佳穎(2010)。圖書館電子資源整合查詢系統之好用性評估:以臺灣大學圖書館Muse電子資源整合查詢系統為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。. 姜義臺(2009)。圖書館電子資源整合檢索系統優使性之研究-以SmartWeaver為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立中興大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺中市。 洪林柏、王念祖 (2012)。公共圖書館提供電子書服務的問題與挑戰。 臺北市立圖書館館訊,29(3),1-19。 國立台灣大學圖書館(2011)。電子資源整合查詢系統MUSE。上網日期:101年3月8日,檢自:http://www.lib.ntu.edu.tw/doc/CE/ 3_2a_muse.pdf 陳昭珍(2000)。電子圖書館整合檢索之理論與實作。臺北市:文華。 陳啟亮(2010)。卡片排序法(Card Sorting):實務工作觀點。上網日期:101年3月8日,檢自: http://www.slideshare.net/xxc/card-sorting- 20101228 曾淑賢(2006)。公共圖書館館藏發展如何因應人口變遷、電子環境及城市國際化。數位時代圖書館館藏發展研討會論文集。臺中市:國立中興大學圖書資訊學研究所。 曾繁娟、李宗翰(2008)。圖書館電子資源整合查詢系統評估之研究。圖書資訊學刊,6(1/2),111-142。 黃明居、黃瑞娟(2002)。我國公共圖書館的挑戰與契機-電子館藏與數位化圖書館。臺北市立圖書館館訊,20(2),1-12。 歐陽崇榮、張關評(2002)。參考服務新挑戰--電子資源整合與管理。臺北市立圖書館館訊,20(2),56-66。 歐陽崇榮、黃琇薇(2005)。從介面設計初探電子資源管理(ERM)系統。國家圖書館館刊,94(1),75-97。 鄭寶梅(2003)。遠距教學在圖書館之應用-以國家圖書館遠距學園為例。圖書館學與資訊科學,29(1),65-73。 賴忠勤(2012)。公共圖書館電子書服務平台之建置與發展。臺北市立圖書館館刊,29(3),38-55。 賴施雯(2011)。Medline醫學資料庫之好用性評估。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。 羅思嘉 (2006)。資訊搜尋與異質資料庫整合查詢系統建置之初探。國立成功大學圖書館館刊,15,33-42。 羅嵐(2005)數位圖書館異質整合檢索系統評析。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/62975 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 過去關於電子資源整合查詢系統的使用者研究多是以大學或學術圖書館場域為主。然而,相較學術圖書館而言,公共圖書館的使用者類型更為多元,且多缺乏電子資源與資料庫架構的知識,因此在資源的選擇上可能需要更多的協助。
因此,本研究以臺北市立圖書館安裝的Hyint2.0電子資源整合查詢系統為例,先以參考館員透過卡片分類法,設計以主題分類與預設資源選擇之實驗介面,以協助使用者在查詢首頁的資源選擇。之後再招募北市圖讀者為實驗法之受試者,其需分別操作2種介面與指定任務後分別填答個別介面問卷,用以評估實驗介面較原始介面是否表現出更佳之效能、效率與滿意度,並輔以檢索歷程記錄,以觀察受試者在實驗過程的行為與反應;其次,在完成所有任務之後須填寫整體系統問卷並進行結構式訪談,以瞭解使用者對個別介面與系統整體之主觀看法與意見回饋。 本研究根據個別介面的問卷結果,顯示受試者在主觀效能、效率與滿意度的評比具有顯著差異,且實驗介面較原始介面的表現更佳;再計算任務完成時間與更換檢索策略之次數,顯示介面差異在客觀效率之評比達顯著水準,亦為實驗介面較原始介面之表現更省時省力;然而,根據2位圖資專家評析任務產出之結果來測量客觀效能之表現,卻顯示介面差異未達顯著水準。整體而言,公共圖書館讀者認同實驗介面較原始介面有更佳之效能、效率與滿意度;在系統整體的評析中,雖提出7項使用問題,但仍在整體好用性表現上給予肯定。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Past usability studies of metasearch systems have been so far mostly conducted in the academic library context, the results of which might not be applicable to public libraries where the users are much more diverse and generally lack the knowledge about the electronic databases. Using the Hyint 2.0 metasearch system currently available through Taipei Municipal Library as an example, the study proposed a subject-based interface for metasearch system that aims at lowering the cognitive burden for users who are not familiar with online databases.
An experimental interface was constructed based on the results of a card sorting study of five reference librarians. A usability study was then conducted, firstly, to compare the performance between the proposed and baseline interfaces; and secondly, to identify usability issues the users might have with the metasearch system. A total of 24 public library users participated in the study, in which they were asked to perform four assigned tasks alternately with the two interfaces. Users’ interactions were logged and their attitudes toward the two interfaces were elicited by the post-search questionnaire. A post-search interview was also conducted with a view to understanding users’ reaction to the metasearch function in general. Furthermore, their search results were judged by the experts as a measurement of system effectiveness. The results show that the proposed interface performed significantly better in all but the search result measure. While in general the users have a favorable attitude toward the meta-search function, seven usability issues were identified for the improvement of the system. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T16:17:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R98126018-1.pdf: 2182134 bytes, checksum: 08c648fbf3675169181cce5c20f98a95 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 i
Abstract ii 目次 iii 圖次 vi 表次 ix 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 問題陳述 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 4 第三節 研究範圍與限制 6 第四節 名詞解釋 7 第二章 文獻分析 9 第一節 電子資源整合查詢系統概述 9 第二節 電子資源整合查詢系統之相關研究 18 第三節 電子資源整合查詢系統之評估 25 第三章 研究設計與實施 32 第一節 研究介面 33 第二節 研究方法與架構 41 第三節 研究對象 43 第四節 研究步驟 44 第四章 研究結果與分析 50 第一節 受試者背景資料分析 51 第二節 整合查詢系統介面實驗結果分析 56 第三節 整合查詢系統整體實驗結果分析 71 第四節 綜合討論 82 第五章 結論與建議 86 第一節 結論 87 第二節 建議 91 第三節 後續研究建議 94 參考文獻 95 附錄一 好用性測試說明書 101 附錄二 基本資料問卷 102 附錄三 個別介面測後問卷 103 附件四 系統整體好用性問卷 104 附件五 訪談大綱 106 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 以資料預設介面協助公共圖書館讀者使用電子資源整合查詢系統之評估研究-以臺北市立圖書館Hyint2.0系統為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | An evaluation of a subject-based interface for metasearch in public libraries-a case study of Taipei municipal library | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 101-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林維真(Wei-Jane Lin),楊東謀(Tung-Mou Yang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 電子資源整合查詢系統,公共圖書館讀者,介面評估,使用者研究, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | metasearch system,public library reader,interface evaluation,user study, | en |
dc.relation.page | 106 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2013-02-05 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 圖書資訊學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 圖書資訊學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-102-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.13 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。