請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/62788
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳玉華 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Ling Chou | en |
dc.contributor.author | 周怡伶 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T16:10:27Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-03-15 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2013-03-15 | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2013-02-22 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Abella, M. and H. Mori. (1996). “Structural Change and Labor Migration in East Asia.” In Pp. 35-62 David O’Connor and Leila Farsakh (Eds.), Development Strategy, Em-ployment and Migration: Country Experiences. Paris: OECD.
Abowd, J. M. and R. B. Freeman. (1991). Immigration, Trade, and the Labor Market. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Allport, G. W. (1958). The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley. Allison, P. D. (1999). Logistic Regression Using the SAS System : Theory and Applica-tion. Cary, N.C.: SAS Institute. Athukorala, Prema-chandra. (2006). International Labour Migration in East Asia:Trends, Patterns and Policy Issues. Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, 20(1), 18–39. Bonacich, E. (1972). A Theory of Ethnic Antagonism: The Split Labor Market. Ameri-can Sociological Review, 37, 547–559. Bonacich, E. (1976). Advanced Capitalism and Black / White Race Relations in the United States: A Split Market Interpretation. American Sociological Review, 31, 34–51. Borjas, G. J. and R. B. Freeman. (1992). Immigration and the Work Force: Economic Consequences for the United States and Source Areas. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. Boswell, T. (1986). A Split Labor Market Interpretation of Discrimination against Chi-nese Immigrants, 1850–1882. American Sociological Review, 51, 352–371. Burns, P., and J. G. Gimpel. (2000). Economic Insecurity, Prejudicial Stereotypes and Public Opinion on Immigration Policy. Political Science Quarterly, Summer, 201–225. Castles, S. and M. J. Miller. (2009). The Age of Migration : International Population Movements in the Modern World. New York : Guilford Press. Chandler, C. R., and Y. Tsai. (2001). Social Factors Influencing Immigration Attitudes: An Analysis of Data from the General Social Survey. Social Science Journal, 38(2), 177-188. Chen, Yu-Hua and Chin-Chun Yi. (2012). “The Perception of Social Distance of For-eign Migrants in a Multiethnic Society: The Case of Taiwan.” Pp. 170-196 in Eric Fong, Nora Chiang ,and Nancy Denton (Eds.), Immigrant Adaptation in Multi-Ethnic Societies—Canada, Taiwan and the United States, USA : Routledge, Taylor and Francis. Citrin, J., D. P. Green, C. Muste, and C. Wong. (1997). Public Opinion toward Immi-gration Reform. Journal of Politics, 59(3), 858-881. Citrin, J., B. Reingold, and D. P. Green. (1990) American Identity and the Politics of Ethnic Change. Journal of Politics 52(4):1124–1154. Cook, S. W. (1978) Interpersonal and Attitudinal Outcomes in Cooperating Interracial Groups. Journal of Research and Development, 12, 97-113. Dustmann, C., and I. P. Preston. (2007). Racial and Economic Factors in Attitudes to Immigration. The B.E. Journals of Economic Analysis and Policy, 7(1), Article 62. Edwards, R. (1979). Contested Terrain : The Transformation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Basic Books. Espenshade, T. J., and K. Hempstead. (1996). Contemporary American Attitudes To-ward U.S. Immigration. International Migration Review, 30(2), 535-570. Espenshade, T. J., and C. A. Calhoun. (1993). An Analysis of Public Opinion toward Undocumented Immigration. Population Research and Policy Review, 12, 189–224. Esses, V. M., J. F. Dovidio, L. M. Jackson, and T. L. Armstrong. (2001). The Immigra-tion Dilemma: The Role of Perceived Group Competition, Ethnic Prejudice, and Na-tional Identity. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 389-412. Fetzer, J. S. (2000). Public Attitudes toward Immigration in the United States, France, and Germany. New York, Cambridge University Press. Ganzeboom, Harry B.G. and D. J. Treiman. (2003). “Three Internationally Standardised Measures for Comparative Research on Occupational Status.” Pp. 159-193 in Jurgen H.P. