Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 文學院
  3. 圖書資訊學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6278
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor黃慕萱
dc.contributor.authorHsuan-Hsuan Chenen
dc.contributor.author陳宣諠zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-16T16:24:51Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-26
dc.date.available2021-05-16T16:24:51Z-
dc.date.copyright2013-08-25
dc.date.issued2013
dc.date.submitted2013-08-20
dc.identifier.citation何光國(民83)。文獻計量學導論。臺北市:三民。
黃玫溱(民97)。電腦科學領域高被引文章與一般文章之書目計量比較分析。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所。臺北市。
黃慕萱(民83)。引用文獻初探。載於王振鵠教授七秩榮慶論文集編輯小組,當代圖書館事業論集─慶祝王振鵠教授七秩榮慶論文集(807-816頁)。台北市:正中書局。
蔡天怡(民97)。資訊可獲性對圖書資訊學博碩士論文引用文獻影響之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所。臺北市。
Ahmed, T., Johnson, B., Oppenheim, C., & Peck, C. (2004). Highly cited old papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited. Part II. The 1953 Watson and Crick article on the structure of DNA. Scientometrics, 61(2), 147-156.
Aksnes, D. W. (2003). Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation, 12(3), 159-170.
Alexander, E (1992). The uncitedness index, Surgical Neurology, 37(1), 69-70.
Amez, L. (2012). Citation measures at the micro level: Influence of publication age, field and uncitedness, Journal of the American society for information science and technology.
Anthony, L.(2001). Characteristic features of research article titles in computer science, IEEE transactions on professional communication, 44(3), 187-194.
Aversa, E. S. (1985). Citation Patterns of Highly Cited Papers and Their Relationship to Literature Aging- a Study of the Working Literature. Scientometrics, 7(3-6), 383-389.
Avramescu, A. (1979). Actuality and obsolescence of scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 30(5), 296-303.
Blessinger K., Hrycaj P. (2010) Highly cited articles in library and information science: An analysis of content and authorship trends. Library and Information science research, 32, 156-162
Bott, D. M. H., L. L. (1991). Are socialologists publication uncited? citation rates of journal articles, chapters, and books.
Brooks, T. A. (1986). Evidence of complex citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(1), 34-36.
Chubin, D & Moitra, S (1975). Content Analysis of References: Adjunct or Alternative to Citation Counting? Social Studies of Science, 5(4), 423-441.
Cozzens, S.E.(1989). What do citation count? The rhetoric-first model, Scientometrics, 15(5-6), 437-447.
Day, R. A.(1994). How to write and publish a scientific paper, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Diana, H (1987). Limitations of Co-Citation Analysis as a Tool for Science Policy, Social Studies of Science, 17(2), 295-316.
Egghe, L., Guns, R., & Rousseau, R. (2011). Thoughts on uncitedness: Nobel laureates and Fields Medalists as case studies. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 62(8), 1637-1644.
Garfield, E. (1972) Uncitedness and the Identification of Dissertation Topics. Current Contents, April 12
Garfield, E. (1973). Uncitedness-III-Importance of not being cited. Current Contents, 16(8), 5-6.
Ghosh, J. S. (1974). Uncitedness of articles in the journal of the American chemical society
Ghosh, J. S. (1975). Uncitedness of articles in nature, a multidisciplinary scientific journal. Information Processing & Management, 11(5-7), 165-169.
Garfield, E. (1980). Premature discovery or delayed recognition- Why? Current Contents, 21, May 5-10
Garfield, E. (1985A). The articles most cited in the SCI from 1961 to 1982. 7. Another 100 citation-classics- the Watson-Crick double helix has its turn. Current Contents, (20) : 3–12.
Garfield, E. (1985B). The articles most cited in the SCI from 1961 to 1982. 8. Ninety-eight more classicpapers from unimolecular reaction velocities to natural opiates – the changing frontiers of science.
Garfield, E. (1998). I had a dream about uncitedness. Scientist, 12(14), 10-10.
Gilbert, G.N. (1977). Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 7(1), 113-122.
Glanzel, W., Schlemmer, B. & Thijs, B. (2003). Better late than never? On the chance to become highly cited only beyond the standard bibliometric time horizon. Scientometrics, 58(3), 571-586.
Glanzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1992). Some Facts and Figures on Highly Cited Papers in the Sciences, 1981-1985.Scientometrics, 25(3), 373-380.
Hamilton, D. P. (1991). Research papers – Who’s uncited now. Science, 251(4989), 25-25.
Hamrick T, Fricker R, Brown G(2010) Assessing what distinguishes highly cited from less cited papers published in Interfaces, 40(6), 454-464
Kostoff, R. N. (2007). The difference between highly and poorly cited medical articles in the journal Lancet. Scientometrics, 72(3), 513-520.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory Life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Leeuwen, Moed(2005) Characteristic of journal impact factors: the effect of uncitedness and citation distribution on the understanding of journal impact factors Scientometrics
Levitt, J. M., & Thelwall, M. (2008). Patterns of annual citation of highly cited articles and the prediction of their citation ranking: A comparison across subjects. Scientometrics, 77(1), 41-60.
Levitt JM, Thelwall, M. (2009) The most highly cited library and information science articles: interdisciplinary, first authors and citation patterns. Scientometrics, 78(1), 45-67
Mackenzie, S (2009) Citedness, uncitedness and the murky world between, Chi, April 4-9 Boston MA
MacRoberts, M. H. & MacRoberts, B. R. (1989). Problems of citation analysis: a critical review, Journal of American society for information science, 40(5): 342-349.
Martin, B.R., & Irvine, J. (1983). Assessing basic research: Some partial indicators of
scientific progress in radio astronomy. Research Policy, 12(2), 61-90
Merton, R. K. (1979).The sociology of science: an episodic memoir. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Moed, H. F. (2005). Cation analysis in research evaluation. Berlin: Springer.
Narin, F.(1976). Evaluative bibliometrics: The use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity. Washington D.C.: National Science Foundation
Nicolaisen, J. (2007). Citation analysis. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 609-641
Oppenheim, C.,& Renn, S. P. (1978). Highly Cited Old Papers and Reasons Why They Continue to Be Cited. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29(5), 225-231.
Pearson (2010). Are highly cited papers more international, Scientometrics, 83, 397-401
Price, D (1976). A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of American society for information science, 27(5-6): 292-306.
Pritchard, A (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25(4): 348-349.
Peritz, B.C. (1983). Are methodological papers more cited than theoretical or empirical ones? The case of sociology, Scientometrics, 5(4), 211-218.
Schwartz, C. A. (1997). The rise and fall of uncitedness. College & Research Libraries, 58(1), 19-29.
Small, H. (1978). Cited document as concept symbols. Social Studies of Science, 8(3), 327-340.
Small, H. (1998). Citations and consilience in science. Scientometrics, 43(1), 143-148.
Small, H. & Griffith, B. C. (1974). The structure of scientific literatures I: Identifying and graphing specialties. Science Studies, 4(1), 17-40.
Smith, C. L. (1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30 (Summer), 83-98
Seglen, P. O. (1992). The skewness of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(9), 628-638.
Sengupta, I. N., & Henzler, R. G. (1991). Citedness and uncitedness of cancer articles, Scientometrics, 22(2), 283-296.
Stern, R. E. (1990). Uncitedness in the biomedical literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(3), 193-196.
Swanson, D.R. (1986). Undiscovered public knowledge. Library Quarterly, 56(2), 103-118.
Wang, M., Yu, G., &Yu, D. (2011). Mining typical features for highly cited papers. Scientometrics, 87(3), 695-706.
White, H.D. (2004). Reward, persuasion, and the Sokal Hoax: A study in citation identities. Scientometrics, 60(1), 93-120.
Wilson, P. (1995). Unused relevant information in research and development. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(1), 45-51.
Wouters, P. (1998). The signs of science. Scientometrics, 41:1-2, 225-241.
Van Dalen, H. P., & Henkens, K. (2004). Demographers and their journals: Who remains uncited after ten years? Population and Development Review, 30(3), 489-506.
