請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6289
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳毓文(Yu-Wen Chen) | |
dc.contributor.author | Ting-Yu Yeh | en |
dc.contributor.author | 葉庭瑜 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-16T16:25:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-03-09 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-16T16:25:08Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2014-03-09 | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2014-02-11 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 司法院大法官會議(2009)。大法官會議第664號解釋文。
朱元鴻(1997)。背叛�洩密�出賣:論民族誌的冥界。臺灣社會研究,26,29-65。 何明晃(2006)。非行少年之人格特質、父母管教態度與其逃家行為之相關研究。社區發展季刊,115,347-362。 何明晃(2008)。虞犯在我國少年司法實務運作之檢討:以臺灣高雄少年法院所受理之經常逃學或逃家事件為例。兒童及少年福利期刊,14,137-155。 何明晃(2008)。釋憲聲請書。中華民國97年8月11日。 李維倫、洪雅琴(2007)。一個犯罪少女的置身所在:家的錯落與回返。本土心理學研究,28,141-196。 余漢儀(1995)。兒童虐待:現象檢視與問題反思。臺北市:巨流。 余德慧(1991)。剖解中國社會的人際苦痛。載於余德慧、林麗雲、呂政達(合著)中國人的愛與苦:犧牲與求全(120-130頁)。臺北市:張老師出版社。 巫珍宜(2002)。青少年逃家與家庭互動關係的討論。輔導季刊,38(2),53-58。 周月清(1995)。婚姻暴力:理論分析與社會工作處置。臺北市:巨流。 周愫嫻、陳吳南(2009)。「虞犯」:真的道德恐慌,假的風險治理。社區發展季刊,128,60-72。 林巧翊(2003)。折翼與展翅-犯案少年與家庭系統相互影響歷程之探討(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學社會工作學系,臺北市。 林宜瑩(2011年10月9日)。勵馨親職教育,籲舉報虐童案。世界新聞網。取自http://la.worldjournal.com/bookmark/15979897-%E5%8B%B5%E9%A6%A8%E8%A6%AA%E8%81%B7%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2-%E7%B1%B2%E8%88%89%E5%A0%B1%E8%99%90%E7%AB%A5%E6%A1%88 姚淑芬(1995)。少年逃家與資源運用之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。碩士,東海大學社會工作學系,臺中市。 洪寶蓮(1992)。逃家行為的形成原因。諮商輔導,84,29-31。 胡幼慧、姚美華(2008)。一些質性方法上的思考:信度與效度?如何抽樣?如何收集資料、登錄與分析?(第二版)。臺北市:巨流。 張婷菀(2002)。由青少年的離家經驗探討家的意義(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所,臺北市。 曹育瑞(2001)。「家是起點,也是終點」?-少年逃家歷程之探究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學社會學研究所,臺北市。 許純鳳(2013年5月22日)。沉迷難抬頭,青少年被手機綁架。台灣立報。取自http://www.lihpao.com/?action-viewnews-itemid-129684 陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的硏究。臺北市:五南。 陳宇嘉、楊慧滿、鐘文君(1999)。逃家少年臨時收容問題之研究。行政院研究發展考核委員會委託研究報告。臺北市:行政院研究發展考核委員會。 陳志賢、戴嘉南(2006)。長期離家出走青少年親子離合關係變化之研究。諮商輔導學報:高師輔導所刊,15,1-34。 陳志賢(2008)。導致青少年長期離家出走之因素脈絡研究。大仁學報,33,87-100。 馮燕、高迪理、林于婷(2007)。失蹤兒童少年離家期間生活型態及返家後適應狀況之探討。內政部兒童局委託研究報告(計畫編號:09630110000A1004),未出版。 馮燕、陳玫伶(2011)。建構我國離家兒少外展服務及暫時庇護所管理及運作模式之研究。內政部兒童局委託研究報告(計畫編號:100301100000A1004)。臺中市:內政部兒童局。 黃德祥(1994)。靑少年發展與輔導。臺北市:五南。 黃麗英(2004)。國中逃家少年的家庭互動及社會支持之分析(未出版之碩士論文)。屏東師範學院教育心理與輔導學系,屏東縣。 賈紅鶯、陳秉華、黃宗堅(2002)。從文化脈絡看親子三角關係與行為適應之運作歷程。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫(計畫編號:NSC 91-2413-H-032-004),未出版。 趙雍生(1997)。對少年逃學逃家問題的探究。社會建設,96,45-61。 趙碧華(1996)。少年逃學、逃家行為的推力與拉力-一項抑制理論的實證研究。東吳社工會工作學報,2,273-304。 劉仲冬(2008)。量與質社會研究的爭議及社會研究未來的走向及出路(第二版版)。臺北市:巨流。 劉秀娟(譯)(1996)。家庭暴力(原作者:R.J. Gelles、C.P. Cornell)。臺北市:楊智文化。(原著出版年:1990、1995) 潘淑滿(2003)。質性硏究 : 理論與應用。臺北市:心理。 鄭瑞隆(2009)。兒少福利體系對少年虞犯的因應與作為:從大法官解釋664號談起。社區發展季刊,128,49-59。 簡慧娟、余紅柑(2009)。從兒童福利與司法處遇整合觀點-談兒童少年偏差行為防治策略。社區發展季刊, 128,頁 21-33。 蘇芳儀(2007)。求助之路-少年保護個案對於服務處遇之主體經驗探究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺灣大學社會工作學研究所,臺北市。 