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik and Christof Wolf (Eds.), Advances in Cross-National Comparison. A European Working Book for Demographic and Socio-Economic Var-iables. New York: Kluwer Academic Press. Haubert, J., and E. Fussell(2006). Explaining Pro-Immigrant Sentiment in the U.S.: So-cial Class, Cosmopolitanism, and Perceptions of Immigrants. International Migration Review, 40, 489–507. Hood III, M.V., and I. L. Morris. (1997). Amigo o'Enemigo? : Context, Attitudes, and Anglo Public Opinion toward Immigration. Social Science Quarterly, 78(2), 309-323. Hoskin, M., and W. Mishler. (1983). Public Opinion toward New Migrants : A Com-parative. International Migration, 21, 440-462. Ilias, S., K. Fennelly, and C. M. Federico. (2008). American Attitudes toward Guest Worker Policies. International Migration Review 42(4):741-766 Jackman, M. R., and M. J. Muha (1984). Education and Intergroup Attitudes : Moral Enlightenment, Superficial Democratic Commitment, or Ideological Refinement? American Sociological Review, 49(6), 751-769. Kleinbaum, D. G., and M. Klein. (2002). Logistic Regression : A Self-Learning Text. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. Martin, Philip. (1997). Guest Worker Policies for the Twenty-First Century. New com-munity, 23(4), 483-494. Mayda, A. (2006). Who Is Against Immigration? A Cross-Country Investigation of In-dividual Attitudes toward Immigrants. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88 (3), 510–30 McLaren, L. M. (2003). Anti-Immigrant Prejudice in Europe: Contact, Threat Percep-tion, and Preferences for the Exclusion of Migrants. Social Forces, 81(3), 909-936. Muller, T. and T. J. Espenshade. (1985) The Fourth Wave: California's Newest Immi-grants. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press. Olzak, S. (1992) The Dynamics of Ethnic Competition and Conflict. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. O’Rourke, K. H., and R. Sinnott. (2006). The Determinants of Individual Attitudes to-wards Immigration. European Journal of Political Economy, 22, 838–861. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2012) International Migra-tion Database. Unpublished instrument. Retrieved from http://stats.oecd.org/ Index. aspx?DataSetCode=MIG# Quillian, L., (1995). Prejudice as a Response to Perceived Group Threat: Population Composition and Anti-Immigrant and Racial Prejudice in Europe. American Socio-logical Review, 60, 586–611. Quillian, L. (1996). Group Threat and Regional Change in Attitudes toward African–Americans. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 816–860. Raijman, R., M. Semyonov, and P. Schmidt. (2003). Do Foreigners Deserve Rights? Determinants of Public Views towards Foreigners in Germany and Israel. European Sociological Review, 4, 379–392. SAS Institute Inc. (1999). SAS/ETS User's Guide, Version 8, Vol.1. Cary, NC: SAS In-stitute Inc. Scheve, K. F., and M. J. Slaughter. (2001). Labor Market Competition and Individual Preferences Over Immigration Policy. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83 (1), 133–145. Sidanius, J., S. Levin, C. M. Federico, and F. Pratto. (2001). “Legitimizing Ideologies: The Social Dominance Approach.” Pp. 307–331 in John T. Jost and Brenda Major (Ed.), The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Simcox, David. (1997) Major Predictors of Immigration Restrictionism : Operational-izing 'Nativism'. Population and Environment, 19 (2), 129-143. Simon, Rita J. (1987). Immigration and American Attitudes. Public Opinion, 10, 47-50. Simon, Rita J. and James P. Lynch. (1999). A Comparative Assessment of Public Opinion toward Immigrants and Immigration Policies. The International Migration Review, 33(2), 455-467. Stein, Robert M., Stephanie Shirley Post and Allison L. Rinden. (2000) Reconciling Context and Contact Effects on Racial Attitudes. Political Research Quarterly, 53 (2), 285-303. Stephan, W. G., and Stephan, C. W. (1985). Intergroup Anxiety. Journal of Social Is-sues, 41, 157–175. Tajfel, H., and J. C. Turner. (1986). The Social Identity Theory and Intergroup Behav-ior. In S. Worchel and W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chi-cago: Nelson Hall. Tsai, Ming-Chang. (2011). “Foreign Brides” Meet Ethnic Politics in Taiwan. Interna-tional Migration Review, 45(2), 243-268. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2012). International Migration Database. Unpublished instrument. Retrieved from http://www.unescap.org/stat/data/statdb/DataExplorer.aspx Wilkes, R., Neil Guppy, and Lily Farris. (2008). “No Thanks, We’re Full”: Individual Characteristics, National Context, and Changing Attitudes toward Immigration. In-ternational Migration Review, 42(2), 302-329. World Bank. (1999) World Development Report 1998 - 1999 , Washington , D. C. : World Bank. 王濟川、郭志剛(2003)。Logistic 迴歸模型-方法及應用。台北:五南圖書。 日本厚生勞動省。外國就業狀況報告(外国人雇用状況の届出状況)。2012年12月取自:http://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/houdou/2r985200000040cz.html 伊慶春、章英華(2006)。對娶外籍與大陸媳婦的態度:社會接觸的重要性。臺灣社會學刊12: 191-232。 