Zunde, P. (1971). Structural models of complex information sources. Information Storage & Retrieval, 7, 1-18
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6278-
dc.description.abstract本研究利用書目計量法,以1992年至2012年出版的圖書資訊學期刊文章為對象,分析高被引、低被引與未被引文章之書目、內容、作者及期刊特性,期能瞭解圖書資訊學的學科引用特性,提供相關未來研究之參考。本研究將圖書資訊學文章依引用次數分為高被引、低被引與未被引文章三種集合,於書目特性與作者特性部分,依年代區分為1992年至2002年與2003年至2012年兩個階段,比較高被引、低被引與未被引文章特性的變化趨勢。
研究結果顯示,在書目特性方面,低被引與未被引文章數占圖書資訊學期刊文章總數近九成,高被引文章的參考文獻筆數、標題字數、文章頁數之平均皆高於低被引與未被引文章;在內容特性方面,高被引文章皆為英語出版的研究型文獻,而低被引文章以研究型文章最多,約占六成,未被引文章之文章類型以書評最多,約占八成,兩者之文章類型數量皆為20種,語言別以英文、德文、西班牙文為主;在作者特性方面,高被引、低被引、未被引文章的作者皆以單一作者的比例最高,但低被引與未被引的單一作者文章數比例分別為高被引文章的二倍及三倍。高被引文章作者國藉共計51國,主要國家依序為美國、英國、荷蘭、加拿大等,發表高被引文章數量最多的機構為荷蘭萊頓大學科學技術研究中心,論文平均引用數最高者由哈佛公共衛生學院所發表。低被引及未被引文章作者國籍數分別有112、118國,主要國家依序皆為美國、英國、加拿大;在期刊特性方面,出版最多高被引文章之期刊依序為Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association、Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology、Scientometrics,分別約占總高被引文章數的19.94%、19.41%、11.44%。出版最多低被引文章則為Library Journal、Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association、Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,分別占總低被引文章數的10.92%、5.07%、4.67%。出版最多未被引文章之期刊為Library Journal,約占總低被引文章數的七成。
圖書資訊學期刊文章在1992-2002與2003-2012兩個年代區間的書目特性與作者特性變化趨勢如下。首先,在書目特性方面,與1992-2002年的數量相比,高被引與未被引文章數量呈現下降的趨勢,於2003-2012年,分別下降32.19%、11.95%,低被引文章數量則微幅上升18.09%。高被引、低被引與未被引文章的參考文獻數量於2003-2012年皆分別增加11.29%、127.93%、137.06%。而文章的標題字數部分,高被引與低被引文章的標題字數比例分別增加11.32%、16.11%,而未被引文章則減少了5.33%。文章頁數部分,只有高被引文章的頁數比例下降6.27%,低被引與未被引文章分別增加46.91%、44.33%。其次,在作者特性方面,就作者數而言,相較於1992-2002年,2003-2012年的高被引文章、低被引文章與未被引文章的合著情形都明顯增加,平均合著率分別成長9.57%、16.89%、2.79%。相反的,單一作者文章數皆呈現下降的趨勢,以高被引文章下降比例最高,共下降11.03%,低被引與未被引文章則分別減少5.9%、7.22%。顯示圖書資訊學期刊文章的有合著的趨勢。就作者的國籍而言,美國籍作者不論是在高被引、低被引或未被引文章的數量排名,都位居第一。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study is to identify and compare the bibliometric characteristics of highly cited, low cited and uncited articles in the field of library and information science journal articles during the period from 1992 to 2012. This study presents an analysis of bibliographic, content, authorship, and journal characteristics using bibliometric methods. Bibliographic and authorship characteristics are further analyzed by dividing publication year to two stage, from 1992 to 2002 and from 2003 to 2012 respectively.
In terms of bibliographic characteristics, the number of low cited and uncited articles account for 90% of total articles in the period concerned. The average number of references , title length and pages of highly cited articles are higher than that of low cited and uncited articles. In terms of content characteristics, highly cited articles are all published in English research articles. Whereas, there are only 60% research articles among low cited articles and 80% book reviews among uncited articles. For both low cited and uncited articles, articles were published in 20 different kinds of languages, with English, Germany and Spanish as the top three languages with highest number of articles. In terms of authorship characteristic, single author article accounts for the largest proportion. The highly cited articles were published by 51 countries, with USA, United Kindom and Netherlands ranked as the top three countries with highest number of highly cited articles. On the institutional level, Center of Science & Technogy Studies of Leiden University published 39 highly cited articles and took the lead as the institution with highest number of highly cited articles. On the other hand, Harvard School of Public Health showed the highest average citation rate, with 192 citation on average during 1992-2012.