Athey, J. L. (1991). HIV infection and homeless adolescents. Child Welfare: Journal of Policy, Practice, and Program. Bender, K., Thompson, S., McManus, H., Lantry, J., & Flynn, P. (2007). Capacity for Survival: Exploring Strengths of Homeless Street Youth. Child and Youth Care Forum, 36(1), 25-42. Benoit-Bryan, J. (2011). The Runaway Youth Longitudinal Study: National Runaway Switchboard. Retrieved from http://www.1800runaway.org/assets/1/7/NRS_Longitudinal_study_report-_FINAL.pdf. Bradley, J. (1997). Runaway youth : stress, social support, and adjustment. New York: Garland Pub. Brennan, T. (1980). Mapping the diversity among runaways: a descriptive multivariate analysis of selected socail psychological background conditions. Journal of Family Issues, 1(2), 189-209. Cauce, A., Stewart, A., Whitbeck, L., Paradise, M., & Hoyt, D. (2005). Girls on their Own: Homelessness in Female Adolescents. In D. Bell, S. Foster & E. Mash (Eds.), Handbook of Behavioral and Emotional Problems in Girls (pp. 439-461): Springer US. Cherry, A. (1993). Combining Cluster and Discriminant Analysis to Develop a Social Bond Topology of Runaway Youth. Research on Social Work Practice, 3(2), 175-190. English, C. (1973). Leaving home: A typology of runaways. Society, 10(5), 22-24. Erdem, G., & Slesnick, N. (2010). That Which Does Not Kill You Makes You Stronger: Runaway Youth’s Resilience to Depression in the Family Context. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80(2), 195-203. Finkelhor, D., Hotaling, G. T., & Sedlak, A. (1990). Missing, abducted, runaway, and thrownaway children in America: First report: Numbers and characteristics, national incidence studies: Diane Pub Co. Flores, R. (2002). NISMART questions and answers. NISMART Fact Sheet. Flowers, R. B. (2010). Street kids : the lives of runaway and thrownaway teens. Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland & Company. Garbarino, J. (1980). Meeting the needs of mistreated youths. [Article]. Social Work, 25(2), 122. Garbarino, J. (1989). Troubled youth, troubled families: The dynamics of adolescent maltreatment. In Cicchetti, D., & Carlson, V. (Eds.), Child maltreatment : theory and research on the causes and consequences of child abuse and neglect ( pp. 685-706). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Greenblatt, M. (1993). lifestyle adaptive strategies and sexual behavior of homeless adolescents. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 44(12), 1177. Greene, J., Ringwalt, C., Kelly, J., Iachan, R., & Cohen, Z. (1995). Youth with runaway, throwaway, and homeless experiences: Prevalence, drug use, and other at-risk behaviors. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children, Youth and Families. Greene, J. M., Ennett, S. T., & Ringwalt, C. L. (1999). Prevalence and correlates of survival sex among runaway and homeless youth. American Journal of Public Health, 89(9), 1406-1409. Greene, J. M., & Ringwalt, C. L. (1998). Pregnancy among three national samples of runaway and homeless youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 23(6), 370-377. Greene, J. M., Sanchez, R., Harris, J., Cignetti, C., Akin, D., & Wheeless, S. (2003). Incidence and Prevalence of Homeless and Runaway Youth. Final Report to the US Department of Health and Human Services. Gullotta, T. P. (1978). runaway: reality or myth. adolescence 135(2), 543-549. Halcon, L. L., & Lifson, A. R. (2004). Prevalence and predictors of sexual risks among homeless youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33(1), 71-80. Hammer, H., Finkelhor, D., & Sedlak, A. J. (2002). Runaway/thrownaway children: National estimates and characteristics (National Incidence Studies of Missing, Abuducted, Runaway and Thrownaway Children). Washington, DC: US Department of Department of Justice. Hier, S. J., Korboot, P. J., & Schweitzer, R. D. (1990). Social adjustment and symptomatology in two types of homeless adolescents: Runaways and throwaways. Adolescence , 25(100) ,761-771. Hong, Y. J., & Jacinto, G. (2011). Running Away: A Rite of Passage? Smith College Studies in Social Work, 81(4), 297-313. Howe, D. (2005). Child abuse and neglect : attachment, development, and intervention. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Hyde, J. (2005). From home to street: Understanding young people's transitions into homelessness. Journal of Adolescence, 28(2), 171-183. Janus, M.-D., Archambault, F. X., Brown, S. W., & Welsh, L. A. (1995). Physical abuse in Canadian runaway adolescents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 19(4), 433-447. Jones, L. P. (1988). A typology of adolescent runaways. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 5(1), 16-29. Kidd, S. A. (2004). The walls were closing in, and we were trapped. Youth & Society, 36(1), 30-55. Kidd, S. A., & Davidson, L. (2007). “You have to adapt because you have no other choice”: The stories of strength and resilience of 208 homeless youth in New York City and Toronto. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(2), 219-238. Lindsey, E. W., Kurtz, P. D., Jarvis, S., Williams, N. R., & Nackerud, L. (2000). How Runaway and Homeless Youth Navigate Troubled Waters: Personal Strengths and Resources. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 17(2), 115-140. Loken, G. A. (1995). Thrownaway Children and Thrownaway Parenthood. Temple L. Rev., 68, 1715. Lourie, I. S. (1979). Family dynamics and the abuse of adolescents : A case for a developmental phase specific model of child abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 3(3–4), 967-974. Macalane, J. M., & Linda, C. T. (2012). Many street teens are resilient and adapt well to street life. In D. Bryfonski (Ed.), Street teens. Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press. Malloch, M. S., & Burgess, C. (2011). Responding to Young Runaways: Problems of Risk and Responsibility. Youth Justice, 11(1), 61-76. Martinez, R. J. (2006). Understanding Runaway Teens. In D. Bryfonski (Ed.), Street Teens (pp. 21-34). Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press. McCarthy, B., & Hagan, J. (1992). Surviving on the Street : The Experiences of Homeless Youth. Journal of Adolescent Research, 7(4), 412-430. Milburn, N. G., Rosenthal, D., Rotheram-Borus, M. J., Mallett, S., Batterham, P., Rice, E., & Solorio, R. (2007). Newly homeless youth typically return home. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40(6), 574-576. Miller, A. T., Eggertson-Tacon, C., & Quigg, B. (1990). Patterns of runaway behavior within a larger systems context: The road to empowerment. Adolescence, 25(98), 271-289. Mitchell, F. (2003). ‘Can I come home?’ The experiences of young runaways contacting the Message Home helpline. Child & Family Social Work, 8(1), 3-11. Montgomery, K. L., Thompson, S. J., & Barczyk, A. N. (2011). Individual and relationship factors associated with delinquency among throwaway adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(7), 1127-1133. Nye, F. I. (1980). A theoretical perspective on running away. Journal of Family Issues, 1(2), 274-299. Oliveira, J., & Burke, P. J. (2009). Lost in the shuffle: culture of homeless adolescents. Pediatric nursing, 35(3), 154-161. Pearce, J. J., Williams, M., & Galvin, C. (2002). It's someone taking a part of you : a study of young women and sexual exploitation. London: National Children's Bureau. Peled, E., & Cohavi, A. (2009). The meaning of running away for girls. Child Abuse & Neglect, 33(10), 739-749. Piliavin, I., Sosin, M., Westerfelt, A. H., & Matsueda, R. L. (1993). The duration of homeless careers: An exploratory study. The Social Service Review, 67 (4), 576-598. Rees, G. (1993). Hidden truths: young people’s experiences of running away. London: The Children’s Society. Rees, G. (2011). Still Running 3: early findings from our third national survey of young runaways, 2011. London: The Children’s Society. Rees, G., Franks, M., Medforth, R., & Wade, J. (2009). Commissioning, delivery and perceptions of emergency accommodation for young runaways. London:The Rees, G., Franks, M. , Raws, P., & Medforth, R. (2005). Responding to Young Runaways: An Evaluation of 19 Projects 2003 to 2004: DFES Publications. Rees, G., & Lee, J. (2005). Still Running II: findings from the second national survey of young runaways. London: The Children’s Society. Rees, G., & Siakeu, J. (2004). Thrown away: the experiences of children forced to leave home. The Children’s Society: London. Rees, G., & Stein, M. (1997a). Abuse of adolescents. Children & Society, 11(1), 63-70 Rees, G., & Stein, M. (1997b). Abuse of Adolescents: Implications of North American Research for the UK. [Article]. Children & Society, 11(2), 128-134. Ringwalt, C. L., Greene, J. M., & Robertson, M. J. (1998). Familial backgrounds and risk behaviors of youth with thrownaway experiences. Journal of Adolescence, 21(3), 241-252. Robert, M., Pauze, R., & Fournier, L. (2005). Factors associated with homelessness of adolescents under supervision of the youth protection system. Journal of Adolescence, 28(2), 215-230 Robin, M. (1982). The abuse of status offenders in private hospitals. Child & Youth Services, 4(1-2), 79-87. Rothman, J. (1991). Runaway & homeless youth : strengthening services to families and children. New York: Longman. Safe on the Streets Research Team. (1999). Still running : children on the streets in the UK. London: The Children's Society. Safyer, A., Thompson, S., Maccio, E., Zittel-Palamara, K., & Forehand, G. (2004). Adolescents' and Parents' Perceptions of Runaway Behavior: Problems and Solutions. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 21(5), 495-512. Schaffner, L. (1998). Searching for connection: A new look at teenaged runaways. [Article]. Adolescence, 33(131), 619. Sjoblom, Y. (2004). Runaway or thrown out? A case study. Young, 12(2), 117-135. Solorio, M. R., Rosenthal, D., Milburn, N. G., Weiss, R. E., Batterham, P. J., Gandara, M., & Rotheram-Borus, M. J. (2008). Predictors of Sexual Risk Behaviors Among Newly Homeless Youth: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 42(4), 401-409. Stefanidis, N., Pennbridge, J., Mackenzie, R. G., & Pottharst, K. (1992). Runaway and homeless youth: the effects of attachment history on stabilization. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 62(3),442-446. Stromberg, M. (2006). Street teens are better off in forster or group homes. In D. Bryfonski (Ed.), Street Teens (pp. 123-136). Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press. Thompson, S. J., Bender, K. A., Lewis, C. M., & Watkins, R. (2008). Runaway and Pregnant: Risk Factors Associated with Pregnancy in a National Sample of Runaway/Homeless Female Adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 43(2), 125-132. Thompson, S. J., Kost, K. A., & Pollio, D. E. (2003). Examining risk factors associated with family reunification for runaway youth: Does ethnicity matter? Family Relations, 52(3), 296-304. Thompson, S. J., & Pollio, D. E. (2006). Adolescent Runaway Episodes: an Estrangement Model of Recidivism. Social Work Research, 30, 4. 30(2), 245-251. Thrane, L. E., Hoyt, D. R., Whitbeck, L. B., & Yoder, K. A. (2006). Impact of family abuse on running away, deviance, and street victimization among homeless rural and urban youth. Child Abuse & Neglect, 30(10), 1117-1128. Tucker, J., Edelen, M., Ellickson, P., & Klein, D. (2011). Running Away From Home: A Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Risk Factors and Young Adult Outcomes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(5), 507-518. Tyler, K., & Johnson, K. A. (2006). A Longitudinal Study of the Effects of Early Abuse on Later Victimization Among High-Risk Adolescents. Sociology Department, Faculty Publications, 44. Tyler, K. A., Whitbeck, L. B., Hoyt, D. R., & Cauce, A. M. (2004). Risk factors for sexual victimization among male and female homeless and runaway youth. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(5), 503-520. Urbina, I. (2009). Recession Drives Surge in Youth Runaways. In D. Bryfonski (Ed.), Street Teens (pp. 65-72). Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press. Walsh, S. M., & Donaldson, R. E. (2010). Invited commentary: National safe place: Meeting the immediate needs of runaway and homeless youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(5), 437-445. Whitbeck, L. B., Hoyt, D. R., & Yoder, K. A. (1999). A Risk-Amplification Model of Victimization and Depressive Symptoms Among Runaway and Homeless Adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27(2), 273-296. Williams, N. R., Lindsey, E. W., Kurtz, P. D., & Jarvis, S. (2001). From Trauma to Resiliency: Lessons from Former Runaway and Homeless Youth. [Article]. Journal of Youth Studies, 4(2), 233-253. Yates, G. L., MacKenzie, R., Pennbridge, J., & Cohen, E. (1988). A Risk Profile Comparison of Runaway and Non-Runaway Youth. [Article]. American Journal of Public Health, 78(7), 820-821. Yoder, K. A., Whitbeck, L. B., & Hoyt, D. R. (2001). Event history analysis of antecedents to running away from home and being on the street. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(1), 51-65. Zide, M. R., & Cherry, A. L. (1992). A typology of runaway youths: An empirically based definition. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 9(2), 155-168. doi: 10.1007/bf00755230 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6289 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 國內過往針對離家少年的研究,多聚焦於「自願性」離家的少年,及其離家後的負面影響與困境,無形中忽略了被迫離家少年的存在,也強化離家少年「偏差」與「適應不良」的形象。在當今服務提供者多以「偏差者」、「受害者」二元視角看待離家少年的現實下,部份視其為「聰明的逃跑者」的論述,似乎透漏了以不同觀點看待此群體的可能性。究竟,被迫離家少年的離家經驗展現何種樣貌?他們如何看待離家的行動與對抗生活的逆境?
經文獻梳理後,我歸納出四個研究問題:一、被迫離家少年的生活(家庭、學校、友伴)經驗與壓力因應為何?二、離家事件如何發生?少年對離家行動的詮釋又是?三、少年離家生活的危機、因應、學習與成長為何?四、其接受服務的經驗與需求是?我採取質性研究典範,運用半結構式的訪談大綱,深入訪談八位(六名女性、兩名男性,年齡為17-25歲)由機構引薦及網路聯繫之曾被迫離家者。並透過:「生活軌跡」、「離家事件與意義」、「離家生活-漂流、奮戰與成長」、「接受正式服務之經驗與需求」四章篇幅回答上述研究提問。 最後,我以「韌性與脆弱共生」歸結被迫離家少年的離家經驗。他們雖長期面臨多重的生活挑戰,但如此經驗正是其克服困境能力產生的關鍵。他們透過離家,逃離家庭的拒絕、虐待與衝突,取得自我保護與追求自立;並不斷地運用個人優勢、外在資源與學習街頭智慧,因應生活逆境與在街頭生存。因此,他們除了是社會體制(家庭、學校、服務機構)傷害、標籤與排除下的「受害者」(victims)外;更是於困境中理性思考,力求出路、奮力求生的「倖存者」(survivors)。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Usually, the existing researches focus on not only the “voluntary” runaways and the negative sides and difficulties of the runaway experiences, which has virtually overlooked the existing of thrownaway adolescents and reinforced the “maladaptive” and ”deviant” image of them. When the service providers commonly see the runaways in the dualistic ways as “deviants” or “victims”, the other perspective of “smart runaways” seems to reveal the different “ways of seeing” to them. What are the distinctive experiences of away from home among the thrownaway adolescents? How do they regard the action of leaving home and overcoming the adversity of life?
This research intends to examine four dimensions of thrownaways’ experiences: 1) their life experiences (family, school and peers) and ways of stress coping; 2) incidents that trigger them to leave home and the meaning of leaving home; 3) the risk, coping, learning, and growth after being away from home; 4) service needs and their experiences of receiving formal services. Qualitative method and semi-structured guidelines were employed to interview eight former thrownaways (6 females and 2 males, aged 17-25), who were recruited mainly by advertisements posted in BBS and Facebook or launched by social workers from youth service centers. The findings are presented in four sections including: Life Trajectories; Incident and Meaning of Leaving Home; Life after Leaving Home: Drifting, Strive and Growth; and Experiences of Receiving the Formal Services and Service Needs. “Resilience in harmony with Vulnerability” was found to be the dominant theme in the life narratives of former thrownaways. Although they faced multiple life challenges over a long period of time, these experiences were the key to their ability to overcome difficulties. They ran away from family rejection, abuse and conflict, protected themselves and pursued independent leaving by leaving home; used their personal strengths, externalized resources and learned street smarts constantly to cope with the adversity and to survive. Thus, they are both the “victims” who were hurt, stigmatized and excluded by the social systems (family, school and service organizations); and meanwhile, the “survivors” who thought rationally, searched for living spaces desperately, and strived to survive in the difficulties. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-16T16:25:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R98330014-1.pdf: 2403366 bytes, checksum: d1b4b7c2693b90e0c6e7a201b48f20f6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 I
誌謝 II 中文摘要 IV 英文摘要 V 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與背景 1 第二節 研究目的 6 第二章 文獻探討 7 第一節 誰是被迫離家者(thrownaways)? 7 壹、 被迫離家群體概念形成:是逃跑?是離開?是失蹤?還是被迫出走? 7 貳、 被迫離家者(thrownaways)的定義 13 參、 偏差者或受害者(Deviants or Victims)? 17 第二節 被迫離家者之背景處境 20 壹、 被迫離家的型態 20 貳、 被迫離家的導火線 20 第三節 離家後的生活 23 壹、 離家之次數與期間 23 貳、 離家後的去向 24 參、 離家後的資源與生存策略 25 肆、 夾縫中求生存:危機抑或轉機? 27 伍、 離家後帶來的危機 29 第三章 研究方法 35 第一節 研究發問 35 第二節 質性研究方法的選擇 35 第三節 研究設計與田野 36 壹、 研究參與者之界定 36 貳、 研究參與者之選取策略 37 參、 田野過程與研究參與者選取 37 第四節 資料收集與分析 41 第五節 資料整理與分析 41 第六節 研究嚴謹度的檢核 42 第七節 研究倫理 43 壹、 研究者的角色及與研究參與者的權力關係 44 貳、 受訪者權益及告知後同意 45 參、 資料保密與匿名發表 45 肆、 避免潛在的傷害與風險 46 伍、 互惠關係 46 陸、 研究關係的轉化與價值的衝擊 46 第四章 生活軌跡 49 第一節 離家少年群像 49 壹、 小樹:離家,是為了找一條回家的路 49 貳、 佳佳:離家,是為了建立一個真正屬於自己的家 52 參、 燕兒:尋一條回家的可能與圖像 54 肆、 娃娃:等不到的道歉,逆境後只求平凡 57 伍、 Angel:回家,是找尋如何愛自己與愛家人的方式 60 陸、 Fish:殷殷期盼自我空間,返家成熟以對 63 柒、 阿霖:撼動父親的權威以作為關心的呼喊 65 捌、 飛翔:渴望飛翔,回頭望家 67 第二節 離家少年之生活經驗 69 壹、 家庭生活經驗:我的家庭真可愛?戰火連天的家 69 貳、 家外的生活經驗 87 第三節 家庭壓力因應機制之形塑 100 壹、 順從與隱忍 101 貳、 抵抗因應策略 105 第五章 離家事件與意義 115 第一節 離家事件 115 壹、 悶燒的壓力鍋:離家前的心理狀態 115 貳、 離家事件的觸發:「我在離家前夕爆炸了!」 116 第二節 少年離家行為之意涵 129 壹、 少年離家行為之動機與詮釋 129 貳、 逃家(runaway)抑或被迫離家(thrownaway)? 133 參、 是與非、自我保護與背棄家人間的矛盾與掙扎 134 第六章 離家生活:漂流、奮戰與成長 139 第一節 危機與漂流的旅程 139 壹、 離家後之生活型態 139 貳、 離家生活的危機 142 參、 離家生活所感 154 第二節 適應與奮戰的韌性 156 壹、 個人內在優勢 157 貳、 學習街頭智慧(street smart) 162 參、 外在資源的進駐 168 第三節 成長與回顧 172 壹、 離家意義的再現 172 貳、 離家的學習與成長 174 第七章 接受正式服務之經驗與需求 181 第一節 與正式服務接觸之經驗 181 壹、 正向的服務經驗 181 貳、 負向的服務經驗 185 第二節 服務需求 189 壹、 一個「有關心」、「能接納」、「願幫助」及「有事做」的去處 189 貳、 基本生存需求的滿足 191 參、 家庭工作 194 第八章 討論與建議 197 第一節 研究討論 197 壹、 再探離家少年之生活經驗脈絡:長期、多面向的生活困境與挑戰 197 貳、 家庭困境的因應:弱者的武器,成人眼中的叛逆 202 參、 離家的「觸發」與「意涵」 204 肆、 再探離家行動:被他者所賦「負面形象」壓倒的「正向意義」 208 伍、 聚焦離家生活的經驗:非典型的存活戰 210 陸、 走過逆境的力量:個人優勢、外援支持與經驗學習為關鍵 213 柒、 服務提供與需求間有所斷裂 214 第二節 建議 215 壹、 多元眼光看待「家」,與「少年離家」的去標籤化 215 貳、 相關服務建議 215 參、 對實務工作者的建議 219 第三節 結語:韌性與脆弱共生 222 壹、 生命的交會與靠攏:返回己身 222 貳、 荊棘中生力量 223 參考文獻 225 附錄一:訪談同意書 233 附錄二:訪談大綱 234 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 「韌性與脆弱共生」-被迫離家少年之離家經驗探究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Resilience in Harmony with Vulnerability: The Experience of Away from Home among Thrownaway Adolescents | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 102-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 彭淑華,胡中宜 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 被迫離家者,青少年,逃家,個人優勢,因應能力, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | thrownaways,adolescents,runaway,personal strengths,coping skills, | en |
dc.relation.page | 234 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2014-02-12 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 社會工作學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 社會工作學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-102-1.pdf | 2.35 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。