行政院勞工委員會編(2012)。國際勞動統計。臺北市 : 行政院勞工委員會。取自:http://statdb.cla.gov.tw/html/nat/0125menu.htm 行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局。外勞人數統計。2012年12月取自:http://www.evta.gov.tw/content/list.asp?mfunc_id=14&func_id=57 行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局。外國專業人員統計。2012年12月取自:http://www.evta.gov.tw/content/list.asp?mfunc_id=14&func_id=58 夏曉鵑(2002)。騷動流移的虛構商品:「勞工流移」專題導讀。臺灣社會研究季刊 48 : 1-13。 陳志柔、于德林(2005)。台灣民眾對外來配偶移民政策的態度。台灣社會學 10:95-148。 傅仰止、伊慶春(1994)。容忍態度的結構肇因:都市背景、遷移經驗、異質網絡。人文及社會科學集刊 6 : 257-301。 曾嬿芬(2004)。引進外籍勞工的國族政治。臺灣社會學刊 32 : 1-58。 韓國法務部入出境管理局。統計月報。2012年12月取自:www.immigration.go.kr/ 藍佩嘉(2005)。階層化的他者:家務移工的招募、訓練與種族化。臺灣社會學刊 34 : 1-57。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/62788 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本文試圖檢視東亞民眾對於勞動移民的接受程度。儘管東亞地區的勞動移民佔總體人口的比重仍然低於歐美工業化國家,但隨著勞動人口全球流動日益增加,個別社會對於是否繼續引入或限縮勞動移民的爭論卻方興未艾。反移民情緒(anti-immigration sentiment)是一般人對於外來移民的心理反應,以西方社會為主的實證研究發現這種不樂見移民的態度,除了與性別、年齡、教育程度、地區等人口特質有關外,也與勞動移民勞動市場競爭威脅、跨文化接觸經驗、保護主義的防禦態度有關,特別是種族偏見(racial prejudice)仍具相當的重要性。
為了驗證上述因素能否解釋個人對於勞動移民的態度,本文利用東亞社會調查(East Asian Social Survey, EASS) 於2008年完成的抽樣調查資料,選定東亞地區在社會經濟發展程度較接近的臺灣、日本、韓國三國國家,使用順序性邏輯迴歸模型比較臺灣、日本、韓國民眾對勞動移民態度差異及成因。研究結果得知臺灣、日本、韓國民眾對勞動移民態度確實存有歧異性,反對接納勞動移民之民眾具有下列特性:有種族偏見、沒有社會接觸經驗者、保護主義態度越強烈者,其中種族偏見對民眾勞動移民態度具有影響之重要性。然而,在過去移民態度研究中備受關注的經濟競爭觀點,在本研究中僅在臺灣、日本得到驗證,臺灣、日本社會中的藍領勞工階級較容易持有反勞動移民態度。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis aims to explore the general attitudes toward foreign workers in East Asia. The increasing demand for foreign labor has raised a series of debates on whether or not this would help economic growth and social cohesion in this region. In addition to socio-demographic characteristics such as sex, age, education and residence, previous studies have indicated that the anti-immigration sentiment is highly associated with personal perceptions of labor-market competition, racial prejudice and patriotism. Obviously, the more individuals have cultural contacts with foreigners, the less likely they would oppose to importing foreign workers.
The current study tries to identify the effects of major determinants associating with individuals’ attitudes toward foreign workers in Taiwan, Japan and South Korea. Using data from the 2008 East Asian Social Survey (EASS), the culture and globalization module, the results show that there are more Taiwanese and Koreans revealed anti-immigration sentiment than their Japanese counterparts. Based on the outcomes of ordered logistic regression models, the negative attitudes toward foreign workers are associated with personal racial prejudice and patriotism as previous studies. The lack of cultural contact with foreigner also decreases the degree of acceptance of labor immigration. The argument of labor market competition theory is evidenced partially. Blue-collar workers in Taiwan and Japan are least likely to accept labor migrants. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T16:10:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R99630007-1.pdf: 579245 bytes, checksum: 5f2a4ab9ecb49f74dc0d9a13586917be (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 i
英文摘要 ii 目錄 iii 圖目錄 vi 表目錄 vii 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究重要性 4 第二章 文獻探討 6 2.1 臺灣、日本、韓國勞動移民政策與現況 6 2.1.1 勞動移民引進政策 6 2.1.2 勞動移民現況 11 2.2 對勞動移民態度的概念意義及其測量 13 2.3 影響民眾對勞動移民態度之因素 14 2.3.1 種族偏見 14 2.3.2 勞動市場競爭 16 2.3.3 社會接觸 19 2.3.4 保護主義 20 2.3.5 個人屬性因素 21 第三章 研究設計 23 3.1 資料來源 23 3.2 變項測量 25 3.2.1 依變項:對勞動移民態度 25 3.2.2 自變項 26 3.3 資料處理與樣本清理 33 3.4 統計分析方法 34 第四章 分析結果 36 4.1 臺、日、韓民眾對勞動移民的態度差異 36 4.2 對勞動移民的態度 38 4.3 影響民眾對勞動移民態度之因素 45 第五章 結論與討論 55 參考文獻 58 附 錄 65 附錄一 各國順序性邏輯迴歸(含缺漏值) 66 附錄二 不同身分之民眾對勞動移民態度 67 A. 臺灣 67 B. 日本 67 C. 韓國 68 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 誰反對勞動移民?以臺灣、日本、韓國為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Who Opposes Labor Immigration? A Comparative Study among Taiwan, Japan and Korea | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 101-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 伊慶春,謝雨生 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 勞動移民態度,種族偏見,勞動市場競爭,跨文化接觸,保護主義, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Public Attitudes toward Foreign Workers,Racial Prejudice,Labor-Market Competition,Cultural Contact,Patriotism ., | en |
dc.relation.page | 68 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2013-02-22 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物產業傳播暨發展學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 生物產業傳播暨發展學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-102-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 565.67 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。