There are 112 and 118 countries with low cited articles and uncited articles respectively, mainly USA, United Kingdom and Canada; In terms of characteristics of the periodicals, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology and Scientometrics published the highest number of highly cited articles, with that of 19.94%、19.41%、11.44% in the overall number of highly cited articles. Library Journal, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association and Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology published the highest number of low cited articles with that of 10.92%, 5.07% and 4.67% respectively in the overall number of low cited articles. Library Journal published the highest number of uncited articles, which accounted for 70% of all uncited articles.
The characteristics of journals in the field of library and information science during the period from 1992-2002 and from 2003-2012 are shown as follow, respectively. There shows a decrease in the number of highly cited articles and uncited articles during 2003-2012 in comparison with that of 1992-2002, with that of decreasing rate of 32.19% and 11.95% respectively, though there has shown a slight increase in the percentage of low cited articles with that of 18.09%. The number of references for highly cited articles, low cited articles and uncited articles have increased with that of 11.29%, 127.93% and 137.06% during 2003-2012. In terms of the title length of the articles, the percentage of highly cited articles and low cited articles have increased to that of 11.32% and 16.11% higher, while uncited articles showed a decrease of 5.33% in comparison with that of 1992-2002. In terms of the number of pages for articles, there has shown a decrease in the number of page numbers for highly cited articles, with that of 6.27%, while low cited articles and uncited articles showed an increase of 46.91% and 44.33% respectively. In terms of the characteristics of the authors, there has shown a dramatic increase in the number of co-authored articles in highly cited articles, low cited articles and uncited articles during the period of 2003-2012 in comparison with that of during 1992-2002, with that of increased average co-authored rate being 9.57%, 16.89% and 2.79% respectively. On the contrary, there has shown a decreasing rate in the number of articles by single authors, with highly cited articles showing the highest decrease rate with that of 11.03%; low cited articles and uncited articles show a decrease of 5.9% and 7.22% respectively. This shows that there has shown a trend in co-authorship in the field of library and information science. Authors from USA published the highest number of articles in highly cited articles, low cited articles and uncited articles respectively.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-05-16T16:24:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-102-R96126016-1.pdf: 6373023 bytes, checksum: 5ba9f96c2ca35d5a70250334bdb9a676 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2013
en
dc.description.tableofcontents摘 要 i
Abstract iii
目 次 vi
圖 次 viii
表 次 ix
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 問題陳述 1
第二節 研究目的 5
第三節 研究範圍與限制 6
第四節 名詞解釋 7
第二章 文獻探討 9
第一節 引用文獻分析 9
第二節 高被引文章 16
第三節 未被引文章 21
第三章 研究設計與實施 29
第一節 研究方法與設計 29
第二節 研究工具與對象 32
第三節 研究步驟與流程 33
第四節 資料處理 35
第四章 研究結果分析 37
第一節 高被引文章特性分析 37
第二節 低被引文章特性分析 57
第三節 未被引文章特性分析 71
第四節 高被引、低被引、未被引文章特性比較分析 89

第五章 結論與建議 100
第一節 結論 100
第二節 建議 103
第三節 進一步研究建議 105
參考文獻 108
附錄一、本研究之研究對象─65種圖書資訊學領域期刊及年代範圍 115
附錄二、高被引文章來源期刊統計表 118
附錄三、低被引文章來源期刊統計表 120
附錄四、未被引文章來源期刊統計表 123
附錄五、低被引文章作者國別分布表 126
附錄六、未被引文章作者國別分布表 130
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title圖書資訊學高被引、低被引與未被引文章特性之比較分析zh_TW
dc.titleCharacteristics of Highly Cited, Low Cited and Uncited Articles in Library and Information Science Journals: A Bibliometric Studyen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear101-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee張郁蔚,林維真
dc.subject.keyword圖書資訊學,高被引,低被引,未被引,書目計量分析,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordlibrary and information science,highly cited article,low cited article,uncited article,bibliometric analysis,en
dc.relation.page133
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)
dc.date.accepted2013-08-20
dc.contributor.author-college文學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept圖書資訊學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:圖書資訊學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-102-1.pdf6.22 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved